Anyone who questions their climate propaganda is labeled as 'disinformation'

29 days ago
5

CCDH CEO Imran Ahmed is peddling a familiar narrative: that anyone who questions the climate consensus is spreading 'disinformation' and undermining the scientific consensus. But what Ahmed is really saying is that anyone who dares to challenge the establishment's climate narrative is a threat to the status quo.

Ahmed's language is deliberately alarmist, warning of a 'tidal wave of climate disinformation' that's designed to undermine the scientific consensus. But what consensus is he talking about? The one that's been repeatedly shown to be flawed, exaggerated, and politicized? The one that's been used to justify draconian policies, suppress dissenting voices, and stifle debate?

Ahmed's real concern is not about the integrity of the scientific consensus, but about maintaining the dominant narrative that serves the interests of the powerful. By conjuring up images of a 'tidal wave of disinformation,' Ahmed is attempting to create a sense of crisis and urgency, which is then used to justify censorship, control, and the suppression of dissenting voices.

And what's this 'epistemic crisis' that Ahmed is talking about? Is it the crisis of people waking up to the fact that the climate narrative is being manipulated and exaggerated for political and financial gain? Is it the crisis of people realizing that the solutions being proposed are nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to impose a new world order?

Ahmed's statement that 'fixing the disorder in our information ecosystem has become integral to the solution' is a euphemism for 'controlling the narrative and suppressing dissent.' It's a call to arms for the establishment to silence critics, manipulate public opinion, and impose its will on the world.

We must reject Ahmed's attempt to stifle debate and silence dissenting voices. We must promote a culture of open inquiry, critical thinking, and transparency, where all voices are heard and all perspectives are considered. Anything less is a betrayal of the principles of democracy and freedom

Loading comments...