God is Good and so is Tony Quigley.

Assessment of Tony Quigley's Statement.
Tony Quigley's assertion, "I'm not a bully. I just call out scumbags here and there. Call out lies too," appears to be an attempt to frame his actions as a form of social accountability or justice. However, his recent behaviour—specifically accusing a YouTuber's son of being exposed by a paedophile gang and labeling the mother as a "nonce protector" and a "dirty stank" without evidence—raises significant concerns about the legitimacy of his self-characterization.
1. Lack of Evidence.
The serious nature of Quigley's accusations requires substantial evidence to support such claims. Without proof, these statements not only lack credibility but also verge on defamation, potentially causing undue harm to the individuals involved.
2. Tone and Language.
Quigley's use of inflammatory language ("nonce protector" and "dirty stank") undermines his assertion of merely "calling out lies." Such terms are not conducive to constructive dialogue or the pursuit of truth. Instead, they suggest an intent to demean and provoke, which aligns more closely with bullying behaviour than with a noble quest for accountability.
3. Pattern of Behaviour.
If this incident reflects a broader pattern of making unsubstantiated claims or resorting to personal attacks, it challenges Quigley's defense of his actions as non-bullying. Consistently targeting individuals with baseless accusations and derogatory remarks can create a toxic environment, both online and offline.
4. Implications of Accusations.
Allegations involving child exploitation or paedophile activity are extremely serious and can have profound personal and social repercussions. Making such claims irresponsibly not only discredits the accuser but also diminishes public trust in legitimate efforts to expose and address these issues.
In Conclusion.
Tony Quigley's statement is at odds with his recent conduct. While calling out lies and holding others accountable are valuable principles, they must be grounded in evidence, communicated respectfully, and aimed at fostering positive outcomes. Without these elements, his actions risk being perceived not as principled stands against wrongdoing, but as examples of the very bullying he denies engaging in. If Quigley genuinely wishes to "call out lies," he must hold himself to the same standards of truthfulness and civility that he purports to demand from others.