Clarity Act - Alberta Independence or the rhetoric of the fifty first state

Alberta Independence or the rhetoric of the fifty first state being propagated on Social engineering Media

What is actually going on?

First we will discuss what is being spewed out regarding Alberta to leave confederation!

They use the Clarity Act as the mechanism to legally gain Alberta’s Independence!
Let’s dig deep into the foundation of the Clarity Act!

When groups, organizations, separation parties or independence parties mention the Clarity Act will be the mechanism.

These groups mention referendums to accomplish their goals for an Independent free sovereign Nation
Here we will examine the Clarity Act in full disclosure to clear up much of the disinformation and uncover the weasel words of the Clarity Act.

The Importance is so you will have a clearer understanding before they make you believe something which is not true, causing you to make a wrong decision.

We will also discuss the referendum mentioned in the Clarity Act!

Numerous groups will mention the MAJIC words on how Alberta to become an Independent Free Sovereign Nation.

Let’s get started

The Clarity Act, was passed in 2000, sets out the requirements for a province to separate from Canada.

According to the Act, there is no unilateral right for a province to secede from Canada under the Constitution Act 1982.

One:
The Act was primarily created in response to the Quebec independence movement.

.

Two
The key requirement is that the House of Commons must determine whether there has been a "clear expression of a will by a clear majority of that province" to separate from the Canada Corporation

Now what is a clear majority in the Clarity Act?

The Clarity Act doesn't specify a precise percentage for a "clear majority" in the context of provincial secession.

Instead, it leaves the determination of what constitutes a "clear majority" to the House of Commons.

In practice, the meaning of "clear majority" would likely be subject to interpretation and debate.
What is interpretation in simple words?

Interpretation is the act of explaining, reframing, or otherwise showing your own understanding of something.

A person who translates one language into another is called an interpreter because they are explaining what a person is saying to someone who doesn't understand.

It's possible that different people might have different views on what percentage constitutes a "clear majority."

That being said, there have been some discussions and proposals around this topic:

* In 1999, the Quebec Premier at the time, Lucien Bouchard, suggested that a "clear majority" would mean a minimum of fifty percent plus one vote in a provincial referendum on secession.

* In 2000, the Calgary Declaration, a statement signed by nine Canadian premiers, proposed that a "clear majority" would require a minimum of sixty percent support in a provincial referendum on secession.

* Some scholars and experts have suggested that a "clear majority" might require an even higher threshold, such as sixty six point six percent or two-thirds or even seventy five percent support in a provincial referendum on secession.

Ultimately, the determination of what constitutes a "clear majority" would depend on the specific circumstances of a provincial secession attempt and would likely involve intense political and legal debates.

It's worth noting that the Clarity Act is intentionally vague on this point, leaving room for political negotiation and compromise.

The Act's authors likely wanted to avoid setting a specific percentage threshold, which could be seen as too rigid or inflexible.

Instead, they opted for a more nuanced approach, acknowledging that the concept of a "clear majority" can be context-dependent and subject to interpretation.

Three

This requirement is based on the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in the Québec Secession Reference case

Four

In essence, the Clarity Act ensures that any secession attempt by a province must be clear, specific, and supported by a significant majority of the province's population

Six

This Act is crucial in understanding the legal framework for provincial secession from Canada

Five
Sources in description of this video

Has and of these groups or organizations mentioned the seven provinces in the Clarity Act!

In Layman's terms the clarity act state seven provinces Must agree!
The Clarity Act's seven provinces agreement requirement refers to the condition that at least seven provinces, representing at least fifty percent of the Canadian population, must endorse any constitutional change related to provincial secession

Six
This requirement is part of the Clarity Act, which was created in response to the 1995 Quebec referendum and ongoing independence movement

Seven
In the context of provincial secession, the Act requires the House of Commons to determine whether there has been a "clear expression of a will by a clear majority of that province" to separate from Canada

Eight
This means that if a province wants to leave Canada Corporation, at least seven provinces with fifty percent of the population must agree to the change

__________________

Let’s investigate amendments to the Constitutional Act 1982

The question of provincial secession in Canada!

It's a complex and debated topic.

While there is no explicit provision in the Constitution Act of 1982 that allows a province to unilaterally secede from Canada Corporation, there are some important considerations to keep in mind.

In 1998, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled in the Reference regarding Secession of Quebec case that a province cannot unilaterally secede from Canada Corporation.

The Court stated that secession would require a constitutional amendment, which would need to be negotiated and agreed upon by the province, the federal government, and other provinces.

However, the Court also stated that if a province were to hold a clear referendum on secession, the federal government would have a duty to negotiate the terms of secession in good faith.

Here is the Red Flag no one is mentioning - Good faith –

Has Canada Corporation ever acted in Good faith!
The covid 19 scam must be a clear in everyone’s mind how Canada corporation acted in good faith!

If anyone thinks Canada Corporation is going to allow a Province to leave lawfully under their control you are being mislead or deceived!

This led to the development of the Clarity Act in 2000, which sets out the rules for future referendum questions and the process for negotiating secession.

So, it's clear that secession would require a complex and likely contentious process involving multiple stakeholders

Who are the Stakeholders?

The stakeholders are the Monarch of Canada, currently King Charles III and his heirs.
As the head of the Commonwealth, the Monarch plays a significant role in Canada's constitutional monarchy.

In Canada's system of governance, the King or Queen (represented by the Governor General) serves as the symbol of Canadian sovereignty and unity.

The Monarch's roles and responsibilities include:

One Symbolic Head of State: The King represents Canada internationally and embodies the country's history, traditions, and values.

Two Head of the Commonwealth:
As the head of the Commonwealth, the King promotes cooperation and friendship among its 54 member states.

Three Represented by the Governor General:
In Canada, the Governor General represents the Monarch and carries out ceremonial and constitutional duties, such as dissolving Parliament and issuing the summons to form a government.

While the Monarch is a significant stakeholder in Canada, the actual governance of the country is carried out by the Prime Minister, the Cabinet, and the Parliament of Canada.

This system is often referred to as a "constitutional monarchy" or a "parliamentary democracy."

Here is the Red Flag most people do not comprehend

The British North American Act of eighteen sixty seven was renamed to the Constitutional Act of nineteen eighty two and only ratified by the de-facto Queen Elizabeth the second.

This Now has been passed on to her heirs King Charles the Third
-----------------------------
In this context, the King's role is NOT ceremonial and symbolic,

The King is the actual decision-making power and uses the Governor General and Lieutenant governors in each Province to carry out his demands.

The representatives all swear an oath the King and his heirs

NOT to the people.

The Canadian Parliament is created by the King and the governor general

Have you heard of Prorogation

Prorogation is a complex and often controversial topic in Canadian politics.

To clarify, prorogation refers to the power of the Governor General (or the King, in certain circumstances) to suspend Parliament

This effectively ends the current parliamentary session, thereby thwarting any ongoing legislative business or potential votes of non-confidence.

In Canada, prorogation has been used in various contexts, including:

1. Routine prorogation: At the end of a parliamentary session, the Governor General typically prorogues Parliament to signal the start of a new session, accompanied by a Speech from the Throne outlining the government's legislative agenda.

2. Political strategy: Governments might request prorogation to avoid defeat on a confidence vote, buy time to regroup, or delay debates on contentious issues.

3. Crisis management: In times of national crisis or constitutional uncertainty, prorogation can be used to prevent instability or imminent defeat of the government.

However, prorogation can also be seen as a controversial tool, as it can:

1. Delay democratic process: Prorogation can delay or thwart the will of Parliament, undermining the democratic process and accountability.

2. Avoid accountability: Governments might use prorogation to evade scrutiny, hide from accountability, or sidestep difficult debates.

3. Undermine confidence: Repeated or unjustified prorogation can erode trust in the government and the institution of Parliament itself.

So if you actually believe the Clarity Act or any other Act will ever give you remedy you are deceived!
Now to an Actual Solution to this serious escalating or threatening situation we face under this current system.

Simple steps we all may work together on
Educate people the facts that Canada constitutional act and the charter were never ratified. Which is a fact and been deliberately hidden from them
The provinces never federated to Canada and these are facts.

Education to as many people as you know that the people have a lawful Right to create a constitution for us we the people

This is the first step forward to restore self governance, accountability and Prosperity to all.

What is the idea that people have a right to govern themselves?

Self-determination refers to the idea that individuals and groups have the right to govern themselves, to make decisions about their own lives and to determine their own future and political status without outside interference.

The people have a lawful right to create a constitution that removes the de-facto Corporation of Canada
--------------------------------
It is time for us to make the rules and Stop worshiping Kings Prime Ministers, MP’s MLA’s as they have usurped their authority unlawfully
It is time for constitutional Committee meetings at ever local area to have this accomplished.

The sooner the better for every man, women to restore their Unalienable Rights that have been denied by these tyrants masquerading as a legit government

When they are NOT our government

Stop referring to them as your government – they never have been your government
It’s all an illusion and this must be corrected NOW – not later

This is an always has been the ONLY solution – start to educate this Powerful Information
The Real Power is you realizing No other man or woman has any authority over you!

Voting in their system is you giving up your unalienable rights to be enslaved!

I do not consent to be ruled Over by tyrants NO more.

Time for us to restore self governance at the individual!

Information is in the description of the video

Please like, follow and share
Thank you

Sources for clarity act

An Act to give effect to the requirement for clarity as set out in the ...
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca

Clarity Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org

A Long and Uncertain Road to Alberta Independence
www.constitutionalstudies.ca

The Clarity Act (Bill C-20) - The Canadian Encyclopedia
www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca

Provinces Leaving Canada Part II: The Clarity Act - LawNow Magazine
www.lawnow.org

prb 99-42e background to the introduction of bill c-20, the clarity bill
publications.gc.ca