WATCH Whats Your Favorite Color? Kennedy Grills Biden Judicial Nominee, Finally Gets A Direct Answer

Barbecuing Anne Rachel Traum, President Biden's candidate to be United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Senator John
Kennedy (R-LA) more than once inquired as to whether she suspected adjudicators ought to pardon criminal trouble making for the sake of civil rights.

At the point when Traum denied multiple times to offer an immediate yes or no response, Kennedy at long last asked her what her cherished shading was. Later she replied, "Blue," Kennedy reacted, "Bless your heart. I got one. I'm one for around twenty. I can't decide in favor of you. Not in the event that you're not going to respond to questions. That is to say, that was humiliating."

The trade went this way:

Kennedy: Professor Traum, do you figure we ought to excuse criminal rowdiness for the sake of civil rights?
Traum: Senator, thank you for that inquiry. I perceive that all issues of wrongdoing and all reactions to wrongdoing are essentially strategy issues. So those are significant issues, they're significant for our local area and our country, yet I pass on those strategy issues to strategy creators. Whenever affirmed as an adjudicator, I would not be an approach creator. I would be

Kennedy: I'm not asking your perspective as an adjudicator. I'm asking your perspective personally, as a law educator. I'll specify with every one of you that you're all going to be reasonable and fair-minded, alright? Presently, do you feel that criminal rowdiness and illicit demonstrations ought to be excused for the sake of civil rights?

Traum: Senator, I do trust that all
Criminal approach is on a very basic level an arrangement

Issue.

Kennedy: Yes ma'am yet do you think personally, as an educator, that an illicit demonstration ought to be pardoned for the sake of civil rights?

Traum: Senator, that isn't a view that I have taken in my work and –

Kennedy: That's no? Is your answer no?

Traum: Senator, in my work I have not taken that view and

Kennedy: I'm asking, Professor, what you accept. I think this is truly direct; you're an educator. Do you accept that an illicit demonstration ought to be pardoned for the sake of civil rights? It's
Basic.

Traum: Senator, I accept that we have criminal laws, criminal laws that are made by strategy making bodies like this one –

Kennedy: I got all that. Do you accept that a criminal demonstration ought to be pardoned for the sake of civil rights?

Traum: So, Senator, we have criminal laws as well as we have a criminal interaction by which individuals precede the court to be considered responsible assuming they are accused of a wrongdoing. Also I have huge regard for that interaction.

Kennedy: I do, as well. Do you accept that a criminal activity ought to be pardoned for the sake of civil rights?
Traum: Senator, when individuals precede the court, assuming they are accused of the wrongdoing, that is an exceptionally individualized and truth explicit cycle with all who are involved. What's more I regard that interaction.

Kennedy: I regard the hell out of it. Do you accept that a criminal demonstration ought to be pardoned for the sake of civil rights?

Traum: Senator, I don't believe that I could say concerning a specific case, or as a consensus as for any class of cases –

Kennedy: Do you not have an assessment?

Traum: I don't have a view to share on how a specific sort of case ought to be
Taken care of.

Kennedy: Do you have a view on my

Question?

Traum: I don't have a perspective to share on how a specific case –

Kennedy: I didn't ask that; I can perceive you would rather not share it; I got that part. Do you have a view? I'm not sure why you won't respond to my inquiry. In the event that you're affirmed you will be a government judge. I join my old buddy Senator Durbin in saying the legal disposition is significant, however I believe being impartial is much more significant, and I track down it
Unimaginable that you won't address my inquiry. So I will ask it once more; perhaps it's me. Do you accept that we ought to pardon a criminal demonstration for the sake of civil rights?

Traum: Senator, I share the view that we ought to be unprejudiced yet I additionally share the view that our criminal equity framework and our cycle is exceptionally individualized, so what ought to occur in a specific case involves the interaction and the unmistakable realities all things considered.

Kennedy: Do you accept that a criminal demonstration ought to be excused for the sake of civil rights?
Traum: Any case is consistently exceptionally individualized, in view of the interaction and

The reality –

Kennedy: What's your beloved tone?

Traum: Blue.

Kennedy: Thank you. I got one. I'm one for around twenty. I can't decide in favor of you. Not on the off chance that you're not going to respond to questions. That is to say, that was humiliating