U.S. government reserved $1 BILLION of TAXPAYER money for regular media vaccine propaganda in 2021

The U.S. government has reserved (and most likely spent) $1 BILLION of TAXPAYER money "to strengthen vaccine confidence" and "to improve rates of vaccination" for an unnecessary toxic ineffective product that everyone should maximally distrust and for which the ideal uptake is 0%. The budget is just for fiscal year 2021. More taxpayer money will likely be stolen for the current and future years.

The money has essentially been (mis)used to bribe for-profit mainstream media companies to spread propaganda and censor real information. Those involved are lying by both commission (telling lies) and omission (not telling necessary truths, not providing necessary context).

They are financially rewarded for being superspreaders of mis- and disinformation. Their (mis)behavior leads to misinformed coercion instead of informed consent. The brain has been the most washed body part in the past 2 years 'to flatten the curve', not the hands.

"If you don't read the newspaper you're uninformed; if you do read the newspaper you're misinformed." ― Mark Twain

Read more in this article by Blaze Media:

Exclusive: The federal government paid hundreds of media companies to advertise the COVID-19 vaccines while those same outlets provided positive coverage of the vaccines
https://www.theblaze.com/news/review-the-federal-government-paid-media-companies-to-advertise-for-the-vaccines

The evidence for the $1 BILLION for vaccine propaganda is here:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1319/text

Quote of entire section 2302 of that bill:

SEC. 2302. FUNDING FOR VACCINE CONFIDENCE ACTIVITIES.

In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriated to the Secretary for fiscal year 2021, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $1,000,000,000, to remain available until expended, to carry out activities, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—

(1) to strengthen vaccine confidence in the United States, including its territories and possessions;
(2) to provide further information and education with respect to vaccines licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262) or authorized under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3); and
(3) to improve rates of vaccination throughout the United States, including its territories and possessions, including through activities described in section 313 of the Public Health Service Act, as amended by section 311 of division BB of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116-260).

The Blaze has found out through a freedom of information request that the government bribed all the usual mainstream media suspects in print, tv and digital media.

They have reached out to media outlets that are known to be the recipient of this budget. The organizations that have responded say in unison that there is a strict separation between the marketing department and the news department. In other words, the content of the reporting between the commercials is not influenced in any way by the sponsors. That is, of course, pure nonsense.

The joint media companies, which are all for-profit organizations, know exactly that negative reporting about the vaccines is not appreciated by their government sponsor and that as much as $1 billion in revenue for 2021 is at stake, let alone the revenue in future years. This does not even account for the enormous investment that Big Pharma injects into the media companies every year.

Then, of course, there are other significant funders such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation who will all be very dissatisfied with any negative bit of information about the necessity, safety and efficacy of the vaccines.

In addition to the tension between honest reporting and profitability, there is also the issue of disclosure. Where does advertising end and undisclosed propaganda begin? For example, did the media get paid for the times Fauci and Walensky got attention? If so, has it been clearly stated that this interview was paid for?

Are the questions asked affected by the huge sums of money? It is not difficult to imagine that a question of why we should not wear more face masks could be replaced by the question of whether there is evidence at all that face masks prevent more damage than they cause, if the current and future flow of money is lost.

CNN has made reports from the hospital in which invariably the attention was placed on unvaxxed COVID patients.