Premium Only Content
REPRISALS against French women after liberation in 1944
🔥PREVIEW ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS
www.Patreon.com/Military1945
Episode 267
Be sure to give this video a THUMBS UP! Best way to support the channel!
SUBSCRIBE to M1945
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN2UQVe6Xaqz5rLFaWq8-mw?sub_confirmation=1
This footage was taken in the French city of Cherbourg in 1944 just after its liberation. It shows some of the reprisals taken against French women who were seen to have collaborated with the enemy. At the end I’ve added some related color German footage taken in occupied France in 1940, so stick around it’s worth it, I promise.
In the aftermath of World War II, particularly following the liberation of France in 1944, the atmosphere was charged with anger, and many felt betrayed by those who had sided with the occupiers. As a result there were widespread reprisals against such individuals. This phenomenon was particularly visible in towns such as Cherbourg, which saw significant collaboration during the German occupation.
Cherbourg, strategically located in Normandy was a key port city and a strategic military location. Its position made it important for both the German military and Allied forces which heightened the stakes of collaboration. The German occupation authorities ran large propaganda campaigns aiming to encourage economic cooperation and feelings of friendship. But the policy towards their soldiers regarding fraternization with French civilians was complex and often contradictory.
Initially, following the fall of France in 1940, there was some encouragement for German soldiers to interact with the local population in order to foster a sense of cooperation and to maintain order. However, this was highly contextual and varied over time and by location.
As the occupation progressed, the official policy became more restrictive, reflecting concerns about the implications of fraternization. The German command feared that close relationships between soldiers and French civilians could undermine morale among troops, lead to mixed relationships that could cause complications, or even foster resistance against the occupation.
With the occupiers having disrupted the traditional economic structures, some individuals found opportunities to profit through black market activities, provisioning German troops, or gaining employment within the occupation administration.
This scene shows the rounding up of French civil servants who had been working for the German occupational regime.
Often those who had more before the occupation were more willing to work within the new German system because they had more to lose and more to gain. One example was the introduced system of Aryianization which involved the systematic dispossession of Jewish individuals and the transfer of their property and businesses to non-Jewish ownership. French civilians who were willing to cooperate with the authorities could gain possession of such assets. During the occupation approximately 90,000 French jews were killed which was made possible by the cooperation of French nationals.
On an individual level, willing women were able to gained access to a more secure and comfortable lifestyle if they managed to pair up with the right “protector”. It was common for German soldiers to have a wives back home in Germany and French mistresses. Many women who had been accused of collaborating with the enemy, often referred to as "collabos,” faced brutal treatment from the local populace, fueled by a collective desire for retribution and justice which led to public humiliation, violence, and even execution in some cases. These acts were not only physical but also a means of symbolically cleansing the community from the stain of collaboration.
Of course taking part in such public reprisals was a way for individuals to point their finger at another, and thus claim themselves to be innocent. Those of weak moral character were more susceptible to collaborate with the enemy and also to be those involved in such public reprisals.
The phenomenon of reprisals against collaborationists extended beyond physical violence and shaming. Some faced formal judicial processes where they could be sentenced for their actions during the occupation. Many faced social ostracism, and found it difficult to reintegrate into their communities.
-
58:24
Uncommon Sense In Current Times
19 hours agoUnbreakable: How Jeff Younger Stands Firm Against Courts, Government, and Personal Attacks
1.71K -
1:56:01
Nina Infinity
22 hours agoGOOD NEWS - Infinite Hope # 219 | Birthday Stream with Guests!
12.7K -
15:08
Silver Dragons
1 day agoWhat Will the TRUMP Tariffs Will Do to Silver & Gold Price?
16K6 -
19:37
Neil McCoy-Ward
7 hours ago🚨 The CRAZIEST Moments From Davos 2025... ! 🔥
14.4K5 -
2:57:43
Benny Johnson
6 hours ago🚨BREAKING: Trump Live Right Now in North Carolina Disaster Area! Real Leader | Trump Visiting LA
152K155 -
58:14
Winston Marshall
5 hours agoHollywood Insider SPEAKS OUT On Woke Hollywood & Trump’s A-List Allies | Andrew Klavan
51.9K23 -
44:59
Game On!
5 hours ago $1.91 earnedTom Brady's BIG GAMBLE! Pete Carroll new head coach of the Raiders! | Crick's Corner
30.5K -
17:26
Tactical Advisor
6 hours agoEverything New From Primary Arms 2025
28.2K3 -
1:55:32
The Charlie Kirk Show
5 hours agoThe Greatest Pro-Life President + AMA | Gingrich | 1.24.2025
113K28 -
2:56:04
The Dana Show with Dana Loesch
5 hours agoThe Dana Show LIVE From SHOT Show | Day 3
46.9K2