Dr. Angus Dalgleish about Ramifications of synthetic DNA contamination of COVID-19 "vaccines"

"Decades of research have demonstrated the risks of foreign DNA integrating into human cells, leading to potentially catastrophic outcomes. Synthetic DNA contamination, as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines by David Speicher, presents risks of a genomic instability which can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases.

To explain in more straightforward terms, the vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles, which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into various organs throughout the body, where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. As such, these vaccines are not vaccines they are in fact a gene therapy based.

This genomic integration as the scientific literature makes clear can lead to cancer development, immune system disruption and more. The sheer levels of contamination detected up to a hundred and forty five times the missile limit in some cases are extraordinary and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product.

The real world evidence from the UK, while this may sound like a remote possibility, I am here to tell you that we are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. In my work as an oncologist in the UK, I started to see a disturbing trend as early as February, 2022. Patients who'd been cancer-free for many years were suddenly relapsing with aggressive explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.

I personally counted six cases in as many weeks in patients who developed rapid progression having been completely stable with zero disease, having been on immunotherapy. I gave them five, eight, ten, fifteen, eighteen years ago. I am used to people who progress when they develop severe depression such as during divorce bereavement, debt, et cetera.

But all these patients only had one thing in common, and that was they'd all been forced to have a booster by their GPs on the grounds they were at risk. One of the most unsettling aspects in the nature of these cancers is that they're not slow progressing, that we are accustomed to managing, that they are aggressive, often presenting in advanced stages, affecting multiple organs by the time they're diagnosed.

Polar rectal cancer in particular is showing explosive growth, something we have never seen before. These cancers are emerging faster and more virulent than we would have expected in patients who have otherwise been stable. In addition to cancer relapses, I have encountered a rise in blood cancers such as leukemias and lymphomas, which have appeared shortly after vaccinations.

I have had many colleagues and patients express concerns about the effects about the timing of these cancers following what I believe to be totally unnecessary boosters. It is not an isolated issue. My own research has shown that the boosters suppress the T-cell response and switch the antibody response to tolerizing.

That means this is a perfect example where you have switched off the policing of foreign invaders, viruses, etc. and cancer, allowing it to grow under control. What does this mean for Australia? Australia has administered more than 63 million doses of these vaccines to over 20 million people.

The same vaccines that are linked to these rising cancer cases are in use here. However, the difference is that Australia health authorities, particularly the Department of Health, and the Therapeutic Goods Administration have chosen not to monitor new or emerging cancer trends following the widespread use of these vaccines.

This is a critical gap in the public health oversight. Given the contamination levels in the Australian Bios significantly higher than acceptable limits, we must expect a similar rise in cancers and other genetic disorders here. This issue is not simply one of vaccine side effects. It is a potential long term health crisis waiting to happen.

It is troubling that the Department of Health has not made data on cancer trends post-vaccination publicly available. In the last month or so, we have had data release from the Office of National Statistics of Japan, followed rapidly by Czechoslovakia and Northern Italy, which have clearly shown that each booster increases the incidence of cancer across the board. So the more boosters, the greater the likelihood of the cancer.

And in these countries, they are already seeing a rise in all cancers across the board, not just those that we know are very sensitive to immune control stuff. I, for the first time, I'm starting to see these in the last few months in the UK, where people have had more than one booster, particularly gliomas and pancreatic cancers and instances that I have never seen.

Low background of these patients, of these cancers, has suddenly accelerated into younger people and more aggressive disease exactly as feared. I therefore urge the council to take this matter seriously and to advocate for immediate public health responses.

We need our health authorities to begin monitoring these trends, develop testing protocols for those exposed to synthetic DMA contamination and prepare treatment pathways for the inevitable rise in vaccine-induced conditions. Without immediate action, we risk leaving Australians vulnerable to a wave of preventable diseases that will dwarf anything that we have ever had to deal with in my lifetime.

The contamination of these vaccines with synthetic DNA should have been caught and dealt with before any doses were administered. However, now that it has come to light, we must act urgently to mitigate the damage. The first step is to halt further distribution of these contaminated products and to ensure that all future vaccines meet the strictest safety council.

In addition, I would point out as someone who sat on the scientific board of CureVac, which calls itself the messenger RNA vaccine company for over five years and who left seven years ago that unlike most clinicians, I understand the details and problems of these vaccines better than any clinical peer I have come across.

They have been totally unable to stabilize these vaccines for years and cannot even meet the standards for cancer therapy. So how come they have been allowed to be rushed through for a disease which was not really a pandemic in the fact that it only killed 0.085% of the population with an average age of 82.

These products are highly dangerous and the governments are being pushed by these pharmaceutical companies to use this technology for childhood vaccines. This could be an unmitigated disaster that would make the thalidomide disaster previously look very, very small beer in comparison."