Discussion between Dick Yardley and Spiros Kalotihos

1 month ago
98

Very interesting question and answer time with Spiros Kalotihos recorded in 2023.
Spiros is a disciple of Dick Yardley's research and uses the factual evidence uncovered and presented by Dick Yardley as the foundation in the legal challenges he faces. Spiros discusses the actions he is involved with and fields questions about certain associations he has had and a change of tack for 2023. In the opinion of the writer, clearly the judiciary and the political system has a less than casual relationship with the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted.
Keeping in mind the Governor General is now under the control of the political parties, having the attributes of a quisling, and with the courts operating under parliamentary supremacy it is impossible for the people to achieve Constitutional judgements from a compromised judiciary serving international interests as opposed to the Judiciary's obligation as guardians of the the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted.

Seeking resolution in the court system is fraught with peril as the judiciary follows the law of private corporations rather than the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted.
The judiciary are no more than lackeys, treasonously serving a foreign master.

The supreme, absolute, uncontrollable authority remains with the people.(fast forward to 20 min mark as there were technical difficulties up until that point).

Loading 6 comments...