Visual Representation Real True Story Behind The US-Mexico Border Wall Today

The Real True Story Behind The US-Mexico Border Wall Today is a complex and multifaceted one, spanning decades and involving various presidential administrations, congressional actions, and technological advancements. Here’s a breakdown of the key events and developments: Early 20th century: The US-Mexico border was relatively porous, with minimal infrastructure and enforcement. However, the 1920s saw the rise of anti-immigrant sentiment and the passage of immigration restrictions, including the Immigration Act of 1924 and the Border Patrol’s creation in 1924.

Show more

1960s-1980s: As illegal immigration increased, the US government began building fences and barriers along specific sections of the border. The first major fence was constructed in 1963 along the San Ysidro Port of Entry in California. Later, in the 1980s, the Reagan administration built a 14-mile fence in San Diego.

1990s-2000s: The 1990s saw a significant increase in border enforcement, including the deployment of National Guard troops and the construction of additional fencing. The Secure Fence Act of 2006 authorized the construction of over 700 miles of fencing along the US-Mexico border, which was completed by 2008.

Trump administration (2017-2021): President Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to build a “big, beautiful wall” along the US-Mexico border, claiming Mexico would pay for it. However, Mexico refused to fund the project, and Congress allocated only $1.4 billion for border barriers in 2018. The Trump administration constructed approximately 60 miles of new fencing and replaced or renovated existing barriers.

Biden administration (2021-present): President Joe Biden has continued to build upon existing infrastructure, including the construction of 20 miles of new fencing in South Texas. While Biden has not pursued a comprehensive wall project, he has maintained the existing fencing and expanded other border security measures.

Key Factors and Controversies
Cost: The total cost of building and maintaining the US-Mexico border wall is estimated to be over $20 billion.

Effectiveness: The wall’s effectiveness in reducing illegal immigration and drug trafficking is disputed. Many experts argue that it has been ineffective and that other factors, such as economic conditions and visa policies, play a more significant role in shaping migration patterns.

Environmental and social impacts: The construction of the wall has raised concerns about environmental degradation, disruption of wildlife habitats, and the separation of families and communities.

Humanitarian crisis: The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy, which led to family separations and detention centers, sparked widespread criticism and humanitarian concerns.

Mexican cooperation: The US government has historically relied on Mexican cooperation to address border security issues, including sharing intelligence and working together to combat organized crime.

In conclusion
The real story behind the US-Mexico border wall is a complex and multifaceted one, involving decades of evolution, controversy, and shifting priorities. While the wall has been a symbol of border security, its effectiveness and humanitarian impacts remain debated. The ongoing efforts to fortify the border reflect the ongoing challenges and complexities of US-Mexico relations.

Militarization at Friendship Park Deepens Division at the Border And What used to be a place for connection and community with San Diego’s neighbors to the south is no longer a place of unity.

It the westernmost point of the US-Mexico border, a little girl hid behind a steel pole at Friendship Park, then reappeared on the other side with a delighted grin. Occurring during a press tour I took of the area in 2016, this improvised game of peek-a-boo forever marked the way I think of this place.

Friendship Park—a historical site that exists in San Diego and Tijuana, split down the middle by the border—was, until recently, a place of connection and union between the two countries. Now, it evokes a prison.

I last set my eyes upon Friendship Park’s US side in spring 2023 while covering a demonstration. As I approached the 30-foot-tall gray wall that was being installed, I felt heavy in my stomach and my limbs. Tears came to my eyes. The place where families separated by the border used to hug, where longtime friends came to play music together, and where one could buy a taco from the other side of the border— that place is gone.

On the south side, the bold, colorful, four-dimensional letters spelling “Tijuana” are still there, but the mural-covered border fence and the view of the California coast have disappeared. The backdrop is now that massive wall, its steel posts so close together one cannot see through them.

Down on the beach, some futuristic contraptions top the wall to prevent people from climbing over. They—and a secondary fence further up north—seem to say, “Don’t make a run for it. You won’t
make it.”

Up on the mesa, construction crews destroyed the US part of the binational native plant garden. Its mirror on the Mexico side remains, albeit with some damage.

For local activists, the important part of the garden was not so much the plants but the connection between caretakers on both sides of the line, watering the flora, removing weeds, and making sure there remains a place for community along a border that divides us more every day.

“[The United States Border Patrol (USBP)] has not said anything about whether they will allow access for the garden on the US side,” says Reverend John Fanestil, the director of the activist group Friends of Friendship Park. “It’s supposed to be a garden for the community, not the Border Patrol.”

The US Customs and Border Protection has vowed to restore the flower beds to their original state, as well as to reopen Friendship Circle—an area where people could walk directly up to the border fence and meet their friends or loved ones during specific times—which has been closed since 2019. “Following the completion of construction activities, access to the Park will be coordinated with USBP through a gate in the secondary barrier, during designated periods of time, once it is operationally safe,” the agency wrote in a recent press release, offering no concrete timeline.

The doors of Friendship Circle may open again. The murals may be repainted, and the hustle and bustle of people may return to Playas de Tijuana. But that little tug in your heart that made you realize you were in a place that was unique in this world is gone. The lower fence and its wider slats allowed for a level of connection that this haunting new one doesn’t.

Because in that game of peek-a-boo I played at the border all those years ago, that little girl and I were breathing the same air, squinting in the same sun, and having fun together in two different countries. We may never get that back.

Hey Man USA-Mexico Border Is Closed-Border Is Secure-We Our A Sanctuary Cities - https://rumble.com/v4bm0ln-hey-man-usa-mexico-border-is-closed-border-is-secure-we-our-a-sanctuary-cit.html

Death in the sands: the horror of the US-Mexico border. Donald Trump has pledged to build a ‘beautiful wall’ – but America’s frontier with Mexico is already aggressively defended by the drones and fences of the US border patrol. It’s a strategy that is causing ever more migrants to die in hostile terrain.

Fifteen-year-old Sergio Hernandez Guereca and three teenage friends ran across the trickle of water in the concrete riverbed that is the Rio Grande, which marks the US–Mexico border, on a cloudy, hot June day in 2010. The river, which runs between El Paso and Juárez, is only centimetres deep and 15 metres wide at the border, because the US diverts most of the water into a canal before it reaches Mexico. The audacity of the boys’ run, in broad daylight in one of the most heavily patrolled spots along the border, roused bored pedestrians inching along the Paso del Norte Bridge towards the checkpoint. Several turned on their phone cameras to record the brazen act. The videos and the searing images of the aftermath momentarily flooded the media, with channels from CNN to Univision showing the footage.

Exactly what Sergio and his friends had in mind is unclear. Even at their young ages, they had to know that an agent would arrive within seconds of their shoes getting wet. Maybe they were a diversion for some other crossing nearby, or had a small package to drop for a smuggler, or, as their families would suggest later, were just doing something stupid to get their adrenaline pumping. They were teenage boys, after all.

As soon as they reached the fence on the US side, they were forced to retreat. Border patrol agent Jesus Mesa Jr ran in from the north with his gun already drawn. Sergio and two other boys easily evaded Mesa and jogged back across to the Mexican side. The fourth boy put his hands up and was detained. Seeing this, Sergio and his two friends picked up rocks and threw them at Agent Mesa. The detained boy fell to the ground; Agent Mesa dragged him by his shirt collar a few metres toward the Rio Grande, keeping his gun pointed into Mexico at the boys, who were at least 20 or 30 metres away.

Sitting in an empty Catholic church in El Paso a few months later, María Luisa (not her real name), a sprightly and energetic 80-year-old woman who resides in El Paso but regularly travels across the bridge to visit family in Juárez, described what happened next. “It was such a long distance,” she said exasperatedly, using her hands to point to either side of the cavernous chapel. “The border patrol was here, the boy was there. It was so far apart. How can you compare a man who has been trained to kill and this young boy, with rocks?”

Agent Mesa fired twice across the border into Mexico. Pop, pop. Then a brief pause, followed by another pop. Pedestrians on the bridge gasped and screamed. “Idiota,” one woman said. Sergio staggered a few metres and fell beside the pylon of a railway bridge. In the photos, the pool of blood around the wound in Sergio’s head is dried and congealed on the concrete riverbed.

The US–Mexico border that took the life of Sergio Guereca is a microcosm of a global change, its increased militarisation not in response to a military threat but focused entirely on preventing the movement of civilians.

In 1989 there were 15 border walls globally; today there are 70. Last year, countries as diverse as Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Kenya, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia announced or began work on new border walls. There were a record 5,604 deaths at borders, according to the International Organisation of Migration, and 65 million people displaced by conflict. These trends continued in 2016 with Bulgaria and Hungary expanding their fences, Pakistan building a fence on its Afghan border, and Britain paying for a wall in Calais to keep migrants away from the road to the channel tunnel. Border walls are also a central issue in the US presidential campaign, with Donald Trump proposing to build a “beautiful wall” on the remaining 1,300 miles of the US-Mexico border that are not yet fenced.

The current route of the frontier was established in 1848 and 1853 with the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and the Gadsden Purchase at the end of the Mexican–American war. The expansionary war inaugurated the idea that the Anglo-Saxon people of America had a manifest destiny to expand the US across the continent, from sea to shining sea. About half of Mexico’s territory was transferred, including large sections of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. At the time, these arid and sparsely populated lands were still not firmly under the control of the Mexican state. They included a population of 200,000 Native Americans (or, as the treaty refers to them, “savage tribes”), and 100,000 former Mexican citizens, 90% of whom decided to become US citizens; the rest relocated to the Mexican side of the new border.

In the years after the war, the border was marked on maps but not necessarily on the ground. It was not until the 1890s that the border was marked with boundary stones. The US did not create a border patrol agency until 1924, the same year Congress passed sweeping restrictions on Asian and southern European immigration.

In the early days the border patrol was small and underfunded. There were initially 450 agents, who provided their own horses and uniforms. Most were stationed at the Canada border, where Asian migrants were more likely to cross. Over the years, the mission shifted to patrolling the Mexico border, but as recently as 1990 it was a small force of just over 3,000 agents. Without the resources or infrastructure to close the border completely, the border patrol allowed migrants to cross before detaining them on the US side. They were then usually released back to Mexico without charges.

In the mid-1990s, in response to criticism of its methods, the border patrol implemented a new deterrence approach. Operation Hold the Line in El Paso and Operation Gatekeeper in San Diego fenced critical sections of the border and deployed hundreds of agents. The number of crossings was cut to almost zero in the immediate areas of the deployments, each less than 15km (a little over nine miles) long. Migrants and smugglers simply relocated to another section. Nevertheless, the localised success demonstrated that fences and larger deployments could secure the border.

Then 9/11 happened. The attacks and subsequent fear of terrorism were used to justify substantial increases in hiring at the border patrol. Resources were focused on densely populated and highly trafficked areas, with the goal of discouraging crossings by forcing migrants into remote and dangerous deserts. By 2010 the border patrol had more than 20,000 agents. In order to hire such a large number of agents quickly, it removed some previous requirements, such as passing a polygraph exam, and drew heavily on veterans from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan – they make up 28.8% of agents. The lower standards, combined with the influx of veterans, altered the atmosphere at the agency, bringing a military ethos to the policing job. Closely related to the funding increases was the emergence of a homeland security industry in which military suppliers repurposed weapons, surveillance technologies and vehicles for use inside the US.

In 2012 the US government spent $18bn on immigration policing – more than it spent on all other federal law enforcement combined, including the FBI ($8bn), the Drug Enforcement Administration ($2.88bn), the Secret Service ($1bn), and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives ($1bn). Homeland Security Research, an industry analysis firm, estimates the sector will be worth an astounding $107.3bn by 2020.

In the past, most migrants detained at the border were quickly processed and voluntarily repatriated to Mexico, often within a few hours of being caught. This was convenient for the border patrol, which had neither the staff to process paperwork nor the space to house thousands of migrants in detention facilities. It was also an acknowledgment that the vast majority of migrants at the border were poor workers, not smugglers or criminals. As the staffing increased and migrant detention facilities were privatised, the government began to detain migrants, charge them with misdemeanours for their first offence and felonies for their second, and then formally deport them. Before 1986 there were rarely more than 20,000 deportations a year; by the mid-2000s, the number was 400,000 a year. The number of migrants in detention facilities increased from 85,000 in 1995 to 440,000 in 2013. Surprisingly, more people have been deported from the US during the Obama presidency than during any previous administration.

Meanwhile, new border infrastructure substantially expanded the enforcement area. This includes nine Predator drones – the largest fleet used in US domestic airspace – that patrol the south-western border, hi-tech surveillance systems known as “smart borders” that use sensors and cameras to monitor movement at the border, and ground-penetrating radar designed to detect subterranean tunnels (the border patrol has found more than 150 since the 1990s). There were no federal fences on the border prior to the short sections built for operations Hold the Line and Gatekeeper, but today, 1,070km (670 miles) of the 3,169km (1,970 miles) border are fenced against pedestrians or vehicles. The metal mesh pedestrian barrier is 6.4m (21ft) high and extends 1.8m (6ft) into the ground. These efforts still leave two-thirds of the border with Mexico unfenced.

The militarisation of the border has resulted in far too many stories similar to that of Sergio Guereca’s killing. From 2010 to 2015, US border patrol agents shot and killed 33 people. These killings became an issue in the summer of 2014 with the firing of internal affairs chief James Tomsheck. The border patrol stated that it fired Tomsheck for not investigating killings, but Tomsheck alleged his sacking was part of a cover-up.

In an interview with National Public Radio, Tomsheck stated that he believed 25% of the fatal shootings were suspicious: “Some persons in leadership positions in the border patrol were either fabricating or distorting information to give the outward appearance that it was an appropriate use of lethal force when in fact it was not.” Similarly, a 2014 report by the American Immigration Council found that of 809 reports of abuse between 2009 and 2012 – and reports are very rare due to the subordinate position of many migrants – no action was taken in 97% of cases.

In media interviews, Tomsheck blamed the culture of the border patrol; its agents thought of themselves as part of the military. “The phrase was frequently used – a ‘paramilitary border security force’ or a ‘paramilitary homeland security force,’” said Tomsheck. In response to criticism, the border patrol issued revised guidelines in May 2014 that state that agents can use deadly force when there is a “reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer/agent or to another person”.

In April 2015, the fifth district US court of appeals ruled against a civil suit by Sergio Guereca’s parents because “a Mexican citizen standing in Mexico” has no standing in a US court. The Guereca family attorney, Marion Reilly, summed up the ruling: “So the court has ruled that it was appropriate for the agent to kill an unarmed teenager based on his nationality – don’t kill him if he is a US citizen, but fire away if he is a Mexican.”

Unfortunately, direct violence, including killings by the border patrol and on the Mexican side, as cartels work to solidify control over profitable smuggling routes, does not even scratch the surface of the violence that surrounds the US–Mexico border. The border patrol has recovered more than 6,000 bodies there since the 1990s, deaths attributable to the construction of the border wall and the massive border patrol presence. Migrants are funnelled to more dangerous and remote locations, just like migrants at the edges of the EU. Instead of crossing in a city, migrants are making the arduous journey through the deserts of Arizona, hiking 50 or more kilometres through arid and desolate terrain. According to the first National Border Patrol Strategy document, released in 1994, that was the goal: “The prediction is that with traditional entry and smuggling routes disrupted, illegal traffic will be deterred, or forced over more hostile terrain, less suited for crossing and more suited for enforcement.” Put another way, the official border patrol strategy was to create conditions that would cause more migrants to die in hostile terrain, in order to deter other migrants from making the trip.

With the increased enforcement, crossings and migrant deaths in California declined, while those in Arizona surged. The Tucson, Arizona coroner’s office has seen a twentyfold increase in the number of migrant bodies found each year since the 1990s. Migrants do not bring enough food and water, often because smugglers, who do not want to be slowed down by the extra weight, tell them the trip is not very far. The harrowing result is documented in books such as The Devil’s Highway by Luís Alberto Urrea, which tells the story of 26 migrants who attempted to enter the US through the Arizona desert in May 2001. Only 12 survived. Leanne Weber and Sharon Pickering of the Monash University criminal justice programme estimate that there are two additional deaths for every recovered body, since remains are quickly obscured by shifting sands.

In line with the global trend, this military build-up has not been directed towards an existential threat to sovereignty, such as an invasion by a neighbouring army. Instead, the full force of modern military technology is oriented toward smugglers profiting from different regulations on either side of the border, and migrant workers looking for better opportunities. The US border patrol operates as if it is part of the military; the actual US military plays a significant role in internal policing at the border. In the emerging security state, privileges are maintained by restricting movement through violence.

Hey Man So Let's Be Crystal Clear Right Now At A Satanic Meeting Jan. 06 2024 & Said President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. My Fellow Pedophile's Americans And Parasitic Monsters Literally and Predatory Feeding Off the 9.6 Million Children Gone Missing Each Year Around the World… Top Secret “Elite Pedophile Of The World” has reverberated throughout America. “Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word.”

Hey Man USA-Mexico Border Is Closed-Border Is Secure-We Our A Sanctuary Cities - https://rumble.com/v4bm0ln-hey-man-usa-mexico-border-is-closed-border-is-secure-we-our-a-sanctuary-cit.html

Border Is Closed-Border Is Secure Period... Said Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas (This Video Above Is Truth & Show You The America People's How Secure Border Really Is Right Now... So Help Me God-Satan) So I'm defending President Biden’s rules and immigration strategy as planned in the first place and emphasized in multiple interviews Sunday that the southern border of the United States “is closed and secure as planned,” as the Biden administration faces criticism over a record number of migrants seeking entry.

P.S. Only 3,000 Person A Week Come Thru This One Opening A Week For Over 3 Years Now. So 3,000 Times 52 Week In A Year Is = 156,000 Per Year Times 3 Year = 468,000 Peoples... Total So Far From This One Opening At The Border! - Wow in 2024 So If Anyone Try To Stop People Coming Into U.S.A... You (The Land Owners) May Go To Jail And Your Gun Will Be Taken Away From You... U.S.A. Gun Control And Confiscation Laws.

So As Per Biden Planning With China 468,000 Chinese's And Other Peoples Have Crossed The Bonder At This Gap Which Is Now Open Over 3 Years Now And Is On A Priority List To Get Fix If We Get More Money To Do It In 2024.

Per President Biden’s And UN Agenda 2030 Planning For 100 Million Illegal Immigration To Be Let Into U.S.A. By 2030 As Per UN Planning And The Take Over U.S.A. By UN Agenda 2030.

People's Republic Of United States Of America Declared Its An Open Sanctuary Cities Is Open To All Good Or Bad Or Who Care ? Be-Headings - Homeless - Drug - Death - Rape - Sex Workers - Child Pedophile's Etc. Is The Border A Crisis Or An ‘Invasion’? Texas Gov. Greg Abbott claims that President Biden’s failure to faithfully execute the immigration laws enacted by Congress has violated Article IV, § 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which provides that “The United States . . . shall protect each [State in this Union] against Invasion.”

We have publicly confronted hate groups, fought for the abolition of corporal punishment in public schools, applied for equal representation when religious installations are placed on public property, provided religious exemption and legal protection against laws that unscientifically restrict people's reproductive autonomy, exposed harmful pseudo-scientific practitioners in mental health care, organized clubs alongside other religious after-school clubs in schools besieged by proselytizing organizations, and engaged in other advocacy in accordance with our tenets.

USA-Mexico Border Invasion Declaration U.S.A. Open Sanctuary Cities Is Open To All - https://rumble.com/v43nu9n-usa-mexico-border-invasion-declaration-u.s.a.-open-sanctuary-cities-is-open.html

Vice President Kamala Harris under fire for saying 'the border is secure' The border is secure, but we also have a broken immigration system, in particular over the last four years before we came in, and it needs to be fixed,” Harris told Chuck Todd during an interview for NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday.

We have a secure border in that that is a priority for any nation, including ours and our administration,” she added.

They took the most secure border in our lifetime and they unsecured it,” Morgan told The National Desk during an interview on Tuesday morning. “We have this administration now including the vice president of the United States lying to the American people,” he added. The CDC reported that more than 126,000+ Americans died of drug overdoses in 2023.

"You must secure the border, both in between the ports of entry and at the ports of entry, to cut off the supply. And part of that is stopping the flow of illegal immigration because those things are connected. As illegal immigration goes up, resources are pulled off the line, resulting in operational control of the border literally being handed over to the cartels where they're exploiting it and drugs are pouring into the country," said Morgan. "We need to shift our strategy to a whole-government approach and commitment to go after the cartels equally as we do terrorist organizations throughout the world."

Per U.S.A. Government DOA-DOJ-FBI-CIA-Etc. Everyone In U.S.A. All Person And Or America Citizens Right Now Today Is A Criminal As of Oct 2023 Need To Be In Jail Or Pay $$$ Fines Now. Per all federal and local police and all government agencies. All The America People Break The Law's Average 3 Times Everyday with A Average Fine of $512 dollars a day. it add up to $512 x 365 days in a year add up to $186,880 Dollars per year in fines per every person alive today right now. also federal and local agencies issue an average of 27 rules for every law over the past decade.

However, the rules issued in a given year are typically not substantively related to the current year’s laws, as agency output represents ongoing implementation of earlier legislation. Remember That Ignorance of the law is a fundamental legal principle in the US that means that if someone breaks the law, they are still liable even if they had no knowledge of the law being broken. According to a 2020 article, the more than 300,000+ laws and regulatory crimes on the federal law books serve little purpose other than inviting arbitrary enforcement by providing prosecutors the tools to charge nearly anyone every day for your life with violating some long-forgotten regulation or law and to pay the fines now or go to jail for everyone in the U.S.A.. Government Every Man, Women, & Child Is A Criminal & Need 2 Go To Jail for life.

Confiscating Entire Wealth of All The Billionaires and Kill Them and Family Too! There are 724 (billionaires) in the U.S., and more overseas according to the 2021 Forbes billionaires list, released in April,” the Journal reports. “At that point their collective net worth was $4.4 trillion, although that figure has presumably since risen along with the stock market. So Per 60% Death taxes are taxes imposed by the federal and some state governments on someone's estate upon their death - Death taxes are also called death duties, estate taxes, or inheritance taxes. After getting the money maybe in 20 weeks or so - Own Government plan's are to kill rest of the family member for more estate taxes, or inheritance taxes.

Also Government Plan's are to Kill and or Black Mail for Lot's of Money All Epstein’s and Maxwell Private Pedophile Islands Visitor Log's including video equipment and sex tape's of rich people and with DNA Sample Testing and secret video tapes and missing body in underground lairs and a bizarre teen sex temple from Pedophile Islands Guestbook and Visitor List They Do Not Want You to See Ever!

Jeffrey Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell Said We Have 1,000's Video Tape's and have 1,000 Forensic DNA Test's, Blood Test's and Hair Sample's DNA Testing all ready Done Now.

Hey Man USA-Mexico Border Is Closed-Border Is Secure-We Our A Sanctuary Cities - https://rumble.com/v4bm0ln-hey-man-usa-mexico-border-is-closed-border-is-secure-we-our-a-sanctuary-cit.html

So per U.S.A. new land reform and confiscation all personal property to pay all new court fines was not only an economic or administrative process of taking and redistributing deeds or legal ownership of land. It was a two party system's republican and democratic parties -led to new mass movement which turned peasants (its you baby) into active participants and which pushed for political and ideological change beyond the immediate economic question of all land confiscation and ownership rights are gone.

If you have a home the state will take it for the fines you own to the state now. you can stay in your old home as a renter with 3 other family to move in with you to help the homeless problem.

Move A Illegal Immigration Or Sex Slave Into Your Own Home Video Marathon 2024 - https://rumble.com/v47ky65-move-a-illegal-immigration-or-sex-slave-into-your-own-home-video-marathon-2.html

Illegal Immigration Or Sex Slave Will You Move Someone Into Your Own Home ? Worrisome stories about the illegal immigration or sex slave crisis hit the news feed every day right now. To help you understand the situation, we've carefully curated a selection of our most important and thoughtful videos on the topic.

Lists of Sanctuary States in the United States
Sometimes the term “sanctuary” encompasses more than just a city. There are many counties across the United States that claim sanctuary county policies, and several states that consider their entire geographical location as a sanctuary. As of March 2021, the following states claim sanctuary status:
California - Colorado - Connecticut - Illinois
- Massachusetts - New Jersey - New Mexico
- New York - Oregon - Vermont
- Washington - And The New World Order !

https://apsanlaw.com/law-246.list-of-sanctuary-cities.html

Alejandro Mayorkas Sold 345,000 Children Sex Trafficking Abuse Of Migrant Children - https://rumble.com/v43sk2l-alejandro-mayorkas-sold-345000-children-sex-trafficking-abuse-of-migrant-ch.html

The Perils of Abuse and Exploitation Threaten Migrant Children from Latin America and the Caribbean Sold As Sex Slave By Alejandro Mayorkas Secretary of Homeland Security 345,000 Children Sex Trafficking Abuse of Migrant Children One of every five migrants in the region is a minor and there are no immigration policies that protect the rights of these children, say experts.

It is estimated that nearly 2 million children mostly girls are being sexually exploited as part of the multi-billion dollar commercial sex industry. And sadly, the United States is the number 1 consumer of child porn. This is a modern day form of slavery, involving: force, fraud, coercion, exploitation and a lot of shame. Today’s guest, Tim Ballard, is an advocate against child sex slavery. He’s the founder of Operation Underground Railroad a non-profit organization to fight against child sex slavery and sex trafficking. This episode may not be easy to listen to, but it’s easily one of the most important you’ll ever hear.

Alejandro Mayorkas Sold and is now hiding the numbers 85,000 kids missing and in the last 3 years over 12,000+ have been killed and are dead now....yes very sad and to now hide the true numbers killed for not paying the slave traders money or sold as sex slave or worked to death working 16 hours a day.

Hey Man USA-Mexico Border Is Closed-Border Is Secure-We Our A Sanctuary Cities - https://rumble.com/v4bm0ln-hey-man-usa-mexico-border-is-closed-border-is-secure-we-our-a-sanctuary-cit.html

Nearly six million people in Latin America and the Caribbean have migrated within the region and approximately 25 million have migrated to the United States or Europe. One of every five migrants is estimated to be a child or adolescent who may be exposed to abuses, according to data from the Newsletter Challenges Nº 11, published today by ECLAC and UNICEF.

Child sex trafficking refers to the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, obtaining, patronizing, or soliciting of a minor for the purpose of a commercial sex act. Offenders of this crime, commonly referred to as pimps, target vulnerable children and gain control over them using a variety of manipulative methods. While anyone can be a victim, kids who are homeless or runaways, LGBTQ, African American or Latino, and youth interacting with the child welfare system are more vulnerable to this type of exploitation. Child sex trafficking is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 1591, which makes it a federal offense to knowingly recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, or maintain a minor (defined as someone under 18 years of age) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that the victim is a minor and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act. Human trafficking can include forced labor, domestic servitude, organ trafficking, debt bondage, recruitment of children as child soldiers, and/or sex trafficking and forced prostitution.

* "When a child has been recruited, transported, harbored, or received and some commercial element is introduced in the production of child pornography, then that individual has also engaged in child trafficking. Whether they work in strip clubs or sweatshops, these boys and girls are victims of human trafficking."

* The Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) defines “severe forms of trafficking in persons” as: sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such an act has not attained 18 years of age."

* "The economic reality is that human trafficking is driven by profits. If nobody paid for sex, sex trafficking would not exist."

Although their migration to other countries may bring some benefits, many children may also be exposed to risks like abuse, exploitation and violation of their rights, warn experts of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) in the article Children and international migration in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Child trafficking victims, whether for labor, sex or organ trafficking, come from all backgrounds, include both boys and girls. They span a wide age range from 1 to 18 years old. Sex trafficking victims up to roughly 25 years old most often started as young as 14. Children are trafficked out of, or into the United States from all regions of the world and represent a variety of different races, ethnic groups and religions. They may be brought to the U.S. legally or smuggled in.

Trafficked children can be lured to the U.S. through the promise of school or work and promised the opportunity to send money back to their families. Children are also vulnerable to kidnappers, pimps, and professional brokers. Some children are even sold to traffickers by their families, who may or may not have an understanding of what will happen to the child. U.S. born children are also trafficked within the U.S., coming from any racial group, socio-economic background, and come from or trafficked within both city and rural areas.

The numbers;
Update: the (UNODC) United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reports the percentage of child victims had risen in a 3 year span from 20 per cent to 27 per cent. Of every three child victims, two are girls and one is a boy.

Gender and age profile of victims detected globally: 59% Women - 14% Men - 17% Girls and 10% were Boys.

600,000 to 800,000 women, children and men bought and sold across international borders every year and exploited for forced labor or commercial sex (U.S. Government)
When internal trafficking victims are added to the estimates, the number of victims annually is in the range of 2 to 4 million
50% of those victims are estimated to be children
It is estimated that 76 percent of transactions for sex with underage girls start on the Internet
2 million children are subjected to prostitution in the global commercial sex trade (UNICEF)
There are 20.9 Million victims of Trafficking World wide
1.5 Million victims in the United States
The impact;
Human trafficking has surpassed the illegal sale of arms
Trafficking will surpass the illegal sale of drugs in the next few years
Drugs are used once and they are gone. Victims of child trafficking can be used and abused over and over
A $32 billion-a-year industry, human trafficking is on the rise and is in all 50 states (U.S. Government)
4.5 Million of trafficked persons are sexually exploited
Up to 300,000 Americans under 18 are lured into the commercial sex trade every year
From 14,500 - 17,500 of those victims are trafficked into the United States each year

According to non-governmental U.S. sources;
Average age a victim enters trafficking is 11 to 14 years old
Approx 80% are women and children bought, sold and imprisoned in the underground sex service industry
Average life span of a victim is reported to be 7 years (found dead from attack, abuse, HIV and other STD's, malnutrition, overdose or suicide)
The largest group of at-risk children are runaway, thrown away, or homeless American children who use survival sex to acquire food, shelter, clothing, and other things needed to survive on America's streets. According to the National Runaway Switchboard 1.3 million runaway and homeless youth live on America's streets every day. [5,000 die each year] It would not be surprising to learn that the number of children trafficked in the United States is actually much higher than 300,000.

Children are often targeted by traffickers as they are deemed easier to manipulate than adults. More money can be earned by younger girls and boys exploited in sexual exploitation, especially virgins. Pre-pubescent girls are reported to be injected with hormones to bring on puberty. Younger girls are expected to have a greater earning potential, and as such are in greater demand.

Shocking Report Links Girl Scout Cookies to Child Sex Trafficking and Slave Labor A shocking investigation by the Associated Press into child labor has revealed unsettling details about an ingredient in Girl Scout cookies and it its ties to child slave labor and sex trafficking. Palm oil. The $65 billion global palm oil industry is one of the largest food industries in the world and it is rooted in corruption and child abuse.

We People's Republic Of America Declared Its An Sanctuary Cities You Ain't Black U Not Vote 4 Me. Congressional Black Caucus and Lori Elaine Lightfoot and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democratic leader "Squad," a group of color, including Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressley with Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi and President Joe Biden and ex-President's Barack Obama and Bill Clinton and Others.

Chicago Is Planning To Move-In 200,000 More Illegal Immigrants With Shelters For ALL By Dec. 2024 Shelters are full after thousands of migrants are sent to Chicago by Congressional Black Caucus and Others As Planned From The Start.

(Older Chicago Men Said I'm Seeking Sex And Lovers Of 40,000 Young Girl And Women And Some Young Boy Too Will Be Fine With Us To Move-In With Us)

Chicago Releases Three Year Prostitution Study If 40,000 Young People Move-In With Older Men Prostitution Will Go Down Fast And Price For Sex Slave Will Drop Maybe By 60% In The City And They The People Will Get Free Room And Board To If You Move-In With A Older Chicago Man Today.

Head's Of Chicago Say: If The Racist Black Men Or Women, Will Not Support The City Of Chicago New Open City Polices Of Illegal Immigrants As Residents Who Have Rights Too. We Can Feed You For Free In Jail If You Want... lol Remember You Voted For Open Borders In The First Place.

People's Republic Of United States Of America Declared Its An Open Sanctuary Cities Is Open To Vets - Homeless - Drug - Rape - Sex Workers - Pedophile's Etc.

Biden-Harris Administration To All Blacks If You Can't Afford To Pay Rent In Your Town... Its O.K. For You To Move Anytime You Want Too... But Remember “You’ve got more questions?” Biden replied. “Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.” So Move If Have Too... But Keep Your Vote For The Democrat Party.

The real costs of a barrier between the United States and Mexico. The cheerful paintings of flowers on the tall metal posts on the Tijuana side of the border fence between the U.S. and Mexico belie the sadness of the Mexican families who have gathered there to exchange whispers, tears, and jokes with relatives on the San Diego side.

Many have been separated from their family members for years. Some were deported to Mexico after having lived in the United States for decades without authorization, leaving behind children, spouses, siblings, and parents. Others never left Mexico, but have made their way to the fence to see relatives in the United States. With its prison–like ambience and Orwellian name—Friendship Park—this site is one of the very few places where families separated by immigration rules can have even fleeting contact with their loved ones, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. Elsewhere, the tall metal barrier is heavily patrolled.

So is to be the wall that President Donald Trump promises to build along the border. But no matter how tall and thick a wall will be, illicit flows will cross.

Undocumented workers and drugs will still find their way across any barrier the administration ends up building. And such a wall will be irrelevant to those people who become undocumented immigrants by overstaying their visas—who for many years have outnumbered those who become undocumented immigrants by crossing the U.S.–Mexico border.

Nor will the physical wall enhance U.S. security.

The border, and more broadly how the United States defines its relations with Mexico, directly affects the 12 million people who live within 100 miles of the border. In multiple and very significant ways that have not been acknowledged or understood it will also affect communities all across the United States as well as Mexico.

The wall comes with many costs, some obvious though hard to estimate, some unforeseen. The most obvious is the large financial outlay required to build it, in whatever form it eventually takes. Although during the election campaign candidate Trump claimed that the wall would cost only $12 billion, a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) internal report in February put the cost at $21.6 billion, but that may be a major underestimate.

The estimates vary so widely because of the lack of clarity about what the wall will actually consist of beyond the first meager Homeland Security specifications that it be either a solid concrete wall or a see–through structure, “physically imposing in height,” ideally 30 feet high but no less than 18 feet, sunk at least six feet into the ground to prevent tunneling under it; that it should not be scalable with even sophisticated climbing aids; and that it should withstand prolonged attacks with impact tools, cutting tools, and torches. But that description doesn’t begin to cover questions about the details of its physical structure. Then there are the legal fees required to seize land on which to build the wall. The Trump administration can use eminent domain to acquire the land but will still have to negotiate compensation and often face lawsuits. More than 90 such lawsuits in southern Texas alone are still open from the 2008 effort to build a fence there.

The Trump administration cannot simply seize remittances to Mexico to pay for the wall; doing so may increase flows of undocumented workers to the United States. Remittances provide many Mexicans with amenities they could never afford otherwise. But for Mexicans living in poverty—some 46.2 percent in 2015 according to the Mexican social research agency CONEVAL—the remittances are a veritable lifeline which can represent as much as 80 percent of their income. These families count on that money for the basics of life—food, clothing, health care, and education for their children.

The remittances enable human and economic development throughout the country, and this in turn reduces the incentives for further migration to the United States — precisely what Trump is aiming to do.

I met the matron of one of those families in a lush but desperately poor mountain village in Guerrero. Rosa, a forceful woman who was initially suspicious, decided to confide in me. Her son had crossed into the United States eight years ago, she said. The remittances he sent allowed Rosa’s grandchildren to get medical treatment at the nearest clinic, some thirty miles away. Like Rosa, many people in the village had male relatives working illegally in the United States in order to help their families make ends meet. Sierra de Atoyac may be paradise for a birdwatcher (which I am), but Guerrero is one of Mexico’s poorest, most neglected, and crime and violence–ridden states. “Here you have few chances,” Rosa explained to me. “If you’re smart, like my son, you make it across the border to the U.S. If you’re not so smart, you join the narcos. If you’re stupid, but lucky, you join the [municipal] police. Otherwise, you’re stuck here farming or logging and starving.”

Any attempt to seize the remittances from such families would be devastating. Fluctuating between $20 billion and $25 billion annually during the past decade, remittances from the United States have amounted to about 3 percent of Mexico’s GDP, representing the third–largest source of foreign revenue after oil and tourism. The remittances enable human and economic development throughout the country, and this in turn reduces the incentives for further migration to the United States—precisely what Trump is aiming to do.

Why the DHS believes that a 30–foot tall wall cannot be scaled and a tunnel cannot be built deeper than six feet below ground is not clear.

Drug smugglers have been using tunnels to get drugs into the United States ever since Mexico’s most famous drug trafficker, Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán of the Sinaloa Cartel, pioneered the method in 1989. And the sophistication of these tunnels has only grown over time. In April 2016, U.S. law enforcement officials discovered a drug tunnel that ran more than half a mile from Tijuana to San Diego and was equipped with ventilation vents, rails, and electricity. It is the longest such tunnel to be found so far, but one of 13 of great length and technological expertise discovered since 2006. Altogether, between 1990 and 2016, 224 tunnels have been unearthed at the U.S.–Mexico border.

Other smuggling methods increasingly include the use of drones and catapults as well as joint drainage systems between border towns that have wide tunnels or tubes through which people can crawl and drugs can be pulled. But even if the land border were to become much more secure, that would only intensify the trend toward smuggling goods as well as people via boats that sail far to the north, where they land on the California coast.

Another thing to consider is that a barrier in the form of a wall is increasingly irrelevant to the drug trade as it is now practiced because most of the drugs smuggled into the U.S. from Mexico no longer arrive on the backs of those who cross illegally. Instead, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, most of the smuggled marijuana as well as cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamines comes through the 52 legal ports of entry on the border. These ports have to process literally millions of people, cars, trucks, and trains every week. Traffickers hide their illicit cargo in secret, state–of–the art compartments designed for cars, or under legal goods in trailer trucks. And they have learned many techniques for fooling the border patrol. Mike, a grizzled U.S. border official whom I interviewed in El Paso in 2013, shrugged: “The narcos sometimes tip us off, letting us find a car full of drugs while they send six other cars elsewhere. Such write–offs are part of their business expense. Other times the tipoffs are false. We search cars and cars, snarl up the traffic for hours on, and find nothing.”

Beyond the Sinaloa Cartel, 44 other significant criminal groups operate today in Mexico. The infighting within and among them has made Mexico one of the world’s most violent countries. In 2016 alone this violence claimed between 21,000 and 23,000 lives. Between 2007 and 2017, a staggering 177,000 people were murdered in Mexico, a number that could actually be much higher, as many bodies are buried in mass graves that are hidden and never found. Those Mexican border cities that are principal entry points of drugs into the Unites States have been particularly badly affected by the violence.

Take Ciudad Juárez, for example. Directly across the border from peaceful El Paso. Ciudad Juárez was likely the world’s most violent city when I was there in 2011 and it epitomizes what can happen during these drug wars. In 2011 the Sinaloa Cartel was battling the local Juárez Cartel, trying to take over the city’s smuggling routes to the United States, and causing a veritable bloodbath. Walking around the contested colonías at the time was like touring a cemetery: Residents would point out places where people were killed the day before, three days before, five weeks ago.

Juan, a skinny 19–year–old whom I met there that year, told me that he was trying to get out of a local gang (the name of which he wouldn’t reveal). He had started working for the gang as a halcone (a lookout) when he was 15, he said. But now as the drug war raged in the city and the local gangs were pulled into the infighting between the big cartels, his friends in the gang were being asked to do much more than he wanted to do—to kill. Without any training, they were given assault weapons. Having no shooting skills, they just sprayed bullets in the vicinity of their assigned targets, hoping that at least some of the people they killed would be the ones they were supposed to kill, because if they didn’t succeed, they themselves might be murdered by those who had contracted them to do the job.

I met Juan through Valeria, whose NGO was trying to help gang members like Juan get on the straight and narrow. But it was tough going for her and her staff to make the case. As Juan had explained to me, a member who refused to do the bidding of the gangs could be killed for his failure to cooperate.

“And America does nothing to stop the weapons coming here!” Valeria exclaimed to me.

While President Trump accuses Mexico of exporting violent crime and drugs to the United States, many Mexican officials as well as people like Valeria, who are on the ground in the fight against the drug wars, complain of a tide of violence and corruption that flows in the opposite direction. Some 70 percent of the firearms seized in Mexico between 2009 and 2014 originated in the United States. Although amounting to over 73,000 guns, these seizures still likely represented only a fraction of the weapons smuggled from the United States. Moreover, billions of dollars per year are made in the illegal retail drug market in the United States and smuggled back to Mexico, where the cartels depend on this money for their basic operations. Sometimes, sophisticated money–laundering schemes, such as trade–based deals, are used; but large parts of the proceeds are smuggled as bulk cash hidden in secret compartments and among goods in the cars and trains daily crossing the border south to Mexico.

Some 70 percent of the firearms seized in Mexico between 2009 and 2014 originated in the United States.
And of course it is the U.S. demand for drugs that fuels Mexican drug smuggling in the first place. Take, for example, the current heroin epidemic in the United States. It originated in the over–prescription of medical opiates to treat pain. The subsequent efforts to reduce the over–prescription of painkillers led those Americans who became dependent on them to resort to illegal heroin. That in turn stimulated a vast expansion of poppy cultivation in Mexico, particularly in Guerrero. In 2015, Mexico’s opium poppy cultivation reached perhaps 28,000 hectares, enough to distill about 70 tons of heroin (which is even more than the 24–50 tons estimated to be necessary to meet the U.S. demand).

Mexico’s large drug cartels, including El Chapo’s Sinaloa Cartel, which is estimated to supply between 40 and 60 percent of the cocaine and heroin sold on the streets in the United States, are the dominant wholesale suppliers of illegal drugs in the United States. For the retail trade, however, they usually recruit business partners among U.S. crime gangs. And thanks to the deterrence capacity of U.S. law enforcement, insofar as Mexican drug–trafficking groups do have in–country operations in the U.S., such as in wholesale supply, they have behaved strikingly peacefully and have not resorted to the vicious aggression and infighting that characterizes their business in Mexico. So the U.S. has been spared the drug–traffic–related explosions of violence that have ravaged so many of the drug–producing or smuggling areas of Mexico.

Both the George W. Bush administration and the Obama administration recognized the joint responsibility for drug trafficking between the United States and Mexico, an attitude that allowed for unprecedented collaborative efforts to fight crime and secure borders. This collaboration allowed U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agents to operate in Mexico and help their Mexican counterparts in intelligence development, training, vetting, establishment of police procedures and protocols, and interdiction operations. The collaboration also led to Mexico being far more willing than it ever had been before to patrol both its northern border with the United States and its southern border with Central America, as part of the effort to help apprehend undocumented workers trying to cross into the United States.

The Trump administration’s hostility to Mexico could jeopardize this progress. In retaliation for building the wall, for any efforts the U.S. might make to force Mexico to pay for the wall, or for the collapse of NAFTA, the Mexican government could, for example, give up on its efforts to secure its southern border or stop sharing counterterrorism intelligence with the United States. Yet Mexico’s cooperation is far more important for U.S. security than any wall.

Although President Trump has railed against the “carnage” of crime in the United States, the crime statistics, with few exceptions, tell a very different story.

In 2014, 14,249 people were murdered, the lowest homicide rate since 1991 when there were 24,703, and part of a pattern of steady decline in violent crime over that entire period. In 2015, however, murders in the U.S. did shoot up to 15,696. This increase was largely driven by three cities—Baltimore, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. Baltimore and Chicago have decreasing populations, and all three have higher poverty and unemployment than the national average, high income and racial inequality, and troubled relations between residents and police—conditions conducive to a rise in violent crime. In 2016, homicides fell in Washington and Baltimore, but continued rising in Chicago.

There is no evidence, however, that undocumented residents accounted for either the rise in crime or even for a substantial number of the crimes, in Chicago or elsewhere. The vast majority of violent crimes, including murders, are committed by native–born Americans. Multiple criminological studies show that foreign–born individuals commit much lower levels of crime than do the native–born. In California, for example, where there is a large immigrant population, including of undocumented migrants, U.S.–born men were incarcerated at a rate 2.5 times higher than foreign–born men.

Unfortunately, the Trump administration is promoting a policing approach that insists on prioritizing hunting down undocumented workers, including by using regular police forces, and this kind of misguided law enforcement policy is spreading: In Texas, which has an estimated 1.5 million undocumented immigrants, Republican Governor Greg Abbott recently signed a law to punish sanctuary cities. Among the punishments are draconian measures (such as removal from office, fines, and up to one–year imprisonment) to be enacted against local police officials who do not embrace immigration enforcement. Abbott signed the law despite the fact that police chiefs from all five of Texas’s largest cities—Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin, and Fort Worth—published a statement condemning it: “This legislation is bad for Texas and will make our communities more dangerous for all,” they wrote in their Dallas Morning News op–ed. They argued that immigration enforcement is a federal, not a state responsibility, and that the new law would widen a gap between police and immigrant communities, discouraging cooperation with police on serious crimes, and resulting in widespread underreporting of crimes perpetrated against immigrants. There is powerful and consistent evidence that if people begin to question the fairness, equity, and legitimacy of law enforcement and government institutions, then they stop reporting crime, and homicides increase.

Police chiefs in other parts of the country, from Los Angeles to Denver, have expressed similar concerns and also their dismay at having to devote their already overstrained resources to hunting down undocumented workers.

The Trump administration has broadened the Obama–era criteria for “expedited removal.” Under Obama any immigrant arrested within 100 miles of the border who had been in the country for less than 14 days—i.e., before he or she could establish roots in the United States—could be deported without due process. The result: In fiscal year 2016, 85 percent of all removals (forced) and returns (voluntary) were of noncitizens who met those criteria. Almost all (more than 90 percent) of the remaining 15 percent had been convicted of serious crimes.

Now, however, any undocumented person anywhere in the country who has been here for as long as two years can be removed. And although it claims it will focus on deporting immigrants who commit serious crimes, the Trump administration is gearing up for mass deportations of many of the 11.1 million undocumented residents in the U.S., by far the largest number of whom come from Mexico (6.2 million), Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Ecuador, and Colombia. To that end, it is vastly expanding the definition of what constitutes deportable crime, including fraud in any official matter, such as abuse of “any program related to the receipt of public benefits” or even using a fake Social Security number to pay U.S. taxes. The Trump administration is also reviving the highly controversial 287(g) program under which local law enforcement officials can be deputized to perform immigration duties and can inquire about a person’s immigration status during routine policing of matters as insignificant as jaywalking.

Many of the people being targeted have for decades lived lawful, safe, and productive lives here. About 60 percent of the undocumented have lived in the United States for at least a decade. A third of undocumented immigrants aged 15 and older have at least one child who is a U.S. citizen by birth. The ripping apart of such families has tragic consequences for those involved, as I have seen first–hand.

“Many of the people being targeted [for deportation] have for decades lived lawful, safe, and productive lives here.”

Antonio, whom I interviewed in Tijuana in 2013, had lived for many years in Las Vegas, where he worked in construction and his wife cleaned hotels. Having had no encounters with U.S. law enforcement, he risked going back to Mexico to visit his ailing mother in Sinaloa. But he got nabbed trying to sneak back into the U.S. After a legal ordeal, which included being handcuffed and shackled and a degrading stay in a U.S. detention facility, he was dumped in Tijuana, where I met him shortly after his arrival there. He dreaded being forever separated from his wife and their two little boys, who had been born seven and five years before. But Sinaloa is a poor, tough place to live, strongly under the sway of the narcos, and Antonio did not want his loved ones to sacrifice themselves in order to rejoin him. As Antonio choked back tears talking about how much he missed his family, I asked him whether they might travel to San Diego to speak with him across the bars of Friendship Park. But Antonio wasn’t sure how long he could stay in Tijuana. He was afraid he would be arrested again, this time in Mexico, because in order to please U.S. law enforcement officials by appearing diligent in combating crime, Tijuana’s police force had gotten into the habit of arresting, for the most minor of infractions, Mexicans and Central Americans deported from the United States. Sweeping homeless poor migrants and deportees off the streets made Tijuana’s city center appear peaceful, bustling, and clean again, after years of a cartel bloodbath. Mexican businesses were pleased by the orderly look of the city center, the U.S. was gratified by Mexico’s cooperation, and tourists were returning, with U.S. college students again partying and getting drunk in Tijuana’s cantinas and clubs. If harmless victims of U.S. deportation policies like Antonio had to pay the price for these benefits, so be it.

If immigrants are not responsible for any significant amount of crime in the United States and in fact are considerably less likely than native–born citizens to commit crime, then what about the other justification for President Trump’s vilification of immigrants, legal and illegal, and his determination to wall them out: Do immigrants steal U.S. jobs and suppress U.S. wages?

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-wall-the-real-costs-of-a-barrier-between-the-united-states-and-mexico/

There is little evidence to support such claims. According to a comprehensive National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine analysis, immigration does not significantly impact the overall employment levels of most native–born workers. The impact of immigrant labor on the wages of native–born workers is also low. Immigrant labor does have some negative effects on the employment and wages of native–born high school dropouts, however, and also on prior immigrants, because all three groups compete for low–skilled jobs and the newest immigrants are often willing to work for less than their competition. To a large extent, however, undocumented workers often work the unpleasant, back–breaking jobs that native–born workers are not willing to do. Sectors with large numbers of undocumented workers include agriculture, construction, manufacturing, hospitality services, and seafood processing. The fish–cutting industry, for example, is unable to recruit a sufficient number of legal workers and therefore is overwhelmingly dependent on an undocumented workforce. Skinning, deboning, and cutting fish is a smelly, slimy, grimy, chilly, monotonous, and exacting job. Many workers rapidly develop carpal tunnel syndrome. It can be a dangerous job, with machinery for cutting off fish heads and deboning knives everywhere frequently leading to amputated fingers. The risk of infections from cuts and the bloody water used to wash fish is also substantial. Over the past ten years, multiple exposés have revealed that both in the United States and abroad, workers in the fishing and seafood processing industries, often undocumented in other countries also, are subjected to forced labor conditions, and sometimes treated like slaves.

Show less