Laura Loomer’s Big Tech Censorship Case Hits Supreme Court Docket SIGNED ASL Patriot Broadcast
This is narrated from Brietbart’s article written by Allum Bokhari Slight modifications made for signing
The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether or not to hear a case brought by Laura Loomer and Freedom Watch against Google, Apple, Facebook, and Twitter, alleging that the Masters of the Universe have been discriminating on the basis of viewpoint and coordinating with each other in an anticompetitive manner. Loomer ( Republican Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent Florida's 21st Congressional District. She lost in the general election on November 3, 2020.
Loomer is represented by Freedom Watch founder Larry Klayman. The case dates back to 2018, when Loomer and Klayman sued Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Apple over allegations that the platforms violated the First Amendment, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the dismissal of the plaintiff’s First Amendment case last year, but the plaintiffs have now appealed the case to the Supreme Court, which has not yet heard any major case on the issue of tech censorship.
In October last year, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas indicated that he thought legal protections for tech companies are too broad.
According to a report by Axios, Justice Clarence Thomas suggested that Section 230 of the CDA should be narrowed. Section 230 grants broad legal protections to social media companies with regard to content posted by users. In a statement issued in response to a petition for writ of certiorari, Justice Thomas argued that Section 230 declares that social media platforms are not “publishers,” which means that they cannot be held liable for content posted by their users. Some industry analysts have suggested that platforms should be responsible for certain content on their platform, and for the censorship of content from their platforms, an act that makes them a publisher instead of a platform.
Loomer was the only major political candidate in the country who was denied access to Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and PayPal. I looked online and it says
Feb 03 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
Will the US Supreme Court hear the case? We shall see…
Facebook link:
https://www.facebook.com/ASLPB2020
https://www.facebook.com/DeafPatriot
MeWe link: https://mewe.com/join/aslpatriotbroadcast
Gab link: https://gab.com/ASLPatriotBroadcast
Rumble link: https://rumble.com/user/ASLPatriotBroadcast
YouTube link: YOU ARE KIDDING ME. NO MORE CENSTUBE.
**********************************************************
-
47:21
thenationalpulse
3 years agoThe Case for The Supreme Court
7463 -
0:23
KTNV
3 years agoUS Supreme Court won't hear Nevada church's COVID-19 case
3981 -
0:45
Learn The Law
3 years agoTEXAS CASE FILED IN US SUPREME COURT
160 -
2:33
KMTV
4 years agoNebraska Supreme Court hears casino gambling case
1.85K1 -
4:47
One America News Network
3 years agoPa. Unlawful Vote Case Heads To Supreme Court
48.2K11 -
13:19
ThinkStory
21 hours agoRINGS OF POWER Season 2 Ending Explained, Season 3 Theories, & Unanswered Questions!
1252 -
36:19
IsaacButterfield
1 day ago $0.12 earnedFinally Responding...
5072 -
6:32
Dr. Nick Zyrowski
1 day agoOne Meal A Day Fasting - OMAD Benefits
4222 -
1:08
OfficialJadenWilliams
16 hours agoThat one person who films too long
511 -
2:48:55
Price of Reason
14 hours agoDESPERATE Hollywood Blames Customers For Losses, AGAIN! Can Ubisoft Survive Amidst ANOTHER Decline?
34.9K7