Dr. Peter McCullough: "These are considered crimes against humanity"

4 hours ago
23

Dr. Peter McCullough: "Anybody who would attempt to block, impair, inhibit, discourage or chill the early treatment of Covid-19 was actually, in a sense, committing a medical crime. In a sense, hurting individuals. Every single pharmacist that blocked a prescription to a patient, that pharmacist was attempting to hurt that patient. Every single doctor that refused a patient treatment, told patients that treatments didn't exist when in fact they do, or told the patient 'I don't treat Covid-19', or told the patient to sit a home and wait until they become hospitalized and die.

Every single doctor that did that, and believe me, we have a million doctors in the United States, you probably have hundreds of thousands doctors in Canada, all of them committed a crime, they committed a sin. They broke their Hippocratic oath to help patients, to care about them always, to help them.

And I'll tell you, those doctors have a long way to come crawling back, a long way. And I tell you, most of those doctors hang their heads when I look at them.

To hold onto the position of denying compassionate care to patients, and to create fear, suffering and hospitalization and death, is immoral, unethical, and in civil court its illegal. And all of you will be hunted, every single one of you listening right now will be hunted and justice will be served.

These are considered crimes against humanity.

When I testified in the US senate November 19, 2020, my estimate, because it was a learning curve on how to treat these patients, is that 50% of Americans could have been saved. And the same thing would have applied to that lower portion of Canadians who didn't make it.

But now, I testified in the Texas senate March 10, 2021, 85% of these lives could have been saved. 85% of these miserable hospitalizations could have been avoided."

"Failure to treat Covid was a medical crime. Its unethical, immoral, & illegal"

Excerpt from Interview on 'What's up Canada?' #DoctorTalks Series #8, May 27, 2021

Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.

Loading comments...