Premium Only Content

Police are not required to Protect You!
Trigger Warning: This case discusses the sensitive topic of sexual assault, viewer discretion is advised.
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. 1981)
https://casetext.com/case/warren-v-district-of-columbia-5
Appellants Carolyn Warren, Miriam Douglas, and Joan Taliaferro in No. 79-6, and appellant Wilfred Nichol in No. 79-394 sued the District of Columbia and individual members of the Metropolitan Police Department for negligent failure to provide adequate police services. The respective trial judges held that the police were under no specific legal duty to provide protection to the individual appellants and dismissed the complaints for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Super.Ct.Civ.R. 12(b)(6). However, in a split decision a three-judge division of this court determined that appellants Warren, Taliaferro and Nichol were owed a special duty of care by the police department and reversed the trial court rulings. The division unanimously concluded that appellant Douglas failed to fit within the class of persons to whom a special duty was owed, and affirmed the lower court's dismissal of her complaint. The court en banc, on petitions for rehearing, vacated the panel's decision. After rearguments, notwithstanding our sympathy for appellants who were the tragic victims of despicable criminal acts, we affirm the judgments of dismissal.
Follow Uncivil Law on Discord (blackleaf): https://discord.gg/4cYdVEs
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitter: https://twitter.com/UncivilLaw
Follow Uncivil Law on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/UncivilLaw
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/uncivillaw
Send me Stuff:
Uncivil Law
1401 Lavaca St # 602
Austin, TX 78701-1634
Camera: Sony A5100
Lens: Sigma 30mm F 1.4
Mic: Rode NT1A
This channel provides general information about law. The content of this channel does not provide individual or specific legal advice for any specific situation. Consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction for specific legal questions.
-
2:07:36
UncivilLaw
1 year agoThursday Night Thunderdome - Starbucks, Waffle House, Santos & More
822 -
2:12:28
The Quartering
4 hours agoChina BANS US Films, Trump DOUBLES Tariff, Democrats BLAST Blue Collar Work & Shocking Gen Z Report
166K41 -
LIVE
LFA TV
21 hours agoLFA TV - ALL DAY LIVE STREAM 4/8/25
968 watching -
1:24:04
Awaken With JP
3 hours agoIt’s Good to PANIC About Tariffs - Lies Ep 86
43.3K30 -
1:09:15
The HotSeat
2 hours agoBlood Money: Funds Still Flowing for Austin Metcalf’s Killer + NYC Fights BACK!
23K4 -
LIVE
Revenge of the Cis
4 hours agoEpisode 1471: Sucker
1,200 watching -
1:03:42
Michael Franzese
3 hours agoShe Spent 36 Years in Prison for a Crime She Didn’t Commit
19.3K8 -
2:28:12
Committee on House Administration
3 hours agoSubcommittee on Elections Hearing: “Revisiting the 2024 Election with Secretaries of State”
12K2 -
1:01:58
The Football Terrace
4 hours ago $1.01 earnedGoldbridge SLAMS Neville's AGENDA! Carragher’s Arsenal AGENDA EXPOSED! Arsenal Ready for Madrid WAR
19.9K1 -
1:24:27
Russell Brand
6 hours agoTrump THREATENS China As Xi Vows to ‘FIGHT TO THE END’ Against US Tariffs – SF562
169K34