Premium Only Content

Social Media Ban or Big Brother Control?
The government, with support of the Liberals, is proposing a ban on children under 16 accessing social media, justifying the measure by claiming it’s "popular." Oh, really? It’s ironic that the same parties that accuse One Nation of populism are now pushing a measure not because it’s workable, but simply because it’s supposedly popular!
A true conservative party, Mr Dutton, would support parents to supervise their own children in their own homes. A true conservative, Mr Dutton, would not be promoting big government replacing parents.
The eGovernment is also trialling age-assurance technology, which uses facial scans of every social media user to confirm they are over 16. If there’s any doubt, the system will cross-check the person’s Digital ID for verification to ensure it matches. In addition to facial scans, the "Assurance AI" will monitor keystrokes, audio patterns and "other measures" to determine the user’s age.
By now you may conclude, as I did, that enforcing a social media age limit of 16 would require verifying everyone’s age using the device camera and their Digital ID—which everyone would be forced to have. So much for Digital ID being voluntary. Even adults will need one to continue using social media.
Even more alarming is the fact that conversations would be monitored for signs of age, yet what happens to the voice prints and keystroke logs this system collects?
To make this work, cameras on devices would need to run constantly to ensure a new user hasn’t hopped on to an existing computer session. This means cameras would always be on, capturing everything - video and audio – that is happening in the room.
This creates a perfect scenario for hackers to access the feed.
In the unlikely event they can actually make this work, children would move to other platforms that are less regulated, less safe and more prone to child exploitation.
One Nation opposes this legislation. The best people to monitor and regulate children’s internet use are parents—not a Big Brother government.
Transcript: https://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/social-media-ban-or-big-brother-control/
-
2:44:57
Laura Loomer
5 hours agoEP115: Democrats' Pet Muslims Bite Back
39.3K15 -
18:37
SantaSurfing
9 hours ago4/17/2025 - Trouble for Tish/Google/Jerome! Trump stops a war!
25.5K16 -
49:39
Man in America
13 hours agoThey’re Feeding Us POISON and Calling It Dinner w/ Kim Bright
42.5K13 -
LIVE
BrancoFXDC
3 hours ago $1.47 earnedWarzone Rounds - DAY 10 of no Internet
331 watching -
1:17:17
RiftTV/Slightly Offensive
8 hours ago $7.52 earnedMASSACRE at FSU: Who was Actually RESPONSIBLE? | Slightly Offensive
40K15 -
3:18:46
SilverFox
4 hours ago🔴LIVE - HUGE UPDATE! LORDS OF THE FALLEN 2.0
25.2K -
2:03:46
Roseanne Barr
8 hours ago $20.02 earned"God, Go Get em' Honey" W/ Tal Oran | The Roseanne Barr Podcast #95
104K44 -
5:53:59
BSparksGaming
7 hours agoLords of the Fallen Version 2.0 Gameplay!
16.6K -
1:04:45
Donald Trump Jr.
10 hours agoThe Left’s Lunacy Knows No Bounds, Plus Taking Your Questions Live! | Triggered Ep234
143K157 -
4:05:32
Rebel News
14 hours ago $17.28 earnedLIVE: Rebels react as leaders face off in Day 2 English debate
94.3K45