Premium Only Content
![Canadian data show immune suppression, adverse events during first weeks after first jab](https://1a-1791.com/video/s8/1/P/l/f/9/Plf9c.qR4e-small-Canadian-data-show-immune-s.jpg)
Canadian data show immune suppression, adverse events during first weeks after first jab
Official data from the Canadian province Alberta show a sharp increase in COVID cases, total hospitalizations and total deaths immediately after the first COVID jab. This sharp increase immediately after the jab is strong proof that the jab caused these effects and that they're not mere coincidence. The increase in cases points to immune suppression. The increase in hospitalizations and deaths is likely partly due to immune suppression, but probably mostly due to vaxx adverse events, such as clotting and inflammation.
Since the data are enormously incriminating against the jab, it should be no surprise in this day and age that the Alberta government has removed them. The specific data used to be here (page still works, but the incriminating data have been removed):
https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm
They can still be viewed on the internet archive (scroll down to the bottom of the page for the graphs):
https://web.archive.org/web/20220107094256/https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-outcomes
Joel Smalley wrote about it on his Substack:
Alberta just inadvertently confessed to fiddling the COVID vaccination stats.
https://metatron.substack.com/p/alberta-just-inadvertently-confessed
It has been known for many months that there is immune suppression immediate after the first jab. See for instance this interview where epidemiologists discuss effects that point to immune suppression but are baffled about what's causing this:
COVID-19: Epidemiology of a comorbid Pandemic with International Epidemiologists
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RLHYvc9JJ8
I wrote a comment below that video where I take their words and relate them all to negative vaxx efficacy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RLHYvc9JJ8&lc=Ugxdjk7f2CLGH7JwOWN4AaABAg
Professors Martin Neil, Norman Fenton and others have written an excellent scientific article on the negative efficacy in the period of partial vaccination:
Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination | ResearchGate, Neil et al.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356756711_Latest_statistics_on_England_mortality_data_suggest_systematic_mis-categorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination
They make a great analogy: Someone who is unvaxxed can be compared to a soldier in a fox hole, who is reasonably well protected. A fully vaccinated person is like being in a bunker. However, to get to that bunker, they first have to pass a mine field (partial vaccination), which results in many 'cases', hospitalizations and deaths. An important question become if the extra (and as it turns out, temporary) protection provided by the bunker is worth the extra risk of crossing the mine field.
What is crucial to understand is that the period where the vaccinated are most vulnerable due to the jab, i.e. the first weeks after the first jab, they are considered UNvaccinated.
The COVID jab seem to be effective if you compare to the period of FULL vaccination to the period of PARTIAL vaccination, where the vaccinated is immune suppressed. Would the jabs also be effective if the period after full vaccination were compared to the period before the first jab? Prof. Martin Neil and others think not.
Prof. Norman Fenton made this excellent video:
Analysing Covid vaccine efficiency and safety statistics
https://rumble.com/vpfeop-analysing-covid-vaccine-efficiency-and-safety-statistics.html
Going back to the data from Alberta and looking at COVID cases, hospitalizations and deaths after the second jab, you see a much, much smaller peak immediately after the jab. Then you clearly see a waning effect where cases, hospitalizations and deaths rise significantly the longer after the jab. It is unclear in what proportion vaxx efficacy, new 'variants', changing seasons and others factors play a role.
SOURCE
Episode 252 of The HighWire, aired on January 27th, 2022 (section starts around 31 minutes in video):
https://rumble.com/vteyc8-episode-252-making-history.html
-
3:41:30
I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast
17 hours ago🔥USAID SCANDAL | MA-GAZA | Cartel VIOLENCE Ramps Up🔥
61.7K11 -
7:57:34
SpartakusLIVE
11 hours agoShadow BANNED, but we PARTY ON || Friday Night HYPE
66.7K3 -
2:00:53
Omar Elattar
10 hours agoGRANT CARDONE: “Will I Run for Governor?” | Trump EXPOSED | Bitcoin | $500 Billion Crisis!
46K13 -
46:48
Glenn Greenwald
13 hours agoGlenn Takes Your Questions On Gaza, USAID, and More | SYSTEM UPDATE #403
84K54 -
56:42
Candace Show Podcast
16 hours agoBecoming Brigitte: One Coincidence Too Many | Ep 3
169K197 -
3:14:38
Nerdrotic
17 hours ago $18.59 earnedDisney Plus's Complete FAILURE! Fantastic Four Trailer, MCU Phase 5 Reveal | Friday Night Tights 340
150K46 -
1:00:58
The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
12 hours agoWill RINOs Sink Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Confirmation? | The StoneZONE w/ Roger Stone
41.5K8 -
1:15:19
Edge of Wonder
13 hours agoReal Biochip Implants & Havana Syndrome Exposed: Interview With Jesse Beltran
34.4K13 -
1:00:12
Sarah Westall
13 hours ago10 Billion Trump Lawsuit against CBS 60 Minutes, Ukraine Bio-labs and more w/ John Mark Dougan
49.7K20 -
57:07
LFA TV
1 day agoThe ‘Dictator’ Who Downsizes Government | TRUMPET DAILY 2.7.25 7pm
40K13