#BREAKING Newly Appointed AZ Judge Denies Democrat’s Request To Stop November 2020 Election Audit

3 years ago
26

Update: Newly Appointed Arizona Judge Denies Democrat’s Request To Stop The November 2020 Election Audit. The Audit Will Continue.

The new judge assigned to the election audit case in Arizona has denied the temporary restraining order (TRO) requested by Democrat operatives and the audit of the alleged massive election fraud that occurred on Nov 3rd of last year continues.

Judge Martin rejects Plaintiffs’ request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), “Plaintiffs have not met the burden required to obtain a TRO,” reported Arizona Conservatives Take Action.

The Judge goes on to say that should signature verification become part of the Cyber Ninjas’ scope of work, then Plaintiffs may amend their request.

Counsel Desai suggests that Plaintiffs may appeal the Judge’s ruling on the TRO following a review of Cyber Ninjas’ policies and procedures manual.

Previously Reported: The audit in Arizona will continue, for now, after the new judge overseeing the lawsuit that was filed by state Democrats declined to order an injunction.

Judge Danial Martin heard arguments from the Democrats about why they think the audit should be stopped. However, Judge Martin declined to halt the forensic team from continuing on with their work saying he needs time to think about the requested relief from the plaintiffs.

The last-minute lawsuit was filed last week and was seeking to block the audit in Maricopa County just hours before the audit was slated to start. They claimed contractors hired by the Arizona Senate which ordered the election review, were not properly securing ballots and equipment. udge Martin said that the Senate has the authority to audit the more than 2 million ballots and dozens of electronic tabulators but they must balance their work with the constitutional rights of voters. Defendants, including the senate, say that since the process is already underway and had an alleged lack of standing or valid claims means the judge should not stop the audit.

The senate believes everything plaintiffs want either does not apply or is already being done and that there is no need for an injunction at all. The audit – which started on April 23rd is being live streamed on AZaudit.org – is using 9 different cameras. All work is done in front of those cameras and both the ballots and the machines under review are always in view of the cameras.

In addition, media has been allowed into the coliseum to oversee the work. Arizona’s Senate subpoenaed the election documents and machines in January. The following month a Judge ruled the subpoenas were valid and must be obeyed. Another hearing has been scheduled for today.

Loading comments...