"Japanese loosing war & Moving away from Tokyo tribunal of history" (Part 2)
It is said that Professor Emeritus Keiichiro Kobori of the University of Tokyo was the first person to use the term "Tokyo Tribunal History View". The crimes against peace and crimes against humanity were clearly ex post facto laws that did not exist when the Potsdam Declaration was issued. It is a major principle of modern law that a person cannot be judged by a law made after the fact. For this reason alone, the Tokyo Trials were a trial that ignored the law and could not be called a trial.
Why can't our government completely deny the Tokyo Tribunal even now, 76 years after its defeat? This is the homepage of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Tokyo Tribunal was established by the Allied Powers after the war to try Japanese nationals for serious war crimes. 28 people were indicted for crimes against peace and humanity, and 25 were convicted except for those who died of illness or were exonerated.
We are aware that there is a lot of controversy about this tribunal, but Japan has accepted the tribunal of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East in accordance with Article 11 of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, and we believe that we are not in a position to object to this tribunal in our relations with other countries. This is the official position of our government. "Serious war criminals" is the enemy's word, but they are using it as is. The only saving grace is the inclusion of the phrase "there are various arguments.
In the past, there was a question in the Diet as to whether Japan had accepted the trials of the Far Eastern Military Tribunal and other trials by the military courts of the various Allied countries, or whether it had accepted the judgments and the effects of trials. If it is interpreted as accepting the judgments and the effects of trials, then it means that Japan does not accept the content and legitimacy of the Tokyo Trials, but it does accept the judgments and the effects of trials.
In response to this, the government's position on June 16, 2006, was that Japan had accepted the trial. The website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is also written based on this view. Therefore, even after 76 years, the government still cannot deny the legitimacy of the Tokyo Trials. This is the shackles that Britain, the United States, China and the Soviet Union have placed on Japan. Again, everything about postwar Japan is built from this. The Japanese Constitution is one of them.
This is also the true meaning of the statement on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' website regarding the Marukin Incident, "We believe that it cannot be denied that there was. At the Tokyo Trials, General Matsui was found guilty and hanged for the Marukin Incident, which was designed to hold General Matsui Iwane accountable. This is because denying the Tokyo Trials would mean that General Matsui was falsely accused. The Japanese Constitution, drafted by GHQ, is also a byproduct of the Tokyo Trials.
At present, national public officials and police officers are required by law to sign and seal a written oath that they will abide by the Constitution of Japan. So, is it not possible for the government and the people of Japan to deny the Tokyo Trials forever and get rid of the historical view of the Tokyo Trials? Neither the Japanese government nor the Japanese people have simply kept being patient and enduring. for 76 years.
In 1952, 1952, the year of the San Francisco Peace Treaty's entry into force, waiting for independence on April 28, the following year, the Diet unanimously passed a resolution pardon request regarding the pardon of prisoners for war crimes, including the Communist Party. Also, Aoi Shigemitsu, who was Minister of Foreign Affairs when Tojo was Prime Minister, was declared a Class A war criminal, but later won election to the House of Representatives and gave a speech at the United Nations. Hideki Tojo's wife, Mrs. Katsuko, continued to live in the government office building in Yoga, where the former prime minister lived, and was paid a salary.
It seems that both the Diet and the government at that time did what they could even if they could not pardon him. In addition, in 2015, Abe's speech, which was released after a cabinet decision on August 14, 2015, he expressed his determination that our children, grandchildren, and the children of generations to come should not be destined to continue to apologize, and our people have decided to abandon the atonement for that war.
As you can see, the Constitution of Japan and other shackles that have been placed on post-war Japan are being removed little by little, though at a cattle pace. There is also the problem of an independent constitution, which has not been established even after 76 years, but public opinion polls clearly show that there is a growing momentum to move forward by revising the current constitution.
I would like to pass on the story of the Greater East Asia War, to our children and grandchildren with pride which our fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers fought in. That's all for now. Good-bye, everyone.
187
views
"Japanese Loosing war & Moving away from Tokyo tribunal history"
This is the twelfth installment of "Is This Still an Invasion?” This year, 2021, marks exactly 80 years since the outbreak of war in Japan. Television and newspapers were reporting that Japan was tired of war and that peace was the most important thing. They did not clear why the war broke out and what we learned from it.
NHK interviewed a 101-year-old mechanic on the USS Kaga, a former aircraft carrier that participated in the attack on Pearl Harbor, and elicited the following comments. I wonder why there is still no peace in the world. In order to prevent wars, it is of utmost importance to be considerate of the other side and engage in dialogue. When they can't solve it through dialogue, in other words diplomacy, they fall into war.
At the time, Japan was also desperately trying to avoid war with Britain and the United States.
Strategist Clausewitz also argues that war is an extension of diplomacy. At that time, Japan began to receive economic sanctions from the United States when the Japanese-Sino War was exhausting its national power. Not only sanctions, but also supporting the Chiang Kai-shek government, which is fighting Japan behind the scenes. At that time, Japan imported oil from the United States and was fighting against the Chiang Kai-shek National Revolutionary Army in China. From the perspective of the United States, it was up to oil to save or kill Japan.
The only miscalculation on the part of the U.S. was that even if war broke out between the U.S. and Japan, the U.S. would have suffered few losses and would not have expected the war to last for three years and eight months. MacArthur himself, who was on the enemy side, testified before the U.S. Senate Joint Committee on Armed Services and Foreign Relations on May 3, 1951, that the reason Japan went to war was mostly for self-defense. Prime Minister Hideki Tojo also testified in his affidavit at the Tokyo Trials that the Greater East Asia War was a war of self-defense.
Both enemy and ally war leaders admit that Japan has become a war for security reasons. However, according to the history education and general wisdom of Japan and the United States, Japan received economic sanctions from the United Kingdom and the United States because Japanese invasion, and Japan wages a war on the United States and Britain. Moreover, it is supposed that the cowardly deception before the declaration of war was made into Pearl Harbor. In 1945, on July 26, 1945, the Potsdam Declaration was announced under the names of the three countries of the United States, Britain, and China, indicating the conditions for surrender to Japan.
On August 6, 1945, the uranium-type atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima for the first time in human history, and the city was devastated in an instant. On the 9th, another more powerful plutonium-type atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki City, killing more than 210,000 civilians by the two types of atomic bombs.
This was clearly an abhorrent and inhumane war crime by the United States that unnecessarily killed civilians in accordance with the international laws and regulations of warfare at the time.
On August 14, the same year, the Potsdam Declaration was accepted, and on September 2, the same year, Japan signed the instrument of surrender on the Battleship Missouri. Internationally, September 2nd, not August 15th, is the day of Japan's surrender.
After the GHQ occupation, Japan signed the San Francisco Peace Treaty with the United States and 48 other countries, regaining its independence and sovereignty, but at the same time it was forced to give up its claims against the United States. In the intervening six years and eight months, Japan was occupied by MacArthur, the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces. The main purpose of the occupation, as it is often said, was to remake Japan from its traditional culture to its national system so that it would never again be a threat to the United States.
Regarding the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, which was held for two years and six months from May 3, 1946 to November 12, 1948, Professor Emeritus Shoichi Watanabe, former professor emeritus at Sophia University, says that two conditions essential for a fair trial were lacking. The first is that there must be a law on which to judge. Judges have to be impartial, and these two things were not there.
He also said that there is no international jurist who admits that the Tokyo Trials were worthy of the name of a trial, yet most Japanese people do not know this. The Tokyo Tribunal view of history refers to the view of history created by the Allied retaliatory trials that did not deserve the name of trial, and it is safe to say that everything in postwar Japan has been constructed based on this view of history.
86
views
1
comment
part 11, "The Greater East Asia War and The Asian Independence"
Is this still an invasion?
This is part 11, the second part of The Greater East Asia War and The Asian Independence.
Tani Yutaka, then three years old, and his Japanese family had also moved from Fukuoka Prefecture to Terenganu, the capital of the southern state of the Malay Peninsula, where they ran a dry cleaning and barber shop.
When the Manchurian Incident occurred, it was used as a pretext for anti-Japanese sentiment in Trenganu, and overseas Chinese began to attack Japanese shops, looting and throwing stones.
It was November 1932, Yutaka had returned to Japan for a draft check and his young sister was lying alone with a cold. Tragedy struck at this time.
An overseas Chinese cut off his sister's neck with a blue dragon sword and held it up during an anti-Japanese demonstration.
When the young man returned, he made a vow. He vowed to take revenge on the overseas Chinese and the British, who were behind the anti-Japanese agitation.
Tani Yutaka was then ostensibly a rubber traiding merchant, but he became the master of hundreds of bandits, ravaging overseas Chinese and British troops as their enemies.
He was very popular with the locals, helping the sick and the poor, and fighting off the overseas Chinese who were controlling the local economy through their ties with the British.
He became known as Harimao, the Tiger of Malaya, and was feared by the British and overseas Chinese.
He is caught and sent to prison, but his Subordinates save him soon and he escapes.
He came to the attention of the Japanese military intelligence service and used bribes to get out of a Thai prison.
He and his men then began to cooperate with the agency.
The army has to fight as soon as it is ordered to do so. Even in times of peace, it is the job of the military to train, plan and prepare for emergencies.
Against the Soviet Union, Japanese army had a plan in place, but it had not been able to fight in the south because Japanese government had not anticipated it.
And that's assuming that the US will export the oil to Japan. However, the situation in the United States became more and more suspicious.
The US policy of exclusion from Japan had continued up to that time, but from about May 1937 the US had broken its neutrality and increased its military assistance to the Chiang Kai-shek administration in its fight against Japan.
If we don't, we may be cut off from oil. In advance, the Japanese military began to conduct intelligence operations in the south.
As well as maps, it was necessary to research roads, rivers, food conditions, availability of drinking water, endemic diseases and even pests and poisonous snakes in the jungle.
In September 1940, Japan finally concluded the Tripartite Pact in order to restrain Britain and the United States.
In fact, when the US banned the export of oil, Japan began to negotiate with the Netherlands to import oil, but the US worked behind the scenes and the Netherlands would not sell.
The American demand, as stated in the Hull Note, was, in a word, that Japan should withdraw from the mainland Chinese market.
If Japan did not anything, Japan would have had an oil crisis, electricity would have been cut off, factories would have shut down, and the streets would have been filled with unemployed people. Some would have starved to death.
Later, MacArthur himself testified in the US Joint Committee on Military and Foreign Affairs in 1951 that Japan's reasons for war were largely security-related.
So what do the people of the countries that were actually colonised and then became independent think of Japan?
In his book, "Dawn of Burma", Myanmar's first Prime Minister Ba Maw wrote that if you look at history, no country has contributed more to the liberation of Asia from white rule than Japan.
In Independence Square in Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia, there is a large monument with the date 17-8-05 written on it.
It is the 17th of August, the day of our independence, and 05 is inscribed not with the Western calendar, but with the year 2005, in honour of Japan.
This is a statue of General Sudairman, sent from Indonesia, at the Ministry of Defence.
He was the Supreme Commander who fought alongside Japanese soldiers in the War of Independence. A wreath-laying ceremony is held every year on 17 August.
Thailand's Prime Minister, Gen. Kukrit Pramod, recalled the Greater East Asia War in the following words, entitled "8 December.
Thanks to Japan, all Asian countries became independent. The mother, Japan, had a difficult childbirth and the mother was damaged, but the child was born and is growing up well.
The 8th of December is the day on which your mother made the momentous decision to risk her life. The 15th of August is the day when our dear mother fell ill. We must not forget these two days.
According to Tomohisa Hayakawa, secretary to Taiwanese former President Lee Teng-Hui, "Lee Teng-Hui always said that Japan is indispensable to Taiwan, but Taiwan is also indispensable to Japan.
He said, "We must not forget that when Lee Teng-hui said, 'I have left Taiwan to you,' he was speaking to us, the Japanese people. These words are the legacy of Lee Teng-Hui.
This would mean that a contingency in Taiwan is a contingency in Japan. We must be aware that there are countries like this in Asia.
That concludes Part 11, The Greater East Asia War and Asian Independence. We will see you again
71
views
"Regain the canceled Japanese history" the Greater East Asia War and the independence of Asia
The Second World War began in September 1939, when Germany invaded Poland and Britain and France declared war on Germany. This was the beginning of the war in Europe.
It was more than two years later that Japan fought against Britain, the United States, the Netherlands and Australia in the Pacific Indian Ocean.
During this time, the war between Japan and Chiang Kai-shek continued on the continent, but it was down. However, the pressure of Britain and the United States on Japan is increasing day by day.
The Japanese war at this time was called the Pacific War or the War of Aggression, which is what we have been taught in schools.
And textbooks other than Jiyusha do not say that the Japanese war wiped out Asian colonies. The beginning of Japan's invasion of China was the Manchurian Incident, the beginning of Japan's invasion of Korea was the annexation of Korea, and so on.
However, these can be said to be the views of China, Britain, the United States, and the Korean side.
They seem to be political propaganda to benefit these countries, to make the Japanese people feel guilty, to keep them weak and to extract profits from them.
I have already mentioned in the Japanese-Sino War that the Chiang Kai-shek administration started a war on Japan.
In 1898, the United States took control of the Philippines, and before that, the British ruled India and the Malay Peninsula, while the Dutch ruled Indonesia as a colony by force.
They were forced to work like slaves for low wages by Western. Japan may well have been colonised by the West in the Edo period or even before.
It wasn't that we were lucky, but only because our ancestors were strong and wise.
After the Japanese-Sino War, the Japanese-Russo War and the First World War, Japan emerged as a powerful military power in the international community.
Britain, the United States and the Soviet Union began to fear and be wary of this. But they knew that Japan's weakness was energy - oil.
In the event of an emergency, they must have thought that if they stopped exporting oil to Japan, the warships and planes would not move and Japan would be forced to do what they said.
When war broke out, it would little more than a skirmish, and they would never have dreamed of ending their colonial rule.
Japan proposed the elimination of racial discrimination at the Paris Peace Conference after World War I in 1919 and 1919.
Japan was the first in history to appeal for the elimination of such racial discrimination at an international conference.
The colonial rule of Britain and the United States naturally disagrees, and the United States in particular crushes this proposal. At that time, Japanese people were not treated as well as white people.
Apartheid and racism were the norm in both African and Asian colonies. At that time, there was a strong opinion that "the League of Nations does not need to participate."
In 1924, the United States enacted the Immigration Act of 1924, which bans Japanese immigrants, and Japan's sentiment toward the United States worsened.
We were victorious in the First World War when we sent a destroyer fleet to the Mediterranean to escort British merchant ships away from German U-boats, and attacked and occupied the German forces in Tsingtao.
At this time, Japanese companies and individuals were becoming economically powerful and were expanding into the South Pacific, where they had inherited German interests, and Malaysias, Indonesia and the Philippines.
As a result, Japan became very wary of the overseas Chinese, who had already established themselves as a major commercial power, and of the Western colonial powers in Southeast Asia.
They used the Manchurian Incident and the subsequent establishment of Manchuria for anti-Japanese promotion. Overseas Chinese are Chinese who have emigrated overseas while remaining Chinese.
There was such an example. Malaysia was a British colony, so it was called British Malaya, usually Malay.
Tani Yutaka, then three years old, and his Japanese family had also moved from Fukuoka Prefecture to Terengganu, the capital of the southern state of the Malay Peninsula, where they ran a dry cleaning and barber shop.
When the Manchurian Incident occurred, it was used as a pretext for anti-Japanese sentiment in Trenganu, and overseas Chinese began to attack Japanese shops, looting and throwing stones.
It was November 1932, Yutaka had returned to Japan for a draft check and his young sister was lying alone with a cold. Tragedy struck at this time.
133
views
Regain the Canceled Japanese History” Manchuria Incident & Founding of Manchukuo 4
Hello everyone. “Restore the canceled history”Is this still an invasion?
This is the final lesson of the Manchurian Incident and the founding of Manchukuo 4.
The Taliban invaded at the same time as the withdrawal of US troops, and the Afghan government collapsed.
Similarly, around the time of the Japanese ceasefire, the Soviet Army, Mao Zedong Communist Army, and Chiang Kai-shek National Party Army invaded Manchuria, and Manchuria disappeared.
At this time, the fate of Japanese people living in Manchuria was at stake.
August 9 Soviet troops broke the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Treaty, invade Manchukuo by force, and the hardships and tragedy of Japanese residents began.
On August 14, a Soviet tank corps struck a gun at over 1,000 Japanese people evacuating for Kakkonbyo (it locates now the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China).
It was a cruel and tragic event with only a hundred and several dozen survivors. It is said that the Kwantung Army that protects them has already retreated and no one was there.
The army moves by order, but did none of the upper army care about the safety of the Japanese?
When Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, is occupied by the Taliban, it seems exactly like the Japanese embassy staff who left the Japanese and fled first.
The original mission of the Kwantung Army was to protect Japanese in Manchuria.
However, in the Kwantung Army, the elite troops moved to the Southern Front, and it seems that their fighting spirit and strength were significantly reduced.
The Kwantung Army in Manchuria handed over its weapons to the Red Army and the Chinese Communist Army following the broadcast of a ceasefire order by His Majesty the Emperor on August 15.
As a result, the Soviet troops took illegal Japanese soldiers to Siberia, forced labor, and the remaining Japanese escaped on their own, causing the tragedy described shown above.
Mao Zedong and Chiang Kai-shek thought that if they occupied Manchuria, where the industry had developed, they would be able to do something about it. Even the Soviet army robbed machinery and equipment such as steel mills.
The Mao Zedong Communist Army occupied outside Shinkyo, the capital of Manchukuo, and the National Party Army located inside Shinkyo.
No supplies come in from either, and many Japanese repatriated children starve to death. The Par Rou troops of the Communist Army intentionally closed the gate to starve the Japanese.
This resentment is said to remain in the memory of the Japanese forever.
As Ms. Homare Endo wrote, "Eria without Exit reveals the cruel treatment that the Japanese were perpetrated by the Chinese at this time.
The Manchu people also lost their country and were subsequently dominated by the CCP, banned from Manchu, ethnic cleansing, and subject to assimilation.
Same as Tibet, Uighur and Southern Mongolia today.
In such a dire situation, some Kwantung Army did not surrender, did not throw away their weapons, and faithfully followed the original mission of protecting Japanese nationals.
There are more than 2,000 soldiers under the commander of the Mongolia Garrison, Lieutenant General Nemoto, who shared the military food with Japanese people and continued to fight with the Soviet mechanized forces until sent the Japanese on the train.
And unit of Captain Getou, they located in the southern end of Manchuriado who retreated to Beijing with 270 Japanese people after fighting against the Mao Zedong Communist Army.
For more information on this, please see YouTube " Yukoku Diary of Simonji Sakura. The URL is in the explanation column.
From now on, I think Japan has made two mistakes. One would be to monopolize Manchuria's interests and exclude foreign countries.
I think we should have invested not only in Japan but also in Britain and the United States and invested together in Manchuria.
The second failure was that Japan could not prevent the Xi'an Incident because it underestimated the relationship between Comintern and Chang Hsueh-li.
With the conclusion of the Tankoo ceasefire agreement, the border of Manchuria was set, and the Chinese side tolerated the existence of Manchukuo.
After that, Chiang Kai-shek drove the Mao Zedong Communist Army to the brink of destruction.
For security reasons, Japan has been working to make the five provinces of Northen China buffer state, which are adjacent to Manchuria, independent of China.
However, if the Japanese army did not do this and cooperated in the conquest of the Communist Party, such as sending a military advisory group to the Chiang Kai-shek army, history might have changed.
If Japan behaved wisely at this time and cooperated with Britain and the United States, and if Britain and the United States also behaved wisely and cooperated with Japan,
The Mao Zedong Communist Army was destroyed, there was no China incident, no Pacific War, no hell of Chars, Manchuria and Manchu people were alive, Uighurs, Tibet, and Mongolia were peaceful, and the atomic bomb should not have fallen.
It is only when we learn the real history of Japan that we will be able to see through the political propaganda that is convenient for some countries to say that Japan is a bad country that invaded other countries, and have hope for the future of Japan.
I hope that the history of the founding and collapse of Manchukuo will be a lesson to our next generation so that they will not have to go through the same hellish suffering as Chars.
Everyone, why don't you read Jiyusha's history textbook? Then Goodbye everyone.
148
views
Manchurian Incident & Founding Manchukuo 3
Hello everyone. 8th Regaining Canceled History. Is this is still an aggression, the Manchurian Incident and the founding of Manchuria 3.
In May 1933 (Showa 8), Japan signed the "Tanggu Ceasefire Agreement" with the Chiang Kai-shek government and decided to settle the Manchurian Incident.
"After the signing of the Tanggu ceasefire agreement, the 800,000-strong Chiang Kai-shek government forces embarked on a campaign to surround and destroy the 150,000-strong Communist army.
The Communist Army abandoned the Soviet districts it had built up and fled to Yan'an.
The Comintern must have been panicked by this.
Manchuria is more than three times as large as Japan. Please take a look at the pictures of how Manchuria developed.
Obviously, the armed forces, government, and police organizations in Manchuria will only function with the cooperation of the people of Manchuria.
The photos I will show you are used with the permission of the administrator from the "Manshu Photo Studio" on the homepage.
Not only the pictures of Manchuria, but the manager is from Manchuria and the explanation is very accurate.
For example, you can see that Japanese immigrants to Manchuria were carried out not only by agricultural immigrants as described in textbooks, but also by a wide range of industries.
We can also see that agricultural migrants often failed. By the time their life stabilizes, you can see the hardships of immigrants, such as being attacked by bandits and losing their young lives to pneumonia.
Naoki Hoshino, who was the Secretary of General Affairs of Manchukuo, wrote about the development of Manchukuo in his book "An Endless Dream: A History of Manchuria Abroad.
Of particular note in the civilian field are the construction of new cities and the remodeling of existing cities.
Under the modern land plan, Japanese construction engineers were gathered and beautiful modern cities were born one after another in the vast land of Manchuria.
In particular, the new national capital, Shinkyo, now Changchun, was constructed as a million cities, equipped with electricity, water and sewage, and the first flush toilet in the Orient, and was colored with abundant greenery.
In addition, Manchuria Railway established Manchuria Railway Hospital, Institute of Medical Science, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, recreation center, etc. in each city along the railway line, and provided patrol treatment in remote areas, greatly contributing to the improvement of the health condition of the people.
In addition, the Central Laboratory and Agricultural Laboratory were established, and the "improved soybeans" developed here became widespread throughout Manchuria and became the driving force for growth as the world's number one soybean exporter.
In addition, the Geological Research Institute, the Railway Technical Research Institute, and the Iron and Steel Research Institute have become the driving force behind the development of agriculture, industry, and mining in Manchuria.
Almost all of the above national land development and industrial development were made by investment from Japan.
For example, the five-year primary industrial development plan compiled in 1936 lists areas for increased production, from electricity, steel, coal and aluminum to airplanes and automobiles.
The total investment was 2.5 billion yen, which exceeded the total expenditure of Japan's general account of 2.4 billion yen in the same year.
Japan invested a huge amount of human resources, technology and capital to bet on the development of Manchuria. Meanwhile, the condition of Manchukuo changed completely.
Security was completely secured and there was no soldier-bandit in the country. From an agricultural country to a fine industrial country, the total production value has doubled. National life has improved remarkably.
Many people gathered from all over the area, and the population, which was 30 million, has exceeded 50 million. I will omit it below.
The born Manchukuo was developed not only by the Japanese who have reached a leading position, but also by the various ethnic groups of Far East.
Young Japanese people have been willing to gather in Manchukuo to share the blessings among all ethnic groups and create a new optimism here. I will omit it below.
With only 13 years of life, the construction of Manchuria has finally ended in an endless dream.
However, the efforts and hardships of the young Japanese people during this time, I am convinced that it is forever enough to be proud of the Japanese people.
As mentioned above, Mr. Naoki Hoshino, the Secretary of General Affairs of Manchukuo, has stated.
As a result, soybean production had increased five times, coal output had increased 14 times, and trade 6 times. What's wrong with this?
Is investment in China good and investment in Manchukuo bad? Then, the Manchurian Incident and the founding of Manchukuo, Part 3 will be completed. See again.
48
views
Manchurian Incident & Founding Manchukuo 2
When the number of Chinese people increases, the control of the land shifts to them. Manchuria was the same.
I mentioned last time that Manchuria was originally a sacred land that was off limits to non-Manchu people. The tombs of the first to third emperors of the Qing dynasty are also located in Fengtian, now in Shenyang.
When the Qing dynasty was stable, there were no Han Chinese and the land of Manchuria was peaceful. However, when the Qing dynasty declines and Russia moves southward, security was disturbed.
The Han Chinese, a peasant who was taken by the Manchus, began to take land. In addition to Russians who fled the Russian Revolution, Han Chinese refugees and bandits also flow into Manchuria.
When Japan changed its era to Showa, warlords with private soldiers were all over the country in China.
It was around 1925. After the Russo-Japanese War, a person like the head of a bandit from Shandong gradually ruled Manchuria with Japan as a backing. This is Zhang Zuolin.
He hired private army and killed all those who oppose him for the sake of showing. The Manchus could not be blamed for any heavy taxes imposed by Zhang Zuolin.
Zhang and his son issued fiat money without gold reserves, picked up products from the inhabitants, and cultivated and bought and sold opium to feed the army.
Chiang Kai-shek was feeding his troops with a monopoly on salt and tariffs on imports and exports. Around 1927, Zhang Zuolin, who had advanced into Beijing, and Chiang Kai-shek had a hostile relationship.
Therefore, Zhang parent and child and Manchuria Railway will initially use each other. Under these circumstances, Zhang Zuolin was bombed along with the return train to Manchuria as recommended by the Japanese army.
All textbooks are supposed to be the work of the Kwantung Army in Japan. The diplomatic document released after the collapse of the Soviet Union says that it was a Soviet work.
Was Zhang Zuolin, who is indebted to Japan for the Communist International, an obstacle? Chiang Kai-shek, who was in conflict with Zhang Zuolin, presented his son to the Soviet Union as if he were a hostage.
In 1930, his son, Zhang Hsueh-li, marched into Beijing and made it the capital, nominally dividing the country in two with the Chiang Kai-shek regime in Nanjing.
Due to the circumstances of foreign powers, the Chiang Kai-shek administration in Nanjing was approved, but Manchuria has never been under the control of the Chiang Kai-shek administration.
Chang Hsueh-li was not a subordinate of Chiang Kai-shek, but an equal ruler who bisected the continent of China. Chiang Kai-shek had never set foot in Manchuria and could not understand the language.
And anti-Japanese activities will expand from China to Manchuria. These movements were backed by Protestant missionaries, Chiang Kai-shek's US advisory group, a US advertising companies, Comintern, and Chang Hsueh-li.
At this time, Japan had already become an enemy of the world. The South Manchuria Railway foreign bond issuance negotiations between Japan and JP Morgan Shokai had been crushed by US.
Chang Hsueh-li, who was in conflict with Chiang Kai-shek, soon approached Chiang Kai-shek. He could be excluded by the Soviet Union like his father if he was in constant conflict.
The minions of Chang Hsueh-li Army frequently interfere with trains on the South Manchuria Railway and terrorist attacks on Japanese people. Even the pro-Chinese diplomacy of Japanese Foreign Minister Kijuro Shidehara did not stop China's Japan-exclusion movement.
300,000 Japanese living in Manchuria are disappointed. There were a series of incidents that threatened the lives of Japanese people, such as the Wanpaoshan incident and the incident of Captain Nakamura.
The great powers, Comintern's conspiracy battle had begun on the stage of Manchuria.
In 1931, the Kwantung Army swiftly ousted Chang Hsueh-liang's army in an attempt to improve the situation in Manchuria at once before the Soviet Union intervened. This was the Manchurian Incident.
Chang Hsueh-liang's army was said to be 150,000 to 220,000 strong, but since they were dispersed throughout the country, they were defeated individually by the fast-moving Kwantung Army and the Japanese army that crossed the border from Korea, which was only 14,000 strong.
It was Lieutenant Colonel Kanji Ishihara, the genius Kwantung Army Chief of Operations, who elaborately created this operation plan over three years. And it was the Manchu people who were most pleased with this.
There were many people in Japan who supported this action by the Kwantung Army, and the Army received a large amount of support. The government also confirms.
And Manchuria was founded with the last emperor Puyi of the Qing dynasty as the head of state. Japan has helped.
As of 1939, Manchuria was approved by about 20 countries, including Germany, Italy, Spain and the Vatican.
At that time, the Soviet puppet state Mongolia had not approved anyone other than the Soviet Union.
With the disappearance of Chang Hsueh-liang's army that controled Manchuria, his control hd returned to the 3 million Manchu people, and he had only declared independence in his hometown, headed by the last Emperor Puyi of the Qing dynasty.
The Han people, such as Sun Yat-sen, who became independent from the Qing dynasty, are good, and should the Manchu people not become independent?
The Manchurian Incident and the second Manchurian founding are over. goodbye everyone.
100
views
Regain the Canceled Japanese History” Manchuria Incident & Founding Manchukuo 1
https://rumble.com/c/c-1017064
History classes in schools and videos on Youtube teach that the Manchurian Incident was a Japanese invasion and that Manchukuo was a puppet state of Japan.
They also tell us that Japan was suffering from a serious economic recession, and since it was unlikely that Japan could recover its economy by domestic means alone, they decided to enrich Japan by occupying and cultivating the vast Manchuria, saying that Manchuria was Japan's lifeline.
This makes Japan an outlawed nation, doesn't it? The Great Depression began in 1929, and Japan was hit by the Great Depression and a bad harvest caused by the cold damage in 1931, and there were farmers in the northeastern Hokkaido region who had little to eat tomorrow.
At that time, the governors of the six northeastern prefectures pleaded with Prime Minister Keisuke Okada and the relevant ministers for support in dealing with the cold damage. This is the same way that various subsidies were disbursed for the Wuhan Corona this time.
Even so, there were many cases where the children of the farmer became malnourished and the young daughters were trafficked to help their family. More than 200,000 Japanese people already lived in Manchuria in the early Showa period.
Ten thousand army troops (the Kanto Army) were stationed there to protect Kanto-Shu Kanto Province and to guard the Manchurian Railway, which had been taken over from Russia after winning the Russo-Japanese War. Kanto-Shu is the southern part of the Liaodong Peninsula, not Manchuria.
It is the land that Japan leased from the Qing dynasty after the Russo-Japanese War. The Manchu people who were originally in Manchuria changed to the Jushen tribe and later the Manju tribe, but advanced to China and created the Qing empire.
Manchuria is the homeland of the Manchu people who founded the Qing Empire. Therefore, it is a very sacred land for Manchu people, and during the Qing dynasty, strict immigration laws were stipulated to prohibit Han Chinese from entering Manchuria except for peasants.
They were subject to the death penalty if they entered without permission. Furthermore, the marriage between Manchus and Han Chinese was prohibited, and this prohibition continued until a few years before the last emperor Pu Yi abdicated.
In 1912, the Xinhai Revolution took place, overthrowing the rule of the Manchus, and Sun Yat-sen became the leader of the Republic.
The last Emperor Pu Yi of the Qing dynasty abdicated after signing an agreement with the Republic of China.
The agreement made Manchuria, his hometown, the "royal territory" in the West, that is, the "land of confinement," and the abdication agreement that clearly stated and confirmed the rights of the Qing dynasty became the fundamental law of China.
However, the Chinese did not adhere to this agreement. They are those who call the decision of the International Arbitration Court a waste paper. In other words, respecting and protecting the agreement would mean allowing the Manchus to rule Manchuria.
It is said that the massacre of Manchu people by Han Chinese during the Xinhai Revolution lasted for a week.
It is said that the Manchu people who fled to Manchuria were most pleased with the founding of Manchukuo after the Manchurian Incident. Their country was created.
This is the same as Israel was pleased that their country was created. Or it is the same as the United States becoming independent with the aid of France. The Statue of Liberty is a gift from France.
Manchukuo was the nation that was founded with the support of Japan and was approved by the Vatican and 20 other countries. However, the fate of the Manchurian people was miserable.
Mao Zedong invaded Manchuria, which became a treasure after Japan invested human resources and money, and Manchu language was banned like Tibet, Uighur, and Inner Mongolia. It is said that no Manchurian people can speak their own language anymore due to the assimilation policy.
This is written as washing the people and is called washing people in Chinese. Today, China calls Manchuria the Tohoku region. And Manchuria continues to be called Japan's puppet state.
At the end of the last China Incident 2, I said as follows.
If Britain and the United States were acting wisely at that time, now there is no Chinese Communist Party, no atomic bombs, no abductions, no crackdowns on Tibet, Uighurs, Inner Mongolia, Manchus speak Manchu language, Both Taiwan and the Senkaku ailands should have been peaceful.
This is China's Anti-Japanese Anniversary on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs website. Among them is the September 18 Manchurian Incident (Liutiaohu Incident).
Although it was not originally an incident that occurred on the territory of China, it invaded Manchukuo and made it their own territory, so they make the Manchurian Incident an anti-Japanese anniversary.
Of course, the "massacre" on December 13th is just a falsification of history. There is a URL in the description column for this.
The CCP helped the Chiang Kai-shek army to fight with Japan , then drive the Chiang Kai-shek army to Taiwan
then created the country, so the CCP’s national policy is an anti-Japanese.
Manchurian Incident 1 is that’s all, then goodbye everyone, see you again.
77
views
the 5th lesson of Regaining Canceled History, the second part of the Japan-China Incident.
Hello, everyone. This is the fifth lesson of Regaining Canceled History, the second part of “Is this still an invasion”, the Japan-China Incident. In this lesson, we will talk about what the Comintern is and who did the invasion.
At the very beginning of the table, it says that the 7th World Congress of the Comintern was held in 1935. Here, it says that the main enemies were Nazi Germany, Poland and Japan.
In 1921, the Chinese Communist Party was established, and the following year, the Japanese Communist Party was born as a branch of the CCP. From their point of view, Chiang Kai-shek and the Japanese government were enemies.
This is the Comintern's strategy for world revolution, from Jiyusha's middle school history textbook. I’ll read it..
The Comintern was quick to create the CCP and gave strong leadership to the revolutionary movement. In 1926, when Chiang Kai-shek was in the process of logging in the north, he obtained the following secret document in which Moscow gave instructions.
All methods must be used to induce the exclusion of foreigners by the masses. In order to achieve this goal, each country and the masses must be armedly clashed.
If this can cause interference from other countries, then it should be carried out in any way possible. It doesn't matter if it results in looting or mass slaughter.
A Communist Party member who sneaked into the Northern Expedition's National Revolutionary Army attacked embassies in Nanking in 1927, including Japan,and looted, assaulted, and murdered.
The Communists lobbied the Kuomintang to fight the Japanese military in order to weaken the Kuomintang. This was the main policy for the Communist Party to come to power. This is how Jiyusha explains it.
Originally, the tyranny of the Communists in Nanking in 1927 was called the real Nanking Incident, but it is now hidden.
Japan understood the danger of communism and was wary of it. Chiang Kai-shek also finally understood the danger too and suppressed the CCP, nearly destroying it.
However, the Xian Incident occurred, and Chiang Kai-shek was under house arrest. In exchange for his life, he decided to stop the conquest of the CCP and fight Japan together.
Each of them had their own interests in mind, and in some cases they used ninja to set up scheming operations, just like Daimyous in Japan's Warring States Period.
Ninjas are today's spies, terrorists, and operatives. The Xi'an Incident was a desperate reversal of fortunes for the Chinese Communist Party.
Britain and the U.S. wanted Chiang Kai-shek to unify China, push Japan out of the way, and profit from the laying of railroads. It is clear that the Comintern also wanted to unify China, which was in a state of military cliques, with the Communist Party.
From both sides, Manchukuo may have looked like a treasure trove. Mao seems to have thought that as long as he could steal Manchuria, the success of the revolution would be manageable.
Textbooks other than Jiyusha do not explain the Comintern at all, in order to give students the impression that Japan invaded.
And the Marco Polo Bridge Incident was also described as a skirmish between the Japanese and Chinese armies that developed into the China Incident and the Sino-Japanese War under the impression that Japan had invaded.
It is believed that Communist Party spies who had infiltrated the KMT army fired several live rounds at the Japanese troops. At this time, the Japanese army was in the middle of an exercise, but it was an exercise without using live ammunition.
After the Boxer Rebellion in 1900, Japan, like other powers, signed the Beijing Protocol and stationed 5,000 troops around Beijing to protect diplomats and their families, etc.
Under the protocol, live-fire exercises were prohibited. Since the local ceasefire agreement was signed at Rohgok Bridge, the full-scale war between the Japanese and Chinese armies, which the Comintern wanted, did not start easily.
At first, there were only about 5,000 Japanese troops in the Beijing area and a thousand and a few hundred in the Shanghai concession.
And as I told you last time, Japan does not want to start a costly war by investing in Manchuria and Korea.
So the Comintern, Britain and the United States came up with various means of provocation. One of the most tragic incidents was the Tungchow massacre.
This is also one of the massacre that other textbooks do not write about, but as Japanese, we should not forget. It was an incident in which 225 Japanese, including women and children, were slaughtered by Chinese students and security forces.
This incident had been planned for two years in order to provoke Japan. Despite suffering so much damage, Japan did not effectively report the damage to the world at that time.
In the same way, the Japanese government's neglect of the political propaganda of the Nanjing Massacre and the comfort women, which never existed and were spread around the world, is now greatly damaging the national interest.
If Britain and the U.S. had behaved wisely at that time, there would be no CCP, no atomic bombings, no abductions, no oppression of Tibet, Uyghur and Inner Mongolia, Manchurians would speak Manchu, and Taiwan and the Senkakus would be at peace.
I wonder if Britain and the United States are now aware of their responsibility, and are beginning to encircle China.
This concludes the fifth article. Good bye, everyone.
107
views
The 4 "Regain The Canceled Japanese History" Japan-Sina Incident I
Hello everyone. My name is Saimoji Sakura. I am the teacher of this class. The lesson 4, Regain the Canceled Japanese History is “Is China Incident still an invasion by Japan? “
In Japan, there had been samurai who valued morals and law for a long time, and it seems that they had influenced the general public.
Many foreigners who came to Japan during the Edo period are actually surprised by the politeness, kindness, and good security in japan.
Japan even took an international law scholar to the battlefield and fought a war with Russia.
In addition, page 179 of the Tokyo Shoseki wrights that the treatment of prisoners of war during the Meiji era was humane in accordance with international law.
Even during the last battle against Nanjing Castle in the Chinese incident, Japanese soldiers were ordered to respect international law and prohibit illegal acts.
While being shot by enemy's anti-aircraft guns, the Japanese pilot plunged,
then sprinkled surrender advisory flyer from the plane, but was rejected by the Chinese army in Nanjing.
It is easy to be misunderstood by those who have no military experience, but there are rules for war, and those who break these rules and fight will be given the severe punishment of death penalty in some cases, regardless of enemy or ally.
It's about fighting among civilians without wearing military uniforms, and using hided their weapons.
There was an implicit understanding that the Japanese army was required to have very strict discipline compared to foreign troops because the Japanese army was the army of His Majesty the Emperor, and the illegal acts of Japanese soldiers hurt dignity to His Majesty the Emperor.
It was raised in 1938, but Chiang Kai-shek's military adviser was a German military officer.
They gave know-how the construction of tochka(pillbox) networks around Shanghai, and were still a military adviser during the Battle of Nanjing in December 1937.
Shanghai was divided into Nantao, which is controlled by the Chiang Kai-shek government, and the concession, where Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States, and France have police and administrative powers.
As shown in the table, the Soviet Union also assisted Chiang Kai-shek in 1937 with aircraft, tanks, and trucks, as well as the United Kingdom and the United States.
Especially in the United States from 1927. That is why Chiang Kai-shek confidently armed his army and challenged Japan.
In this respect, the strategic objectives of Britain, the United States and the Communist International were the same.
With 50,000 troops of Chiang Kai-shek, the Imperial Japanese Navy Land Force, which protects the Shanghai concession, was attacked with a machine gun.
Therefore, a rescue army commanded by General Matsui Iwane landed in Shanghai, but there was a strong pillbox and creek networks under the guidance of the German military advisory group.
Due to the state-of-the-art weapons and the military guidance of the German advisory group, the Japanese army suffered great damage immediately, causing 40,000 casualties in about three months.
For this reason, the Japanese army carried out a landing operation behind the enemy, and as a result, the Chiang Kai-shek army collapsed and retreated to Nanjing.
However, textbooks and schools still teach that Japan has invaded which Britain, the United States and China claims.
For example, in Tokyo Shoseki, Japan, which controlled Manchuria, further invaded northern China. It states that the Sino-Japanese War began in July 1937, triggered by the Marco Polo Bridge Incident.
You have to check the information. It is important to have an attitude of giving an answer after wondering whether it is true or why.
Even so, Japan needs to negotiate and agree with the other party to end the war.
However, the strategy of the Communist International and the United States and Britain was to drag Japan into a long-term war, so when we think about it now, there was absolutely no ceasefire.
It may come what Japan's failure and Japan's reflection on it is that Perhaps Japan didn't see the intentions of Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union, and went too deep into the strategy of them.
So did Japan invade the continent of China, or was it not?
The answer was that Japan had no intention of invading, but as Japan continued to attack enemy territories for defense, the result came to be called aggression.
The definition of aggression is also ambiguous, and each country freely interprets it as it is convenient for themselve and accuses it of invading the other.
Please see the table to think about it.
You can see why Chiang Kai-shek, who studied abroad in Japan and has experience in the Japanese military, had to fight Japan.
Students studying in textbooks other than Jiyusha may not understand the meaning of Comintern.
Japan has two war experiences, Japan-sino War and Japan-Russia War, on that wide Chinese continent.
We knew how difficult it was to fight a war on the continent, both physically and economically.
Therefore, Japan really does not want to go to war.
With the money to go to war, Japan would have wanted to invest more in Manchuria, Korea and the country.
For Japan's security, it was important for Manchuria and the Korean Peninsula to develop and be economically stable.
However, the interests of Japan and other countries are not the same.
It didn't happen.
Japan had already lost the information warfare and conspiracy war against Japan. Goodbye everyone! See you again.
169
views
"Regain the Canceled Japanese History" the Nanjing Massacre was war propaganda 3
"Information warfare and history textbooks"
The Japanese army struggled in the battle in Shanghai, causing as many as 40,000 casualties in a short period of time, so they carried out an operation to land behind the enemy.
Then the Chinese Army collapsed and retreated to Nanjing.
However, the Kuomintang government and foreigners evacuated to Chongqing,
In addition to the enemy soldiers, the only people left in Nanjing were the poor Chinese who could not be criticized, more than 20 members of the Safety Zone Committee, and five reporters.
All the Nanjing atrocity reported by foreigners can be traced to a specific foreigners of the Safety Zone Committee.
One of them, Rev. Maggie, said at the Tokyo Tribunal that he had saw a Japanese soldier on guard stopped the Chinese and shot him from behind because he ran away.
This was the only one he saw as he roamed the city freely. The Kuomintang government's public relations department hired foreign reporters and university professors to promote the fake news of the Japanese military violence in Nanjing to the world.
This is called wartime propaganda because it is during the war. For some time, Britain and the United States have been very cautious about Japan entering the Chinese market and have used Christian missionaries to secretly support China's Japan-exclusion movement.
And at the Tokyo Tribunal, Chiang Kai-shek brought up the wartime advertisement again in order to condemn General Matsui Iwane, who was in charge of the Battle of Nanking. Since there is no evidence, it was also used as evidence in hearsay.
After that, when the soldiers and reporters who participated in the Battle of Nanking disappeared, the Chinese Communist Party government used this Nanking massacre again for political promotion and spread it not only in Japan but also all over the world.
The Chinese government, which has a strong voice in the United Nations, forcibly registered this Nanjing Massacre in the UNESCO Memory of the World Program in 2015. However, the storage location of the evidenced material has not yet been disclosed.
If they publish it, the photos and materials will soon be recognized as fake. The Government of Japan immediately protested and withheld the payment of UNESCO donations and contributions.
However, as a result of research activities by many people, including the Japanese Nanjing academia, their promotional activities are now declining.
This is a book written in 1997 by Professor Tokushi Kasahara, one of the people who once claimed that there was a Nanjing massacre. The pictures in this book are explained as follows.
"Chinese women in the Gangnam region abducted by Japanese soldiers. Published in the Military Affairs Commission of the Chinese Kuomintang Government," The Record of the Assault on Japanese soldiers "(published in 1938). The same picture was also published in Iris Chang's book.
However, in fact, this photo was published on page 12 of Asahi Graph's issue on November 10, 1945. This is a photo taken by Correspondent Kumasaki on the 14th of March.
Actually, Mr. Katsuichi Honda of the former Asahi Shimbun also used this fake photo in the book "Japanese Army in China", but later admitted that it was a fake photo.
It is this book "Verifying Nanjing Massacre Evidence Photographs" that reveals that many so-called evidence photographs are all fake photographs.
Formerly Professor Higashinakano of the Asia University said, "There is no photograph that can be used as evidence in the Nanjing Massacre.
We are not in a war with the People's Republic of China now, but they loook like to try to isolate Japan from the world and worsen the national sentiment of Japan and the United States.
Not only the major media, but also Japanese education unions and some opposition parties seem to be tuned to China's promotional activities.
In response, Japan, the United States, united Kingdom, Australia, India, France and others are rather strengthening their cohesion, because of China's arms race and crackdown on Tibetans and Uighurs.
Each other's nations use all means to wage an intelligence war in which the other is at a disadvantage and their own is at an advantage. Textbook information is no exception.
In Japan, the organization that engages in intelligence warfare was dismantled after the war. In addition, the era in which newspapers, television, radio, and books were the only sources of information for the people continued.
Finally, in the age of the Internet, people can see and hear information about counters that detect lies against fake news. However, history and civics textbooks are also strongly influenced by the information warfare.
The Nanjing Massacre is one of them. It is very important for students to wonder if this information is true and to think why it is true.
That is the end of the 3rd class. The next lesson to regain the canceled history is the Chinese incident, is it still an aggression? Goodbye everyone, see you again.
212
views
Nanjing Incidnt was war propaganda (2) "Nanjing was smiling"
Hello everyone. The second lesson to regain the canceled history is the Nanjing Massacre Part 2. Then, how was the actual situation in Nanjing city at that time?
Indeed, as the Chinese Communist Party government says, if the Japanese military had illegally killed as many as 300,000 Chinese in the city, there would be no Chinese in the city.
The population of Chinese in Nanjing at that time was said to be 100,000 for the Nanjing Defense Force and 200,000 for its citizens. The number of 200,000 citizens was because a safety zone was established at that time, and the safety zone committee that managed it said that it was 200,000.
They were always concerned about the food of the people in the safety zoon.
The Chinese army can be calculated as zero due to killed in action, prisoners of war, and retreat, so it is estimated that there are 200,000 civilians in the city's safe zone.
However, the population of citizens after the occupation of the Japanese army had increased from 200,000.
Because the security was stable and the Chinese were back.
This is a photo of "Nanjing smiles", Asahi Shinbun, December 25, 1945, introduced in "The Truth of Nanjing". After that, the Chinese Communist Party government increased the population number to 1 million including the area around Nanjing.
However, it is said that the Chinese Army burned down all the buildings around Nanjing to make them unavailable to the Japanese army. It is an ancient Chinese strategy.
For this reason, both the people around Nanjing and in it escaped from the city, and the remaining people are believed to have evacuated to a safety zone where the Japanese military would not attack under international law.
At that time, there were many newspaper reporters and cameramen in Nanjing who moved with the Japanese army, writing and sending articles. Yuji Maeda of Doumei Press was one of them.
The following is an excerpt from his book "In the Flow of War": "On the 14th, reporters, cameramen, and radiotelephone engineers came in one after another from each gate.
Reporters Tokio Oga, Kenkichi Higuchi, Takeshi Kosaka, Matsu Kato, Mikizo Fukasawa, Photographer Mikiji Inazu, a radiotelephone engineer Kutaro Kikuchi, and assistants Koga, Teshima, Nakamura, etc.
The temporary bureau had swelled to 33 people.
Compared to 10 to 15 people of other companies, it became a large unit, but this backfired. There was no problem because both the reporter and the cameraman went out for coverage during the day, but when everyone returned in the evening, the field bureau was full of humans.
It is also written as follows. They ware totally baffled by the news that after the occupation, there was a large-scale looting, assault, and arson in the refugee area.
It is also written as follows. They ware totally baffled by the news that after the occupation, there was a large-scale looting, assault, and arson in the refugee area.
This is because the security in the safety zoon has been restored. It was shortly after that which the news of the violence of Japanese soldiers in the refugee zone was transmitted from Shanghai.
In other words, it was just before we started a peaceful daily life at a branch office in the refugee district that had regained its former vibrancy.
We looked at each other. None of Arai, Horikawa, Atsoo Nakamura, and the photographs, movies who were working hard around the city didn't know about the violence after the restoration of security.
The elimination of the remaining enemies and the detection of Chinese soldiers who fled into the safety zone and lurked were also over on the 14th.
If there was such an illegal act, it could not have been in the eyes of the 100 reporters of each company, not only us.
If there was such an illegal act, it could not have been in the eyes of the 100 reporters of
each company, not only us.
None of the hundred reporters in Nanjing at the time have witnessed the massacre of 300,000 people that the Chinese Communist Party government says.
However, time passed and three Japanese reporters came to say they had seen the Nanking Massacre. Records of where they were at the time quickly turned out to be inconsistent.
Goodbye everyone! See you again.
152
views
"Regain The Canceled Japanese History" The Nanjing Incident 1
Hello everyone. My name is Saimonji Sakura, instructor of "Regain The Canceled Japanese History". The first lesson is Nanjing Massacre of wartime propaganda 1. Each lesson takes about 5 minutes and is configured with 4 lessons. Well then, let's start. Japan once had a war with Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang government, that is, the current Taiwanese opposition Kuomintang, when they were on the Chinese continent.
Since it was in a state of civil war, I doubt if it can be called a country, but it is a country before the People's Republic of China. It was a member of the League of Nations for the convenience of Europe and the United States.
This is also called the China Incident or the Japan-China War without declaration. The China incident is said to be a war started by Japan, but this is also a fake, and I will talk about it in detail in the China Incident of the5th lesson. Of course, neither the Japanese nor the Chinese wanted a war.
After the Japanese troops defeated the enemy capital Nanjing,
the current Chinese Communist Party government,along with the Asahi Shimbun, has made political publicity around the world saying that Japanese army has slaughtered 300,000 Chinese during the six weeks from December 13, 1937 to the beginning of February of the following year at capital Nangjing.
The time when it was most actively promoted was around 2015. However, in Japan, there are textbooks that describe this and textbooks that do not.
Jiyusha's history textbooks, which do not describe it, think that this case is not a historical fact, as is the comfort women that Asahi newspaper has already apologized for his false reports
So why is it described in other textbooks? There are three grounds for this. 1. Ministry of Foreign Affairs website 2. Kaikosha's Nanjing war history 3. Tokyo trial materials. The basic reason is that it would be convenient to have the Nanjing Massacre in order to make people believe that Japan is a bad country that has invaded.
The website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is written in Japanese and English as follows. However, "Killing a large number of Chinese, including women and children, the general public and prisoners of war”in a textbook, is not found on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs website at all.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has no choice but to approve the Tokyo Tribunal, so it cannot write that the Nanjing Massacre did not exist.
Of course, it is not possible to write that what is not true is true.
Therefore, it became an expression that The Government of Japan believes that it cannot be denied that...
The history of the Nanjing War of Kaikosha was not accurate after that, and it was corrected in the August 2012 "Special Issue of Kaikosha that the Nanjing Massacre was a wartime propaganda by China.
This is the homepage of Kaikosha that is a public interest incorporated foundation for veterans
At the Tokyo Tribunal, the Republic of China at the time alleged that the Japanese military had slaughtered many civilians. However, all of these complaints were hearsay testimony.
Among them were many hearsay testimonies described in the textbooks of Tokyo Shoseki that they killed a large number of Chinese, including women and children, the general public and prisoners of war.
Hearsay testimony was not adopted as evidence in the criminal case trial, but hearsay testimony was specially adopted as evidence in this Tokyo trial.
In other words, I heard from Mr. A that the Japanese army killed ordinary people such as women and children, and many Chinese including prisoners of war.
In this way, at the Tokyo Tribunal, just hearing the story proved it. It's a terrible trial, but we can't say anything because we lost the war.
General Matsui Iwane, the commander of the Battle of Nanking at that time, was hanged only for violating the war abandonment of prisoners of war and the general public by ignoring the responsibility for respecting the treaty.
It is clear that it is a story of a Chinese massacre created to hang General Matsui, who was resented by Chiang Kai-shek.
Then, how was the actual situation in Nanjing city at that time?
The continuation is the second. Goodbye everyone. Let's meet again.
201
views
2
comments