Putin...

By the looks of it, Putin whipped out a new Russian ICBM that NATO defense systems cannot intercept, but did NOT attach nuclear payloads to them.

Essentially, Putin just showed the West that he has the ability to destroy them if they keep provoking him.

It was a warning. Putin just exercised extreme restraint, while also showing Ukraine/NATO that they are outgunned.

This should be front page news on every outlet, but for some reason, it’s not. Perhaps it’s because this situation does not fit their narrative that Putin is this Hitler-esque loose-cannon who wants to conquer the world.

Putin is showing restraint. He wants diplomacy, not nuclear war. But the West continue to poke the bear.

We cannot wait until January 20th. We need Trump in office right now.

~T edit: Remember, ALL nuclear warheads have been disabled worldwide, but Bio's point still holds. It just proves Russia could wipe out [nato] in 10 minutes.
https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/1859683791989543018?t=YESDGSu6FNP4uVKyT1OHNg&s=19

Wie es aussieht, hat Putin eine neue russische Interkontinentalrakete hervorgebracht, die von den NATO-Verteidigungssystemen nicht abgefangen werden kann, er hat sie aber NICHT mit nuklearer Ladung ausgestattet.

Im Wesentlichen hat Putin dem Westen gerade gezeigt, dass er in der Lage ist, ihn zu zerstören, wenn er ihn weiterhin provoziert.

Es war eine Warnung. Putin übte lediglich äußerste Zurückhaltung und zeigte der Ukraine/NATO gleichzeitig, dass sie in Bezug auf Waffen unterlegen sind.

Das sollte eigentlich auf jeder Titelseite stehen, aber aus irgendeinem Grund ist es das nicht. Vielleicht, weil die Situation nicht in ihr Narrativ passt, Putin sei ein Hitler-ähnlicher unberechenbarer Typ, der die Welt erobern will.

Putin übt Zurückhaltung. Er will Diplomatie, keinen Atomkrieg. Doch der Westen reizt den Bären weiter.

Wir können nicht bis zum 20. Januar warten. Wir brauchen Trump jetzt im Amt.

~T edit: Denken Sie daran, ALLE Atomsprengköpfe weltweit wurden deaktiviert, aber Bios Argument gilt immer noch. Es beweist nur, dass Russland [die NATO] in 10 Minuten auslöschen könnte.
https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/1859683791989543018?t=YESDGSu6FNP4uVKyT1OHNg&s=19
The Subversion against the United States:
18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

§ 2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

§ 2382. Misprision of treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. § 2383. Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

§ 2384. Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

§ 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes .
‘The DoD IG knowingly concealed the extent of the delay in constructing a narrative that is favorable to DoD and Pentagon leadership,’ the letter says.

Federal bureaucrats within the Department of Defense (DoD) delayed the deployment of the National Guard on Jan. 6, 2021 and covered it up, according to a House Republican investigation of government conduct related to the Capitol riot.

On Thursday, Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., who is leading a review of the work completed by the partisan Jan. 6 probe run by then-Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, sent a letter to the inspector general for the Department of Defense demanding a correction to an agency report published in November 2021.

“This report was the final product of the DoD IG’s review into the events of January 6, and reviewed how the DoD responded to requests for support as the events unfolded,” Loudermilk, the chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight for the House Administration Committee, wrote. “Throughout the Subcommittee’s extensive investigation into the failures of January 6, 2021, we have discovered numerous flaws and inaccuracies in the report that your office has yet to appropriately address.”
READ | XPOST