Canon 70-200mm f/4l IS II VS f/2.8l IS II USM | Which lens is better?
3 years ago
77.4K
Welcome to this review of the new Canon 70-200mm f vs. the 4L IS II USM vs the Canon 70-200mm f vs. the 2.8L IS II USM lens, tested on the 5D Mark IV and 80D. Enjoy!
+++ PROS +++
1. Great build quality
2. Great sharpness
3. Inbuild image stabilizer
4. Can be used on all Canon DSLR`s since 1985
5. Dust and moisture protection
+++ CONTRAS +++
1. No tripod mount on the f4 version included
2. Weight of the f/2.8 version
3. f/4 version clacks
Loading comments...
-
7:48
thedaniellife
3 years ago $0.45 earnedApple AirPods vs AirPods Pro: Which is better?
791 -
12:30
thedaniellife
3 years ago $0.91 earnedCanon EOS 90D vs EOS RP | Which one should you buy?
8.86K -
7:36
thedaniellife
3 years ago $1.72 earnedCanon RF 85mm f/1.2L USM: The biggest 85mm lens ever!
1.05K3 -
6:22
thedaniellife
3 years ago $0.08 earnedCanon RF 28-70mm f/2 review
1.79K1 -
5:27
JACABRERA1
4 years agoCanon Lens Fix
12 -
2:37
KGTV
3 years agoWhich COVID-19 restrictions work better than others
50 -
0:43
TeamCortex
3 years agoYu-Gi-Oh! Duel Links - Which HERO Type is better? (Evil HERO vs. Elemental HERO)
20 -
5:06
Digital Trends
4 years agoiPhone 12 vs your TV: Which has better picture quality?
53 -
1:21
KNXV
4 years agoContour Medical: Supplements VS food. Which is better?
14 -
6:30
Classic Guitar Rock
4 years ago $0.01 earnedA big amp or a small amp? Which is better?
862