Bigfoot is Real...

The legend of Bigfoot has fascinated and divided people for decades. Known as Sasquatch in North American folklore, Bigfoot is often depicted as a large, bipedal ape-like creature that roams the dense forests and remote wilderness areas, primarily in the Pacific Northwest. Dismissed by mainstream science as a myth or a case of misidentification, the idea of Bigfoot’s existence has been relegated to the realm of fantasy and urban legend. But is that really the case?

What if we’ve been too quick to dismiss the evidence? What if Bigfoot is real, and we simply haven’t been looking hard enough or taking the right approach? Here, I’m going to lay out the case that Bigfoot is not only plausible but may indeed exist.

1. Eyewitness Testimonies: Too Many to Ignore.

For centuries, thousands of people from various walks of life—hunters, hikers, biologists, and even law enforcement officers—have reported encounters with Bigfoot. These sightings describe remarkably similar characteristics: a towering figure covered in dark fur, walking on two legs, often leaving behind massive footprints. These accounts span across time and geography, from Native American oral traditions to modern-day sightings.

While individual testimonies can be dismissed as hoaxes or misidentifications, the sheer volume and consistency of these reports suggest a phenomenon that deserves more scrutiny. When so many unrelated people, with no incentive to fabricate a story, describe the same creature, should we really dismiss it so easily?

2. Physical Evidence: Footprints and Hair Samples.

Bigfoot enthusiasts often point to physical evidence as a sign of the creature’s presence. Thousands of oversized footprints have been discovered, many of which show dermal ridges (the ridged patterns on the skin of the foot), suggesting they are not just carved imitations. Scientists have analysed some of these prints and concluded that they reflect a biological origin consistent with the weight and motion of a large, bipedal animal.

Moreover, hair samples collected from supposed Bigfoot sightings have often stumped labs. While some have been identified as bear or elk hair, others remain unclassified. These unclassified samples point to an unknown primate species, one that does not match any known creature in the database.

3. The Patterson-Gimlin Film: A Controversial Masterpiece.

Perhaps the most famous piece of Bigfoot evidence is the Patterson-Gimlin film, shot in 1967 in Bluff Creek, California. This short clip shows a large, upright, fur-covered creature striding away from the camera. Sceptics have long argued that it’s simply a man in a costume, but despite decades of scrutiny, no definitive proof of fakery has emerged.

Scientists and film analysts who have studied the footage in detail note anatomical details that would be extremely difficult to replicate with 1960s technology. The muscle movement, limb proportions, and gait of the creature are unlike any known human or costume. If it’s a hoax, it remains one of the most convincing and sophisticated in history.

4. The ‘Missing Link’ Theory.

Bigfoot might be more than just an undiscovered ape; it could represent a “missing link” between humans and other primates. Some researchers argue that Bigfoot could be a relic hominid, like Gigantopithecus, a giant ape species that lived alongside early humans. Gigantopithecus fossils have been found in Asia, and it’s not inconceivable that a population could have crossed over the Bering Strait land bridge and adapted to the forests of North America.

If Bigfoot is a descendant of Gigantopithecus or another unknown hominid, it would explain why it has evaded capture for so long. As an intelligent, possibly nocturnal creature, it would be adept at avoiding humans and may even possess a rudimentary understanding of human behaviour—staying hidden to ensure its survival.

5. The ‘No Body’ Problem: An Explanation.

One of the biggest arguments against Bigfoot’s existence is the lack of a body. If such a large creature existed, surely one would have been found by now, whether from natural causes or human interference. But consider this: the natural world is incredibly efficient at decomposing organic matter. Scavengers, insects, and the elements work quickly to break down dead animals, leaving little behind.

In remote wilderness areas, the bodies of large mammals like bears, cougars, and even deer are rarely discovered unless intentionally sought. Furthermore, if Bigfoot possesses any social structure akin to great apes, they might actively conceal or dispose of their dead. This, combined with their likely small population size, makes finding a body extremely unlikely.

6. Science Doesn’t Have All the Answers.

Finally, it’s important to remember that science is a process of discovery, not a fixed set of answers. Throughout history, creatures once thought to be myth—like the coelacanth fish or the giant squid—have turned out to be real. The natural world is vast, and we have explored only a fraction of it, especially in dense forests and remote mountain ranges where Bigfoot is most often sighted.

Until we fully survey every inch of these habitats, it’s premature to declare Bigfoot a mere figment of our imagination. Science should remain open-minded, investigating all possibilities rather than dismissing them out of hand.

In Conclusion.

Bigfoot may remain one of the greatest mysteries of the modern age, but there is enough compelling evidence to warrant serious investigation. With thousands of credible eyewitness reports, unexplained physical traces, and intriguing theoretical foundations, the case for Bigfoot is far from closed.

Scepticism is healthy, but so is curiosity. As technology advances and our understanding of the natural world deepens, perhaps one day we’ll have a definitive answer to the question: Does Bigfoot really exist? Until then, keep your eyes open the next time you’re deep in the woods. You never know what might be watching you.