Jim Al-Khalili explains the Slit Experiment

Jim Al-Khalili explains the Slit Experiment

00:08 Underlying problems with Jim Al-Khalili’s ‘explanation’ of Thomas Young’s Double-Slit Experiment
00:50 Mathematical ‘physicists’ dismiss physical interpretations as petty philosophy. So why did they attempt to provide a physical interpretation in the first place?
03:35 Mathematical ‘physicists’ simulate invisible phenomena with particles, but particles cannot explain a single one. Popperian falsifiability demands a rejection of the Particle Hypothesis of Quantum Mechanics.
07:10 A theory is not a description. A theory is an explanation. Mathematical ‘physics’ has no explanations whatsoever for invisible phenomena. Math can only describe.
10:20 The general public is wholly unaware that the mathemagicians are entirely ignorant of the invisible mechanisms Mother Nature uses to do her daily work.
12:25 Technology is not proof of a theory (explanation of a mechanism).
15:55 Al-Khalili quotes Feynman: impossible to explain the Slit Experiment under Quantum Mechanics.
20:20 Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle (which Feynman and Al-Khalili claim underlies the foundations of Quantum Mechanics) is total poppycock!
22:55 Feynman asks (rhetorically): How does the Slit Experiment work? He replies that mathematicians have no clue whatsoever. You must simply work outside logic and rationality.
24:15 Description of the Double-Slit Experiment.
2 Simulating the Slit Experiment with particles.
25:20 Why particles fail to simulate the Slit Experiment: the idiotic debate between Einstein and Bohr at the 1927 Solvay Conference.
26:45 We replace the double slits with a needle: Newton’s Hair Experiment (2nd experiment carried out by Thomas Young in 1801). Particles are debunked.
28:05 Bill Gaede’s Needle Experiment: particles have no chance to explain fringes.
30:20 Mathematicians such as Al-Khalili never learned that there is a third type of wave. 31:30 Difference between Quantum Mechanics and the Rope Hypothesis
Is light mediated by one-way particles / waves or by a two-way rope?
33:10 Explaining the Slit Experiment
34:50 Constructive & Destructive Interference
37:10 Dynamic version of constructive and destructive interference
40:40 Entanglement explained in 5 seconds. Did Akira Tonomura and Alain Aspect et al. handle one electron/photon at a time?
45:05 Arthur Eddington’s inference in 1919 that light curves around the Sun is bunk! 5
47:10 Summary and closing arguments

#bgaede #rationalscience #RopeHypothesis

Free illustrated book on the Rope Model of Light and Gravity
Download it at: https://www.ropehypothesis.com/book

Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Bill-Gaede

Academia: https://independent.academia.edu/BillGaede

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/RationalSci