Trump Prophecies

Cause Before Symptom - With Your Host James Carner

Show more

Trump Prophecies

Fake news is spinning the recent video of Bill Clinton in North Carolina. “Former President Bill Clinton busted out a bizarre and confusing impression of Donald Trump on Thursday, during which he suggested that the GOP nominee might send him to “supermax” prison for life. Clinton, 78, made no real attempt at capturing Trump’s distinctive voice or mannerisms when he spoke as the 45th president during a North Carolina rally with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz — with the intention of conveying that he might be considered by Trump to be “the danger within.” “When you sign up, the oath says you promise to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” Clinton told the crowd.”

Check out this video of Bill Clinton.

Who is he talking to? Why say this in front of a group of Americans at a rally for Harris? Why did he say this? A transfer to Gitmo? A change of heart? I know that many Americans are hanging on to the idea that Trump is talking with the lord and is a prophet. I have told you that I don’t believe this because history always repeats and we’ve never had a jubilee of debt forgiveness. Especially when it takes hundreds of years to setup world domination to begin with.

No. All of this was orchestrated. I have said that if there are tribunals, they will be controlled as the higher up are ready to eat their young. For example, Former Abercrombie & Fitch CEO Mike Jeffries was just arrested on sex trafficking charges. The 13 illuminati familes are going down. Not the Zorastrians. They need to put a stop to the great awakening so their job is to give the appearance of a savior and that will be trump.

Every 100 years, the elite get caught trying for world domination and their secret societies go underground breifly and change their name. People seem to forget who is in control of all the corporations and countries to begin with. Satan has his hands in every single one. Not the small businesses, however. Yes, the Clintons seem to be the ones that the Jesuits will pin all of this on and the take down of Hillary and Bill will satisfy the angry right.

This is how you control the narrative. Send a savior. The illuminati cards even predicted Trump via his image and said this exact thing will happen and those cards were created in the 80’s. Trump is the false savior that will at first bring peace and then total destruction through a world war. He is not the antichrist but an antichrist. You can tell by his fruits. We can also see many similarrities between America now and Germany pre world war 1.

The specter of war, once a distant memory, has resurfaced in contemporary discourse, fueled by escalating tensions and economic anxieties. As the world grapples with the aftermath of a global pandemic and the enduring challenges of economic inequality, many have drawn parallels between the present and the tumultuous years leading up to World War I. In particular, the burgeoning national debts of both Germany in the early 20th century and the United States today have raised concerns about the potential for a debt-fueled conflict.

Pre-WWI Germany, burdened by the reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles, found itself in a precarious economic position. The nation's inability to meet its financial obligations led to hyperinflation, social unrest, and a growing sense of resentment towards its creditors. The rise of extremist political parties, particularly the Nazi Party, capitalized on this economic discontent, promising a return to national glory and economic prosperity through aggressive foreign policy.

Similarly, the United States today faces a mounting national debt, fueled by decades of deficit spending, tax cuts, and government bailouts. While the causes of America's debt are different from those of pre-WWI Germany, the consequences could be equally dire. A failure to address the nation's fiscal challenges could lead to economic instability, political polarization, and a loss of international standing.

However, it is important to note that the parallels between the two periods are not exact. The global political landscape has changed dramatically since the early 20th century, and the interconnectedness of the modern world makes it difficult to isolate any single nation's economic problems as the sole cause of a potential conflict. Moreover, the United States has a much more diverse and resilient economy than pre-WWI Germany, and its democratic institutions are more likely to prevent the rise of extremist ideologies.

Nevertheless, the growing economic disparities and geopolitical tensions around the world cannot be ignored. The risk of a debt-fueled conflict, while perhaps remote, is not entirely hypothetical. It is imperative that policymakers in the United States and other nations work together to address the underlying causes of economic inequality and promote international cooperation. By doing so, they can help to prevent a tragedy that would have devastating consequences for humanity.

Here’s what we are to expect with Trump winning the election this year as we compare what Hitler did when he took over Germany before World War 1.

Elections: The Nazis gained power through democratic elections, though their tactics were far from fair or democratic. They used propaganda, intimidation, and manipulation to win votes.

Enabling Act: This law, passed in 1933, granted Hitler extraordinary powers, effectively making him a dictator. Trump will pass some law that will give him dictator power, however, I argue that the President already has this ability anyways.

Purge and Repression: The Nazis used violence, intimidation, and imprisonment to eliminate political opponents and consolidate their power. According to Bill Clinton, in his speech to North Carolina delegates, he says he is definitely going to jail. We will see a purge.

World War: Trump told us who our enemy is. It’s China. Trump is in favor of the federal reserve. Which means he’s working for the Orsini family. China threatens the federal reserve with their Yuan and the BRICS gold backed bank.

I have mentioned many times that 1500 years ago, there were two familes that controlled everything. The Guelphs and Ghibellines or the Breakspeare and Orsini familes. I have uncovered through my own research that the Orsini family placed their own pope in the catholic church around 1500 which gave them the spear of destiny.

I do believe that both families are always competing for the grey pope position. The Breakspeare family are responsible for the BRICS banking interest. The Democratic party is controlled by the Breakspeare family who want to destroy the west. And the republican party is controlled by the Orsini family who wants to remain in control of the federal reserve.

Both familes are related in blood. They are the sons of Cain. Cain was a biblical figure in the Book of Genesis within Abrahamic religions. He is the elder brother of Abel, and the firstborn son of Adam and Eve, the first couple within the Bible. He was a farmer who gave an offering of his crops to God. However, God was not pleased and favored Abel's offering over Cain's. Out of jealousy, Cain killed his brother, for which he was punished by God with the curse and mark of Cain. He had several children, starting with Enoch and including Lamech. The narrative is notably unclear on God's reason for rejecting Cain's sacrifice. Some traditional interpretations consider Cain to be the originator of evil, violence, or greed. According to Genesis, Cain was the first human born and the first murderer.

Since the families are blood related, they do not war with one another in the traditional sense. They use the lower illuminated familes to fight each other over their interests. Meaning, the Orsini and Breakspeare are the top two familes of the 13 Zorastrian bloodlines of Cain. Zoroastrianism is one of the world's oldest monotheistic religions, having originated from ancient Persia. It contains both monotheistic and dualistic elements, and many scholars believe Zoroastrianism influenced the belief systems of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

Trump is on the side of the west who is losing economically to the east. The only way for the west to stay in control is to start a war with the east. The west is still more powerful via militarily than the east.

A West vs. East Military Might Comparison

The West: A Tradition of Military Dominance

Historically, the West, often synonymous with Western Europe, North America, and Australia, has held a significant military advantage. Key factors contributing to this dominance include:

* Technological Superiority: The West has often been at the forefront of military technology, from gunpowder to nuclear weapons.
* Industrial Capacity: Robust economies and industrial bases have allowed for large-scale production of military equipment and supplies.
* Global Presence: Western nations have established extensive military bases and alliances around the world, enhancing their strategic reach.
* Military Doctrine: Western military doctrines, such as those developed by the United States, have emphasized innovation, adaptability, and the ability to project power.

The East: Rising Influence and Military Modernization

While the West has traditionally held the upper hand, the East, particularly China, has been rapidly modernizing its military capabilities. Key factors driving this shift include:

* Economic Growth: China's economic rise has fueled significant investments in military infrastructure and technology.
* Military Reforms: China has implemented reforms to modernize its military, including a shift towards joint operations and a focus on information warfare.
* Regional Ambitions: China's growing regional influence has led to increased military spending and the development of a blue-water navy.
* Nuclear Deterrent: Both China and Russia possess nuclear arsenals, serving as a deterrent against potential aggression.

The West: A Tradition of Military Spending

The West, particularly the United States, has historically maintained a large and well-equipped military. While exact figures fluctuate, the United States typically has one of the largest militaries in the world, with millions of active and reserve personnel. Other Western nations, such as France, the United Kingdom, and Germany, also maintain significant military forces.

The East: Rising Military Spending

The East, particularly China, has been increasing its military spending in recent years. While its exact military personnel numbers are often debated, it is estimated to have one of the largest militaries in the world. India, another major power in the East, also maintains a substantial military force.

The West: Technological Advantage
The West, particularly the United States, has historically maintained a technological advantage in weapons development. This advantage has been fueled by:

* Research and Development: Significant investments in military research and development have led to advancements in areas such as precision-guided munitions, stealth technology, and electronic warfare.
* Industrial Base: A robust industrial base has enabled the production of sophisticated weapons systems.
* Military-Industrial Complex: The close relationship between the military and defense industry has fostered innovation and continuous improvement.

Key Western Weapons:

* Aircraft: F-22 and F-35 stealth fighters, B-2 and B-21 bombers
* Missiles: Tomahawk cruise missiles, Patriot missile defense systems
* Naval Vessels: Aircraft carriers, nuclear-powered submarines
* Tanks: Abrams main battle tank

The East: Rapid Modernization

While the West has traditionally held a technological edge, the East, particularly China, has been rapidly modernizing its military capabilities. This modernization has been driven by:

* Increased Spending: Significant investments in military research and development and procurement have accelerated the acquisition of advanced weapons systems.
* Domestic Production: China has focused on developing its own weapons systems, reducing reliance on foreign imports.
* Technology Transfer: Cooperation with other nations has provided access to advanced technologies and expertise.

Key Eastern Weapons:

* Aircraft: J-20 stealth fighter, H-6 bomber
* Missiles: DF-21 and DF-31 ballistic missiles, PL-15 air-to-air missiles
* Naval Vessels: Aircraft carriers, submarines
* Tanks: Type 99 main battle tank

The East has more

* The East typically has a larger population, which can provide a significant manpower advantage.
* The West, particularly the United States, has historically invested heavily in military technology and infrastructure, giving it a significant firepower advantage.

However, it's important to note that military power is not solely determined by population size or firepower. Other factors such as:

* Strategic alliances
* Economic strength
* Technological advancements
* Military doctrine
* Leadership

This can also play a significant role in determining a nation's military capabilities.

Strategic Alliances: A West vs. East Comparison
The West:

The West has a long history of forming strategic alliances to enhance its security and influence. The most prominent alliance is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), a military alliance between 31 member states, including the United States, Canada, and most European countries. NATO's primary purpose is to provide collective defense against external threats.  

Other significant Western alliances include:

* Australia, New Zealand, United States (ANZUS) Agreement: A trilateral security pact between Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.
* Five Eyes: An intelligence-sharing alliance between the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

The East:

The East has also formed strategic alliances to counterbalance Western influence and enhance its security. The most notable alliance is the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which includes China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. The SCO focuses on economic cooperation, security, and counterterrorism.

Other Eastern alliances include:

* Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO): A military alliance between Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.
* BRICS: A group of emerging major economies consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. While not primarily a military alliance, BRICS has been working to strengthen economic and political cooperation among its members.

Key Differences:

* Scope: NATO is a primarily military alliance, while the SCO has a broader focus on economic and security cooperation.
* Geopolitical Context: NATO was formed during the Cold War to counter the threat of Soviet expansion, while the SCO has emerged as a regional power in Asia.
* Membership: NATO is a predominantly Western alliance, while the SCO includes both Western and Eastern countries.

Economic Strength: East vs. West

The economic landscape between the East and West has shifted significantly in recent decades, with the East, particularly China and India, experiencing rapid growth.

The East: A Rising Economic Power

* China: As the world's second-largest economy, China has become a major economic force. Its rapid industrialization, export-led growth, and significant investments in infrastructure have contributed to its economic success.
* India: India's economy has also experienced substantial growth, driven by its large and young population, a growing services sector, and a favorable business environment.

The West: Economic Challenges

* Mature Economies: Western economies, such as the United States and Europe, are generally more mature and have experienced slower growth rates compared to the East.
* Structural Challenges: Some Western economies face structural challenges, including aging populations, rising inequality, and technological disruption.

Key Indicators of Economic Strength

* GDP: The East, particularly China, has experienced rapid GDP growth, surpassing many Western nations.
* Trade: Both the East and West are major players in global trade, with China and the United States being the world's largest exporters and importers.
* Foreign Investment: The East has attracted significant foreign investment, while the West has seen a decline in recent years.
* Innovation: Both regions are investing in innovation and technological development, but the East has shown increasing competitiveness in certain sectors.

Military Doctrines: East vs. West

Military doctrines are the fundamental principles and guidelines that govern the organization, training, and employment of a nation's armed forces. While there are variations within each region, the East and West generally have distinct approaches to military doctrine.

The West: Emphasizing Offense and Deterrence
Western military doctrines, particularly those of the United States, have traditionally emphasized offensive capabilities and deterrence. Key principles include:

* Force Projection: The ability to project military power into regions of interest, often through the use of aircraft carriers and expeditionary forces.
* Deterrence: The use of military strength to prevent potential adversaries from aggression.
* Technology: A focus on technological superiority, including precision-guided munitions, stealth technology, and advanced intelligence systems.
* Joint Operations: Coordination among different branches of the military to achieve strategic objectives.

The East: A Focus on Defense and Asymmetry
Eastern military doctrines, particularly those of China, have often emphasized defensive capabilities and asymmetrical warfare. Key principles include:

* Defense in Depth: The use of layered defenses to protect key areas and delay enemy advances.
* Asymmetric Warfare: The use of unconventional tactics and strategies to exploit vulnerabilities in an opponent's military.
* People's War: A concept that emphasizes the mobilization of the population to support military efforts.
* Nuclear Deterrent: The maintenance of a nuclear arsenal to deter potential aggression.

Evolving Doctrines

It's important to note that military doctrines are not static and can evolve over time in response to changing geopolitical conditions, technological advancements, and strategic objectives. Both the East and West are adapting their military doctrines to address emerging challenges and threats.

Leadership Styles: East vs. West

Leadership styles can vary significantly between cultures, and the East and West have distinct approaches. While there are generalizations, it's important to recognize that individual leaders and cultural nuances can influence these styles.

The West: Individualistic and Task-Oriented

Western leadership often emphasizes individual achievement, personal responsibility, and a focus on tasks. Key characteristics include:

* Individualism: Leaders are expected to take initiative and make decisions independently.
* Direct Communication: Communication is often direct and explicit, with a focus on clarity and efficiency.
* Task Orientation: Leaders prioritize goal achievement and measurable results.
* Hierarchy: A clear hierarchical structure is common, with authority flowing from top to bottom.

The East: Collectivist and Relationship-Oriented
Eastern leadership, particularly in cultures like China and Japan, often emphasizes collectivism, harmony, and relationships. Key characteristics include:

* Collectivism: Leaders prioritize the needs of the group over individual interests.
* Indirect Communication: Communication is often more subtle and indirect, with a focus on preserving harmony and avoiding conflict.
* Relationship Building: Building strong relationships and trust is essential for effective leadership.
* Consensus-Based Decision Making: Decisions are often made through consensus or negotiation, rather than by individual authority.

Hybrid Approaches

While these generalizations provide a framework for understanding leadership styles, it's important to recognize that there are hybrid approaches and individual variations within each region. Many leaders incorporate elements of both Western and Eastern styles, depending on the specific context and cultural influences.

Interdependence and Challenges

Despite the economic rise of the East, the West and East remain interconnected through trade, investment, and financial markets. However, challenges such as trade tensions, geopolitical risks, and economic uncertainty can impact the economic prospects of both regions.

Technological Advancements: East vs. West

The technological landscape between the East and West has become increasingly competitive, with both regions making significant strides in various fields.

The East: Rapid Innovation

* China: China has emerged as a major technological powerhouse, particularly in areas like artificial intelligence, e-commerce, and renewable energy. Its government's support for technological development and the presence of numerous tech startups have contributed to its rapid innovation.
* India: India is also making significant advancements in technology, particularly in information technology services and software development. Its large pool of skilled engineers and programmers has fueled its growth in this sector.

The West: A Tradition of Innovation

* United States: The United States has a long history of technological innovation and remains a leader in many areas, including biotechnology, aerospace, and semiconductors. Silicon Valley remains a global hub for technology and innovation.
* Europe: European countries, such as Germany and France, are also strong in technology, particularly in areas like automotive, aerospace, and renewable energy.

Key Areas of Competition

* Artificial Intelligence: Both the East and West are investing heavily in AI research and development, with China making significant strides in recent years.
* E-commerce: China has dominated the e-commerce market, with companies like Alibaba and JD.com leading the way. However, Western companies like Amazon and eBay remain strong competitors.
* Renewable Energy: Both regions are investing in renewable energy technologies, with China being a major player in solar and wind power.
* 5G Technology: The race for 5G technology is intense, with both the East and West competing for market dominance.

Collaboration and Competition

While there is intense competition between the East and West in many technological areas, there is also increasing collaboration. Joint ventures, research partnerships, and technology transfer can accelerate innovation and benefit both regions.

A Complex Landscape

It's important to note that the military balance between the West and the East is a dynamic and complex issue. Factors such as economic conditions, political instability, and technological breakthroughs can significantly influence the relative power of these regions.

The Economic Rise of the East

The East, particularly China and India, has experienced significant economic growth in recent decades, outpacing many Western nations. This economic surge is driven by several key factors:

Demographic Dividends

* Large, Young Populations: Both China and India have large, young populations that offer a significant labor force advantage.
* Increased Productivity: As these young populations gain education and experience, they can contribute to increased productivity and economic growth.

Policy Reforms

* Market-Oriented Reforms: Both countries have implemented market-oriented reforms, such as privatization, deregulation, and trade liberalization, which have fostered economic growth.
* Investment in Infrastructure: Government investments in infrastructure, including transportation, energy, and telecommunications, have created a favorable business environment.

Global Integration

* Export-Led Growth: The East has successfully leveraged its low-cost labor and abundant resources to become major exporters of goods and services.
* Foreign Direct Investment: Attracting foreign investment has provided capital, technology, and management expertise.

Technological Advancements

* Rapid Technological Adoption: The East has been quick to adopt new technologies, particularly in areas like information technology and manufacturing.
* Innovation Hubs: The rise of innovation hubs in cities like Beijing, Shanghai, and Bangalore has fostered a culture of entrepreneurship and technological development.

Challenges and Future Prospects

While the East has made significant strides, it's important to note that it faces challenges such as income inequality, environmental concerns, and geopolitical tensions. However, with continued economic reforms, technological advancements, and effective governance, the East is poised for continued growth and development.

Hypothetically, a direct conflict between the West and the East would be catastrophic and likely result in a stalemate or mutually assured destruction.

Several factors would contribute to such an outcome:

* Nuclear Deterrence: Both the West and the East possess nuclear weapons, which serve as a powerful deterrent. The threat of mutually assured destruction makes large-scale conventional warfare extremely risky.
* Economic Interdependence: The global economy is highly interconnected, with the East and West heavily dependent on each other for trade and investment. A major conflict would disrupt these economic ties, causing severe damage to both sides.
* Strategic Alliances: Both the West and the East have extensive strategic alliances, which could draw in other countries and escalate the conflict.
* Technological Parity: While the West has historically held a technological advantage, the East has made significant strides in recent years. This technological parity makes it difficult to predict a clear winner.

Even without nuclear weapons, a hypothetical conflict between the West and the East would be incredibly destructive and difficult to predict.

Several factors would influence the outcome:

* Military Strength: Both the West and the East have significant military capabilities, including advanced weaponry, trained personnel, and strategic alliances. The outcome would depend on factors such as the effectiveness of military strategies, the quality of leadership, and the ability to maintain logistical support.
* Economic Resilience: A prolonged conflict would strain the economies of both regions, impacting their ability to sustain military operations. Factors such as economic diversity, trade relationships, and access to resources would play a crucial role.
* Geopolitical Factors: The conflict could potentially involve other countries, expanding the scope and complexity of the war. Factors such as regional alliances, strategic interests, and geopolitical rivalries would influence the trajectory of the conflict.
* Public Support: Maintaining public support for a prolonged war can be challenging. Factors such as casualty rates, economic hardships, and the perceived legitimacy of the conflict can influence public opinion.

Ultimately, a conventional war between the West and the East would likely result in significant casualties, economic devastation, and geopolitical instability. The goal of international diplomacy and cooperation is to prevent such conflicts and promote peaceful resolution of disputes.

However, based on historical data and expert analysis, a large-scale war between the West and the East could potentially result in millions of casualties on both sides. The use of advanced weaponry, the potential involvement of multiple countries, and the devastating consequences for civilian populations would all contribute to a massive loss of life.

Trump and his pride could lead us to war. History will record it as such, anyways. The reason he would choose such a course would be several fold:

* Economy
* Debt
* Inflation
* Power
* Israel
* Agenda 2030

Economy

The economy as it stands is barely holding on. The Federal Reserve just started raising interest rates, which is a sign that people are borrowing again, but this is a trick. The housing crisis is here again and the over-inflated numbers are even worse than in 2008. After the first crisis, laws were passed to stop such risky gambling of the real estate market, but the laws were rescinded once Trump got back into office and the derivitives market is worse than before. The jobs market has been pumped up as each state has been reporting false hiring reports. No matter how the government and media spins this, we can see just through our friends and family all throughout the united states that no one is working.

Debt

When Trump came into ooffice, the Gross Domestic Product was less than our debt. In fact, we were 1 trillion over the fiscal cliff. Trump did raise American income but the debt remained 1 trillion over GDP after he left. Biden, inheriting Covid, unfortunately, added 6 trillion to the fiscal cliff leaving us completely unsustainable. For example, the United States makes 26 trillion a year for everything it does, but owes almost 36 trillion. A business might file for bankruptcy when its expenses are greater than its income, and it's unable to resolve its credit problems. The right time to file for bankruptcy depends on the business, its situation, and the owner's plans for the future. The United States is still selling 1 trillion a year in US bonds, which means it doesn’t seem to have credit problems. But here’s the thing. The majority of debt the US owes isn’t to foeign countries. It’s actually to the federal reserve, which is not a government agency but a group of 12 private investors who are still investing in it as they continue to raise the debt ceiling. As long as the richest investment firms in the world continue to invest in the federal reserve by borrowing money from it, the less likely they need to file for bankruptcy. For example, Blackrock, Vanguard, StateStreet, Fiedlity, JPMorgin Chase and Goldman Sachs continue to borrow money from the private bank. As long as they are profitable, we can’t file for bankruptcy.

Inflation

Our cost of goods and services have gone up anywhere from 8 - 25% on everything. This will not go down unless we pay off our debts. The United States sits on trillions of dollars of resources from oil, to minerals, to water and more. We do have enough resources to sell to pay off the debt. This would bring inflation down and make the dollar stronger. The powers that control all of this purposely put us in foreclosure debt to keep Americans from accumulating wealth to compete. They continue to hold us hostage here until it comes time for war. War will be profitable for banks because they tend to fund printed money to both sides and keep new debtors. We will never tap into our own resources as long as we can print our own money baked by nothing.

Power

The East and West are making plans 100 - 200 years in the future. Those plans will be world domination by a select few. It will not include both Orsini and Breakspeare families. Just one as the Orsinis are in control right now. This means, all NATO nations will lose it’s leaders if they lose the war and all of the west will develop a new Epoch controlled by the Breakspeare family who favor a monarchy over capitalism.

Israel

This will be the country that lights the fire for another world war. They will continue to execute people via mass genocide and expand their borders ourtward. They already have a new map on their flags and war clothing called Greater Israel which will take the Golan Heights, West Bank, east Egypt, sourthern Iraq, northern suadi arabia and most of Syria. This will enrage the East and most likely be the start of a world war.

Agenda 2030

In order for the World Economic Forum and their support from The United Nations to end our dependence on oil and land to thus gather all people into cities to go grreen, a world war is the only way to achieve this. During war, people are drained, tried, hungry and most likely will give in to the demands of the Orsini clan. But they have to remove the East and their economic power in order to be successful.

Conclusion

The rumor is, Trump made a deal with the United States Military to run for office in order to take out the Orsini clan. This was propaganda invented by the Tavistock Institute which gave the people something to research and find while they are sitting in their homes during Covid. The great awakening is nothing more than fabricated event to keep the people unarmed. First, Trump has been a life long democrat and mafia boos of New York. He’s a freemason and zionist who became an actor. He falsely converted to Christianity, while his daughter to Judaism and has fooled the entire world into waiting for him to fix things.

Bill & Hillary Clinton, regardless of what you see, hear, smell, taste or touch, will never go to prison and are purposely playing their part before they retire with the Nazis in Brazil. Sure, Gitmo has expanded and Trump added resources down there to make it bigger. But this was part of the magic show. The whole world is deceived into this wolf in sheep’s clothing. The man who brags about sleeping with his daughter and how great her body is. That video of Bill Clinton saying Trump had a change of heart is a Tavistock ploy so that people will send this viral video to ease themselves with relief for another few months. It’s a lie. Bill had a script and read it. And people are buying into it. Otherwise, if Trump and the military were really in control, why did thousands die in North Caralina and Florida? Why is there still a Patriot Act, which gives the government the right to spy on you while they are looking for “terrorists”? Why does BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street own the majority of shares in all of the Fortune 500? Do you not see the illusion? They created controlled opposition using their own. A devote democrat who continues to speak at Tammany Hall who has currently made human trafficking a military business.

But his inauguration speech, you ask? Has any of that come into fruition? Is the power back to the people? Are there tribunals? But he created a 4 year sting operation to teach the left about the corruption? Is that why he allowed us to go 7 trillion over GDP and inflation to 25% just to wake us up? Why did he not just take control when he had it. Too many excuses have been brought and the goal post moved. He is a busiiness man interested in girls and profit. He is just another antichrist telling his followers to hold on while the calvary is coming. When he gets back into office, Israel will start its expansion into Syria and the southern most part of Turkey. Russia will have no choice but to get involved and Trump will tell his Christian followers to support God’s people and land. The Christians will be praying for the Rothcnhilds invention of Israel which is nothing more than the synagog of Satan. Gaza and it’s 3.5 million will be dead. All while Trump tries to make American Great Again, which is a satanic acronym for the high witch. Remember, you live in a fallen world. There is no peace until Jesus comes.

sources

Gemini AI

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orsini_family
https://ivebo.co.uk/post/9568_prince-domenico-napoleone-orsini-is-a-owner-of-the-israeli-mafia-ursino-ndranghe.html
https://www.gematrix.org/?word=another%20real%20head%20of%20this%20is%20henry%20breakspear%20who%20resides%20now%20in%20macau%20in%20china%20%20many%20of%20the%20papal%20bloodline%20heads%20now%20live%20in%20asia%20and%20india%20what%20does%20that%20tell%20you
https://x.com/arish108/status/1057517486944501760?lang=en
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Zoroastrianism
https://nypost.com/2024/10/17/us-news/bill-clinton-leaves-nc-audience-befuddled-with-bizarre-trump-impression/

Show less