Notice of Demand and Conditional Acceptance Kathy Straus,; Manulife Bank

Join The Zoom 7 PM Daily
https://us02web.zoom.us/s/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09#success

Notice of Demand and Conditional Acceptance

Attention:
Kathy
Straus,
Mortgage Collections Specialist; Manulife Bank of Canada, Waterloo Ontario
cc: Andrea M Steen, WITTEN LLP, Edmonton Alberta
(Confirmation of receipt of this e-mail is required.)
Subject Matter:
CLEMENT PAUL JUBINVILLE and
SHANNON MARIE
JUBINVILLE Account:
#4015878 held with Manulife Bank of Canada, Waterloo Ontario
C/O 61501 Range Road, 464 Box 5394 Bonnyville, Alberta [T9N 2G5]
Dated this day, December 30 th., in the year of our Lord 2024
Preamable;
(all words herein with a * are taken from a BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY, for clarification
purposes)
Take note that this letter is written in the language that we, Clem and Shannon (we, us, our)
are familiar with and we, as declared and re-presented in all documents as CLEMENT PAUL
and SHANNON MARIE, JUBINVILLE are not agreeing to that identity as it is the property of the
CROWN as specified in our previous correspondence dated December 27 , 2024 to; Judge
Park, Andrea Steen, Adel Naftaliev, Ben Smith, and Sergeant Sarah
Parkes. (a letter to His Majesty King Charles III, may be necessary
in this matter)
We further state that we rebut the assumption and presumption that we are CLEMENT PAUL
and SHANNON MARIE JUBINVILLE.
It has and continues to be, our intent to resolve this matter honorably, timely and to the
satisfaction and remedy of all concerned. However, that has not been the position and actions
of those involved through the interests of Manulife Bank of Canada. Any further action against
us, shall be taken as *extortion and *Fraud since there is no reasonable reason why the
situation has *devolved to the state it's in now. We, Clem and Shannon, have made payments
to Account #4015878 in good faith and have been thwarted by Manulife Bank of Canada
whenever there was an *error or *omission in the payment, wherein we asked for clarification,
as is our right as the supposed *obligor to said *obligation created at infancy, without the
capacity to contract.
It is because of our treatment by Manulife Bank of Canada and the *affiliates involved that we
were forced, literally, to look further into the matter before us, thus discovering the *joinder with
His Majesty King Charles III (CROWN) Should we be taken as the Trustee in the identity of
CLEMENT PAUL and SHANNON MARIE JUBINVILLE, then as is the right of the Trustee, a
Statement for Services will be forthcoming. The filing of Statement of Defense with a Statement
of Counter Claim for Financial & Punitive Damages.
For your further understanding and information, we will quickly note some of the points in
Contract Law that are *pertinent to the matter before us, Freewill to contract notwithstanding,
there must be an intent to create a legal relationship based on ;

1) Agreement ie: Offer and Acceptance
2) Lawful Consideration: *consideration that is fully disclosed so as to be a win/win for all
parties negotiating the contract.
3) Capacity to contract: again requires full disclosure of relevant facts to the agreement, given
AND comprehended by the parties.
4) Free consent: meaning that NO trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, or *coercion
can take place. ANY mistake therein, *voids a contract between the parties.(Voids has 'Fraud in
the Factum' within its definition.) ie:*Glossa
5) Certainty of meaning and full disclosure: are the benchmarks of the contract/agreement
since there's a difference in the meaning of words in the English language, known to most men
and women, and those in a BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY. Therefore, a meeting of the minds
cannot take place.
6) Signature/Autograph: Unequal things ought not be joined.
7) Remedy: There must be *remedy in all contracts so as to address anything wrong, illegal or
equitable.
Therefore, having made the statements above , this Notice of Demand and Conditional
Acceptance is subject, but not limited to, the following conditions:
a) Can you provide the true copies with ink signatures, of the contract, loan, mortgage, or
securities,(the document(s)) herein; refered to as Account #4015878? *( Solvendo quisque
pro alio, licet invito et ignorante, liberat eum) Anybody who pays on behalf of somebody
else frees that person of the obligation, even without the person's knowledge or consent. Dig.
3.5.38 Provide the evidence to your claim against us.
b)Is Account #4015878 a lawful document? yes or no
c) What language are the documents written in? Define the language therein.
d) What is the definition of 'person' and what language in reference to?
e) Did Manulife Bank of Canada give full disclosure in the documents? Provide proof by way of
identifying the disclosures to all parties. *(Alterius circumvento alii non praebet actionem) A
deception practised on one person does not give cause of action to another.
f) What was the 'consideration' given by Manulife Bank of Canada for Account 4015878, in said
documents? *(L'obligation sans cause, ou sur une fausse cause, ou sur illicite, ne peut
avoir aucun effet) An obligation without consideration, or on a false consideration, or on
unlawful consideration, cannot have any effect.
g) Did not the signature we put on the original document(s) create the value for the
consideration? *(Dolo malo pactum fit quotiens circumscribendi alterius causa aliud
agitur et aliud agi simulatur) A pact is made with malice when, with the aim of defrauding
another, one thing is done and something else is pretended. ('Consideration' as defined in the
Bills of Exchange Act)
h) What exactly are the documents(s) in question? Are they securities, bonds, or something
else? Provide an explanation and proof of claim.
i) Who is paying the tax on the securities if thus is so? Provide evidence that the tax is being
paid.
j) Can Manulife Bank of Canada provide proof and thus demonstrate that they were put at risk
by extending said credit? yes or no *(Ex nudo pacto non oritur actio) No action arises on a
contract [document(s)] without consideration

k) What was the jurisdiction of the court? Provide document to prove juris.
l) What oath was the judge under? For we rebut the assumption and presumption that it was a
public matter, and hereby state and demand that the members attending the court were serving
in the capacity of 'public officials', bound by oath to serve honestly, impartially, and fairly as
dictated by the oath. Provide a copy of the oath in which our case was adjudicated, since we
were not treated in all fairness as outlined in Court of Alberta, Kings Bench; Part 1, Division
1; Rule 1.1(2) These rules also govern all persons who come to the court for resolution of a
claim, whether the person is a self-represented litigant or is represented by a lawyer.
m) Was the judgement public or private? For we rebut any assumption and presumption that it
was public and thus openly express that it was to be on the 'public' record. Provide said records
of the proceeding.
n) Who moved the court? Provide the evidence of 'who' was being trespassed upon.
o) Who are CLEMENT PAUL and SHANNON MARIE JUBINVILLE; living (wo)man or a
corporate fiction? Clarify this identity, for we, Clem and Shannon are being harmed by the
operation of this *person.
We reiterate once more that it is our intention to remain in honor, while under *duress and
*necessity caused by this *offense against us, for *remedy and *discharge is the reason for our
continued correspondence, to the satisfaction of all parties involved in this matter.
Any questions noted from a - o in the above Notice of Demand and Conditional Acceptance,
that remain unanswered, will be accepted as tacit admission. Under penalty of * perjury to all
those listed in all correspondenses regarding Account #4015878, and those having
knowledge or named in the correspondences will be therefore held personally liable.
By: Clem and By: Shannon
*Verus beings, acting in private, in personam, and as principal and equitable benificiarys of
CLEMENT PAUL and SHANNON MARIE JUBINVILLE
All rights reserved, without prejudice