Jones v. Becerra Ban on 18-20 year olds from buying long guns - PI Appeal Oral Argument

3 years ago
24

The 9th circuit has made it impossible to win a facial Second Amendment challenge to a law. And so what does the FPC lawyer say? She says she is only making a facial challenge to the law.

Please donate to Charles Nichols and his fight for Open Carry:
PayPal (Debit/Credit/E-Check) - http://tinyurl.com/PC12031Lawsuit
GoFundMe - https://www.gofundme.com/help-charles-nichols-fight-for-2a
Bitcoin: 1AdtAJfcdBkA777fwtVhmCwSwCKGTFrgGz

Amazon.com Wish List - https://a.co/eCfHOzB
B&H Photo Wish List - https://www.bnh.com/wish/2a15bc2972ae21a62644bdd63e958351/

Website - https://CaliforniaOpenCarry.com
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/CaliforniaRightToCarry/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/CRTC_Nichols

My California Open Carry lawsuit was originally filed under the name Charles Nichols v. Edmund G. Brown Jr., et al, but it has been in Federal court for so long, both Governor Brown and Attorney General Harris have left office and been replaced as defendants. The lawsuit is now stylized as Charles Nichols v. Gavin Newsom et al.

November 30, 2020, marked the beginning of the tenth year of my California Open Carry lawsuit, Charles Nichols v. Gavin Newsom et al.

Jones v. Becerra Ban on 18-21 year olds from buying long guns - PI Appeal Oral Argument

Loading comments...