Exit the United Nations Now!

United Nations Agencies and programs are contrary to US interests, the Constitution and US sovereignty. Eighty years of participation and countless wasted dollars have demonstrated their destructive impact on every aspect of our Nation’s life.

The Executive Order of February 4, 2025, requiring the Secretary of State and the United Nations Ambassador to review and report to the President on international bodies “to determine which organizations, conventions, and treaties are contrary to the interests of the United States and whether such organizations, conventions, or treaties can be reformed”, I strongly believe that the UN and its subsidiary organizations are antithetical to the interests of the United States, violating the inalienable rights of citizens of the United States. There is no meaningful way to reform, reorganize or reconstitute an avowedly Marxist system focused on instituting a One World Government hegemony, thereby subjugating the sovereignty and principles of the United States. Withdrawing this country is the only logical action to take.

Consider the following:
Although the UN consistently presents itself as merely advisory, benign and helpful, the sinister reality is a rapidly evolving implementation of comprehensive world domination. This is clearly evidenced by its own assertions and directives (see, for example, Pact for the Future, Declaration on Future Generations, United Nations 2.0, Agenda 2030/Sustainable Development Goals, Global Digital Compact, UNDRIP, 15 minute cities, WHO and One Health, Pandemic Preparedness and Response Protocol, Comprehensive Sexuality Education, Gender Ideology, etc., etc.)

Indeed, the UN foundational Universal Declaration of Human Rights itself stands in direct opposition to the very existence of our inalienable rights and a representative form of government — see particularly Article 29:

“These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”

The UN and the World Economic Forum (WEF) have a long-standing partnership to accelerate the implementation of Agenda 2030 for Sustainable [sic] Development, which includes Agenda 2030’s vision of climate change [sic], health [sic], digital cooperation [sic], gender equality [sic], education [sic], and skills [sic]. The fundamental principle upon which this comprehensive reorganization of society is based is naked Marxism. According to both the UN and the WEF, human rights are a useless relic of the past, most of the population of the world is “unnecessary”, and easily replaced by machines. Clearly this is incompatible with the interests of the people of the United States who have been given no opportunity to oppose the UN destruction of their society and the alteration of their genetics.

Agenda 2030 is a comprehensive plan to reshape and/or destroy every facet of human society and, indeed, the genetic integrity of humanity itself, implementing total world domination, control, and ownership. Through specialized corporations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), International Labor Organization (ILO), World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), no aspect of private, political or community life remains intact once Agenda 2030 is implemented.

The UN Declaration of Human Rights (UNDHR) is incompatible with our Constitutional Rights. The UNDHR sets forth ‘rights’ or ‘freedoms’ and allows restrictions on the same, ‘as provided by law’ – there are no inalienable rights under the UN system, contrary to the provisions of the US Constitution, such as Amendment One, which prohibits any law restricting freedoms of speech, religion, petition and assembly.

The US Senate ‘Consent’ to the UN Charter (1945), although deceptively presented as a Treaty, actually binds the US to nothing. The US relationship with the UN is unconstitutional and thus ultra vires. The President may, by unilateral act, withdraw from the UN. The UN Charter is not a treaty binding the United States as part of the Supreme Law of the Land.

The Order
Sec. 3. Funding. (a) Executive departments and agencies shall not use any funds for a contribution, grant, or other payment to UNRWA, consistent with section 301 of title III, division G, of Public Law 118-47 (March 23, 2024). The Secretary shall withdraw the determination previously made under section 7048(c)(1) of title VII, division F, of Public Law 118-47. Accordingly, of the funds appropriated for a contribution to the UN Regular Budget under the heading “Contributions to International Organizations” of Public Law 118-47, as most recently continued by Public Law 118-158 (December 21, 2024), the Secretary shall withhold the United States proportionate share of the total annual amount of UN Regular Budget funding for the UNHRC, consistent with section 7048(c) of title VII, division F, of Public Law 118-47.

(b) Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary, in consultation with the UN Ambassador, shall conduct a review of all international intergovernmental organizations of which the United States is a member and provides any type of funding or other support, and all conventions and treaties to which the United States is a party, to determine which organizations, conventions, and treaties are contrary to the interests of the United States and whether such organizations, conventions, or treaties can be reformed. Upon the conclusion of that review, the Secretary shall report the findings to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, and provide recommendations as to whether the United States should withdraw from any such organizations, conventions, or treaties.
WE MUST ACT NOW!!! PreventGenocide2030.org