Project 2025 and the EPA,NWS & NOAA. The danger is palpable.

When Bill Hicks uttered ""By the way, if anyone here is in advertising or marketing, **** yourself." Bill may have been speaking of the unscrupulous industry of "buy, buy buy", but today those words can be replaced by "fascists and climate change deniers". Bill must be turning over in his grave looking at the horrific events unfolding in the US today. He certainly would have fodder for endless criticism.
#project2025 #epa #maga #neocons #conservadems #trumpism
~~~~~~
Join Antonio Reid and Sandy Schoelles for a dive into Chapter 13 of the Project 2025 Mandate for Leadership, specifically the EPA, and related topics, such as the privatization of the NWS and NOAA. Who is Mandy Gunasekara and what scientific cred does she have to rewrite the mission of the EPA?
Will this be ignored? "The U.S. has sustained 396 weather and climate disasters since 1980 where overall damages/costs reached or exceeded $1 billion (including CPI adjustment to 2024). The total cost of these 396 events exceeds $2.780 trillion." "Project 2025 suggests eliminating the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Weather Service housed therein and replacing those organizations with private companies. The blueprint appears to leave the National Hurricane Center intact, saying the data it collects should be “presented neutrally, without adjustments intended to support any one side in the climate debate.”
~~~~~~
Climate Change
* Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source
category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting
program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies
that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate.
* Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009
endangerment finding.
* Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs).
Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation
and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22
* Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act
that are unnecessarily stringent and costly.
* Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add
new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants
and equipment.
— 426 —
Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise
* Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences
instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is
virtually cost-free."
~~~~~~~
Refs: https://static.project2025.org/2025_M...
https://static.project2025.org/2025_M...
Drilled : https://drilled.ghost.io/everything-y...
https://globalwarmingisreal.com/2024/...
https://truthout.org/articles/epa-sci...
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/bill...
https://www.sej.org/publications/watc...
https://www.insurancejournal.com/news...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Give us a hand by supporting the channel. Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @environmentalcoffeehouse
Buy Us A Coffee! https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ecoffeeh... Thank You!
~Or~
Pay Pal @sandraschoelles1