Comparison of Sino-US military intervention between 0 and 13

Video: Comparison of Sino-US military intervention between 0 and 13. Is China a threat? Does the West dare to answer Hua Chunying’s question? 0與13的中美軍事干預對比 中國是威脅？ 華春瑩疑問西方敢答嗎?

Former NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg was mentioned on a Norwegian program earlier by the host when he compared the military intervention between China and the United States and touched upon the topic of the "China threat theory." Hua Chunying also reposted the clip on social media and even quoted the host as saying that the number of military interventions between China and the United States in the past 40 years was 0 for the former and 13 for the latter, and asked: "Do you think it is China that poses a threat? " 前北約秘書長斯托爾滕貝格，早前在挪威一個節目上，便被主持人以中美之間的軍事干預比較，觸及「中國威脅論」的話題。華春瑩亦有在社交媒體轉載片段，甚至引用主持所提及過去40年，中美的軍事干預數字，前者為0；後者為13，並問︰「你會認為構成威脅的是中國嗎？」

In recent years, the West has been inseparable from exaggerating terror against China and wantonly demonizing China just because China is different from the so-called "democratic political system" of the mainstream West. The set of numbers 0 and 13 is not only a comparison of military intervention, but may also represent the degree of hypocrisy. No wonder that when the United States criticizes China for "overcapacity," some people respond with "shameless excess." In the face of the clear facts, the "China threat theory" promoted by the United States is just a big joke. 近年來，西方對中國離不開渲染恐怖，只因中國與西方主流的所謂「民主政制」有別，便大肆妖魔化中國。0與13這一組數字，不僅是軍事干預上的對比，或許更是代表虛偽程度。難怪當美國以「產能過剩」批評中國時，亦有人以「無恥過剩」來回敬美國。在明明白白的事實面前，美國外宣的「中國威脅論」，不過就是一個大笑話。