This Supports that Taxes are Not Mandatory: Brady Quiring's Landmark Court Decision

This Supports that Taxes are Not Mandatory: Brady Quiring's Landmark Court Decision

• Jurisdiction and Consent: The core of Brady Quiring's approach is that jurisdiction and consent are key. By not explicitly accepting the public identity (surname) as his own, he avoids the jurisdiction of the court and the legal obligations tied to that identity, including taxes.

• Trust and Ownership: The legal identity and the associated obligations, such as taxes, are held in trust by the Crown. If an individual does not claim ownership of that identity (and therefore the obligations), the government cannot enforce those obligations, making taxes effectively voluntary for those who understand and apply this logic.

• Successful Legal Strategy: Brady's success in having cases dismissed by applying this logic suggests that the system recognizes the validity of these arguments when properly presented. This success indicates that the enforcement of taxes and other legal obligations may rely more on individuals' acceptance of certain roles and identities than on absolute legal mandates.

This transcript illustrates how Brady strategically navigates the legal system by understanding the distinction between public and private identities, challenging the jurisdiction, and asserting his rights, which aligns with the concept that taxes are not inherently mandatory.