COVID-19: What We Were Told vs. What We Know Now

'It basically said that all the conspiracy thoerists were correct'

COVID-19: What We Were Told vs. What We Know Now

Findings from the Final Report of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic (December 4, 2024):

* The Origins of COVID-19: Early narratives dismissed the lab-leak theory as a conspiracy. Today, substantial evidence supports it as a plausible explanation, backed by agencies like the FBI and DOE.

* Masks and Mandates: Mask mandates were heavily enforced, yet studies now show mixed efficacy in curbing viral spread, particularly with cloth masks.

* Six-Foot Rule: The six-foot social distancing guideline lacked strong scientific backing and was more of a precautionary measure than a proven standard.

* Lockdowns: Strict lockdowns caused significant harm to mental health, education, and the economy, with limited long-term benefit in preventing virus spread.

* Natural Immunity: The protection offered by prior infection (natural immunity) was underestimated and largely ignored in early policies.

* School Closures: Extended closures were not supported by science and have left lasting impacts on children's education and mental health.

* Vaccine Expectations: While vaccinesmost likely reduced severe illness and death, their ability to prevent transmission was overstated in initial messaging.

These are key findings from a report aimed at analyzing lessons learned from the pandemic. ✈️👍