Spirituality Is Not to Be Found in Counter-Information and Alternative Media

https://spiritualseek.online/blog/spirituality-is-not-to-be-found-in-counter-information-and-alternative-media/

------------

What is the primary critique of alternative media presented in this article?
The article argues that alternative media, while serving an important function in challenging mainstream narratives, are fundamentally reactive. Instead of setting their own agenda or offering constructive alternatives, they primarily focus on opposing what they perceive as the excesses or manipulations of mainstream power structures. This reactive stance limits their ability to bring about transformative change because they are defined by what they are against rather than what they stand for. Their dependence on mainstream narratives for their existence also means that they don't operate independently.

How does the article describe the psychological mechanism of "counter-information"?
Counter-information is described as primarily a reactive mechanism, characterized by skepticism and mistrust of authority. It tends to respond to new developments introduced by mainstream power structures with opposition, often without offering a proactive and alternative vision. This constant reaction can lead to emotional exhaustion and limit long-term effectiveness since it doesn't focus on building lasting solutions, just tearing down existing structures.

What is meant by the "conservative and traditional" tendency within counter-information?
The article points out that counter-information often leans towards conservatism and traditionalism, seeking to preserve the status quo by resisting changes brought by globalization, technological advancements, or progressive social policies. It is critical of the tendency to idealize the past and to resist progress, which it says can hinder innovation and make counter-information movements appear backward-looking or resistant to positive change.

How does the article explain the concept of "opposition as energy transfer" from a spiritual perspective?
From a spiritual perspective, the article suggests that opposition can inadvertently strengthen the very forces it seeks to resist. By focusing energy on opposing something, the opposition becomes more defined and entrenched. This concept, grounded in various spiritual traditions, suggests that resistance creates polarity, and thus actually feeds the opposing force with power and momentum. The article implies that non-resistance, which means to focus on creating alternatives rather than direct confrontation, is a more effective route.

What is meant by "non-resistance" and how does it differ from passivity, according to the article?
"Non-resistance" does not mean passivity or apathy, but rather transcending dualities like "us vs. them" or "right vs. wrong". Instead of fighting against oppressive systems directly, non-resistance encourages redirecting energy towards creating alternatives that embody higher values. It is about moving beyond conflict and towards transformation, and it promotes proactive creation over reactive opposition.

What examples does the article provide to illustrate how counter-information can paradoxically reinforce the systems it opposes?
The article uses the example of opposition to digital currencies to illustrate this point. By fervently opposing digital currencies, counter-information campaigns inadvertently highlight their importance by bringing them to the forefront of public discourse. Mainstream power structures can also easily frame opponents as resistant to progress, thereby reinforcing their own authority, while also revealing an attachment to existing financial systems.

How does the article suggest we move towards true freedom, and what is the most revolutionary act we can perform?
The article proposes that true freedom comes from liberating oneself from attachments—to material possessions, societal validation, and fear-driven narratives. The most revolutionary act is to stop seeking answers in the external world and instead focus on inner transformation. This involves shifting the focus from external battles to internal empowerment, and proactive creation, instead of opposition to existing power structures.

What does the article mean by a "holistic approach" andwhat two components does it emphasize?
A "holistic approach," according to the article, involves addressing issues both psychologically and spiritually. Psychologically, this means recognizing how fear-based responses perpetuate cycles of conflict and cultivating empathy for diverse perspectives. Spiritually, it means embracing non-resistance, focusing on creating harmonious alternatives, and prioritizing inner freedom (https://spiritualseek.online/the-quiz-of-inner-liberation/) over external battles. A holistic approach doesn't reject questioning authority but rather emphasizes the importance of building something better rather than merely tearing down what exists.

Mini Test: Are You a Conspiracy Theorist?
https://spiritualseek.online/mini-tests-on-philosophical-topics/#conspiracy