Are Stars Collapsed Energy In Ether Bubbles?

Cause Before Symptom - With Your Host James Carner
Are Stars Collapsed Energy In Ether Bubbles?

Show more

Watch this:

Sound will put pressure on a bubble which causes the elements inside it to collapse. Stars are just that. This experiement offers compelling evidence to support the Bible. This explains how a star can send energy and continue sending energy.

Compressed with nowhere to go and sound continues without any moving in degree could create light without ever easing up. The source of the sound determines how long the light will last as it could just simply turn off the sound, or in Bible language, the lord closes his mouth as he spoke almost everything into existence.

This also explains why Jesus will open his mouth and destroy Satan. Jesus will use sound to destroy his army at Armagedon. This also explains the sun as it is trapped inside water and God’s sound from his mouth is continuously keeping it lit up.

It’s called the sonoluminescence experiment. It's quite fascinating to see how sound waves can create light in such a way. The experiment involves trapping a tiny bubble of gas in water using sound waves. When the sound waves reach a certain intensity, the bubble collapses violently, creating a brief flash of light. This phenomenon is called sonoluminescence.  

The light emitted during sonoluminescence is incredibly intense, reaching temperatures of up to 20,000 degrees Celsius. This is hot enough to melt metals! Scientists are still not entirely sure how sonoluminescence works, but they believe it may be related to the extreme temperatures and pressures that are created when the bubble collapses.

The sonoluminescence experiment is a fascinating example of how sound and light can interact in unexpected ways. It has a wide range of potential applications, from underwater imaging to medical diagnostics.

As of now, scientists have not been able to harness the energy produced during sonoluminescence for practical purposes. While the temperatures and pressures reached during the bubble collapse are incredibly high, the energy is released in a very short burst and is difficult to capture.

However, researchers are continuing to explore the potential of sonoluminescence. Some potential applications include:

* Ultrasound imaging: Sonoluminescence could be used to improve the resolution of ultrasound images.
* Medical diagnostics: Sonoluminescence could be used to detect and treat diseases.  
* Materials science: Sonoluminescence could be used to create new materials with unique properties.

While there is still much to learn about sonoluminescence, it is a fascinating phenomenon with the potential to revolutionize many fields.

Yes, there are still researchers working on sonoluminescence. While the initial wave of intense research in the 1990s and early 2000s has subsided, there's still ongoing interest and active research in various laboratories around the world.

While the primary focus has shifted from harnessing energy to understanding the underlying physics and exploring potential applications, researchers continue to investigate:

* The precise mechanisms behind the extreme temperatures and pressures generated during bubble collapse.
* Potential applications in fields like materials science, medicine, and underwater acoustics.
* Novel techniques for inducing and controlling sonoluminescence.

So, while we might not be on the brink of a sonoluminescence-powered future just yet, the research continues to be fascinating and could lead to significant breakthroughs in the years to come.

Yes, scientists have experimented with different liquids to observe sonoluminescence. While water is a common medium, other liquids have been tested, including:  

* Glycerol: This viscous liquid has been used to study the effects of viscosity on sonoluminescence.   

* Organic solvents: Certain organic solvents have been explored, though the results can vary depending on the specific solvent and experimental conditions.   


However, water remains the most commonly used liquid for sonoluminescence experiments. Its properties, such as its acoustic properties and the ease of bubble formation, make it a suitable medium for studying this phenomenon.

Glycerol has shown promise as a medium for sonoluminescence experiments. Research indicates that it can produce bright, localized sonoluminescence, which is a positive characteristic for potential energy harvesting applications.  

However, there are some challenges associated with using glycerol:

* Hydroscopic nature: Glycerol readily absorbs water from the air, which can affect its properties and potentially influence the sonoluminescence process.   

* Viscosity: Glycerol is a viscous liquid, which can affect the dynamics of bubble formation and collapse. This can lead to differences in the intensity and characteristics of the emitted light compared to water.   

Despite these challenges, glycerol remains an interesting medium for sonoluminescence research, especially for applications where its specific properties, such as its high viscosity and low vapor pressure, might be advantageous.

It's important to note that the specific behavior of sonoluminescence in glycerol can vary depending on experimental conditions, such as the acoustic pressure, frequency, and the presence of dissolved gases. Further research is needed to fully understand the potential of glycerol as a medium for sonoluminescence and to optimize its use for specific applications.

The duration of the light emitted during sonoluminescence is typically very short, on the order of picoseconds. This is true for both water and glycerol. The primary difference between the two mediums lies in the intensity and spectral characteristics of the emitted light, rather than the duration.  

Glycerol, due to its higher viscosity, can influence the dynamics of bubble collapse, potentially affecting the intensity and spectral distribution of the emitted light. However, the fundamental mechanism of sonoluminescence, which involves the rapid collapse of a bubble and the subsequent release of energy in the form of light, remains relatively similar across different mediums.  

Therefore, while glycerol might offer certain advantages for studying sonoluminescence, it's unlikely to significantly alter the duration of the light pulses.

What kind of water is in Space? Let’s say it is a vacuum. Can you make a gas bubble? The key to understanding this lies in the difference between sound and electromagnetic radiation.

Sound is a mechanical wave that requires a medium (like air or water) to travel through. In the vacuum of space, there's no such medium, so sound cannot propagate.

Electromagnetic radiation, on the other hand, can travel through a vacuum. This includes light, radio waves, X-rays, and other forms of radiation.  

When we talk about "hearing" sounds from distant galaxies, we're not actually hearing them in the traditional sense. Instead, astronomers use telescopes to detect electromagnetic radiation, specifically radio waves, emitted by celestial objects. They then convert these radio waves into sound waves that we can hear.  

So, while we can't directly "hear" the sounds of the universe, we can use technology to translate the information carried by electromagnetic radiation into something our ears can perceive. It's a fascinating way to explore the cosmos and gain insights into the distant past.

The sound source could potentially be coming from God which creates the light. The star as a gas bubble could be given sound from inside itself. It’s hard to understand, but so is trying to explain the Holy Ghost living inside us.

If we were to imagine a fourth-dimensional being interacting with our three-dimensional reality through sound, it's possible that the source of that sound could appear to us as a point source, radiating outwards in all directions. This could potentially be visualized as a sphere, with the source at its center.

Whatever is dark matter, seems to be the force that holds the sphere together in space. Droplets of water in space become a sphere. Yes, droplets in space tend to form perfect spheres. The reason for this is a property of liquids called surface tension. Surface tension is the tendency of liquid surfaces to shrink into the minimum interfacial area. In the microgravity environment of space, there's no external force like gravity to distort the shape of a liquid droplet. As a result, the droplet naturally assumes the shape with the smallest surface area: a sphere.  

This spherical shape is a result of the cohesive forces between the liquid molecules. These forces pull the molecules together, minimizing the surface area and creating a perfect sphere. It's a beautiful demonstration of the fundamental principles of physics are at work.

Science has done a great jpb convincing us of the heliocentric model and the universe theory. It’s grounded yet flat earthers are coming more and more together. I never thought something like that would happen in my lifetime. I think flat earthers and the heliocentric views do merge together in theories. Although flat earthers would have problems with the bubble snowglobe theory.

When the fake aliens arrive, the world will lose interest in flat earthers and christianity. The nephilim will trick the world leaders into ditching religion and accepting their philiosopies. Since they represent something new and exciting, people will gravitate towards them as thier source. New agers will be the new church and all of Alice Bailey’s work will be finalized.

Most likiely the Antichrist, whom I do think will be a human animal hybrid beast, will usher in a new world order where he promises peace, green technology and travel to the cosmos. They will drug and implant memories to astronauts to give the testimonies of being somehwhere out there. People like me who will be against the lie, will be outcasts and will struggle with keeping friends and family.

This next generation that was created to be lazy will embrace the new world and believe in the lie altogether. But first, they great revealiing must happen and lives must be lost to usher in the urgency to follow in line with government direction.

Since all of the current generations combined have evidence of ancestors beiling in the heliocentric model, the aliens will have no problem keeping the lie going. The stars are the first light created in Genesis. The second light of the sun and moon were created second. I do believe the planets are a 3D shadow representation of a fourth dimension beings wandering the heavens. They are trapped and cannot do anything other than send communication to the people of earth and their children the bodyless spirits of the old nephilim called demons.

In the sonoluminescence experiment, the light bursts quickly and goes away instantly not able to hold it’s power. Since a day in heaven is a thousand years on earth, these light sources are operating in ‘heaven time’ and are slower than our comprehension. If god were to watch us on his time, he would see us sped up so fast he would see buildings go up and fall and land change quickly. Sped up at 1000x. Our lifetime would truly be a blink of an eye.

According to science: The force that holds stars together and prevents them from collapsing under their own gravity is a delicate balance between two opposing forces:  

1. Gravity: This is the inward force that pulls all matter together. It's the same force that keeps your feet on the ground.   

2. Thermal Pressure: This is the outward force generated by the intense heat and pressure within the star's core. This heat and pressure are created by nuclear fusion, a process where hydrogen atoms are fused together to form helium, releasing enormous amounts of energy.   

Hydrostatic Equilibrium:

A star is in a state of hydrostatic equilibrium when these two forces are balanced. This means that the inward pull of gravity is exactly counteracted by the outward push of thermal pressure.  

This delicate balance is crucial for a star's stability. If gravity were to win, the star would collapse. If thermal pressure were to dominate, the star would expand and eventually disperse.  

It's a bit like a tug-of-war between gravity and thermal pressure, and as long as they're evenly matched, the star remains stable.

Evenly matched sounds weird to me. If this were true, wouldn’t the stars all be the same size?

You're absolutely right! The key to understanding why stars of different sizes can maintain this balance lies in the intricate relationship between a star's mass and its internal processes.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

* Mass Determines Internal Pressure: A star's mass directly influences the gravitational force pulling inward. More massive stars exert a stronger gravitational pull, which in turn requires higher internal pressure to counteract it.   

* Nuclear Fusion and Energy Output: The rate of nuclear fusion in a star's core is also linked to its mass. More massive stars fuse hydrogen at a faster rate, producing more energy and generating higher internal temperatures and pressures.   

* Balancing Act: The balance between gravity and internal pressure is dynamic. As a star ages and its core changes, the balance can shift. For instance, as a star's core runs out of hydrogen, it may contract, increasing the core temperature and igniting fusion of heavier elements. This can lead to a temporary expansion of the star's outer layers.

In essence, while the principle of hydrostatic equilibrium applies to all stars, the specific conditions and processes that maintain this balance vary depending on the star's mass and evolutionary stage.

This is why we see such a wide range of star sizes, from tiny red dwarfs to supergiant stars many times larger than our Sun. Each star finds its own equilibrium point, determined by its unique mass and internal energy generation.

Then this would mean there is a lot of gas and debris in space because not all matter will form the stars.

Absolutely, you're spot on!

Not all clouds of gas and dust will form stars. There are several reasons why this might happen:

1. Insufficient Mass: If a cloud of gas and dust doesn't have enough mass to initiate and sustain nuclear fusion, it won't become a star. Instead, it may form a brown dwarf, a celestial object that is too massive to be a planet but too small to be a star.  
2. Disruptive Forces: External forces, such as shock waves from supernovae or the gravitational pull of nearby stars, can disrupt the formation of a star by dispersing the gas and dust cloud.
3. Rapid Cooling: If a cloud of gas and dust cools too quickly, it may not reach the critical temperature and pressure needed for nuclear fusion to begin.

These factors can lead to the formation of various celestial objects, including nebulae, planetary nebulae, and interstellar clouds. These objects, while fascinating in their own right, are not stars.

Then that means stars should be a rarity in formation since achieving such a delecate balance actually needs the perfect conditions right?

That's a great question! While the conditions for star formation are indeed specific, the universe is vast and filled with countless opportunities for these conditions to arise.

Here's why stars aren't as rare as you might think:

1. Abundant Gas and Dust: The universe is filled with vast clouds of gas and dust, providing the raw materials for star formation.   

2. Gravity's Pull: Gravity is a powerful force that can pull these clouds together, initiating the process of star birth.   

3. Frequent Disturbances: Events like supernova explosions and galactic collisions can trigger star formation by compressing gas and dust clouds.   

While it's true that not every cloud of gas and dust will form a star, the sheer number of these clouds, coupled with the frequent disturbances in the universe, means that star formation is a relatively common occurrence.

So, while the conditions may be specific, the universe provides plenty of opportunities for new stars to be born.

Science and academia is saying stars are not rare. It says there is enough gas and debris out there to form them all the time. But where does all this debrid or matter come from?

The origin of the gas and matter that fills the universe can be traced back to the Big Bang. This event, which occurred approximately 13.8 billion years ago, marked the beginning of our universe.  

Initially, the universe was an incredibly hot and dense state. As it expanded and cooled, elementary particles like quarks and electrons formed. These particles then combined to form protons and neutrons, which eventually formed the nuclei of atoms, primarily hydrogen and helium.  

Over billions of years, gravity caused these primordial elements to clump together, forming stars and galaxies. Within these stars, nuclear fusion processes created heavier elements, such as carbon, oxygen, and iron. When massive stars die in spectacular supernova explosions, they scatter these heavier elements into space, enriching the interstellar medium.  

This enriched material can then form new stars and planets, including our own solar system. So, the elements that make up our bodies, our planet, and everything around us were once forged in the hearts of ancient stars.  

In essence, the universe is a cosmic recycling system, where the remnants of old stars become the building blocks for new ones.

So the big bang means all matter and gas were an object that blew up?

Not quite. The Big Bang theory doesn't describe an explosion in the traditional sense, like a bomb detonating. Instead, it's the idea that the universe began as an incredibly hot, dense point that rapidly expanded and cooled.  

It's more like a rapid expansion of space itself, rather than an explosion within a preexisting space. This expansion continues today, causing galaxies to move farther apart.  

So, while the image of a cosmic explosion is a common misconception, the Big Bang theory is a more nuanced and complex explanation for the origin of our universe.

But science still can’t explain where matter comes from. That's an excellent question. The origin of matter itself is one of the biggest mysteries in physics. While the Big Bang theory explains the expansion of the universe and the formation of elements, it doesn't fully explain where the initial energy and matter came from.

There are various hypotheses and theories, but a definitive answer remains elusive. Some theories suggest that matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts during the Big Bang, but a slight imbalance in favor of matter allowed our universe to exist. Others propose that our universe may be just one of many, each with its own unique laws of physics.

It's important to note that this is a field of active research, and new discoveries are constantly being made. As scientists continue to explore the cosmos and delve into the quantum realm, we may eventually uncover the ultimate origin of matter.

So science isn’t settled. That's correct. While the Big Bang theory is widely accepted as the best explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe, it's important to remember that science is always evolving. As new evidence emerges, theories can be refined or even replaced.

There are still many unanswered questions about the universe's origins, such as:

* What existed before the Big Bang?
* What caused the initial expansion?
* What is the nature of dark matter and dark energy?

Scientists continue to explore these questions through observations, experiments, and theoretical models. While the Big Bang theory provides a strong framework for understanding the universe, it's not a complete picture.

It's the nature of scientific inquiry to question, test, and refine our understanding of the world.

But when our alien buddies show up, they will offer an explanation and settle this. It will just be a lie on top of lie. Just as science behaves. I believe Albert Einstein was praised by his peers or the elite, not because he was smart in understanding the universe and how it behaves, but rather, created an entire theory based on lies and equations to explain the heliocentric model. It was close enough in math to fool the very elect.

Quantum physcis didn’t exist pre 1900’s. The foundations of quantum physics were laid in the early 20th century. Max Planck's work on black-body radiation in 1900 is often considered the birth of quantum theory. He proposed that energy is quantized, meaning it can only be emitted or absorbed in discrete packets called quanta.  

However, it was the work of many scientists over the following decades that truly shaped quantum mechanics. Key figures include:  

* Albert Einstein: His explanation of the photoelectric effect in 1905 further solidified the idea of quantization.   

* Niels Bohr: His model of the atom in 1913 introduced the concept of quantized energy levels for electrons.   

* Erwin Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg, and Paul Dirac: Their groundbreaking work in the 1920s developed the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics, which is still used today.   

So, while the roots of quantum physics can be traced back to the early 1900s, it was the collaborative efforts of many brilliant minds that led to the full development of this revolutionary theory.

Perhaps quantum physics was created to bypass ether and it’s properties. Ether was added to the Russian periodic table and removed entirely by academia around the same time quantum physics entered the scene.

Perhaps there is a math theory that is missing. Quantum physics has a long history with black magic. Perhaps this theory needed supernatural help to support it. Perhaps there are two types of Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH). One is the creators and one is the deception.

The rich and powerful have been able to hold onto ancient writings and philosophies from the public eye. The vatican alone has thousands of books that are considered classified. Gaining access to these books takes a lot of qualifications and vetting.

Perhaps Tesla stumbled upon this math. He did not support quantum physics. Why? Ultimately, while Tesla's contributions to science and technology are undeniable, his views on quantum physics were not aligned with the prevailing scientific consensus of his time.

Tesla was more into magnetism and not gravity. He, like me, chose not to take the adademies word for it. He played with Edison and saw how the secret societies were perverting science for power. Tesla wasn’t interested in money, rather, he had a love for his neighbor. He wanted people to be able to be self suffiicient while the current world model relied on government.

Tesla said earth is a realm and “The stars are attached to the firmament.” The original quote by Tesla is from his article “The Problem of Increasing Human Energy with Special References to the Harnessing of the Sun’s Energy, ” published by Century Magazine, June 1900. It was only a figure of speech, emphasizing human togetherness in the energy problem.

Tesla said the numbers 3, 6 and 9 are the key to the universe. Tesla expwerimented with vribrations and sound, which these phrases with his name is highly censored on the internet. Tesla was working with energy and vibrations or sound to bring harmony with man and earth. Tesla focused on power and not signal. We are talking about two forces. Good and evil. Evil uses the most damagable force for his deeds and Tesla was using God. I do believe he was a Christian.

If Tesla was to learn of the sonoluminescence experiment, he could have came to the same conclusion as I. That stars are trapped a slow time warp emanating light. They are trapped in the firmamant and providing light from an explosion of gas. Perhaps this would explain galaxies. They are just whirlpools of bubbles with sound vibrating through or from them giving light at 1000x slower speeds than our own.

Tesla didn’t believe in gravity as we know it and did follow the ether model. Tesla said that the ether is acted upon by the life-giving creative force. The ether is thrown into “infinitesimal whirls” (“micro helices”) at near the speed of light, becoming ponderable matter. Then the force subsides and motion ceases. Matter reverts to the ether (a form of “atomic decay”). The Dynamic Theory of Gravity of Nikola Tesla explains the relation between gravitation and electromagnetic force as a unified field theory (a model over matter, the aether, and energy). It is a unified field theory to unify all the fundamental forces (such as the force between all masses) and particle responses into a single theoretical framework.

Einstein was a genius liar. Tesla’s critique on Einstein’s work was considered by the scientific establishment to exceed the bounds of reason. Because Tesla offers truth and the establishment wants Satan’s will. It’s so obvious when you study the life of Tesla and his feud with the Illuminati. Especially with Thomas Edison who asked where to put the meter on his free electricity grid.

The establishment removed ether from the periodic table because it stores information infinitely. It is the only material that cannot be deleted or erased. It is compact, light, mobile. Ether is intangible but its particles will continue to exist and be recreated for millions of years. Satan only wants to steal, kill and destroy. He can’t use ether to do such a task, so they created quantum physics to work around ether.

Ether is the key to understanding other dimensions. In ancient greek mythology, ether is referred to God’s breath. If we think of the four types of ether in terms of plasma, the fourth state of matter making up most of the matter in the universe, it seems evident that plasma and æther are one and the same, but in different phases or forms of spherical, luminous, disc-forming, and individual. The fourth state of matter means just that: heat a solid sufficiently and it becomes liquid; heat a liquid and it becomes a gas; heat a gas (or subject it to a strong electromagnetic field) and it ionizes to become something no longer like ordinary gas in that it is strongly influenced by electric and magnetic fields. This is plasma, and the physics of plasma is about electrons and ions, conduction, high-voltage discharges, the mirroring ionosphere, the “dancing plasma” of the aurora borealis, our Sun, other stars

Æther is also viewed as extending to the subtle bodies of light that all biological creatures have (including planet Earth)—bodies vulnerable to ionized and non-ionized electromagnetic radiation. Austrian scientist Rudolf Steiner delineated four ethers (note the difference in spelling for subtle bodies) binding the physical to the psychic (ψνχή Greek for “soul” or “spirit”):

* The warmth ether, the most primordial, manifests centrifugally as heat and appears as SPHERICAL.
* The light ether, centrifugal, manifests as gas. Its primary quality is LUMINOSITY.
* The chemical/sound ether, centripetal, manifests as fluid and is DISC-FORMING.
* The life ether, centripetal, immediately precedes matter and is INDIVIDUALIZING.6

So, given the possibility of the gas source in a star, perhaps ether is what explodes and combusts to form light and can hold the energy for longer than the current sonoluminescence experiment using water or glycerol. I do believe that Elon Musk chose the name Tesla and be associated with it, was to throw us off of Tesla’s work and finding the truth. I could care less if I am right or wrong on the star theory. But it makes more sense to me than a ball of energy without a source of matter to continue the explosions emanating light. I do believe the controller of knowldge on earth is hiding ether and Tesla as best as they can so that we stay dumb in Einstein’s made up theory of relativity.

source

https://nobulart.com/aether-plasma-scalar-waves/
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/17/8790

Show less