The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind

~ Supplemental Material ~

"Our cause is the cause of all mankind...we are fighting for their liberty in defending our own."

- Benjamin Franklin

Many individuals are familiar with video-sharing platforms like YouTube, which serve as profitable venues for businesses of all sizes; from small enterprises to multinational corporations. These platforms provide opportunities to promote products and services, at no cost.

Some have used these types of platforms to launch their careers, particularly in the media sectors. Entrepreneur Justin Bieber is a success story: he launched a successful music career by showcasing his talent on these platforms, selling an estimated 150 million records worldwide.

What many people don't realize is that posting videos online, can generate significant income; without the need to become an internet celebrity. Some operators of these types of channels, are on the verge of becoming billionaires; simply because they post video content (they are also known as content creators or digital creators).

https://rumble.com/v55m5m9-stardust.html

YouTube, in particular, has witnessed the rise of well-known online personalities; who achieved significant wealth during what is often referred to as its "golden age," from 2013 - 2019. With its massive user base, YouTube has become a highly competitive landscape. The numerous niche markets are oversaturated, as individuals strive to stand out and establish dominance in their respective fields.

Newcomers and those with a few subscribers, face significant challenges with building a profitable YouTube channel. Moreover, the platform's controversial political agenda; which promotes a specific ideology and the human element of favoritism; further reduces the chances of success. Other aspects of the challenges faced by aspiring content creators on YouTube, can be seen in the links provided below.

https://rumble.com/v3n9i3j-freaky-friday.html

https://rumble.com/v4vmqgw-youtube-purge-begins-35000-removed-and-new-2024-censorship-annoucned.html

Those committed to ethical principles, must grapple with the platform's apparent divergence from fundamental ideals of freedom and Christian values. Furthermore, YouTube openly aligns itself with the philosophies that are part of the "Woke Movement," which supports all who espouse such ideologies and the platform actively engages in censorship.

https://rumble.com/v390fm4-bill-gates-now-determining-what-you-can-say-on-youtube.html

As an advocate for traditional Christian values, I find it necessary to recommend exploring opportunities on TikTok. This recommendation might appear surprising, especially considering my previous endorsements of platforms that prioritize freedom of speech.

It is essential to acknowledge that; while free speech platforms are the ideal venues to champion; unfortunately, they are akin to niche groups; in the online landscape. These platforms generally lack the broad audience and widespread recognition enjoyed by major tech companies.

Although Rumble is starting to establish itself as a viable alternative, it still doesn't reach the huge profit margins that larger corporations achieve. Despite this, making money on Rumble is easier for individuals to achieve on this platform, than on all other existing platforms, except one. Unlike many other platforms, TikTok is the easiest platform to generate a revenue stream. Rumble is second but it's not even a close second.

Compare TikTok's referral program to Rumble's. TikTok pays out a lot more money when someone joins its platform. Also, unlike Rumble or any other platform, TikTok offers individuals the opportunity to start making money with just 1,000 followers. To clarify, this means having 1,000 followers interested in your channel, opposed to you following a large number of accounts yourself.

Upon reaching 1,000 followers, TikTok notifies users through their message center; inviting them to monetize their posts, by featuring sponsored content or products. By posting an image, with a designated song, individuals can earn money when others view the post and listen to the song. Alternatively, users can promote listed products to earn income.

TikTok facilitates video creation with its built-in, user-friendly, editing program. Users can simply select an image, add a song and create a video, without complicated editing skills. For those seeking to enhance their videos; templates are available to automate the process. Allowing the creation of engaging content, without showing their face.

As the number of subscribers increases, new opportunities for promotions and income are offered. TikTok also offers to promote an individuals' success but unlike expensive advertising campaigns, that cost thousands of dollars; TikTok will help you promote yourself for the price of a restaurant meal.

This convenient source of income is never mentioned in the media. The legendary "secret sauce," which is said to be its search engine (as the media claims) is an insult to people's intelligence but for those who do not have the app; there would be no need to question this ridiculous conclusion.

Ironically, TikTok, founded by a Chinese citizen; operates more like a capitalist entity, compared to some American platforms that exhibit characteristics of communism. The platform seems to follow the business philosophy of "a satisfied customer, is a returning customer." Perhaps, influenced by the founders' upbringing, in a communist society.

To fully grasp this point; the infiltration of communist ideologies, into the American education system; has existed since the 1960s. This would foster the development of the concern over issues such as "income inequality." Which is part of socialist or communist philosophy.

This influence has created companies such as Costco Wholesale Corporation, led by chairman and CEO Craig Jelinek and co-founder and chief education officer Ken Boyd, to pay higher wages to employees, while keeping executive's income below the industry average.

Costco's approach reflects values commonly found among individuals raised in socialist or communist educational systems, where financial success serves to promote a "fair distribution of wealth." The same philosophy guides how TikTok approaches business.

As for the perception of TikTok as a free speech platform, that is a mistake. Similarly, some people see TikTok as a politically biased platform that supports left-wing ideology; which is also not the case. TikTok is more accurately characterized as "independent." There are those on the left and right; which in some cases are considered "extreme" by many; with the full knowledge and acceptance of the company.

The platform abides by its terms of service (TOS) and remains impartial. What normally occurs, someone reports content from a channel. If the algorithm detects something that may violate the TOS, the post is suspended. TikTok's "bias," where they seem to be extensions of leftist ideology; this is a result of those trying to get people off the platform, are pro-Woke activists.

As long as users abide by the TOS, individuals of all ideological backgrounds can freely share their content on TikTok. Those who have been suspended or banned, can simply contact the company and ask them to look into the reason for your account status. This tends to solve most people's problems but again, unless you violate the TOS.

The primary reason users have been placed on suspensions or have faced bans from the platform, is often due to spam rather than the content they create. Spam comprises unwanted advertisements or irrelevant content, that disrupts the user's experience. Platforms implement strict regulations against such behavior, to maintain the integrity of users' interactions. In an environment without these rules, users would face relentless marketing messages. This would lead to an overwhelming digital noise that no one would find appealing.

Regarding security issues: several Congressional hearings were held in 2023. Following an extensive investigation, where no evidence was discovered to substantiate claims of data misuse or abuse. Despite the lack of concrete proof to support these allegations, suspicions and accusations continued to linger.

Upon closer examination, one may suggest there is a certain level of incompetence in managing these issues. The narrative surrounding perceived threats, from foreign entities, often oversimplifies complex issues. It prompts a reevaluation of the capabilities and motivations of both domestic and international actors.

The speculation regarding possible repercussions from foreign governments; raises questions about the implications of what is a real threat? Could individuals whose metadata is captured by TikTok; face repercussions from foreign entities? Would they be contacted by China's People's Police or agents from the Ministry of State Security? This scenario feels exaggerated when put into perspective.

The operation of this misinformation campaign, echoes the propaganda strategies famously employed during World War II. For instance, governments during that era, frequently resorted to oversimplification and emotional manipulation, to rally their populations against perceived enemies. Such tactics involved creating an "us versus them" mentality, that amplified fears and encouraged support for governmental policies.

The modern-day fear of foreign interference bears a resemblance to this historical context. In both instances, the manipulation of information serves the interests of powerful entities, effectively veiling the complexities and truths that define international relations.

https://rumble.com/v4sybh2-wild-target.html

The video above helps to provide the insights, as to the mental image that is trying to be conveyed to the American public. The rhetoric surrounding metadata surveillance, specifically in the context of international relations and security, seeks to instill fear.

Those who fuel such fears often exploit public ignorance. In reality, no Chinese official can take direct action against an American citizen, without proper legal authorization, in the United States. In any case, despite the illogical nature of this paranoid inducing narrative, it ultimately manipulates the public to accept further reductions in freedoms under the pretext of security.

Moreover, it is essential for citizens to recognize why data stewardship within their jurisdiction is critical. Countries that maintain close diplomatic relationships, provide information concerning activity of individuals and have immense implications for a person's privacy and security.

Unlike distant countries, where their administration has no concerns with activity going on outside their borders. Those with an agreement of mutual assistance, is how one has situations like what was seen in the previous video, as well as the ones blow.

https://rumble.com/v5aan31-uk-arrests-online-thought-criminals-is-the-usa-next-ep.18-080924.html

https://rumble.com/v31tztw-lair-of-the-dragon-public-enemies.html

The lack of professionalism within bureaucratic organizations is often a surprising phenomenon for many individuals. The paradox lies in the established standards that should govern behavior. These standards are intended to ensure that individuals, within bureaucracies, act in a manner reflective of their duties.

https://rumble.com/v60w895-red-tails.html

However, inconsistencies arise from human nature. Wherever there are humans, human problems exist. Factors such as individual ambition and personal biases, often conflict with established protocols.

For instance, in government agencies, the pressure for promotion, can lead to unethical decisions. The desire to align with certain political ideologies or to curry favor can overshadow professionalism.

The concept of "identity politics," further complicates the issue of professionalism in bureaucratic institutions. Identity politics categorizes individuals into groups, based on inherent characteristics, leading to generalized assumptions. Groups can be defined by ethnicity, gender, profession or other factors.

Left-wing proponents, often proposes a vision that elevates certain groups as "noble;" driven by an agenda promoting equity. While this is a well-meaning approach, aimed at addressing historical inequalities; it leads to stereotyping.

The right-wing perspective, isn't as blinded by gender or ethnicity but rather professions. First responders and military personnel, are often lauded for their self-sacrifice and bravery. Traditional values emphasize these professions as exemplars of virtue and integrity.

The inherent imperfection of human nature is critical with breaking free from the misguided views that are part of identity politics. It is a fundamental truth, that no class of humanity is devoid of flaws. This includes individuals across various professions, ethnicities and religious affiliations. Such communities are often celebrated for specific traits but this celebration can mask underlying imperfections common to all humans.

The Founding Fathers grasped the complex dynamics of human imperfection, when drafting the Constitution. The safeguards established during the creation of democratic institutions take this reality into account. They implemented checks and balances that aimed to prevent the concentration of power in any single entity.

This design serves as a crucial framework for avoiding any subversive activity, altering the intent of the ideals the nation is founded on. Their foresight is relevant today as bureaucracies worldwide grapple with similar challenges.

Citizens must maintain a critical awareness of systemic flaws within bureaucratic organizations, rather than unconditionally accepting the information provided by officials. This vigilance is a testament to those who value and uphold freedom. Given that bureaucratic institutions are not immune to errors; it is imperative for individuals to scrutinize decisions and advocate for transparency and honesty, within these systems.

Throughout history, there have been numerous examples of failures within bureaucratic systems, that highlight the detrimental outcomes of unwavering trust; often leading to significant harm to society. It is crucial to also consider the past performance of the current administration; particularly concerning popular platforms like TikTok.

https://rumble.com/v69tl4m-blue-velvet.html

https://rumble.com/v6aimqj-how-the-west-was-won.html

https://rumble.com/v69sscs-lolita.html

https://rumble.com/v6aibga-the-wrong-man.html

https://rumble.com/v67ct3j-everyone-says-i-love-you.html

The various agents of the bureaucracy, who report such impropriety; they too deserve critique. The same individuals involved in scrutinizing TikTok, may themselves have a track record rife with questionable activities or affiliations; leading to a sense of hypocrisy in their public stance.

This corruption seems to extend into the realm of politics and as such, the actions of American bureaucrats cannot go unexamined. As evidenced by the decision to ban TikTok, while turning a blind eye to the questionable practices of American corporations.

In contrast to TikTok, major American technology companies have been found to violate domestic and international laws. Essentially, these companies engage in behaviors that resemble the very activities our policymakers caution against, when it comes to TikTok.

This inconsistency raises significant questions about motives and accountability within the political and bureaucratic class. The apprehension surrounding TikTok thus serves as a critical point for broader discourse on societal values and systemic integrity. The framing of foreign entities as threats, while ignoring domestic infractions; illustrates a contradiction that demands scrutiny from citizens. This inconsistency not only undermines trust in bureaucratic institutions but also illustrates how bureaucratic narratives can be selectively crafted to serve specific agendas. Consequently, it highlights the need for a proactive citizenry, that does not shy away from demanding accountability from all organizations that wield power.

https://rumble.com/v3xln1j-kindergarten-cop.html

Additional sources of interest include:

https://rumble.com/v4ozdvt-angels-we-have-heard-on-high.html

https://www.tiktok.com/@thegreatlondini.com/video/7360390288919072042

https://www.tiktok.com/@makeupfresh/video/7359299534322699563

https://www.tiktok.com/@zackmaluccio/video/7348592790919613742

https://www.tiktok.com/@mjhanks/video/7351954990249889066

https://www.tiktok.com/@teacherpaywithk/video/7361203264953617706

Upon examining the vast pool of information, it becomes evident that TikTok is a victim of its own success. Consequently, measures were implemented to ensure the sustained prosperity of the entities tasked with monitoring its user base.

Many speculate that the TikTok ban will be lifted under the new administration. While this notion is prevalent, it could potentially serve as the catalyst for the downfall of the platform, which provides substantial income for numerous individuals.

However, it is essential to recognize that once a bill becomes law, it requires a formal process to repeal it. This process echoes the challenges faced in 2010, when the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare was introduced. Attempts to repeal it met with numerous legislative hurdles; illustrating the complexities inherent with navigating the legal system. Such historical parallels, highlight that the assumption of TikTok's safety; under a new administration, might be overly simplistic.

When the subsequent administration endeavored to annul this law; they encountered a deficit of votes for such action. Consequently, presuming that TikTok is now secure, may stem from a misinterpretation of the legal framework.

https://rumble.com/v4wy5ow-im-just-a-bill.html

The ultimate recourse lies in the hands of the judiciary. Currently, they stand as the sole authority capable of halting the ban. Speculations about the new administration utilizing executive orders, remain futile. Established laws cannot be nullified in such a manner. The only plausible course of action would be to temporarily halt the ban through executive orders for a period of 60-90 days.

For individuals wishing to support TikTok's cause and advocate for its continued operation; there are several avenues for proactive involvement. The first step in advocacy is contacting your representatives. Citizens possess the power to influence policy through democratic participation. By expressing their concerns about the ban; individuals can encourage lawmakers to reconsider their stance.

It is important to recognize that the TikTok ban will be fully enforced on January 19, 2025. If swift action is taken, including contacting representatives to lift the ban, in conjunction with an executive order; the ban's impact would only be felt for a day.

However, the outcome heavily relies on the commitment and involvement of individuals. More details on participating in these efforts can be found through the following link.

https://rumble.com/v3h8eam-noise-matters.html

Beyond individual efforts, collective action can further bolster the chances of overturning the ban. Protesting serves as a demonstration of collective sentiment against bureaucratic overreach. A well-organized protest can draw media attention and elevate public discourse surrounding the implications of banning popular platforms like TikTok.

Constructive, peaceful protests, complemented by a social media strategy, can enhance visibility. Furthermore, a boycott of major tech giants, specifically: Google, Apple, Facebook and Instagram; is another method to express dissatisfaction.

Additionally, the potential emergence of a new, alternative platform, by TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, may reshape the digital media landscape, in response to the ban.

https://rumble.com/v4u1y3e-the-rundown.html

Additionally, it is also recommended to download TikTok videos that you like or find valuable. In the event the ban is not lifted. The link below offers some great resources to help you with this.

https://rumble.com/v3gm7ta-witness.html

Everything about the TikTok ban shows the importance of elections because they have consequences. To that end; consider joining, supporting and pray for the two organizations that are linked below. Being part of groups that are seeking to secure the elections, is paramount to having the will of the people and not special interest.

https://rumble.com/c/FrankSpeechTV

https://rumble.com/user/FortTruth

For all those that are Christians, consider checking out and subscribing to the ministry below. They provide good content, so that people are informed and offer solid advice; with dealing with the challenges that we currently face.

https://rumble.com/c/IntercessorsForAmerica

Though there are already plenty of political alternatives mentioned at this point; it would be ideal to somehow squeeze in and incorporate the channel below:

https://rumble.com/v4jtttc-growing-pains.html

The next link is worthwhile. With all the chaos that's going on around our nation, the link below will be critical with the protection of all loved ones.

https://www.aqi.in/us/dashboard/united-states/

Additional resources to checkout:

https://www.211.org

The link above, provides a host of resources. About the link underneath; though it focuses in on California; a majority of offers and benefits are not limited to those residing in California's borders.

https://rumble.com/v4am619-bad-times-at-the-el-royale.html

As true with the link above, the resource below has numerous benefits and offers. Though the main topic concerns the State of North Carolina, as well as State lotteries but it also covers material that does not include either and the benefits mentioned there in, is available nationwide.

https://rumble.com/v52zu6u-chasing-rainbows.html

For those who find value in this channel and wish to contribute positively; the most significant manner of doing so is through prayer. The lifting up of prayers for this channel; represents undoubtedly the most profound gift one can offer.

Given the various bureaucrats and their operatives, that support the Woke movement; I will not reveal my identity. However, you can always pray for "the individual running the channel, Blue Enigma zero-one." God will know your intentions.

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration!

https://gab.com/Dannyski/posts/111010544179843683

Post Scriptum: In the section labeled "Supplemental Material:" located just below the video post date, view count and provided tags; there is valuable content worth exploring, especially on this channel. This section often contains a wealth of additional information and resources.

You may find it beneficial to peruse this section to gain further insights. The reason for the detailed explanation is to address the varied terminology used by different individuals, which can sometimes make it challenging to locate the desired content.

(DISCLAIMER: All videos posted within this channel are for educational and historical purposes only. Under the auspices of the Copyright Act of 1976; under section 107 of the copyright disclaimer; all material within this channel is posted with the aforementioned purpose.

The participation of all individuals involved in the creation or association with the video, as well as those referenced in the description section - including any linked resources - does not imply any acknowledgment, endorsement, support or affiliation with this channel or the content produced by its operator.

Moreover, neither this platform, nor any associated individuals necessarily concur with or endorse the views expressed by the operator of this channel. All opinions and perspectives are exclusively those of the channel's operator.

Conversely, all images, videos, quotes, etc., the facilitation of such, does not necessarily equate usage as an endorsement (e.g., the use of the images from Anonymous, isn't an endorsement of the movement). The utilization of said items, within posts, is for aesthetic purposes or to underscore an issue.

Permission is granted in the use of written content; which has been constructed by the operator but the utilization of the videos themselves; permission can NOT be granted, since they are NOT owned by said operator. Only that which is authorized by the Copyright Act of 1976 and the guidelines in which it is given; is what is allowed, in terms of videos.

All materials pertaining to health, nutrition, dietary supplements and associated topics; may not possess approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Therefore, it is advisable that inquiries related to health matters and any associated concerns, should be directed to qualified professionals. Furthermore, any financial recommendations provided should be thoroughly evaluated, prior to implementation, as there are no assurances of successful outcomes.)

Help rekt the system of ctrl and abuse by the ieleet