STAGGERING Starmer Response May Be His BIGGEST MISTAKE EVER!

Right, so if you thought Keir Starmer was bad before, that his position regarding Israel and Gaza was already unforgivable, then he’s just stood up in parliament and said something so cold, callous and cruel, so evil in fact – I would go that far – it’ll make your blood run cold.
His slavish loyalty to Israel, his bought and paid for backside by the Israel Lobby, who he owes everything to, mean even now 13 months into what is clearly a genocide in Gaza, that a plausible case for that has been demonstrated according to the International Court of Justice and Keir Starmer continues to not only deny that, to stand up and arrogantly talk down to someone putting that to him, but to still have the brass neck to point to the night of October 7th as if that is when all of this actually began and that that trumps absolutely everything Israel have done since and will continue to do going forwards. What Keir Starmer has essentially stood up and declared to the world, is that he will never define what is happening in Gaza as a genocide therefore and given his background as a human rights lawyer, he cannot even claim ignorance on such matters. He knows a genocide when he sees it, but unless it’s politically advantageous to himself, he’ll be selective in when he chooses to admit that, which is positively sociopathic.
Right, so that was Independent Alliance MP Ayoub Khan, himself a barrister, stood up at PMQs just yesterday talking about Article 2 of the Genocide Convention, which defines the 5 articles that describe a genocide in international law. He brought up the fact it is not about numbers, but intent in direct contradiction to David Lammy’s idiotic comments from the other week, where he implied it could not be a genocide in Gaza, because not enough people in his view had died yet. Lammy is also a lawyer apparently, but much like he is a politician, he comes across not on top of his brief, little more than a mass of imbecilic enthusiasms.
Khan then turned to Starmer himself, where last week at PMQs he was put on the spot by I think it was Zarah Sultana, when he said he has never described what has happened in Gaza as a genocide and so Khan put him on the spot and asked him straight, what is your definition of genocide and when Starmer stood to respond, he didn’t give a definition, he just brought up the night of October 7th and that reference to that should be made and that he knew what the definition of genocide was and that was exactly why he has not described Gaza as a genocide.
Words failed me yesterday when I saw that, I went ballistic and it’s a probably a good thing, I didn’t choose to record this yesterday, let me tell you I was bleddy raging.
The sheer arrogance of talking down to a lawyer bringing up international law and then skirting over it, by saying what it is and I have no doubt of that, Starmer was a human rights lawyer, but clearly he was in it for the pay check, not any belief in those human rights because it seems to me that by his own admission, the people of Gaza don’t have any. That’ll be news to an awful lot of lawyers around the world, because Keir Starmer seems to think that the Genocide Convention doesn’t apply to Israel when they’re breaking it, doesn’t cover the people of Gaza, that the attack on Israel on the night of October 7th was the beginning of everything and that everything Israel do, no matter how many people die at their hands, 45,000 in Gaza now as Ayoub Khan stated, it is all in the name of Israel being able to defend ‘herself’ as Starmer ridiculously puts it each time he is asked. 70% of those who have been killed in Gaza have been women and children and yet those deaths it would seem are legitimate and acceptable to Starmer in the name of Israel’s self defence, which given his refusal to declare their actions as genocidal must surely be the case. Collective punishment by not caring whether it is combatant of civilian who dies, tents being bombed from refugee camps to hospital grounds. He could attack Russia for striking hospitals, he can call their actions genocidal, but when Israel do the same thing? Self defence. The law on what constitutes a genocide under the Genocide Convention that we are signed up to as a nation are clear and not debatable and if any one of these definitions are met, then it is a genocide:
‘(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.’
According to one of Israel’s own newspapers, Haaretz, in just the last week, Israel have met 4 of these criteria, so this is a genocide four times over, but Starmer doesn’t agree and given his insistence on pointing to the night of October 7th, where Israel itself has been identified as using helicopters and tanks against their own people at both the Nova music festival and the nearby kibbutzim, where they enacted Hannibal Directive to shoot their won people rather than let them be taken hostage, even pointing to that night as he does not exonerate Israel at all, just amplifies their barbarism even more. Taking hostages is a crime of course it is, and that is on Hamas, but to say Israel can essentially wipe out people on the scale they are doing, enact ethnic cleansing in the north of the Gaza Strip where they are now seizing land, to deny humanitarian aid and cause famine, to see the return of polio such is the dire state of health conditions, can ban the only aid agency that has kept Gaza habitable for decades in UNRWA, a UN backed agency and so much more and so much worse as his comments imply is quite simply sociopathic, but what am I saying? Of course we know Starmer backs this don’t we? [LBC CLIP]
It's little wonder he has never apologised for saying Israel could commit those war crimes, it seems they can do what they like and he will never call it a genocide, because all of it, everything Israel has done, the very worst things you’ve heard them commit over the last 400 plus days now, by Starmer’s answer to Ayoub Khan, is justified and not a genocide.
I actually genuinely think it is worth asking if the country is being run by a literal sociopath at this point?
According to the Mayo Clinic website Antisocial Personality Disorder, ASPD, the proper term for sociopathy is defined as follows:
‘Antisocial personality disorder, sometimes called sociopathy, is a mental health condition in which a person consistently shows no regard for right and wrong and ignores the rights and feelings of others. People with antisocial personality disorder tend to purposely make others angry or upset and manipulate or treat others harshly or with cruel indifference. They lack remorse or do not regret their behaviour.
People with antisocial personality disorder often violate the law, becoming criminals.’
Refusing to acknowledge international law where it comes to genocide in Gaza. Showed no regard for the people of Gaza in his response at PMQs and has therefore completely disregarded their human rights under international law. Cruel indifference, lack of remorse, making others purposely angry – and we can point to various policy decisions made as well as far as that goes, how angry he has made the British public, how unpopular he has become and how fast that has happened – and they may also lie and well, enough said on that where Starmer is concerned. It also means he can have as much atrocity pointed out to him, all the images and videos we’ve seen going back over a year shown to him and he wouldn’t bat an eyelid at it.
Of course another explanation might just be that having stuck to this line of support for Israel for as long as he has, unquestioningly, slavishly loyal, bought and paid for by pro Israel Zionist donors, he’s simply in too deep now to back off. If he changed his tune now, he’d have to admit to being complicit, he’d have to admit to having made a mistake, he’d have to admit to being wrong, he might be forced into an apology and Keir Starmer, never, ever, ever does that. He never says sorry for anything. He's given cover to Israel, given weapons and military aid to Israel, continues to do so, has provided intelligence to Israel from all those various flights from the RAF base on Cyprus over Gaza and not least allowed that same base to be used to deliver said military aid and munitions to Israel itself.
Keir Starmer belongs in Hague. This latest comment, this response to a question at PMQs, could be the biggest mistake he’s ever made politically, because he has effectively said there is no limit to what Israel can do in Gaza, because all of it is a legitimate response to the events of October 7th which in his mind is all on Hamas in spite of plenty evidence now that what transpired on that night was not all on them. He will never therefore ever admit to Gaza being a genocide, he’s boxed himself in in such a way, he could never admit to that now, without admitting his own complicity. He has damned himself to a point he can never recover from this and his reign as Prime Minister cannot end soon enough. He doesn’t represent us at all with a mindset like that.
Of course one fool who will follow in Starmer’s footsteps and frankly has been shown to say whatever necessary to benefit himself the most no matter who the Labour leader has been is indeed David Lammy, the other monster Ayoub Khan brought up in his question. For more on what he actually said of Israel’s genocide, that 45,000 dead Gazans apparently isn’t enough to constitute a genocide, well, I tore apart that claim by looking at some other claims of Lammy’s on such matters and what a surprise, he’s a hypocrite too! Get all the details of that story in this video recommendation here as your suggested next watch and I’ll hopefully catch you on the next vid. Cheers folks.