James Hind, “Fantasist asks China for money after abandoning Saudi Arabian fantasy.”

In response to James Hind's blog post titled "Fantasist asks China for money after abandoning Saudi Arabian fantasy", dated September 21, 2024, several key points need to be addressed. This blog, filled with personal attacks and baseless claims, once again demonstrates Hind’s agenda to discredit and humiliate me, Matthew Taylor. It's crucial to break down these accusations, expose the absurdity of his claims, and clarify the reality of the situation.

Baseless Accusations About Business Ventures.

Hind’s claims about my alleged business ventures involving a Saudi Arabian prince and later China are entirely fabricated. He paints a picture of me as a “fantasist,” concocting grand delusions to obtain funding from foreign entities. The truth is far simpler and much less sensational—Hind is fabricating stories to fit a narrative that suits his ongoing smear campaign against me.

The notion that I have made statements regarding Saudi or Chinese investments is pure fiction. As someone active in creative and entrepreneurial endeavours, I have never made any such claims. Hind’s attempts to paint me as a charlatan seeking improbable investments is not only a complete lie but a diversion from his own lack of transparency and questionable activities.

False Claims of Religious and Sexual Incompatibility.

Hind attempts to stir controversy by claiming my religious and personal views would disqualify me from receiving investment from countries like Saudi Arabia, citing my alleged “Satanist” leanings and homosexual orientation. This is a blatant attempt to sensationalise and confuse my creative expression with reality. Throughout my life, I have never portrayed myself as anything but honest about my identity and beliefs. These personal attacks, including accusations of prostitution and pornography, are beneath any reasonable discourse and demonstrate the extent of Hind’s willingness to fabricate narratives to damage my reputation.

Attack on My Business Acumen.

Hind’s criticism of my alleged lack of business experience, failure to form relationships with local planners, and inability to present a business plan are irrelevant when you consider that there is no actual business proposition involving Saudi Arabia or China, as he claims. Hind’s entire argument rests on the premise of a fantasy he has created about me, but it fails to hold water when confronted with reality.

Projection and Deflection.

Hind's continued efforts to label me a liar, fantasist, and someone incapable of serious endeavours is clearly an attempt to project his own inadequacies onto me. His claims that I have aligned with fraudsters are ironic, given that his own activities with Project Night Watch have raised significant concerns among various communities. Hind has a documented history of creating false narratives to deflect attention from his questionable behaviour, and this post is simply an extension of that strategy.

The Real Issue at Hand: Hind’s Ongoing Campaign Against Me.

This blog post is yet another example of James Hind’s tireless attempts to discredit me through misinformation. His obsessive fixation on my character, personal life, and alleged business dealings raises serious questions about his motivations. Hind, who claims to be a child protection advocate, continues to focus all of his energy on attacking me, rather than providing meaningful contributions to the causes he purports to support.

In contrast, I have remained open about the legal challenges I’ve faced, as well as the baseless allegations that have been thrown my way. Sussex Police thoroughly investigated these claims, and I have not been found guilty of any wrongdoing. Hind’s insinuation that I am somehow evading justice is a transparent attempt to shift focus from his own dubious online activities and potentially illegal behaviour.

In Conclusion.

James Hind's latest blog post is a continuation of his long-standing agenda to spread misinformation about me, Matthew Taylor. His accusations are unfounded, exaggerated, and designed to divert attention from his own actions. I will continue to expose his false narratives and defend myself against the relentless and unfounded attacks. Rather than being distracted by Hind’s fantasies, I remain focused on the truth, and I will continue to stand up for myself in the face of these baseless and malicious allegations.

What Has It Got to Do with Him?

When I reflect on the obsessive nature of James Hind's commentary about my life, one question stands out: What has it got to do with him? Why is someone, who claims to be involved in child protection and other noble causes, so heavily invested in everything I do, say, or even think?

Hind’s continuous fixation on me - whether it’s about alleged business ventures, personal beliefs, or legal matters - raises serious concerns. His relentless effort to discredit me isn’t just the occasional critique; it’s an ongoing, exhaustive campaign to vilify me in every way possible. But what does it gain him? Why is he so deeply embroiled in my affairs? The answer to that seems to lie less in anything I’ve done and more in Hind’s need for control, narrative, and a target to project onto.

There’s no doubt that we all face criticism and differing opinions, but Hind’s obsession goes well beyond that. It's no longer about critique or differing views - it's about relentless stalking and antagonism. But again, I ask: What has it got to do with him?

Why Is He So Invested in Everything I Do or Say?

This leads to the second question: Why is he so invested in everything I do or say?
At some point, Hind shifted from being a person with differing opinions to someone with an unhealthy fixation on me. Whether it's my involvement in creative projects, personal beliefs, or even legal matters, Hind is always there, ready to comment, misrepresent, and attack. It’s as though every move I make is analysed, scrutinised, and turned into a new angle for him to exploit.

One has to wonder - what drives this level of obsession? Is it envy? A desire to feel relevant by inserting himself into my life and twisting the narrative to suit his needs? Or is it something more insidious - a deep-seated need to project his own shortcomings and guilt onto someone else?

At the end of the day, his motivations remain unclear, but one thing is certain: his constant focus on me raises more questions about him than it does about me.

Final Thoughts

These aren’t rhetorical questions - they’re genuine reflections on why James Hind has taken it upon himself to make my life his business. I’ve faced legal challenges, creative endeavours, and personal ups and downs, as everyone does. But the energy Hind spends on me is disproportionate and obsessive.

So, I pose these questions not just to him, but to anyone observing this saga: What has it got to do with him? And why is he so invested in everything I do or say?

Maybe it's time Hind took a step back and asked himself these same questions.

James Hind, “Fantasist asks China for money after abandoning Saudi Arabian fantasy.”
https://substack.com/home/post/p-149242185