Covid1984 Propaganda War: Avengers or Antibody Dependent Enhancement

Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK

Show more

We write as concerned doctors, nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally “smeared” by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out.

1 No attempt to measure the harms of lockdown policies
2 Institutional nature of COVID
3 The exaggerated nature of the threat
4 Active suppression of discussion of early treatment using protocols being successfully deployed elsewhere.
5 Inappropriate and unethical use of behavioural science to generate unwarranted fear.
6 Misunderstanding of the ubiquitous nature of mutations of newly emergent viruses.
7 Misunderstanding of asymptomatic spread and its use to promote public compliance with restrictions.
8 Mass testing of healthy children
9 Vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions.
10 Over-reliance on modeling while ignoring real-world data

Conclusions
The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group – the elderly –
the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children. Moreover your policies have failed in any event to prevent the UK from notching up one of the highest reported death rates from COVID in the world.
https://www.covid19assembly.org/doctors-open-letter/

The Vaccinated Are Worried and Scientists Don’t Have Answers
About 3/4 of the 469 infections were among vaccinated people.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/the-vaccinated-are-worried-and-scientists-don-t-have-answers/ar-AANzgN7

The droplet model

Many ‘health authorities’ have relied on the obsolete ‘droplet model’ of virus transmission. If this model were correct,
face masks would indeed work. But in reality, respiratory droplets – which by definition cannot be inhaled – play almost no
role in virus transmission. Instead, respiratory viruses are transmitted via much smaller aerosols, as well as, possibly, some object surfaces. Face masks don’t work against either of these transmission routes.

Fake science

For decades, studies have shown that face masks don’t work against respiratory virus epidemics. But with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic and increasing political pressure (see below), suddenly studies appeared claiming the opposite. In reality, these studies were a mixture of confounded observational data, unrealistic modelling and lab results,
and outright fraud. The most influential fraudulent
study was a WHO-mandated meta-study published in The Lancet.
https://dailysceptic.org/2021/08/22/face-masks-dont-work-against-respiratory-viruses-so-why-did-so-many-public-authorities-impose-mask-mandates/

1. The spike protein of the virus, that is also being utilized in the vaccines, is damaging to our cells through 3 mechanisms.
The first is that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the ACE2 to send signals to the mitochondria within
the cell which destroys the mitochondria, eventually killing the cell. The second is that when the spike protein binds to our ACE2
receptors it causes the ACE2 to send signals to other cells which increases the amount of pro-inflammatory agents in the blood. This
inflammation damages the tissues. The third way is that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 of the platelets in our blood, it
causes them to clot. Now, the vaccine manufacturers did take steps to make the spike protein more safe. The spike protein has two
parts an S1 subunit and an S2 subunit. The S1 is the part that connects to the ACE2, and the S2 is the part that opens up like a
knife stabbing the membrane and facilitates fusion between the membrane of the cell and the envelope of the virus. With the vaccines,
they modified the S2 subnit so that it could not open up and jab into the cell membranes if it connects with any ACE2 receptors. They
thought this would make the spike protein safe, but this assumption is false and if they had taken the time to do more research before
rushing to production they would have found that out. It may seem like the jabby bit is what damages the cells, but actually the major
damage is caused by the S1 connecting to the ACE2 receptor. Just the S1, by itself without the
S2, causes the ACE2 receptor to start the cell signaling processes that cause the mitochondrial damage, the pro-inflammatory response,
and the blood clots.

Studies on the spike protein:-

How the virus uses the spike protein to enter human cells: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-y

Article on how the Covid19 spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612030406X?via%3Dihub

Japanese article on how the Pfizer vax is associated with brain hemorrhaging
(lending credence to the hypothesis that the spike proteins are crossing the blood brain barrier in some people):
https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40545-021-00326-7

Article on how AstraZeneca is associated with blood clots in the brain (lending more credence to the hypothesis
that the spike proteins are crossing the blood brain barrier in some people): https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840

Article on how the Covid19 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor of our platelets to cause bloodclots:
https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-020-00954-7

Article explaining that blood clots from the spike protein interacting with our platelets are associated with both
COVID-19 infection and vaccination: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003648

Article explains that just the S1 subunit of the spike protein can cause platelets to clot:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.21252960v1

Article with evidence that spike proteins do end up circulating in the blood, when they're not supposed to,
they're supposed to be anchored on the cell membranes: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075

More evidence that spike proteins do not stay on the cell membranes but end up circulating in the blood. This study aims to explain the blood clots caused by the J&J and AstraZeneca adenovector vaccines, they claim that the DNA isn't properly spliced and the spike proteins end up in the blood causing thrombosis when the spikes attach to the ACE2 receptors of the endothelial cells: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1

Article on how the spike protein can cause neurodegeneration: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X2100499X?via%3Dihub

Journal article with evidence that the spike protein by itself can damage cells by binding to ACE2,
causing the cells mitochondria to lose their shape and break apart:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902

Article on how the spike protein in vaccines can cause cell damage via cell signaling:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827936/

Article that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the release of soluble
IL-6R which acts as a extracellular signal which causes inflammation (see the first paper for evidence
that the spike causes the release of IL-6R and see the second paper for an explanation of how soluble
IL-6R causes pro-inflamatory extracellular signaling: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33284859/ And
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491447/

Another article that Spike protein from covid or the vaccine causes inflammation through cell signaling,
this time there is evidence that the spike protein causes senescence (premature aging) signals in the cell which
attracts leukocytes that cause inflammation of the cell:
https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JVI.00794-21

Spike protein by itself causes cell damage by eliciting a pro-inflammatory response:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-021-01332-z

Biodistribution data:-

Pfizer animal testing document that was obtained by Dr. Byram Bridle through a FOI request to the Japanese government which shows the biodistribution of the lipid-nano particles throughout the bodies and organs of the test subjects. This is evidence that the lipid nanoparticles do not stay in the injecton site, but instead travel all throughout the body (go to pg 16/23 for the charts showing biodistribution over the course of 48hrs): https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf

Addendum to the above link. This blog post provides easy to understand information (with pictures) on the make-up of the lipid nanoparticles used in the Covid19 vaccines. It shows that the pharmaceutical companies could have designed them to have targeting ligands on the outside, so that the nanoparticles would only transfect the muscle cells. But instead the vax was designed with PEG polymers on the outside, so that the immune system will not be able to pick them up and put them in the trash. The PEG is what Byram Bridle says is the reason the vaccine travels throughout the body and since it does not have targeting ligands, it can transfect any type of cell: https://www.cas.org/resource/blog/understanding-nanotechnology-covid-19-vaccines

2. Vaccine enhanced immune escape occurs when a poorly designed or weak vaccine helps create new variants. This happens in the exact same way as antibiotic resistance and regular old evolution. In the case of evolution, if you want to make an organism stronger, you put it under evolutionarily unfavorable conditions. This way you kill all the weak examples of the organism and just leave the strong ones. If you want to create heat resistant bacteria, put a petri dish full of the bacteria under moderately high heat that kills 99% of the bacteria. Save the 1% that were able to survive the heat, allow them to grow, and repeat the process over and over again while turning up the heat just a little each time. Do this until you have a population of bacteria that are all extremely heat resistant. The same process occurs with antibiotic resistance.

When you only take half your meds, you kill 99% of the bacteria and you leave only the 1% that were slightly more resistant to the drugs and now they flourish. Before they were a small part of the population but you changed the conditions of their environment so that they have the advantage. You've killed all the normal bacteria that the mutant variants had to compete with so that now the antibiotic resistant bacteria are the alpha strain that have unlimited resources and so surge in population to take over your body. Well, the same thing happens with viruses and vaccines.

If you produce a vaccine that elicits a weak immune response, you are creating an unfavorable environment for the virus.

This will kill the weak 99%, and leave those 1% of mutant virus particles that are not as hindered by the antibodies produced by the vaccine. Whereas before these mutants were only a tiny part of the population and would have been unlikely to transmit on to the next person. Now these mutant virus particles surge in number because they no longer have to compete with the other virus particles and your bodies defenses do not work. They are now highly likely to transmit on to the next person, whereas before they would not have been able to leave the host in which the mutation occured. In terms of creating variants, the current covid vaccines are very bad for three reasons. First, some vaccine manufacturers require two shots and now also boosters because the first shot produces a very weak immune response. Second, the vaccines are very leaky. Even after you have gotten a full immune response from both shots, you can still get and transmit the virus onto others. Well, which virus particles are likely to get passed on by a fully vaccinated person? Clearly they will be those virus particles that have the ability to multiply quickly while avoiding the antibodies produced by the vaccines. This will create very virulent and antibody resistant variants. Watch for these variants in the news as time goes on, we're already seeing things like Delta, Lambda, Eplsion, etc.

As we implement boosters, they will start to come at faster and faster rates, and over time data scientists will start to see timed correlations between the implementation of mass boosters and the emergence of new strains. Third, the vaccines do seem to help reduce the severity of the disease when people are infected (although this may change as new variants emerge).

Why would this be a concern? Well, because of the leakiness of the vaccines we just spoke about. If you have very low symptoms
but you can still get and transmit the virus, then you won't even realize that you're sick and you'll be spreading the virus to even more people as an asymptomatic carrier. So, these vaccines will only increase transmission by creating more and more asymptomatic carriers (although this may not be a bad thing, if everyone in the world gets the virus and everyone is asymptomatic, then there's really no need to care about covid anymore. But this is an unrealistic idealization that is unlikely to occur, some people will still get sick and die or suffer long haul covid). One additional point to address here is the claim that the unvaccinated are causing the emergence of new vaccine resistant variants. Let me be clear, the unvaccinated absolutely have the ability to facilitate the creation of new variants. However, it would require a statistically enormous number of people to get the virus before they could produce a new variant by chance. This is because a mutant virus particle will only make up a small portion of the virus population inside a person's body.

Therefore, it is highly unlikely that this particular particle will be able to spread to a new person. Whereas, in the vaccinated,
their weak immune response specifically selects for the mutant variants. It is highly likely that if a vaccinated person passes on the
virus to another person, the particles they pass on will be those that have the ability to escape from the immune response elicited
by the vaccines. An analogy would be if you did an experiment with 500 room temperature petri dishes filled with bacteria and 500 heated
petri dishes with bacteria, then found a heat resistant variant but didn't know which dish it came from. It would be absurd to think
that the heat resistant strain of bacteria came from the room temperature petri dishes. It would possible, sure, but completely
improbable that the heat resistant strain had suddenly appeared in a room temp petri dish. There would be no reason for it to
become a dominant strain in that environment. Logically, statistically, and evolutionarily, it must have come from the heated petri dishes. This is a very basic and obvious conclusion, but the media and government bureaucrats in lab coats are trying to tell you that the absurd thing is true. They're trying to say that the unvaccinated (the room temperature petri dishes) are where the vaccine resistant strains are coming from.

Vaccine Enhanced Immune Escape:-
Evidence of cov2 immune escape:
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2021/06/30/science.abi7994

Article from 2015 that explains how imperfect vaccination (like the Pfizer and moderna that require at
least two shots to be effective) can create immune escape variants:
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198

Article from 2021 explains that unless vaccination is done quickly, there will be a high probability
of escape mutants:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95025-3

3. There is a potential for ADE, antibody dependent enhancement. This is when the virus mutates so that the
antibodies no longer neutralize the virus but the antibodies still try to attach to it. This can actually help the virus
get into your immune cells because when the virus is covered with antibodies it will draw macrophages to the virus that
will try to eat it. However, when your macrophages come to eat the virus particle that they think has been neutralized,
the virus gets inside them and starts replicating because the antibodies actually didn't neutralize the virus. Your own
antibodies act like a kind of Trojan Horse. Another way that ADE can happen is your own antibodies connect to the
receptors of your cells and actually help the virus get in directly. This was a huge problem with the Dengue vaccine
and we need to do a lot of testing to make sure this isn't a possibility. Clearly with these rushed vaccines we haven't
eliminated this possibility and with the virus mutating, ADE may pop up with a later variant. We must stay vigilant and
keep an eye out for this signal. It will manifest as people with high antibody levels being more likely to get sick and die.

Antibody Dependent Enhancement:-

Journal article from 2005 shows evidence that sars-cov1 vaccine, that also focused on the spike protein,
caused ADE when subjects were challenged with different strain:
https://www.nature.com/articles/news050110-3#ref-CR1

Article explaining how ADE works in Sar-cov1:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8

Article explaining the potential for ADE in Covid19:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8

Another article that speculates on the potential for ADE in Covid19:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32920233/

Article from 2021 explains that there is evidence that covid19 is able to kill macrophages by using antibody
dependent mechanisms:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.22.432407v1

4. There is a potential for an autoimmune response from the vaccines. The vaccines that were developed for Sars-Cov-1
used the spike protein, just like the vaccines for Sars-Cov-2. Unfortunately, those vaccines caused the animals to develop
serious autoimmune disorders and they ended up causing severe organ damage. There is a question about whether these new
vaccines, which also focus on the spike protein, will also cause autoimmune disorders. The problem is that autoimmune
disorders take time to develop and to show up. It may also take a long time before doctors and scientists can link the
sudden rise in autoimmune disorders with these vaccines. Usually, in a vaccine trial you closely monitor your trial group
for years and years. This allows you to identify the signals. With the current program of injecting millions of people,
there will be no clear way to link causation to the vaccines and an increase in autoimmune disorders may just fly under the
radar. We may not know for a very long time or never. Another concern is that because of the way the mRNA vaccines work, they
cause your own cells to present as foreign entities. Your immune system comes over and starts killing your own cells. This has
never been done before in human history. We have no idea if there will be long term consequences for this and whether this will
lead to autoimmune disorders.

Research results of past vaccines for sars-cov1 that used the spike protein:-

Journal article from 2004 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that also focused on the spike protein:
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2004/12/sars-vaccine-linked-liver-damage-ferret-study

Journal article from 2005 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that also focused on the spike protein:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15755610/

Journal article from 2012 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that also focused on the spike protein:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421

Journal article from 2020 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov vaccine (can't figure out if they're talking about cov1 or 2):
https://jvi.asm.org/content/78/22/12672.abstract

Journal article from 2020 explains why immune disorders happen with covid vax, because human and Covid19 proteins are similar:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186

5. The mRNA vaccines are narrowly focused on just the spike protein when they could have been designed to target more proteins. The
Covid19 coronavirus has 4 main proteins. There are 3 on its outside and 1 on the inside. The S-protein, the M-protein, and the E-protein,
are on the outside, while the N-protein is on the inside. When you get a natural infection your body will likely produce antibodies for
all or most of these proteins (depending on the function of your own unique immune system). We knew from studying Sars-Cov-1 that antibodies
to the S-protein and the M-protein are both neutralizing. In fact, they used exactly that knowledge when they designed the current vaccines.
So, they could have tried to make vaccines that utilize the M-protein to avoid the potential for autoimmune disorders discussed above. But
they didn't, they instead focused only on the S-protein. They could have designed the vaccines so that they present both the S-protein and
the M-protein. This would have made the vaccines much more effective and less leaky since any mutated virus particles would have to have
mutated both the S-protein and the M-protein to avoid the antibodies. Whereas, the current vaccines are narrowly focused on just the
S-protein, meaning that the virus only has to mutate the
one protein. It is exponentially harder for an organism to mutate two beneficial traits vs just mutating one beneficial trait. So, these
vaccines are worse than they could have been.

Vaccine efficacy:-

Article explains how vaccine manufacturers have used relative risk reduction to determine that vaccine efficacy is ~90+%, however they
should have used absolute risk reduction which would tell us that the vaccines will only reduce total covid cases by ~1%:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext

Addendum to the above information. This video from 2013 explains the difference between relative and absolute risk reduction in
a very simple way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K30MGvOs5s&ab_channel=TerryShaneyfelt

Article from 2005 explains that antibodies to the S-protein and the M-protein are effective in neutralizing the sars-cov1 virus.
However, the sars-cov2 vaccines only target the S-protein. This is evidence that the vaccine manufacturers could have chosen to
make a superior mrna vax that produced two types of antibodies, but chose to focus narrowly on just the S-protein:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16544518/

Antibodies from vaccines start to drop within 6 months, get ready for endless boosters:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03777-9

6. There are alternative treatments that are effective against Covid19 but they are being suppressed.
Why? Because the vaccines are not approved by the FDA but instead they are emergency use authorized only. The emergency
use authorization can only be granted if "there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives". Well, a growing
body of scientific research is showing that both Ivermectin and Fluvoxamine (among other drugs) are adequate alternatives
for early treatment of Covid19, and both of these drugs have been FDA approved for years. Unfortunately, that means they are
now off patent and no one can make any money off of them. So, for the vaccines to continue to receive their EUA, the existence
of these treatments must be suppressed. We have seen a huge amount of censorship of doctors who have been speaking out about these drugs.

Ivermectin:-

Emergency use authorization for the vaccines cannot be granted if there are effective alternative approved treatments for Covid19.
So, if the pharmaceutical industry is going to make any money off covid, they must suppress the existence of any existing off patent
drugs that may be effective in treating or preventing covid:
https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization

Meta-analysis on the efficacy of Ivermectin in treating Covid19:
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Abstract/9000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial shows that Ivermectin is able to cure covid within 6 days
for most people:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1

More evidence that Ivermectin treatment leads to much faster recovery from Covid19:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.26880

An NIH study reveals that a five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/

Ivermectin stops replication of covid: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011

Ivermectin has anti-viral properties: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888155/

Ivermectin has anti-viral properties against covid: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-020-0336-

Ivermectin binds to Covid19 proteins to block the virus: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996102/

Evidence that Ivermectin can be effective as a prophylaxis, Argentinian frontline healthcare workers were given Ivermectin
as a preventative and zero got sick with covid, whereas 58.2% of the control group who did not take Ivermectin got covid:
https://www.buongiornosuedtirol.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Nota-Journal-of-Biomedical-Research-Safety-and-Efficacy-Iota-Carrageenan-and-Ivermectin.pdf

Ivermectin safe to give 12mg per day for 5 days: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712%2820%2932506-6/fulltext

Ivermectin safely administered 60mg per day for 6 months: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10428194.2020.1786559

38M Records Were Exposed Online—Including Contact-Tracing Info
Misconfigured Power Apps from Microsoft led to more than a thousand web apps accessible to anyone who found them.
More than a thousand web apps mistakenly exposed 38 million records on the open internet, including data from a number of Covid-19
contact tracing platforms, vaccination sign-ups, job application portals, and employee databases. The data included a range
of sensitive information, from people’s phone numbers and home addresses to social security numbers and Covid-19 vaccination status.

The incident affected major companies and organizations, including American Airlines, Ford, the transportation and logistics company
J.B. Hunt, the Maryland Department of Health, the New York City Municipal Transportation Authority, and New York City public schools.
https://www.wired.com/story/microsoft-power-apps-data-exposed/

Is catching Covid now better than more vaccine?
You get a broader immune response after being infected with the virus than vaccination.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210821005235if_/https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58270098
NOW CALLED
Covid: What’s the best way to top up our immunity?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-58270098

OPEN LETTER re VACCINATION MANDATES BY EMPLOYERS FOR EMPLOYEES OR
POTENTIAL EMPLOYEES
This letter is not intended to give, nor should it be taken as giving, any legal advice or medical
advice. Anyone reading this letter who has any concerns or queries should take their own legal
advice and seek any medical assistance as appropriate or necessary.

PRELIMINARY
4. It is an established principle in English Law that individuals with capacity to consent cannot and
should not be compelled to have any medical treatment against their wishes. This is further
explained below in the section dealing with Informed Consent.
5. The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 (section 45E) provides that Regulations made
under certain sections of that Act “may not include provision requiring a person to undergo
medical treatment .... “Medical treatment” includes vaccinations and other prophylactic
treatment”.
6. Furthermore, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe passed Resolution number
2361 of 2021ii on 27 January 2021, which stated that:
6.1 Paragraph 7.3.1 - ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and
that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they
do not wish to do so themselves;
6.2 Paragraph 7.3.2 - ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated,
due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
The United Kingdom remains a member of the Council of Europe and, as a member state, is
expected to adhere to resolutions passed.
7. We argue that the principle of free and informed consent, enshrined in our domestic law, would
make it inequitable and potentially unlawful for any employer to seek to mandate the Covid-19
vaccine.
https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fa5866942937a4d73918723/6124b01a87ab194c9e4d8d57_UKMFA_Open_Letter_Employers_Covid_19_Vaccine_Mandate_Update.pdf

Lisa Shaw: BBC presenter died of AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine complications, coroner concludes
BBC Radio Newcastle worker died three weeks after first dose, inquest hears
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/lisa-shaw-covid-vaccine-death-b1909089.html

“Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers” –
A groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published in the
Lancet, includes alarming findings devastating to the Covid vaccine roll-out, reports the Defender.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccinated-healthcare-workers-threat-unvaccinated-patients-co-workers/

A decade ago, scientists funded by the National Institutes of Health used ferrets to engineer a highly
lethal flu virus. The purpose of the research — known as “gain of function” — was to better understand how viruses
evolve and to help devise medicines to combat the potential disease threats.

It also came with a risk: A laboratory mishap could unleash a devastating pandemic.

The research, conducted in the Netherlands and at the University of Wisconsin, sparked an international controversy
and led to new safeguards for such experiments. But over the past four years, NIH leaders and other U.S. officials have weakened key
aspects of those controls, a Washington Post examination found.

“The risks are absolutely real. They’re not intellectual constructs or hypotheticals,” said David A. Relman, a Stanford
University physician and microbiologist who has advised NIH and other federal agencies on biosecurity. Eventually, he said,
“something that you make or information that you release will result in an accident of some kind.”

However, Collins and Fauci in recent years have helped shape policy changes, directly and through their aides, that undercut
the committee’s authority, according to federal documents, congressional testimony and interviews with dozens of present and former
officials and science experts.

In 2017, a change made under their watch removed the committee’s power to block the projects, recasting the panel as strictly an advisory body.

Another change at that time redefined gain-of-function research, giving NIH leaders greater leeway to approve projects without
referring them to the review committee. Some researchers had complained that far-reaching reviews would slow NIH approvals and scientific progress.

Since then, the experiments have continued to unfold amid secrecy, and HHS, which administers the review committee, has kept its work
confidential: No agendas, meeting minutes or other records of its proceedings are public. Even the names of the federal
officials assigned to serve on the committee, which has
spanned the Obama, Trump and Biden administrations, are kept secret.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-science-in-the-shadows/ar-AANLOZ0

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections

Israeli Study Finds that Natural Immunity Protects Much Better Against Infection than Pfizer Vaccine
What did the researchers find? Of the 257 cases that were detected in the follow-up period, 93% occurred in the vaccinated group, and
only 7% occurred in the previously infected group. And of nine hospitalisations, eight occurred in the vaccinated group, compared to just one
in the previously infected group.
These results indicate that natural immunity confers substantially more protection against infection than vaccine-induced immunity.
They also suggest that natural immunity confers more protection against hospitalisation, although one should be cautious here, as there were
only nine hospitalisations in total.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1

The WHO’s mass vaccination program has been installed in response to a public health emergency of international concern.
As of the early days of the mass vaccination campaigns, at least a few experts have been warning against the catastrophic impact
such a program could have on global and individual health. Mass vaccination in the middle of a pandemic is prone to promoting
selection and adaptation of immune escape variants that are featured by increasing infectiousness and resistance to spike protein
(S)-directed antibodies (Abs), thereby diminishing protection in vaccinees and threatening the unvaccinated. This already explains
why the WHO’s mass vaccination program is not only unable to generate herd immunity (HI) but even leads to substantial erosion of
the population’s immune protective capacity. As the ongoing universal mass vaccination program will soon promote dominant
propagation of highly infectious, neutralization escape mutants (i.e., so-called ‘S Ab-resistant variants’), naturally acquired,
or vaccinal neutralizing Abs, will, indeed, no longer offer any protection to immunized individuals whereas high infectious
pressure will continue to suppress the innate immune defense system of the nonvaccinated. This is to say that every further
increase in vaccine coverage rates will further contribute to forcing the virus into resistance to neutralizing, S-specific
Abs. Increased viral infectivity, combined with evasion from antiviral immunity, will inevitably result in an additional
toll taken on human health and human lives. Immediate action needs, therefore, to be taken in order to dramatically reduce
viral infectivity rates and to prevent selected immune escape variants from rapidly spreading through the entire population,
whether vaccinated or not. This first critical step can only be achieved by calling an immediate halt to the mass vaccination
program and replacing it by widespread use of antiviral chemoprophylactics while dedicating massive public health resources
to scaling early multidrug treaments of Covid-19 disease.
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/c-19-pandemia-quo-vadis-homo-sapiens

⁣2020: A PROPAGANDA MASTERPIECEPERSPECTIVES ON THE PANDEMIC | MARK CRISPIN MILLER
⁣"Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government,” wrote Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda. In
this combined 2-part interview, Mark Crispin Miller, professor of Media Studies at New York University, discusses the propaganda
onslaught that defined the year 2020, when what was dismissed one week is confirmed the next, and why questioning official narratives
"necessarily means taking ‘conspiracy theory’ seriously.
Mark Crispin Miller is Professor of Media, Culture and Communication at New York University. His research interests include
modern propaganda, history and tactics of advertising, American film, and media ownership. He is the author of Boxed In: The
Culture of TV; Seeing Through Movies; Mad Scientists: The Secret History of Modern Propaganda; Spectacle: Operation Desert
Storm and the Triumph of Illusion; and The Bush Dyslexicon.

Moderna’s human HIV vaccine trial to use same tech as Covid jab
Moderna will start human trials for two new HIV vaccines based on technology used in its Covid-19 jab.
Although experts urged caution, any effective vaccine would be a game changer in the global fight against HIV and AIDS.
The US biotech giant will on Thursday begin to scout out 56 healthy people aged between 18 and 50 into its
Phase 1 trial to assess the safety of the vaccines and their ability to generate a broad range of neutralising antibodies against HIV.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/moderna-hiv-vaccine-human-trial-covid-vaccine-b951308.html

Fauci says mandating COVID vaccines for kids to attend school is a 'good idea'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9937865/Fauci-says-8-month-COVID-booster-shot-timeline-flexible-confirms-rollout-begins-Sept-20.html

NIH Research Matters
November 3, 2014
The Structure and Dynamics of HIV Surface Spikes
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/structure-dynamics-hiv-surface-spikes

ADE has been documented to occur through two distinct mechanisms in viral infections: by enhanced antibody-mediated
virus uptake into Fc gamma receptor IIa (FcγRIIa)-expressing phagocytic cells leading to increased viral infection and
replication, or by excessive antibody Fc-mediated effector functions or immune complex formation causing enhanced
inflammation and immunopathology (Fig. 1, Box 1). Both ADE pathways can occur when non-neutralizing antibodies or
antibodies at sub-neutralizing levels bind to viral antigens without blocking or clearing infection.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-00789-5

Leading lockdown sceptic Alex Berenson, a former New York Times science reporter, has been permanently suspended from Twitter following a tweet pointing out some of the limitations of the Covid vaccines last week. The New York Post has more.

Berenson’s account was banned Saturday after “repeated violations” of the rules, a Twitter spokesperson told NBC News in a statement.

Berenson, a one-time New York Times reporter, addressed the suspension in a Saturday night post to his Substack page, blaming his removal from Twitter on a recent post where he was critical of the coronavirus vaccine.

“It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine,” the tweet read.

“Think of it — at best — as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed IN ADVANCE OF ILLNESS.”
https://dailysceptic.org/2021/08/29/former-new-york-times-reporter-and-lockdown-sceptic-alex-berenson-banned-from-twitter/

Two die in Japan after shots from suspended Moderna vaccines - Japan govt
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/two-die-japan-after-shots-suspended-moderna-vaccines-japan-govt-2021-08-28/

JAPANESE INVESTIGATION

NHK, in a report published late on Thursday, cited health ministry sources as saying the contaminant was believed to be a particle that
reacted to magnets and was therefore suspected to be a metal. Moderna has described it as “particulate matter” that did not pose a safety or efficacy issue.

A Japanese health ministry official said the composition of the contaminant has not been confirmed. In a statement, Takeda said it asked
Moderna to investigate the issue and that it would work with the ministry to replace the affected supply.

News of the contaminant could prove a fresh setback for Japan’s inoculation drive as it struggles to persuade many - particularly young
people - to get vaccinated.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210827051407/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-japan-moderna-idUSKBN2FS02D

The chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, Haruo Ozaki, held a press conference this week announcing that the
anti-parasite medicine Ivermectin seems to be effective at stopping COVID-19 and publicly recommending that all doctors
in Japan immediately begin using Ivermectin to treat COVID.

Another prominent Japanese physician, Dr. Kazuhiro Nagao, appeared on Japanese television proposing that COVID-19
should be treated as a Class 5 illness as opposed to its current classification as a Class 2. In Japan, illnesses are categorized
by a classification system; approaching COVID as a Class 5 illness would mean that it could be treated like a seasonal flu.

Dr. Nagao said he has used Ivermectin as an early treatment for over 500 COVID patients with practically a 100% success
rate, and that it should be used nationwide.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-japanese-medical-association-chairman-tells-doctors-to-prescribe-ivermectin-for-covid/

Ivermectin, ‘Wonder drug’ from Japan: the human use perspective
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/

"2019 Novel Coronavirus Vaccine" dated July 23 2019?
Making a vaccine 6 months before the pathogen officially appeared?

He referred to an interesting promotional B-roll video posted by NIH on Jan 30, 2020 about scientists working tirelessly to invent vaccine against “Novel Coronavirus”.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/niaid/49465177603/

This video shows, at about 1:00 minute mark, a woman taking out from a freezer, and placing back, a box with vials labeled “KC 2019 Novel Coronavirus Vaccine”.

What? How can the “2019 Novel Coronavirus Vaccine” be dated 7/23/2019, when “Novel Coronavirus” Sars-Cov-2 was only “discovered” in December 2019?

mRNA Coronavirus Vaccine Candidated Transferred from NIAID to Ralph Baric of UNC on Dec 16 2019:

These scientists seem to have worked very tirelessly PRIOR to the discovery of Sars-Cov-2, but knew a little bit too much about what ended up happening, PRIOR to the discovery. Here we see the Moderna vaccine candidate transferred from NIAID to Ralph Baric of UNC as of Dec 12, 2019:

Ralph Baric is the scientist who experimented with adding HIV genetic sequences to coronaviruses to enhance their function:

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/2019-novel-coronavirus-vaccine-dated

~ClassWar ~AntiWar ~ BDS ~ Covid1984 @hatethemachine

Show less