When Bots Attack! Catch Up Ratios. - NVAP Presentation - Clip 28 of 32

When code or algorithms are used to manipulate voter counts, a target ratio is established first.

What this causes are strange reporting totals where votes for one candidate 'accelerates' while the other candidate stays flat to hit a goal. Remember Clip 26, normal elections show a consistent ratio after 10% of the vote; manipulated elections show a systematic adjustment towards a target ratio.

Like all fraudulent elections targeting a result, Nebraska precincts counted their votes in prearranged fashion where the precincts with the most Biden votes submitted first and then, in order, the precincts reported with increasing Trump votes until the precinct with the most Trump advantage submitted last. We believe NE counting took so long due to this weighted precinct priority was utilized to achieve the needed Trump / Biden ratio as it took 3 days it took to count 90% of the vote.

"But Trump won the state!" or "If there's cheating, why would anyone give Trump more votes ever?". Remember Nebraska's electoral vote was split 2 / 1, that was the goal. Machines don't think in political goals, but in mathematical goals with registration constraints.

Twice the Secretary of State posted on the Election Results website that the Presidential vote total was low and at the incorrect ratio and then corrected the results. One time this was with a drop to zero votes for both candidates followed by a huge 4% change from one instant to another.

Most up to date presentation can be downloaded at:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/wbhqn2zbd5m2tq1/NebVAPPresentation27Jan22v17.pdf