Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution

Zoom 7 PM Alberta time daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09
The Hudson Bay Company Charter is the true enemy and continues this present day hidden

Show more

To comprehend how and why all the men and women have No Property will be educated in this important video. Please share so we may all become informed to rectify these injustice. Thank You

Knowledge is Power - Dallas hills

We will start here and go deep into the past to connect all the dots to where this all started.
From their we will be able to end the illusion once and for all.

Lets get started

Pierre- Andre Pare believes that owning a house and owning a car are privileges in Quebec and that the State should be able to put an end to these..
"All is privilege conceded by the State: your car, your house, your profession, in short your life; and what the state gives (you), it can take back (from you) if you’re not a docile taxpayer." Pierre-André Paré, former Deputy Minister at the Quebec Department of Revenue before a commission of the National Assembly of Quebec. Published byLe Devoir, April 6, 1996.)
[Council Order 863-96, July 10, 1996

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

"The discretion of a judge is said to be the law of tyrants. It is always unknown. It is different in different men. It is casual and depends upon constitution, temper and passion. In the best, it is sometimes caprice. In the worst, it is every vice, folly and passion to which human nature is liable." Justice Charles Pratt, Lord Camden (1714-1794)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ACT ONE (THE ROYAL CHARTER)

Smoke and mirrors and Rupert's Land Act appears In 1670, King Charles II of England formed a charter for a corporation, called "The Governor and Company Of Adventurers of England Trading in the Hudson Bay". It would later be called the Hudson Bay Company or HBC.
The charter comprised 40% of what is now the Canadian landmass, and included much of what is currently the U.S. states of Minnesota and North Dakota.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Charles II King of England, (Scotland, France, and Ireland and Defender of the Faith)

The Royal Charter for incorporating The Hudson's Bay Company, A.D. 1670.

King Charles II signed the Hudson Bay Charter over to his German cousin, Prince Rupert of the Rhine, and seventeen of Rupert's associates known collectively as "The Company of Adventurers".

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The deed was in the name of the monarch, fully and forever, for all heirs in perpetual succession. It can never be revoked.

Rupert held the rights to "sole trade and commerce" of this enormous land. King Charles II called his cousin and the 17 associates the
"true and absolute Lords and Proprietors" of what would now be referred to as Rupert's Land.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Never mind the millions of people whose ancestor's, successors and heirs, already inhabited the land, the Native People, plus the Native settlers.

(Being born in a specific location on the land, makes you Native to the land (the BNA Act and the Indian Act were created by the de-facto Canada corporation which has complete control over all the land- and all men and women.

Chief and band councils were created by the Corporation of Canada within the Indian Act, which as you may Not Know? This video will give you information to do your own research. Educate yourself so we may take the steps to correct this serious injustice that effects us all. This Indian Act is a piece of Canadian legislation, which is why Native men and women are tenants and we can never own the land that was stolen from us through their deception. As it is now, The King and Queens and their heirs own all the land.

,all of whom would come to despise and loathe the ruthless Hudson Bay Company. The charter's partners ran into their forts and locked up with their cannons in order to stay protected from those on the outside, who hated this company.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Rupert's Land Charter controlled 100% of all resources of the land, the fur trade, forestry, minerals, the waterways, and everything else. It was a full-on monopoly, plus, they could make their own laws and enforce them. And all members of the HBC had to take oaths back to the King or Queen, as they still do today.

No one knows what the actual deal was between King Charles and Prince Rupert, and we are only given a cryptic clue which sounds more like an inside joke. We are told that in exchange for the deed, the Hudson Bay Company owed the British Royals two beaver pelts and two elk heads yearly. One can imagine what one likes, but It might have meant that King Charles II was getting a cut of the profits. Symbolically, the two beaver pelts, and two elk heads might have been a way of saying this business" fleeces them, decapitates them, and mounts their heads like trophies".

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Hudson Bay Company ran like this for 200 years.

From its first beginnings in North America, the HBC pulled a large Proportion of men and women into the web of capitalist economy. Being predominantly a trading company, the HBC was dependent on labour to fill its ships headed to European markets. Fur trappers were predominantly originals or Métis (but also French, Scottish and others), and worked for the HBC not as partners but as exploited workers.

With 200 years of exploitation of resources they depleted everything in their path and financially were no longer a viable company on its own.

After all the struggle and competition, it was obvious that the fur trade would soon come to an end. One of the main reasons of the end of the fur trade was that the beavers' and other animals' populations were decreasing due to the overwhelming harvesting depleting the population of a species more quickly than it can reproduce and recover.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Under severe economic pressure brought about by their fierce competition, the Hudson's Bay Company and North West Company. amalgamated in 1821, and King Charles II of England ordered Hudson's Bay Company to create colonies.

The number of beavers and river otters killed during the fur trade was devastating for the animals' North American populations. The natural ecosystems that came to rely on the beavers for dams, river and water management and other vital needs were also ravaged, leading to ecological destruction, significant environmental change, and even drought in certain areas. Following this degradation, both the river otter and beaver populations in North America would continue to decline, which brought great hardship for the original and settlers.

Originals, Metis and settlers population were devastated by the fur trade and many hardships and deaths occurred.

Still to this day many are unaware that smallpox was used a biological warfare, that was deliberately introduced to exterminate millions.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Smallpox Used as a Biological Weapon Once introduced into North America, smallpox spread everywhere. Intentionally to kill people!

Now here is some alarming information: Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors.

The poison decimated the local population and was instrumental in the fall of the empires of the Aztecs and the Incas. Similarly, on the eastern coast of North America, smallpox was planned as a biological weapon and led to a decline of millions of originals, Metis and settler native population. The devastating effects of smallpox also gave rise to one of the first examples of biological warfare. During the French-Indian War (1754–1767), Sir Jeffrey Amherst, the commander of the British forces in North America, suggested the deliberate use of smallpox to diminish the American Indian population hostile to the British.

Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (.gov) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
by S Riedel · 2005 · Cited by 1350 — Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors. The poison decimated the local population

This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path.

The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path.

The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The company allowed courts and all the trappings of a regular country, but it was actually a for-profit corporation, called the Hudson Bay Company. Everything came down to paying fees and penalties, using the corporate court system to uphold laws and make money.

Everything was controlled by the HBC because they had the biggest guns and an arsenal of bio weapons including diseases and liquour. Anything the common men and women wanted to do, they had to go through the company, such as putting their canoes in the bay. You had to pay to travel the bay. Settlers could not trade with the Natives, and if they did, they were fined.

Let the curtains close to prepare for the next act and let us reflect on what we have seen. What it was then— it is now. Canada actually operates under this perpetual charter but the royals, and the deceivers who work for them, make believe that elected officials are enacting laws. The same system is still in place.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The key to the solution, or the way to contest this back then—as it is now —is to refute any law that is repugnant to Natural Law.

The kings and queens have sworn an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to be "defenders of the faith" so whatever contracts they have entered into they must not be repugnant. But if they are, and everyone still agrees to uphold them, the royals are exonerated.

What was meant to be checks and balances on the laws, had been ignored. The Kings and Queens did whatever they wanted through threats or violence! Nothing has changed still to this day.

If men and women don't object, they agree, and the Hudson Bay Company got away with it for 250 years, i.e. from 1670 till 1920 supposedly. We will dive in a littler deeper and see what we may discover!

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

How do MONARCHS maintain and justify their power of illusion?

The divine right of kings, or divine-right theory of kingship, is a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. It asserts that a monarch is subject to no earthly authority, deriving his right to rule directly from the will of God.

The king was in charge because God had chosen him. They also think they as a king are above the law. For those who defied the king including lords were punished and lost their land and title. Some kings would execute lords and mount their heads on pikes to show the power of the king. The king threatened lords and nobles into serving him using federal authority and power as a threat to make them follow him.

Pretty much what is happening today in the Canada corporation as the heirs maintain the Charter of Hudson Bay Corporation!

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

An absolute monarchy is a form of dictatorship government in which an all-powerful king or queen rules a state. This form of government was popular in Europe toward the end of the medieval period all the way up to twenty first century.

Rulers in an absolute monarchy had total control over their corporations. Most believed they had the divine right to rule, meaning that God created the monarchy they ruled over and they alone were God’s representative on Earth. These monarchs ruled for life and power was passed down through bloodlines, meaning their children ruled after them, creating a dynasty.

Causes of Absolutism

Before the time of the all-powerful monarchs, Europe had decentralized governments. Planned and created by Kings - Invasions by Vikings and other “barbarian” groups were orchestrated in stealth. They created fear amongst the population. This created a perfect environment for these all-powerful leaders to rise.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Effects of Absolutism

Once absolute monarchs gained power, they began to consolidate, or reinforce, their power within their borders. They would set up large royal courts, which were an extended royal household, including all those who regularly attend to the monarch and the royal family. Monarchs did this in order to appear more powerful and to control the nobility. They also regulated religion to control the spread of ideas. If monarchs could control what the people were hearing, they could keep their power. Large bureaucracies were also created in order to control the economy.

They use this today continually with their propaganda of wars to keep the people in perpetual fear. Fear is an effective force to control society. It is used to divide people in a society and validate racist/bigoted/homophobic/etc ideas.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

As we move forward in time as to how these monarchs work their stealth, strategy and finance both sides of every war. They are cunning and scrupulous manipulators. Also they are above the law. Same as today in Two thousand and twenty-five.

In the 1860’s, the monarchs back in England said to themselves, these HBC people have a country where they can do whatever they want an make as much money as they want, and all they give us in return is a nebulous gift.

King Charles was looking at options to get out of the contract he had made; it was a contract that he had signed, and he took an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to uphold his contracts. This was no way for royals to do business.......poof!

The deceivers were at work building a new illusion.

The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860

ACT TWO (THE BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT)
A body is sawed in two and then put back together again with the BNA Act of 1867.
In 1866 - 1867 the then ruling monarch, Queen Victoria, had a plan to get the charter back from the Hudson Bay Company. She joined the provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick with Upper Canada and Lower Canada, added a railroad and formed a dominion called British North America by passing an act. This act was called the British North America Act (BNA Act).
The 1867 BNA Act formed a British dominion, called British North America.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ACT THREE (REPATRIATION OF THE RUPERT’S LAND ACT)

And now, men and woman, the two parts of the body will be rejoined into one!

Recapitulation: there were two corporate entities running side by side, the dominion, British North America (Canada) and the Hudson Bay Company. Next, we will see the Queen use her magic pen and her weapons of force to ensure she gets what she wants.

Queen Victoria demanded the Hudson Bay Charter back. By making a "country" called British North America, the queen forced the HBC to be admitted into the newly formed country.

Now the HBC Charter was given back to Her Majesty, for the price of 12 million pounds.

Victoria got her piece of paper but the men and women of the land had to pay for it, as usual. Some things never change.

31 July 1868, HBC had to surrender their charter to the queen, and her majesty's successors and heirs in perpetuity.

The Deed of Surrender or Rupert's Land and North-Western Territory Order is an 1870 British order in council that transferred ownership of Rupert's Land and the North-Western Territory from the United Kingdom to the newly created Dominion of Canada.

The Deed ended just over 200 years of Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) control over Rupert's Land and began western Canadian expansion. Often confused with the Rupert's Land Act 1868, the deed is different as the act only expressed that the United Kingdom and Canada permitted the transfer, but did not settle on the details of exchange with HBC, which were outlined in the Deed of Surrender.

Rupert's Land Act, 1868, 31-32 Vict., c. 105(U.K.)

ACT FOUR (STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT)

On June 9th 1893, queen Victoria pulls a rabbit out of her hat and un-enacts the BNA Act, 26 years after she had formed it.

The rabbit (or the country now called Canada) which Queen Victoria pulled out of her hat 26 years ago hopped away!

The BNA Act disappeared!

The dominion of British North America was removed by the queen with her Statute Law Revision Act of 1893, but no one knew what she had done.

Even today, no one knows, except insiders.

Statute Law Revision Act, 1893 - Enactment No.3

Let the curtains fall so we can have an intermission and reflect on what it means that there is no Act, no Parliament, no Constitution, no de jure laws.

The queen, Elizabeth II, did NOT sign the laws into being in British Columbia, or any other Province or Territory in Canada Corporation.

Many have discovered that the Lieutenant Governor, who represents the queen, also does NOT sign the laws into being. Zip! Nothing!

Its all a grand illusion.

_____________________________________________________

The Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia is the viceregal representative of the Canadian monarch, Queen Elizabeth II. This vice was created in 1871, and has served the crown ever since.

The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability.

She admitted that she did not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why? Because the laws are repugnant to Natural Law

Here is what Iona Campagnolo, Lieutenant Governor said:
“As Head of State, I have the same mandate as Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen of Canada; that is to say, apart from a single reserve power to sustain democratic governance . . .

NONE!

Thus Her Majesty is our head of State, while the Governor General is the de=facto Head of State, and neither is in command of Provincial or Territorial jurisdiction!

A Head of State however is the CEO of the Province and is required to sign all state documents in the name of the People to render them into law.”

But neither Iona Campagnolo, nor the queen sign them!

Abracadabra!

There are NO de jure laws in B.C or any of the provinces in the Corporation called Canada.

Now the curtains suddenly malfunction and come crashing down on the deceivers, sending them scurrying and the stage hands scrambling to get things righted.

When your in court, challenging the legal "name game" (the strawman/legal fictitious name, manifested by the issuance of the state’s birth certificate after the child’s physical birth), the judges will roll their his eyes in many cases. When you start reading the words by Iona Campagnolo, that related to the fact that she did not sign the laws and neither did the queen.

Judges panic: Lawyers may be confused " don't even understand what this is all about!"

The judges know your challenging the jurisdiction of the court."

The words of Iona Campagnolo and pondered, "How can someone admit they have no power and then sign the documents into law?"

Judges, Mayors, MP’s, MLA’s, Police all assumed she was signing them. Many have found out later that she was not; a clerk of the court was signing them.

That is Iona Campagnolo was a very smart, no nonsense lady, who was exonerating herself from the whole scam and any liability.
What she said in her speech was, "I am supposed to be signing these documents into law, but I am not, and therefore there is no law."

Why did the queen not signing the laws? Because, they are repugnant to Natural Law. The queen’s representative, Iona Campagnolo was not signing them either.

So, tax laws are not tax laws, they only exist inside the Hudson Bay Charter jurisdiction. The minute you step into Natural Law jurisdiction, or a higher

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Jurisdiction, they don’t apply. The full liability would land on the Queen and Lieutenant Governor in Commerce Law jurisdiction.

The curtains have been secured and the deceivers Show has been restored soon to the next act!

Act Five Repatriation of the Constitution

A New Deceiver Called Pierre Trudeau was on the stage and ready to maintain the fraud or lie for his master the Queen, Elizabeth II of England.
Trudeau, the 15th Prime Minister of Canada, revived the BNA Act, in an effort to continue the deception that de-facto Canada status as a country with a (legitimate) parliament and a Constitution was a de-jure, and the ability to make its own laws de-jure and govern itself. Which was all smoke and mirrors as you will learn the facts

To solve their problem was, he had to call the act by a different name, because the BNA Act had been repealed by Queen Victoria and that made it impossible to revivify.

There was no mechanism to restore the BNA Act, because the BNA Act created the parliament and the parliament had been virtually dissolved, so they couldn’t even pass an act to create themselves! The Queen’s deceivers had the more powerful legalize or weasel words.

Trudeau was ordered to name the BNA Act to the Constitution Act of 1982, adding in a Charter and Bill of Rights and freedoms. Which you will all learn were smoke and mirror as they actually removed your unalienable rights.

Here are Facts of the Charter of Rights and Freedom you may not yet know or comprehend .

Charter of so called rights are privileges and can be removed

Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada Corporation are FALSE!
So when you refer to them as rights you are DECEIVING YOURSELF and others, TEACHING THEM FALSE information.

THE Charter of rights has never been ratified and is not in play:
Section 58 & 59 & 23.1 a

Section 23.1a refers to language laws in Quebec, if authorized into law

this would give parents legal rights to educate their children in the language of their choice. Must be satisfied first to be ratified. Has never been satisfied by Quebec.

Section 58 & 59 must be repealed and replaced.

This proved that the so called charter of rights has never been ratified and that we sovereigns have no rights its proven right here.
Something you should all ponder and wonder why the leaders and politicians do not tell you the truth.

Part 7 sections 58
Section 58: commencement

Subject to section 59, this act shall come into force on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada

(This is the section that introduces a subject that needs to be satisfied, Satisfied meaning discharge of an obligation)

Section 59: commencement of paragraph 23(1) (a) in respect of Quebec

(1) Paragraph 23(1(a) shall come into force in respect of Quebec on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada

(This is the introduction of the subject and refers you to the specific section that needs to be satisfied)

(2) Authorization of Quebec
A proclamation under subsection 1 shall be issued only where authorized by the legislative assembly or government of Quebec
(This means that Subsection 1 can only be satisfied by the sitting government of Quebec)

(3) Repeal of this section
This section may be repealed on the day paragraph 23(1)(a) comes into force in respect of Quebec and this act amended and renumbered, consequentially upon the repeal of this section by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada

(This is the section that says that once all the subjects have been satisfied, section 59 will be repealed and a new proclamation will be made to bring the charter into force)

Section 23(1) Citizens of Canada

(a)Whose first language learned and still understood is that of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province in which they reside ... have the right to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in that language in that province

(This is the section that says that if your first language is English, the province must provide you with primary and secondary education in English)

Part 1
Section 32 Application of Charter

(1) This charter applies
(a) To the parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and

(This section covers parliament and government employees)

(b) To the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province

(This section covers parliament and government employees provincially)

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Exemption

(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force

(This section states that section 15 (Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law) needs three years of charter ratification before it can come into play)

Section 24 Enforcement of Guaranteed Rights and Freedoms
(1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances

(This section means that anyone who is covered in the application section has a right to seek justice)

Exclusion of evidence bringing administration of justice into disrepute

(2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all these circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

(This section protects anyone covered in the application section from having their rights infringed upon during an investigation and/or trial)

Act Six Queen Elizabeth's Proclamation

With the help from Trudeau the Constitution Act, the queen pulled, and is still pulling, a string of scarves from her sleeve. Scarves and more scarves many miles long as the queen smiles confidently. This is perhaps the most clever trick of all . . . .
Proclamation of April 17, 1982,

Of particular interest is this sentence from the queen's proclamation:

"Now Know You that We, by and with the advice Our Privy Council for Canada, do by this Our Proclamation, declare that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two."

Here is enlarged copy of the Proclamation 1982

If you Notice at the Top Queen Elizabeth Signature and then as well as the Minister of Justice, Jean Chrétien.

As you clearly identify from the Document.

This is where it gets very interesting – Queen Elizabeth never signed at the bottom of this Document.

We are all contract signed with our signature/s or autograph at the end of a contract, indicating that the parties have read, understood, and agreed to the terms and conditions outlined in the document.

Signing at the top means you have removed yourself from liability.
With your wet ink signature or autograph at the end of the entire contract verifies you have read and agree to all the terms in the contract.

Furthermore all parties must sign with the same instrument.

When signing a document or agreement, putting your initials on all pages before the last page where your full name and signature is requested is a common practice. Initialing each page serves as a way to indicate that you have reviewed and agreed to the contents of the entire document.

It helps to prevent any unauthorized modifications or substitutions of pages after you have signed the document. By initialing each page, you are essentially confirming your acceptance of the terms and conditions stated throughout the document.

We are told to sign at the end, where the signature blocks are usually placed.

Magicians use a variety of techniques, including psychology, misdirection, and sleight of hand, to create the illusion
Now this brings us back to what Iona Victoria Campagnolo had said in her speech

The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability.

She admitted that she did Not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why?

We have done some research on this as Dallas Hills as brought this to our attention over the last fifteen years. Dallas has also published videos on this important research. and produced numerous videos on the fact Queen Elizabeth never signed the Constitutional Act of 1982.

Dallas Hills also has questioned Queen Victoria signing of this so important document that supposedly created the dominion called Canada. How could this be factual when their is NO SIGNITURE on the BNA Act, So in fact this is just more evidence that the entire de-facto government has never had any authority to govern let alone make any policies.

Now with this evidence their is much confusion about Queen Victoria's role in signing the BNA Act of 1867.

The British North America Act received Royal Assent on March 29, 1867, but it was not signed by Queen Victoria herself.
It states that when the Governor General assents to a Bill in the Queen's Name, he sends an authentic copy of the Act, implying that the Governor General, not the Queen, signs the Act.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

And seem to suggest that Queen Victoria was involved in the process, but they don't explicitly state that she signed the Act.

It's worth noting that provides the text of the Act, but it doesn't mention Queen Victoria's signature.

So, to summarize, while Queen Victoria played a role in the process, there's no conclusive evidence to suggest that she personally signed the BNA Act of 1867.

Now in regards to Queen Elizabeth this is all we have been able to find as an explanation.

The Canada Act 1982, which was signed by Queen Elizabeth II at the top, but not at the bottom. This is an interesting exception to the typical convention of signing at the end of a document.

In this case, the Queen's signature at the top of the document is known as a "broad seal," which is a formal way of authenticating a document in accordance with royal protocol. The broad seal is usually affixed to the top of the document, and it signifies the Queen's approval and authorization of the contents.

So, while it might seem unusual to us, the Queen's signature at the top of the Canada Act 1982 is a deliberate choice that follows traditional royal protocol.

If men and women accept this a a legal contract then they have been deceived again.

The operative words here are “subject to section 59” of the Constitution Act. Now section 59 defers to section 23(of the Constitution Act), and what is 23? It is the language issue.

So, the people of Quebec would have to agree that in their province, children may be educated in any language that their parents desire. In Quebec, this is never going to fly.

They will not sign off on a language issue and the Queen knew it. So section 59/23 is the condition for which the Constitution Act of 1982 will come into force and effect"

And that did not happen. The Queen’s magic words are the strongest of all. So, there the Constitution Act. To add more facts the Meech Lake Accord of 1987 and the Charlottetown Accord of 1992. Both failed.

Pierre Trudeau came out of retirement to oppose the Accord.as it would weaken federal power.

Simple facts is there has been no ratification

No matter what anyone says about Canada’s Constitution Act, it is sitting in limbo subject to section 59. Section 59 says, when 23 is satisfied, there has to be another Proclamation and this section has to be not only repealed, but disappeared.

All that Trudeau did, does not come into effect, until section 59 has been satisfied, so that takes us back to the Hudson Bay Charter. And the one who owns the Hudson Bay Charter is Queen Elizabeth II, or someone in her family. When she mentions the word "Canada" in her proclamation,

The Queen is not talking about a country, she is talking about the Hudson Bay Corporation or charter. Who ever owns the Royal Charter corporation, owns all of the resources, licensing fees, fines, and taxes extorted from the men and women of Canada.

“Now Know You Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two.”

The 1982 Constitution with its Bill of Rights never came into force.

That is why, when you go into court and try to assert your freedom rights by way of the Constitution, they love it. They know that the constitution does not exist and you just gave them jurisdiction.

The monarchs perceived that if this magic trick were exposed, it might prove too inflammatory. So, the royal magicians have been trying to change the name and connotations of the BNA/Constitution Act going all the way back to 1867.

They want to pretend like the 1867 BNA Act
was never there! And this new Constitution Act in 1982 has always been here, but it has not.

Another interesting part of the Queen’s Proclamation is this:

“Of All Which Our Loving Subjects and all other whom these Presents may concern are hereby required to take notice and to govern themselves accordingly.”

Queen Elizabet is talking to two sets of people here, “my subjects” and “all others” who are not my subjects. You are free to not be my subject.

You, who are outside my subjects, and still want to interact with this document, “whom these Presents may concern”, you must govern yourselves accordingly.

This document tells where Canada actually is. Until section 59 is satisfied, there are No laws, No government, No acts, No parliament, and
No legislature. All there is, is whatever they can get with their Hudson Bay Charter.

This show is complete!

We always had the lawful unalienable Right for Self-determination.

We can create our own Contract, Charter, Constitution that removes a de-facto system and replace with a de-jure system.

THE ILLUSION vs JURISDICTIONS

Please share so we may end this fraud!

Show less