Premium Only Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc1c3/fc1c387cabc77ecae38ccc7ab2f71448d429cdfb" alt="MASSIVE UPDATE in Trump’s Fani Willis Case in Georgia | Sekulow"
MASSIVE UPDATE in Trump’s Fani Willis Case in Georgia | Sekulow
American Center for Law and Justice | MASSIVE UPDATE in Trump’s Fani Willis Case in Georgia | Two important events just took place in Georgia regarding the Deep State DOJ’s political prosecution of President Donald Trump. First, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis just defied the subpoena to appear before the state Senate committee regarding her alleged affair with former Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade. Such a refusal to appear in court shows that Willis believes she is above the law.
Second, Georgia judge Scott McAfee dismissed two counts against Trump in DA Willis’ Georgia election interference case. Remember that DA Willis’ indictment against Trump is a state case, so it has different ramifications than Special Counsel Jack Smith’s federal election interference case against Trump.
Let’s recap how we got here. After a wild few days in court, Judge Scott McAfee ruled that Willis’ standing as DA was tainted, citing an “odor of mendacity” – lying – permeated her disqualification hearing. However, the judge gave Willis the option to step down as DA or remove Special Prosecutor Wade. Unsurprisingly, she decided to remain on the case against Trump.
Following this, President Trump appealed to the Georgia Court of Appeals to have DA Willis removed based on her illicit conduct. The ACLJ became involved at this point, filing an amicus brief to disqualify Willis from her tainted political prosecution of Trump. The Georgia Court of Appeals delayed Willis’ election interference case until a ruling was made in Trump’s appeal, which will take place after the election.
So the Georgia judge’s actions today mean that Willis’ case against Trump got weaker, as two charges were dropped based on false documents allegedly being filed in federal court. We’ll see how it affects Willis’ case going forward.
In other election news, the ACLJ has a brand-new case headed to the U.S. Supreme Court, where we just made an emergency filing on behalf of the Green Party. The Democrat Party unconstitutionally had the Green Party removed from the 2024 presidential election ballot in Nevada to ensure that more votes are cast for Vice President Kamala Harris. We’re urging the high Court to intervene and prevent Nevada from printing more ballots without all the qualified candidates’ names until the Court has the opportunity to fully hear and ultimately decide the case.
As you remember, the ACLJ secured a 9-0 victory at the U.S. Supreme Court after the Colorado Supreme Court banned President Trump from the state ballot. We represented the Colorado Republican Party to ensure that all Americans have the right to vote for the candidate of their choice. And we will now be fighting to ensure that all voters in Nevada can vote for the candidate of their choice despite the blatant attempts at election interference.
My dad, ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, joined the broadcast to expound on our new client. Some might be surprised that we are representing the Green Party. However, the ACLJ has a history of representing the constitutional rights of clients on both sides of the aisle.
"As you said, Jordan, we’re representing the Green Party. And by the way, this is not the first time that we’ve represented groups that ideologically we may not line up with, which we represented the Hare Krishnas [and] we represented the National Democratic Policy Committee at the Supreme Court. So you do cases where it impacts, as you said, you put your money where your mouth is, and you live the principles that you believe in. What happened to the Green Party in Nevada is so outrageous."
Because of our stellar legal work in representing the Colorado GOP, the Green Party wanted us to represent them. And we want to preserve the constitutional right to vote of all Americans.
And don’t forget: If the legal system can be weaponized against any party or candidate, then it can be weaponized against you. And it can be used against your preferred candidate.
-
16:25
TSPLY
23 hours agoNew CNN / MSNBC Meltdown Moments Of Getting Mad At Donald Trump In February
12.8K8 -
8:33
scoutthedoggie
3 hours agoAirsoft War Games Scotland
7.58K1 -
4:56
Kirill MultitoolOfficial
1 day ago $0.67 earnedSurvival TIPS and usefull bushcraft DIY in the wild
15K3 -
27:25
ArturRehi
1 day agoThis is How Dictatorships are Formed
8.13K1 -
59:35
AlaskanBallistics
16 hours ago $0.28 earnedI Love this Gun Episode # 11
6.19K1 -
1:21:01
BibleUnbound
18 hours agoThe Complete Story of Moses: The Man of God
12.8K3 -
15:56
Chris From The 740
7 hours ago $0.01 earnedFenix LR36R Review: The Most Powerful Light I've Ever Tested!
6.9K1 -
1:01:47
Wendy Bell Radio
8 hours agoPet Talk With The Pet Doc
14.6K6 -
2:23:45
Game On!
18 hours ago $9.90 earnedTom Brady approves of President Trump calling out Governors wanting men in women's sports!
50.1K8 -
5:34
BIG NEM
16 hours agoFrom Atheist to Seeing Auras: My Unlikely Spiritual Awakening 🤯
3.01K1