New "COVID Dossier" Reveals All

"The COVID Dossier" is a record of what Lerman and Latypova describe as the military and intelligence coordination of the global COVID-19 event, spanning from early 2020 to the present. Authored by Debbie Lerman, a retired science writer with a focus on unraveling complex narratives, and Sasha Latypova, a former pharmaceutical R&D executive with deep insight into drug development processes, the dossier challenges the conventional understanding of the pandemic response. It argues that the measures implemented--lockdowns, vaccine rollouts, and emergency declarations--were rooted in national security and biodefense frameworks rather than traditional public health strategies. Their work aims to serve as a resource for journalists, researchers, and the public to reconsider the official narrative surrounding the pandemic.

Breakdown of Their Findings

1. Military and Intelligence Coordination Across Countries

Claim: The COVID-19 response was orchestrated by military and intelligence agencies rather than public health officials.
Evidence: The dossier documents involvement of national security entities in multiple countries, including the US, UK, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Germany, and Italy. In the US, for instance, the National Security Council (NSC) and Department of Defense (DoD) played significant roles early on, with NSC meetings on COVID classified as early as mid-January 2020--before any substantial outbreak was evident.

Implication: This suggests a top-down, militarized approach, with public health agencies taking a backseat to security apparatuses.

2. Emergency Declarations Under CBRN Frameworks

Claim: The response was initiated under legal frameworks designed for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons attacks, not public health emergencies.

Evidence: On February 4, 2020, the US Secretary of Health and Human Services issued two CBRN-related declarations--the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and the PREP Act--despite fewer than a dozen confirmed cases in the US and under 500 deaths globally. These declarations enabled extraordinary measures under biodefense protocols.

Implication: The timing and nature of these declarations indicate that the pandemic was framed as a national security threat, allowing rapid deployment of countermeasures with minimal oversight.

3. Global Coordination of the Response

Claim: The COVID-19 response was a globally synchronized operation, not a series of independent national efforts.

Evidence: Similar measures--lockdowns, mask mandates, and vaccine rollouts--were implemented simultaneously across diverse countries, regardless of local epidemiological conditions. The dossier points to military alliances like NATO as potential coordinators of this uniformity.

Implication: This suggests a centralized, possibly pre-planned strategy, treating the pandemic as a bioweapons scenario rather than a natural health crisis.

4. Vaccine Development as Biodefense Countermeasures

Claim: COVID-19 vaccines were developed and distributed as "medical countermeasures" under biodefense protocols, not as standard pharmaceuticals.
Evidence: The dossier highlights that vaccines were classified as "prototypes," with their manufacturing labeled a "demonstration," exempting them from rigorous safety and efficacy testing typically required by regulatory bodies like the FDA. Latypova, leveraging her pharmaceutical expertise, argues that this bypassing of norms was intentional and facilitated by CBRN emergency laws.

Implication: This framework prioritized speed and deployment over traditional safety standards, aligning with a military countermeasure strategy rather than public health goals.

5. Public Health Subordinated to National Security

Claim: The COVID-19 response diverged from established public health principles, favoring national security objectives.

Evidence: Measures like lockdowns and social distancing are framed as military-style countermeasures rather than evidence-based health interventions.

Agencies like the NSC, DoD, and FEMA in the US--and their equivalents elsewhere--took leading roles, overshadowing public health authorities.

Implication: The dossier posits that the response was designed to address a perceived bioweapons threat, not to optimize population health outcomes.

6. Control of Information and Narrative

Claim: Military and intelligence agencies shaped the public narrative, suppressing dissent and promoting specific messaging.

Evidence: In the US, the NSC reportedly controlled pandemic messaging by February 27, 2020, suggesting early information management. The dossier may also document censorship efforts targeting alternative viewpoints on the virus and vaccines.

Implication: This indicates a concerted effort to maintain a unified narrative consistent with a national security operation.

Authors' Background and Perspective

Debbie Lerman: As a Brownstone Institute Fellow and former science writer, Lerman brings an analytical lens to the legal and institutional aspects of the pandemic response, focusing on the role of national security agencies.

Sasha Latypova: With her extensive experience in pharmaceutical R&D, Latypova scrutinizes the irregularities in vaccine development and distribution, arguing that biodefense protocols undermined public safety.

Together, their expertise lends credibility to the dossier's claims, combining investigative research with insider knowledge of regulatory and scientific processes.

Conclusion

"The COVID Dossier" by Debbie Lerman and Sasha Latypova presents a provocative argument: the global COVID-19 response was a military and intelligence operation disguised as a public health effort. Through detailed documentation of agency involvement, emergency declarations, global coordination, and biodefense-driven vaccine rollouts, the authors challenge readers to rethink the pandemic's management. While controversial, their findings underscore a narrative of centralized control and national security priorities, offering a stark contrast to the widely accepted public health framing of the crisis.

The COVID Dossier
https://substack.com/home/post/p-156283061

COVID was a Military-led PSYOP
https://rumble.com/v1s1mgo-emergency-freedom-movement-briefing.html