Follow The 9/11 Science: Episode Two – Programming The Impossible

EPISODE TWO

"Nobody in our government, at least, and I don't think the prior government, could envision flying airplanes into buildings on such a massive scale." (President George W. Bush, April 13, 2004)

"I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon; that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile." (Condoleezza Rice, President George W. Bush's National Security Advisor, May 16, 2002)

Did terrorists use airplanes as steel-beam penetrating missiles on 9/11, as history and the official science claim? Or are the critics of the Government's narrative correct in questioning what we've been told?

This video examines the relevant National Institute of Standards and Technology reports, following the official 9/11 science wherever it leads.

Along the way, we will also hear from witnesses who claim they saw smaller aircraft strike the towers. We will also learn about the Operation Northwoods memo, the birth of the Twin Towers, and much more.

This video contains news footage, witness accounts, and other pertinent information. For example, did you know that engineers designed the Twin Towers to withstand the impact of a commercial passenger jet traveling at 600 mph?

Is the official 9/11 Science an example of an honest and logical application of the scientific method, or nothing but deceptive propaganda?

Can passenger jets become steel-breaking missiles, or is the official 9/11 Science nothing but a lie?

Contact: chickenlittlesyndrome@gmail.com