CDC admit to withholding large amounts of COVID data, reveal THEIR definition of 'misinformation'

Last weekend, the New York Times published a bombshell article:

The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the COVID Data It Collects: The agency has withheld critical data on boosters, hospitalizations and, until recently, wastewater analyses.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.html

From the article:

"The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, [one] official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective."

Their use of the word 'misinterpretation' in the previous quote reveals how they define 'misinformation'. In their book, misinformation is not false information, but information might lead to conclusions and behavior that is against their desires. It has been no secret how they define this term if you looked at their BEHAVIOR versus their WORDS, but it is nice to now finally have it on record.

The CDC is a political organization. They start out with political goals ― such as maximum vaccine uptake, regardless of necessity, safety and effectiveness ―, and subsequently publish, spin and suppress information according to their political goals.

If they really had transparency (which is strictly necessary for informed consent) and public health as their highest priority, they would have published the data as soon as it became available.

We know the data is detrimental to the jabs, because if it were beneficial, they absolutely would have published. Many hundreds of millions of people have gotten jab according to a distorted risk-reward assessment, because they have been fed misleading and incomplete information.

Also horrible are real experts who have been smeared as misinformationed spreaders and dangers to public health, who have been fired, whose medical licenses have been stolen, who have been deplatformed. They were speaking the Truth the whole time, but what they were punished for speaking against the narrative.

What they said would justifiably lead to vaccine hesitancy. From a public health perspective, COVID vaxx hesitancy is a good thing, because the 'vaccines' are unnecessary, highly toxic and ineffective and even countereffective. However, from a political and True Believer perspective, vaxx hesitancy is a bad thing.

The CDC is absolutely not alone. Also from the article:

"On Thursday, public health officials in Scotland said they would stop releasing data on Covid hospitalizations and deaths by vaccination status because of similar fears that the figures would be misrepresented by anti-vaccine groups."

We already knew the gross exaggeration of 'COVID' deaths where for instance gun shot victims might be labeled as COVID deaths if they happened to have a positive test. See for instance:

Counting Covid - Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson
https://rumble.com/votalj-counting-covid-full-measure-with-sharyl-attkisson.html

CDC director Walensky admits: 75% of COVID deaths were in unwell people with four co-morbidities
https://rumble.com/vshvod-cdc-director-walensky-75-of-covid-deaths-were-in-unwell-people-with-four-co.html

We also already knew how hospitalization statistics on vaxx status were completely unreliable. See for instance:

Dr. Pierre Kory on why vaxx status of U.S. COVID hospitalized patients is PURPOSELY misleading
https://rumble.com/vt9gt3-dr.-pierre-kory-on-why-u.s.-covid-vaxx-status-of-hospitalized-patients-is-p.html

CDC has many times been caught actively lying. See for instance:

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky LIES: Face masks supposed to be 80% effective
https://rumble.com/vosvgt-cdc-director-rochelle-walensky-lies-face-masks-supposed-to-be-80-effective.html

They Sold The Vaccines As If They Stop Transmission
https://rumble.com/vrj6im-they-sold-the-vaccines-as-if-they-stop-transmission.html

By withholding information detrimental to their goals, they have now also admitted to lying by omission.

By misbehaving so badly, CDC and other government agencies have lost an enormous amount of credibility with the population. This is well deserved and correct, because you shouldn't trust people and organizations that have a track record of behaving untrustworthy.

A relevant question is: Why is the CDC choosing this specific moment to admit to their secrecy? Perhaps they know of a whistle blower about to go public? Perhaps they realize the data from around the world are simply too overwhelming? Perhaps officials are trying to remain out of jail? Perhaps they realized the narrative has collapsed and they are trying to save whatever minimal amount of credibility they have left? Perhaps the voter polls are horrible? Perhaps all of the above?

From a public health perspective, it is a severely flawed system if the person who is in charge of the policy (i.e. Fauci) is the same person who distributes the research and other grants. Now experts will not speak up for the fear grounded in reality of losing future grants.

REFERENCES

We the people, demand to see the data! | Robert Malone
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/we-the-people-demand-to-see-the-data

CDC admits it withheld data from the public because they didn't want to create vaccine hesitancy | Steve Kirsch
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/cdc-admits-it-withheld-data-from