Yes, Trump’s Bold Greenland Plan Could Actually Work

Historical Precedence: The idea of the U.S. acquiring Greenland has historical backing, with previous U.S. presidents like Andrew Johnson and Harry Truman showing interest in buying the island.

International Law: Greenland has a right under international law to choose its future, as it was once a non-self-governing territory listed under Chapter XI of the UN Charter. This status implies that Greenland could decide to align more closely with the U.S.

Geopolitical Benefits: Greenland's strategic location between the U.S. and Russia, its long Atlantic coasts, and the potential opening of the Northwest Passage make it geopolitically significant.

Resource Wealth: The island is rich in rare earth metals, crucial for modern technologies, particularly those involving national security.

Legal Options: Various models exist for how Greenland could become closer to the U.S., from outright purchase if it declares independence to forming a compact similar to those with Micronesia or the Marshall Islands.

Trump's Strategy: President-elect Trump's interest in Greenland is seen as part of a broader strategy to reorient U.S. foreign policy towards securing influence in the Western Hemisphere and countering moves by China and Russia in the Arctic.

Public and Political Reaction: Despite initial skepticism and opposition from Denmark and Greenland's leadership, there are arguments that a closer relationship with the U.S. could be beneficial, especially considering Greenland's push towards independence and economic development.

Potential for Success: The article concludes that Trump's plan has the potential to succeed given the historical, legal, and strategic contexts, suggesting that international law and U.S. constitutional practices could accommodate such a move.

Read More: https://discern.tv/yes-trumps-bold-greenland-plan-could-actually-work/