Premium Only Content
Did Trump & Epstein Rape Young Girls Together?
These Court Documents Indicate – a very strong possibility. But, read them for yourself and make your own deductions.
Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document 1 Filed 06/20/16
*NOTE: This was a REAL Case (excerpts included below with sources to all documents). Look the case # up for yourself. It was Dismissed and Fact Checkers are saying this is not Evidence of Anything.
Yes, these were Allegations, but these are about as serious as allegations as one can have on their record.
Ask Yourself, if the media really hated Trump, why wouldn’t they probe this and bring it to the Public’s attention and make Trump answer this.
The answer is simple – the script says it’s once again time for DJT to take the stage to drive the narrative.
It makes you wonder if Epstein was actually axed because of his inside knowledge of what DJT did to little girls.
He was known to keep hidden cameras and had video on just about everyone.
Did he have video of Trump?
Why was Trump’s name in Epstein’s Black Book? *See source # 5 below.
This case was to be tried about EXACTLY when Trump was elected in 2016.
How convenient it was dismissed WITHOUT prejudice, meaning that charges could still be refiled, unsure about statute of limitations.
Was Epstein removed to pave a clear and worry-free path for Trump to play this role of being a clean cut guy who is going to clean the swamp and remove the Deep State (which is complete laughable, once you dig deep and find out he was born in the Swamp and is definitely 100% IN the Club.)
It is so easy to look the other way when the country is in the state it is in.
Everyone is filled with so much hope?
How did that hope go the first time around? A Pandemic was created, the country was shut down, vaccines were mandated and in the midst of the lockdown, Trump initiated 5G to be put up EVERYWHERE.
Then they play the card that Biden stole the election to make Trump look like he was screwed, and now the “savior” is back.
Is it a major jump to think this way?
This is just the use of free speech while connecting all the dots from the past.
This is not being stated as Fact but some things that need to be considered.
Censorship is about NOT Asking Questions.
In this day and age we should be constantly asking questions.
Anyway, here is just a part of of the Case – go visit that site as it gets much deeper into the details regarding the accusations of horrendous acts by DJT -- from Sources #4 & #5 below.
A lawsuit is filed accusing Trump and Epstein of rape, sexual misconduct and threats against a minor in 1994.
What is the nature of the lawsuit?
What accusations are made against Trump?
Ask your own questions
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.) Case No.:JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Plaintiff Jane Doe, proceeding under a pseudonym, brings this action against Donald J.Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein, and alleges that:
PARTIES
2. Plaintiff is an individual residing in and a citizen of the State of California.2.
3. Upon information and belief, Defendants Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epsteineach reside in this District and are citizens of the State of New York.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
4. Plaintiff is a citizen of the State of California for purposes of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.4.
5. Defendants are citizens of the State of New York for purposes of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
6. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction with respect to this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as there exists complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiffand Defendants and the amount in controversy exceeds Seventy Five Thousand Dollars($75,000.00), exclusive of interest and costs.
7. Defendants are each subject to the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1332 with proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 as both defendants are residents ofand/or are domiciled in this district and the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this district.
RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT.
8. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The partieswere held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 andwas legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NYPenal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto. Jane Doe and Tiffany Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B.8.
9. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for privacy outweighs the public’s interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the defendants.
Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification ofPlaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of theten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity, especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g.,factors one and two: “whether the litigation involves matters that are ‘highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,’” and “’whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or even more critically, to innocent non-parties’”.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity. Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim.9.
10. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend aseries of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residencethat was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended byDefendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant Trump had known Defendant Epstein for seven years (New York, 10/28/02), and knew that Plaintiff was then just 13 years old. Exhs. A and B.10.
11. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A andB.11.
12. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.12.
13. Defendant Epstein had sexual contact with Plaintiff at two of the parties. The second sexual encounter with Defendant Epstein took place after Plaintiff had been raped by Defendant Trump. Defendant Epstein forced himself upon Plaintiff and proceeded to rape her anally and vaginally despite her loud pleas to stop. Defendant Epstein then attempted to strike Plaintiff about the head with his closed fists while he angrily screamed at Plaintiff that he, Defendant Epstein, rather than Defendant Trump, should have been the one who took Plaintiff’s virginity, before Plaintiff finally managed to break away from Defendant Epstein. Exhs. A andB. 13.
14. The threats of violence against Plaintiff and her family continued, this time from Defendant Epstein, who again reiterated that Plaintiff was not to reveal any of the details of his sexual and physical abuse of her or else, specifically, Plaintiff and her family would be seriously physically harmed, if not killed. Exhs. A and B.14.
15. While still under threats of physical harm by coming forward and having no reason to believe that the threats have ever been lifted or would ever be lifted, Plaintiff, who has suffered from stress, emotional distress, mental pain and suffering, among other problems, ever since the assaults, was subjected to daily painful reminders of the horrific acts of one of the perpetrators, Defendant Trump, via mass media coverage of him starting on or about June 16, 2015 that, over a short period of time, became continuous and unavoidable. Exh. A.15.
16. As a direct and proximate result of the sexual assaults and rapes perpetrated by Defendants upon her, Plaintiff has suffered stress, emotional distress, and mental pain and suffering, as well as adverse physical consequences.
17. As a direct and proximate result of the sexual assaults and rapes perpetrated by Defendants upon her, Plaintiff has suffered physical pain and suffering.
18. As a direct and proximate result of the sexual assaults and rapes perpetrated by Defendants upon her, Plaintiff has been subjected to public scorn, hatred, and ridicule and has suffered threats against her life and physical safety.
19. As a direct and proximate result of the sexual assaults and rapes perpetrated by Defendants upon her, Plaintiff has incurred special damages, including medical and legal expenses.19.
The sexual assaults and rapes perpetrated by Defendants upon Plaintiff were intentional acts.
20. The conduct of Defendants demonstrates willful, reckless and intentional conduct that raises a conscious indifference to consequences.
21. At the appropriate time in this litigation, Plaintiff shall amend her complaint to assert a claim for punitive damages against Defendants in order to punish Defendants for their actions and to deter Defendants from repeating their conduct.
TOLLING OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
22. Any statute of limitations applicable to rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment of a minor, if any, is tolled owing to the continuous and active duress imposed upon Plaintiff by Defendants that effectively robbed Plaintiff of her freewill to commence legal action until the present time.
Cullen v. Margiotta , 811 F.2d 698, 722(2nd Cir.1987); Ross v. United States, 574 F. Supp. 536, 542 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). More particularly, Plaintiff was unrelentingly threatened by each Defendant that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse caused to her by Defendants, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. The duress has not terminated and thefear has not subsided. The duress is an element of or inherent in the underlying causes of action complained of herein. The duress and coercion exerted by Defendants has been such as to haveactually deprived Plaintiff of her freedom of will to institute suit earlier in time, and it rose tosuch a level that a person of reasonable firmness in Plaintiff's situation would have been unable to resist. Exhs. A and B.23.
Both Defendants let Plaintiff know that each was a very wealthy, powerful man and indicated that they had the power, ability and means to carry out their threats. Indeed, Defendant Trump stated that Plaintiff shouldn’t ever say anything if she didn’t want to disappear like Maria, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the third incident with Defendant Trump and that Plaintiff had not seen since that third incident, and that he was capable of having her whole family killed. Exhs. A and B.24.
The duress had prevented Plaintiff from starting litigation before this year.However, as soon as she surfaced, she received threats. More specifically, shortly after her first complaint was filed in California on April 26, 2016, she started receiving threatening phone calls on her cell phone. Exh. A.25.
Defendants are equitably stopped from arguing that any statute of limitations has not been tolled as Defendants wrongfully forced Plaintiff to refrain from timely commencing this action by threats, duress, and other misconduct. Exhs. A and B.26.
Moreover, this action has been brought before the facts giving rise to the estoppelhave ceased to be operational (i.e., while still under threats of physical harm by coming forward and having no reason to believe that the threats have ever been lifted or would ever be lifted) and since Plaintiff has decided to seek redress at this time, Plaintiff seeks an order of protection in favor of Plaintiff and all associated with her so as to protect them from harm and harassment from Defendants and their agents and associates. Exh. A.
DEFAMATION
27. On information and belief, on or about April 28, 2016, Defendant Trump provided the following statement to American Media, Inc. and/or Radar Online LLC for publication on at least their website RadarOnline.com regarding Plaintiff’s complaint ED CV 16-797-DMG (KSx) filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California:
“The allegations are not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level and clearly
framed to solicit media attention or, perhaps, are simply politically motivated. There is
absolutely no merit to these allegations. Period.”
28. The statement provided for publication by Defendant Trump was published by said website and has been republished elsewhere in whole orin part numerous times (and similar statements of an attorney for Defendant Trump were also published). The statement provided for publication by Defendant Trump and that was published by said websites is false as it pertains to Plaintiff.
The published statement is libelous on its face, and clearly exposes Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and obloquy.
29. As a proximate result of the above-described publication, Plaintiff has suffered loss of her reputation, shame, mortification, and injury to her feelings, all to her damage in an amount to be established by proof at trial.
30. The above-described publication was not privileged because it was published by Defendant Trump with malice, hatred and ill will toward Plaintiff and the desire to injure her.
31. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Trump’s defamation of Plaintiff Plaintiff has been subjected to public scorn, hatred, and ridicule and has suffered other injury.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants and for the following relief:
A. That judgment be entered against Defendants for special damages, compensatory damages, and punitive damages in an amount which shall be shown to be reasonable and just bythe evidence and in excess of Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00), exclusive of interests and costs;
9B. That all costs of this action be assessed against Defendants, including all
reasonable attorney’s fees, costs and expenses of this action ;C. That an order of protection in favor of Plaintiff and all associated with her be issued so as to protect them from harm and harassment from Defendants and their agents andassociates; andD. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of all issues properly triable by jury in this action. Respectfully
Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 20, 2016 By: / s/ Thomas Francis Meagher
Thomas Francis Meagher SDNY Bar Code TM6707One Palmer Square Princeton, New Jersey 08542Telephone: (609) 558-1500tmeagher@thomasfmeagheresq.comATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF.
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
I, Jane Doe, the Plaintiff in this matter proceeding under a pseudonym, state as follows:
1. I am a competent adult over 18 years of age able to testify as to personal knowledge.
The facts in this declaration are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, and I am competent to testify to them if called upon to do so.
2. I was subject to extreme sexual and physical abuse by the Defendants, including forcible rape, that took place at several parties of Defendant Epstein during the summer of 1994 in New York City at a residence used by Defendant Epstein. During this period, I was 13 years old.
3. More particularly, I traveled by bus to New York City in June 1994 in the hope of starting a modeling career. I went to several modeling agencies but was told that I needed to put together a modeling portfolio before I would be considered. I then went to the Port Authority in New York City to start to make my way back home. There I met a woman who introduced herself to me as Tiffany.
She told me about the parties and said that, if I would join her at the parties, I would be introduced to people who could get me into the modeling profession. Tiffany also told me I would be paid for attending.
4. The parties were held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
Each of the parties had other minor females and a number of guests of Mr. Epstein, including Defendant Donald Trump at four of the parties I attended. I understood that both Mr. Trump and Mr.Epstein knew that I was 13 years old.
5. Defendant Trump had sexual contact with me at four different parties in the summer of 1994.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied me to a bed, exposed himself to me, and then proceeded to forcibly rape me. During the course of this savage sexual attack, I loudly pleaded with
Defendant Trump to stop but he did not. Defendant Trump responded tomy pleas by violently striking me in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted.
6. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened me that, were I ever
to reveal any of the details of Defendant Trump’s sexual and physical abuse of me, my family and I would be physically harmed if not killed.
7. Defendant Epstein had sexual contact with me at two of the parties that summer.
On the second occasion involving Defendant Epstein, Defendant Epstein forced himself upon me and proceeded to rape me anally and vaginally despite my loud please to stop. Defendant Epstein then attempted tostrike me about the head with his closed fists while he angrily screamed at me that he, Defendant Epstein, should have been the one who took my virginity, not Defendant Trump, before I finally managed to break away from Defendant Epstein.
**NOTE: This is just part of all the documents – One Final Excerpt Highlight:
7. It was at these series of parties that I personally witnessed the Plaintiff being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old.
8. I personally witnessed four sexual encounters that the Plaintiff was forced to have with Mr.Trump during this period, including the fourth of these encounters where Mr. Trump forcibly raped her despite her pleas to stop.
SO: Is it possible that Trump is a Sexual Deviant, a Raping Pedophile?
He did say that if Ivanka wasn’t his own daughter he would date her.
Isn’t that just a little hint?
Sources:
1. TheFreedomArticles -- https://rumble.com/v5n3fw2-trump-and-epstein-raped-girls-together-remember-video-155.html
2. Doe v Trump – Download Free Pdf’s on this Case -- https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4357335/9/doe-v-trump/
3. Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit -- https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits#fullscreen?platform=hootsuite
4. The 19 Page PDF File – Case 1:16-cv-07673 – Jane Doe v Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein – filed on 9/30/2016 -- https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/3130729/DOE-V-TRUMP.pdf
5. Why is Donald Trump’s Name in Pedophile Epstein’s Little Black Book? -- https://thefreedomarticles.com/trump-and-pedophilia-epstein-black-book/
6. Many More Trump Wake Up Rumble Videos – The Man Isn’t Who We Think -- https://mrnavac.blogspot.com/2024/10/trump-truther-rumble-videos.html
*******************************************************
Earn unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase, every day. Plus a $200 Cash Bonus. → https://i.capitalone.com/GxODNQtCd
For a limited time only—earn a one-time $250 cash bonus if they spend $500 on purchases within 3 months from account opening.
• Earn 1.5% cash back on every purchase, every day.
• Earn 5% cash back on hotels and rental cars booked through Capital One Travel.
• Enjoy a $0 annual fee.
***********************************************************
PROTECT YOURSELF: Protect yourself, your children and loved ones from the harmful EMF from the newly installed 5G Towers. We are constantly being Bombarded by Harmful Radiation, being hit from all directions, every single day.
Orgone Generators, Pendants, Phone Shields, & EMF Protection for Laptops
Orgone Pendants & Phone Shields & Energy Generators and much more- https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/528/
Special Offers -- https://www.ftwproject.com/our-special-offers/ref/528/
Follow me on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/WakeUpWorld
*Also: Please Visit My Blog Homepage, where I am now placing Full Summaries all my Top Videos and you will find many videos that I have not released to public yet → https://mrnavac.blogspot.com/2021/03/deaths-and-side-effects.html
Thank You!!
END. 11/9/2024 – 9:00 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
15:36
Neil McCoy-Ward
1 hour ago🚨 Emergency Martial Law Declared, Special Forces Deployed...
12.7K2 -
LIVE
The Charlie Kirk Show
1 hour agoDemocrat Billionaires in Crisis + Fixing the Migrant Crisis | Blagojevich, O'Brien, Metaxas| 12.3.24
8,211 watching -
1:01:07
The Dan Bongino Show
4 hours agoBiden’s Reign Of Destruction Isn’t Over Yet (Ep. 2381) - 12/03/2024
611K1.3K -
1:59:02
Steven Crowder
4 hours ago🔴 COVID Chronicles: The Hidden Truths of the Pandemic Exposed
336K181 -
LIVE
SoundBoardLord
3 hours agoMulti-Gen Don Juan in Full Force!
222 watching -
1:08:54
MTNTOUGH Fitness Lab
3 hours agoSheriff Mark Lamb Exposes America’s Border Crisis and Cartel Infiltration | MTNT POD#93
8.75K1 -
8:52
Cooking with Gruel
12 hours agoToasted Brown Butter Cornbread
10.8K -
1:01:44
The Rubin Report
3 hours agoJon Stewart Loses His Cool with Democrats for Saying This About Hunter Biden Pardon
49.7K51 -
1:52:47
Benny Johnson
3 hours agoLibs BACKSTAB 'Senile' Biden | Trump Tells Trudeau USA Is Going To Make Canada '51st State!’ 🇨🇦
60.1K68 -
1:13:08
Graham Allen
5 hours agoCOVID Conspiracies TRUE! Jill FORCED Joe To Pardon Hunter! + Trump wants Canada as The 51st State!
128K244