Editorial Press confused by issue of adult consent

A conservative government has commissioned an education program to inform school children on adult consent laws. For decades, media has endorsed extreme left wing tribalism breaking down barriers protecting children from adult sexual predations. So that young children are inappropriately discussing gender dysphoria as normal, and explicitly discussing deviant sexual activity as normal. Press reportedly are confused by the new program which seeks to exemplify consent issues. The program uses concrete examples of consent. But the problem is that modern consent mores are silly. And the program shows this.

Two 'friends' each have a milkshake. The girl offers the guy a taste of her milkshake. He tries it and decides he doesn't like it. So the girl, playfully (?) rubs the milkshake in his face. This upsets the guy who hadn't given permission for the milkshake to be rubbed onto his face. The girl does not understand she has 'crossed the consent line' and their friends ostracise the girl to illustrate how nobody ever liked her anyway. This is where modern consent debate is at.

Is it legally possible to give consent to sexual assault? An account of a Lutheran Minister who consented to sex with Julian Assange describes how he disrespected her before and after his 'condom broke.' Media tell me that this is ok behaviour. An account of a booty call by a prominent Rugby League player had the player stretching her vagina digitally until the wall burst, and the player left her bleeding. Why would we put these issues before children who cannot consent to them anyway?

An issue which children face involves parties and illegal behaviour involving drugs and alcohol. Press have reduced the issue to 'peer pressure.' There is opposition to police policing drugs and alcohol, even among youth.

But where the rubber really hits the road is with marriage.

When some Islamic extremists kidnapped over a hundred (276) school girls from Chibok school in Nigeria (14th April 2014), the wife of the then US President, sprang into action with the hashtag #Bringthemhome. Following, 57 of the Christian girls escaped captivity and Nigerian military found some more. Twenty months after, a baby said to be born by a missing school girl was 'given' to Nigeria, 211 remained captured. One child who had escaped reported six had died. In 2015, Amnesty International reported that Boko Harem, believed to be the abductors, had captured over 2000 women and girls for sexual slavery. However, the media reporting has been fuzzy on the issue, saying that Islamic tradition has it that the girls are married to their abductors. What does marriage mean? What does it mean for the consent of the school girls? It is, apparently, racist to question if the marriages are legal. What does it mean for gay marriage? Over seven years since the girls were abducted, Michelle Obama has moved on. Like Eleanor Roosevelt, Michelle knows that there are many ways the oppressed can serve the Democrats. When it comes to voting, the dead merely signal their consent.
http://conservativeweasel.blogspot.com/2021/04/tue-20th-april-2021-current-affairs.html
AUAWN0420221