Occult Theocrasy - Part I - Ch 33 - pg297

Occult Theocrasy - Part I - Ch 33 - pg297

This video explores chapter 33 of "Occult Theocrasy," focusing on Freemasonry's structure and interrelations with various secret societies. It discusses the perception of Freemasonry as a charitable organization while revealing its intricate connections to other rites and organizations not officially recognized by British Masonry. Noteworthy figures and their roles within multiple Masonic offices are highlighted, emphasizing the intricate web that exists within these societies.

Key Points:

Freemasonry's Charitable Image
Freemasonry is presented as a noble organization emphasizing brotherhood and charity, appealing to good men who view the 'G' in the Pentagon as representing God. However, this idealistic perception masks the recruitment strategies of higher degrees and their involvement with various secret societies.

Interconnections of Masonic Organizations
The chapter reveals that British Freemasons are often taught to disregard other rites as irregular, yet significant historical figures like William WN Westcott were actively involved in several other Masonic organizations while holding prominent positions, highlighting the interconnected nature of these groups.

Historical Figures and Their Roles
The video discusses notable Masons, such as Theodore Roose and John Yker, detailing their multiple prestigious titles within various Masonic rites. It underscores how these figures contributed to the interchanging dynamics between different Masonic frameworks and affiliations.

The Complexity of Masonic Hierarchy
A detailed examination of how ranks within Freemasonry overlap and interact across different rites is presented. This examination is grounded in historical documents and affiliations that show how a singular Mason may hold multiple titles and roles in various organizations, thus complicating the narrative of exclusivity.

Call for Historical Understanding
The narrative critiques reliance on outdated perceptions of Masonic isolation, urging for a base of future understanding built on historical knowledge rather than misconceptions about the freemason structures and their historical context.