Jan 17, 2025

The Supreme Court heard consolidated oral argument in TikTok v. Garland and Firebaugh v. Garland, a case about TikTok's First Amendment challenge to a law requiring the app to divest from Chinese parent company ByteDance or face a nationwide ban. ByteDance, TikTok, and content creators argued the law violated the First Amendment, but the Justice Department maintained TikTok was a national security risk due to ultimate ownership under China. In December 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit upheld the law, which takes effect Jan. 19, 2025. ByteDance and TikTok then filed an emergency appeal. President-elect Donald Trump, who tried to get TikTok banned during his first term, reversed course and filed a brief asking the Court to temporarily block the law so he could "pursue a political resolution" in the dispute January 10, 2025

Jan 9, 2025

Dec 30, 2024

Dec 04, 2024

Nov 23, 2024

Nov 22, 2024

Nov 10, 2024

Nov 1, 2024 A lower court previously held that not counting undated ballots violated the state constitution.

Oct 12, 2024n

The U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary holds a full committee hearing titled "'When the President Does It, that Means It's Not illegal': The Supreme Court's Unprecedented Immunity Decision" at 10 a.m. ET on Sept. 24.

AUG 28, 2024

11:01 AM · Aug 4, 2024

AIRED 7/29/24

July 25, 2024 Justice Elena Kagan Speaks at U.S Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit Conference Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan said criticism of the Court’s code of conduct lacking an enforcement mechanism is “fair.” She added she would welcome enforcement of the rules. Justice Kagan spoke about this topic while attending the U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit conference in Sacramento, California. Other topics included the increase in the number of emergency applications during the Trump and Biden administrations and why too many concurring opinions by the justices is not always a good thing Roger Townsend Chair Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference->Program Committee Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court Madeleine Wanslee Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court->District of Arizona

@Article3Project Founder and President Mike Davis @mrddmia tells @RealPNavarro Peter Navarro that Democrats will nuke legislative branch voting rules and the Supreme Court if the party wins Congress and the White House: “That's why it is so critical that we put President Trump back in the White House. Because do you want President Trump or President Kamala Harris replacing Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito on the Supreme Court?” 12:51 PM · Jul 29, 2024

July 2, 2024

Mark Paoletta Reacts to Dems Calling For the Assassination of Trump After SCOTUS Immunity Ruling July 2, 2024

July 2, 2024

"It's Going To Stop That Case In Its Tracks Because You're Dealing With Immunity" Aired On: 7/2/2024

'The Five' co-host Judge Jeanine Pirro weighs in after Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claimed the Supreme Court's immunity ruling is an 'assault on American democracy. July 1, 2024

Trump campaign senior adviser Alina Habba reacts to the SCOTUS ruling that Trump has substantial protections from criminal prosecution

SCOTUS 'gutted' case against Trump, legal experts conclude: 'MAJOR VICTORY' Former federal prosecutor Andrew Cherkasky and constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley discuss the latest SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity.

July 1, 2024 related docs Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1008_1b82.pdf Moody v. NetChoice, LLC https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-277_d18f.pdf Trump v. United States https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Cherkasky on expected Supreme Court rulings, particularly former President Donald Trump's immunity claim Chevron explained

June 28, 2024 Links to docs. City of Grants Pass v. Johnson https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-175_19m2.pdf Fischer v. United States https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf Moyle v. United States https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-726_6jgm.pdf Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23a349diff_lkhn.pdf

Fox News contributors Jonathan Turley and Andy McCarthy joined 'America's Newsroom' to discuss the Supreme Court's latest opinion and the justices' views on how the obstruction law doesn't apply. FISCHER v. UNITED STATES June 28, 2024 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf

June 26, 2024

June 24, 2024

June 24, 2024

June 21, 2024 @amrenewctr Director of Litigation @JeffClarkUS says the Supreme Court ruled Friday morning that U.S. citizens do not have a constitutional right to guarantee their noncitizen spouse’s admittance into our country.

June 10, 2024

Apr 29, 2024

Apr 25, 2024

The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the case Starbucks v. McKinney, appealing a National Labor Relations Board ruling that said it must reinstate seven workers at a Memphis, Tennessee, store who lost their jobs during a campaign to unionize. APRIL 23, 2024

Apr 23, 2024

The Supreme Court hears oral argument in a case on whether an Oregon city’s ordinance restricting people including the homeless, from camping or sleeping in outdoor spaces, violates the Eight Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Apr 22, 2024

Apr 16, 2024 The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fischer v. United States, a case that could impact hundreds of January 6 defendants' cases as well as Special Counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case against former President Donald Trump. Joseph Fischer, the petitioner and a January 6 defendant is challenging a criminal statute used by the federal government to charge him with obstructing an official proceeding. The proceeding is the congressional certification of the electoral votes in the 2020 presidential election on January 6, 2021. His legal team argues the statute is only applicable when there is tampering with evidence, and they contend Mr. Fischer did nothing of a sort. They want the obstruction charge thrown out. The federal government disagrees with their legal interpretation. The Supreme Court has through June 2024 to issue a ruling.