Why Are We INALIENABLE University?

3 months ago
409

Inalienable. Your rights are INALIENABLE.

Have you ever heard a politician speak that word?
A clergy person?
The media?

Nope.

Why did we choose to call our curriculum Inalienable University?

Because once you fully understand your rights, you'll have the courage to exercise your God given rights.

Amendments 1-10 were made under the Republic.
Everything after that was made under the corporation.

It's time you learn the MECHANISMS created by the CORPORATION they created, using Roman Statutory Codes.

The greatest "Summer of the Supreme Court" happened this year and you were a witness to it.

I will hammer this until you open your eyes and ears.

The Chevron Deference removed regulatory AMBIGUITY that gave administrative agencies.

All State/STATE courts are Article I courts where you have no rights as they are ADMINISTRATIVE and only deal with LEGAL ENTITIES.

In commenting about the Chevron Deference, Roman Martinez stated:
“By ending Chevron deference, the Court has taken a major step to preserve the separation of powers and shut down unlawful agency overreach.

Going forward, judges will be charged with interpreting the law faithfully, impartially, and independently, without deference to the government. This is a win for individual liberty and the Constitution,”.

This quote sums up the Chevron Deference; “It further requires courts to “hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be . . . not in accordance with law.” §706(2)(A).”

Held: The Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, and courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous; Chevron is overruled. Pp. 7–35.

There is never statutory authority over you without your consent.

Our rights are a private (individual basis) matter and anything adjudicated otherwise is a public right that is administrative, not private.

You are not public without consenting to it.

Are you beginning to understand that we teach you how to live in the PRIVATE and not THE PUBLIC?

No BAR CARD tool of the state is ever going to speak of this.

They do not learn this.
They learn statutes and codes.

They might be AWARE of the founding documents but they do not know how to interpret and use them.

Scott (guy in my video) deliberately studied this and is an expert scholar of it.

Quote from Jarkesy:
"To determine whether a suit is legal in nature, courts must consider whether the cause of action resembles common law causes of action, and whether the remedy is the sort that was traditionally obtained in a court of law.
Of these factors, the remedy is the more important. "

HUGE!

Judge Gorsuch issued a scathing Supreme Court ruling in the SEC v Jarkesy, that the "British attempted to evade American cries by siphoning adjudication to jury-less admiralty, vice admiralty, and chancery courts."

Those are Article One courts.
You never heard those words on TV law shows. LOL

Hell your zillion dollar BAR CARD tool has never heard those terms.

The Supreme Court in Jarkesy reaffirmed that actions involving private rights, such as common-law fraud, must be heard by an Article III court: "Congress cannot 'conjure away the Seventh Amendment by mandating that traditional legal claims be... taken to an administrative tribunal." SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. (2024)

This is the basis in LAW (not the code based system they push us around using) for which you STAND.

Are you willing to stand and learn this?

It's easy as I've created a path to take you on the ride so you can one day speak and think like we do.

This hangs by a thread until YOU THE PEOPLE decide to get off your asses and turn off the TV and move your political bitching to purposeful efforts.

Join at https://Inalienable.University

Follow me to freedom.
Share this like hot sauce at a BBQ!

Loading comments...