School Shootings - The Cause

Cause Before Symptom - With Your Host James Carner

School Shootings - The Cause

Why is this happening? Is this a manufactured effort to get rid of the second amendment using trauma as a psychological weapon? Or is it a mental health issue? How many have happened and what data supports any of the above? Is this an American issue or worldwide? And lastly, if we get rid of the right to own and operate a gun, will history repeat itself as genocide will follow? School shootings are absolutely horrific. They leave a haunting feeling for decades in every town they happen in. My own town had a school shooting. A friend I went to school with had his son directly in the cross fires. Thanks to my friend’s fatherly duties, his boy chose to be a hero and not a victim and tackled and restrained the shooter saving many lives. You don’t think it would happen in your town but it’s a phenomenon that is more common than we think. The argument to outlaw guns as the problem has many hurdles to overcome. But it’s gaining strength. I used to worry about what would happen if we lost our right to defend ourselves until I went through the stages of grief for a dying country. I have gone to acceptance that my opinion is just that. It holds no weight in the social realm. Sure, I could come up with a clever meme to hold it off for another year but the entities that want to get rid of guns are stockpiling evidence and data that eventually will be used to remove them altogether. It’s in the data.

Personally, if we lose those rights, I will be just fine. I am not worried nor do I care anymore about the second amendment because history shows every country that gave those rights take it away eventually. So why would I worry about it? It’s only a matter of time as the ones who are afraid of an armed citizen find a way to remove their way of defending themselves. To be angry and protest never truly did much of anything. The only real power that has kept the second amendment at play has been the way the constitution was written and the NRA lobbyists. Frankly, the second amendment has been used as a divide and conquer tool, in my opinion. The political right are being used for the left to hate. It’s a simple divide and conquer strategy. Mass shootings started in the 70’s right when George Bush was the director of the FBI. Coincidence? The interesting thing about the data is the incidences drop every election year by 90%. Data doesn’t lie. Could the government or secret service be actually creating these events? Alex Jones was sued for almost a billion dollars refuting the Sandy Hook case. His argument was there were crisis actors and the deaths were faked. I remember seeing the evidence and there were familiar faces in other events not including freemasonic necklaces on witnesses. But this doesn’t prove anything. Like the challenger explosion and the astronauts that died are now professors and business people, it appears to be faked but the evidence at a glance isn’t there.

Could the government have framed Alex Jones? It’s possible, but he retracted his statements, so if he was innocent, why would he not stand his ground? The truth always comes out in 20 years. I mention this a lot because it’s how long the military is capable of keeping a secret through departmentalization. Humans can keep a secret for 2 years and the government 20. That’s the stats. Just like the truth about 911 has come out. There are so many books now about the evidence that if one wanted to see the truth, they could find it now, but during the 20 years of secrecy, it was hard to find any good author until now. The evidence is overwhelming but the government will never admit that. There is too much at stake releasing the truth. Paul James Lioy, an environmental scientist known for his analysis of the health effects of the dust produced by the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, died after collapsing at Newark Liberty International Airport. This story is the same with many other authors who exposed the 911 conspiracy. A majority of the authors about it have passed away. For the government, it’s easy to cover things up. Just look at the Franklin coverup. The Franklin Cover-Up was a controversial conspiracy theory that alleges a child sex trafficking ring operated in Omaha, Nebraska, in the 1980s. The ring was supposedly connected to prominent political figures and business leaders, and the allegations included claims of ritual abuse, satanic worship, and murder. Still to this day, not one person has been identified or arrested for their crimes just like Jeffrey Eptein’s list.

So what are the commonalities of these school shootings? What are the widespread patterns? I read somewhere but can’t find the link anymore that a lot of the shooters had parents that were high ranking military officials. I asked AI and it said that was untrue. This situation requires a deep investigation as to the cuase before symptom. I personally would need a year to dig so this can’t be a one time show to prove what the real problem is whether it’s society as a whole or a manufactured event. I wish it were that simple. But let’s take a look at what academia says about school shootings and why they are happening. The causes of school shootings are complex and multifaceted. While there is no single definitive answer, several factors have been identified as contributing to these tragic events:  

* Mental health issues: Many perpetrators have been diagnosed with mental health conditions, such as depression, anxiety, or psychosis.
* Bullying and victimization: Experiences of bullying or social isolation can contribute to feelings of resentment and anger.  
* Access to firearms: The availability of firearms, particularly in countries with lax gun control laws, can increase the likelihood of school shootings.  
* Media influence: Some studies suggest that exposure to violent media, such as video games and movies, may contribute to aggressive behavior.  
* Societal factors: Issues such as poverty, inequality, and a lack of support systems can also play a role in school shootings.

Mental health factors play a significant role in many school shootings. While not all perpetrators have mental health conditions, a substantial number do. Here are some of the most common mental health issues that have been identified in school shooting cases:

Depression: Feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and worthlessness can lead to suicidal ideation and violent behavior.

* Anxiety: Excessive worry, fear, and avoidance can contribute to feelings of isolation and frustration.
* Psychosis: Symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations can impair a person's judgment and perception of reality.
* Personality disorders: Conditions such as antisocial personality disorder or borderline personality disorder can be associated with impulsive behavior and difficulty controlling emotions.

It's important to note that having a mental health condition does not automatically make someone a potential perpetrator. However, untreated or unmanaged mental health issues can increase the risk of violent behavior.

Bullying and victimization can be a significant factor in school shootings. Experiences of being bullied or socially isolated can contribute to feelings of resentment, anger, and hopelessness, which may lead to violent behavior.

Here are some ways in which bullying can contribute to school shootings:

Increased stress and anxiety: Victims of bullying may experience high levels of stress and anxiety, which can negatively impact their mental health.

* Feelings of isolation and rejection: Being bullied can lead to feelings of social isolation and rejection, which can contribute to a sense of hopelessness and despair.
* Difficulty forming relationships: Bullying can make it difficult for victims to form positive relationships with peers, which can further contribute to feelings of loneliness and isolation.
* Revenge: Victims of bullying may feel a desire for revenge, which can lead to violent thoughts and actions.

Preventing bullying is essential for creating a safe and supportive school environment. Schools can implement anti-bullying programs, promote a culture of respect and inclusivity, and provide support for victims of bullying. Additionally, it's important to educate students about the harmful effects of bullying and encourage them to report incidents to school officials.

Access to firearms is a significant risk factor for school shootings. The availability of firearms, particularly in countries with lax gun control laws, can increase the likelihood of these tragic events.

Here are some ways in which access to firearms can contribute to school shootings:

* Increased lethality: Firearms are highly lethal weapons, and their availability can increase the severity of violence.
* Reduced barriers to violence: Having access to a firearm can lower the threshold for violence, making it more likely that individuals will resort to violence to solve problems.
* Impulsive behavior: In some cases, individuals with mental health issues or a history of violence may act impulsively and use firearms to harm themselves or others.
* Easy access to firearms: In countries with lax gun control laws, it can be relatively easy for individuals to obtain firearms, even those with a history of mental illness or violence.

Implementing stricter gun control measures can help reduce the availability of firearms and prevent their misuse. This can include measures such as background checks, waiting periods, and restrictions on assault-style weapons. Additionally, schools can implement security measures, such as metal detectors and active shooter training, to help deter and respond to incidents.

Keep in mind that this article is not going to argue the second amendment and the importance of it. This is about finding the cause in school shootings as it doesn’t seem to be going away even though the numbers have dropped some.

Media influence is another factor that has been studied in relation to school shootings. While the exact nature of this influence is debated, some research suggests that exposure to violent media, such as video games and movies, may contribute to aggressive behavior.

Here are some potential ways in which media influence can contribute to school shootings:

* Desensitization to violence: Exposure to violent media can desensitize individuals to violence, making them less likely to be disturbed by it.
* Normalization of violence: Repeated exposure to violence in media can normalize it, making it seem like a more acceptable way to resolve conflicts.
* Imitation: Some individuals may imitate violent acts seen in media, particularly if they are experiencing personal difficulties or have a history of violence.

It's important to note that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. While there may be a correlation between exposure to violent media and aggressive behavior, it's difficult to prove that media influence is the sole or primary cause of school shootings.

Additional factors, such as mental health issues, bullying, and access to firearms, also play a significant role. To prevent school shootings, it's essential to address a combination of factors, including limiting access to firearms, promoting mental health support, and addressing bullying and social isolation.

Societal factors can also play a role in school shootings. These factors can create a climate that is conducive to violence and aggression. Here are some examples:

Poverty and inequality: Economic disparities can lead to stress, frustration, and a sense of hopelessness, which may contribute to violent behavior.

* Lack of support systems: Individuals who lack strong social support networks may be more likely to experience feelings of isolation and loneliness, which can increase the risk of violence.
* Cultural factors: Certain cultural attitudes or beliefs that glorify violence or devalue human life may contribute to a climate of aggression.
* Political polarization: A highly polarized political environment can create a climate of fear and division, which may contribute to violent behavior.

Addressing these societal factors can help create a more supportive and peaceful environment for young people. This may include:

* Reducing poverty and inequality: Implementing policies to address economic disparities and create opportunities for all.
* Strengthening social support networks: Promoting community involvement, volunteering, and social connections.
* Promoting a culture of respect and inclusivity: Encouraging tolerance, understanding, and empathy.
* Addressing political polarization: Fostering dialogue and cooperation between different groups.

By addressing these societal factors, we can create a more positive and supportive environment for young people and reduce the risk of school shootings

Addressing school shootings requires a multifaceted approach that targets multiple factors. While no single solution can guarantee complete prevention, a combination of strategies can significantly reduce the risk. Here are some key areas to focus on:

Mental Health Factors

* Increased access to mental health services: Providing affordable and accessible mental health care for students, teachers, and staff.
* Reduced stigma around mental health: Promoting a culture of understanding and acceptance of mental health issues.
* Early intervention programs: Implementing programs to identify and support at-risk individuals before they engage in violent behavior.

Bullying and Victimization

* Anti-bullying programs: Implementing comprehensive anti-bullying programs in schools to create a safe and inclusive environment.
* Support for victims: Providing resources and support for students who are victims of bullying.
* Educating students about the harmful effects of bullying: Promoting empathy and understanding among students.

Access to Firearms

* Stricter gun control measures: Implementing stricter gun control laws, such as background checks, waiting periods, and restrictions on assault-style weapons.
* Safe storage laws: Encouraging safe storage of firearms to prevent unauthorized access.
* Red flag laws: Allowing authorities to temporarily remove firearms from individuals who pose a significant risk to themselves or others.

Media Influence

* Media literacy education: Teaching students how to critically evaluate media content and recognize the potential negative effects of exposure to violence.
* Responsible media practices: Encouraging media outlets to promote responsible content and avoid glorifying violence.

Societal Factors

* Addressing poverty and inequality: Implementing policies to reduce economic disparities and provide opportunities for all.
* Strengthening social support networks: Promoting community involvement, volunteering, and social connections.
* Promoting a culture of respect and inclusivity: Encouraging tolerance, understanding, and empathy.
* Addressing political polarization: Fostering dialogue and cooperation between different groups.

By addressing these factors, we can create a more supportive and peaceful environment for young people and reduce the risk of school shootings. It's important to note that this is a complex issue, and no single solution will be effective. A comprehensive approach that involves collaboration between schools, communities, and policymakers is essential to address the root causes of school violence.

This is academia’s response to addressing this critical issue. Have you noticed how unbias it is? Versus the memes and social media posts that point the finger politically at a party? All of the above factors to address this problem is and are absolutely reasonable and makes the most common logical sense. Not once did academia or Gemini AI say to remove the guns. Shouldn’t that give you a big clue?

There is a difference between politics and government.

Politics is defined as:

* The process of making decisions that apply to a group of people.
* The science and art of government.
* The activities of governments and political parties.
* The struggle for power and influence within a society.

In essence, politics is the study and practice of government, including the processes of decision-making, leadership, and governance. It involves the interaction between individuals, groups, and institutions to shape public policy and determine the direction of a society.

Government is defined as:

* The political system by which a country or state is governed.
* The governing body of a nation, state, or city.
* The act or process of governing.
* The administration of public affairs.

In simpler terms, government refers to the institutions and processes that manage the affairs of a society. It is responsible for making laws, enforcing them, and providing public services to its citizens. Governments can take various forms, such as democracies, monarchies, dictatorships, and republics.

Although it appears that politics and government go hand in hand, that is where I differ in opinion. There should not be power, science and art in government. There should be no study or practice when it comes to law. This is where I am in full agreement with Russell-Jay: Gould. His creation of the now moment removes argument and loopholes of law. The way laws would be written would be cut and dry with no room for past or future. For example, if the law says an individual can own a gun, you cannot ask it what age. Cut and dry. This also means if the law says if you kill a person, you will be killed for it. You cannot argue their psychological upbringing etc…

If you want to know more about becoming soverign, and this isn’t a plug for it, check out Russell’s website at lastflagstanding.com or fortheclaimofthelife.com. Becoming a soverign helps you steer clear of legalize and allows you to stand up for your rights as a human being and not citizen. I interviewed Russell twice. I like him. I believe him. Although I do not feel the need to sign up for his classes, I do think his work is important and will be seen in the future as a man for the people and by the people. A hero.

Will removing guns help stop school shootings? Let’s see what academia says.

The relationship between gun access and school shootings is a complex and highly debated topic. While there's no single factor that can be attributed to these tragic events, many experts agree that limiting access to firearms can significantly reduce the risk of school shootings.

Here are some key points to consider:

* Correlation: Numerous studies have shown a strong correlation between gun ownership rates and the frequency of mass shootings. Countries with higher gun ownership rates tend to have higher rates of gun-related deaths, including those in schools.
* Reduced lethality: Removing firearms from the equation can dramatically reduce the number of casualties in school shootings. Even if an individual intends to commit violence, the availability of a firearm can significantly increase the potential for harm.
* Prevention of impulsive acts: In many cases, school shooters act impulsively, and the presence of a firearm can make it easier to carry out a violent act. By limiting access to firearms, we can reduce the likelihood of impulsive acts of violence.
* Addressing the root causes: While removing firearms can be a crucial step in preventing school shootings, it's important to address other factors as well, such as mental health issues, bullying, and societal factors. A comprehensive approach that targets multiple factors is essential for long-term prevention.

It's important to note that this is a complex issue with no easy solutions. While removing firearms can be a significant step in reducing the risk of school shootings, it's not a guaranteed solution. A comprehensive approach that addresses multiple factors, including mental health, bullying, and societal issues, is essential for long-term prevention.

So, academia says the numbers don’t lie. If we remove guns, the rates will drop. But let’s play devil’s advocate. What if a high number of these shootings were manufactured for this reason? It stops because the secret service or hired henchmen stop because they got what they wanted? Is this just a stupid thought or is there common sense to back up this claim?

I asked AI to go throughout history and show me what happens to a society when they can't defend themselves. This is what it said:

The Consequences of Vulnerability: Historical Examples

Throughout history, societies that have been unable to defend themselves have often faced a range of negative consequences, including:

1. Invasion and Conquest:

* Roman Empire: During its decline, the Roman Empire became vulnerable to invasion by Germanic tribes, leading to its eventual collapse.  
* Aztec Empire: The Aztecs were conquered by the Spanish conquistadors, who exploited their lack of immunity to European diseases and military technology.  

2. Exploitation and Colonization:

* Native American Tribes: Many Native American tribes were exploited and colonized by European powers due to their lack of advanced weaponry and military organization.
* African Nations: Many African nations were colonized by European powers, leading to centuries of exploitation, oppression, and loss of sovereignty.  

3. Loss of Independence and Sovereignty:

* Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth: The Commonwealth was partitioned by Russia, Prussia, and Austria in the late 18th century due to its internal divisions and military weakness.  
* Kingdom of Hawaii: The Kingdom of Hawaii was overthrown by American sugar planters and annexed by the United States due to its lack of military power.

4. Economic and Social Decline:

* Ottoman Empire: The Ottoman Empire's decline was exacerbated by its inability to modernize its military and economy, leading to economic stagnation and social unrest.
* Qing Dynasty: The Qing Dynasty's inability to resist foreign aggression and modernize its economy contributed to its eventual downfall.

5. Cultural Erosion and Loss of Identity:

* Indigenous Peoples: Many indigenous peoples have suffered cultural erosion and loss of identity as a result of colonization and forced assimilation.  
* Minorities: Minority groups in vulnerable societies may face discrimination, oppression, and the loss of their cultural heritage.

It's important to note that these are just a few examples, and the consequences of a society's inability to defend itself can vary greatly depending on the specific circumstances. Factors such as geographical location, natural resources, and internal cohesion can also play a significant role in determining a society's vulnerability.

Now, don’t get caught up with emotion here. If you disagree, then I respect your feelings. If society caves in and removes the right to defend themselves, then for a time, there will be less deaths. This is good right? But in the long run, it can’t be, right? Giving up your right to kill someone with a bullet to prevent them from killing you should be our right to choose?

And on the other hand, removing guns doesn’t stop someone from buying one illegally. If you can’t defend yourself against a criminal, then what? I can see this argument holds weight for some, but not everyone. We have entered into an emotional ethos where feelings trump data. There are millions of people in America who do not feel comfortable here because guns are legal. If they move to Haiti, they would not feel any safer as the criminals use automatic rifles and eat humans. Not all but the comparison of Haiti and America is a wide gulf. Australia and Canada removed the right defend themselves. We are witnessing more government overreach there than here in America where we still hold on to the 2nd ammendment.

AI couldn’t answer this simple question, are there any examples of canada and australia where government overreach occured after they removed the right to defend themselves? AI said it wouldn’t answer political questions during an election year. One example is in both countries, you can go to jail for having a different opinion of the government. This started happening in New York where the cops come to your door for something you posted online that offended someone. Could the government of Canada and Australia feel more comfortable trying this tyranny since they are not armed? Well, self defence is a crime in Canada. Could they get away with that if the Canadians had guns? It criminalizes women who defend themsewlves from rape. Something to think about. Genocide doesn’t follow immedietely. But genocide does follow.

But let’s take the focus towards mental health. I saw a bunch of videos of people who were homosexual in the 50’s and were being recorded as patients of mental health. How far have we come since then? But there were other people who were recorded that most definitely belonged in there. Narcisists, schizophrenics and the like. Now, they are part of society and we are told to blend in with them or you are a hater. This also borders on pedophelia where MAPS or minor attracted people want to be part of society. They require that we accept them. Not that MAPS are linked or related to school shootings. But mental health is something we have embraced as normal. We are embracing people who think they are animals and polacing kitty litter in bathrooms to make them feel more at home. But do they belong in society? Is there a line that we must draw to stop this before it goes even further?

I remember when the bullying campaign came out during the Obama years. They launched The National Education Association (NEA). This I believe was on purpose. It’s a communist tactic to stop people from speaking up. It worked, too. At surface level, it seems like the right thing to do. Bullying is bad. But it was used politically to shut up opposing forces in other situations. This is when computer bots were introduced which were fake social media accounts that acted like keyboard and social justice warriors standing up to bullies online. Again, it seemed benign and the right thing to do, but it shifted society into shutting up altogether for fear of mob attacks and shaming online. DOXing became a thing where the activist posted your home address. Was the government involved? Was this DARPA? Whistleblowers have confirmed the rumor that DARPA has a social justice warrior department. They already are doing social and behavior research for national security. These bots are designed to steer public opinion using artificial intelligence. They also could be used to bully people online to conjur up an event. Is our government bullying unstable children to influence them to shoot up schools? It sounds like it to me after reading this: As it tries to grade social and behavioral research, DARPA clearly acknowledges the need to fully embrace social science. “Given the accelerating sociotechnical complexity of today’s world—a world that is increasingly connected but often poorly understood—there are growing calls to more effectively leverage Social and Behavioral Sciences (SBS) to help address critical complex national security challenges in the Human Domain,” DARPA wrote in a 41-page document announcing the program in June 2018.

What about violent media as acadamia suggests? Do video games enable children to go kill? Acadamia doesn’t seem to think so. The Link Between Video Games and School Shootings is a Complex debate with little proof.

The relationship between video game violence and real-world violence, particularly school shootings, has been a subject of intense debate for decades. While some studies have suggested a correlation, the majority of research indicates a lack of causal link.

Key Findings from Research:

* No Strong Causal Link: Numerous studies, including meta-analyses, have found no consistent evidence to support the claim that violent video games directly cause real-world violence.
* Multiple Factors: School shootings are complex events influenced by a variety of factors, including mental health issues, social isolation, bullying, and access to firearms.  
* Confounding Variables: Studies often struggle to control for confounding variables, making it difficult to isolate the specific impact of video games.
* Reverse Causation: Some research suggests that individuals with violent tendencies may be more likely to play violent video games rather than the games causing violence.

Notable Studies:

* American Psychological Association: The APA has issued multiple statements emphasizing the lack of strong evidence to support a causal link between violent video games and real-world violence.
* Meta-Analyses: Several meta-analyses have reviewed the existing research and concluded that the evidence for a causal link is weak or nonexistent.
* Longitudinal Studies: Studies that follow individuals over time have generally failed to find a strong correlation between violent video game exposure and aggressive behavior.

While research has not found a strong causal link, the impact of violent video games on individuals, particularly vulnerable populations, remains a complex issue that warrants further study.

I grew up with violent games. Played them. Even all of the Grand Theft Auto games. It doesn’t influence me to kill people and throw money at a strip club. Neither has it done that affect to all the other people I know who have played violent video games.

And lastly, societal factors. Issues such as poverty, inequality, and the lack of support systems academia says play a role in school shootings.

Societal Factors Contributing to School Shootings: A Deep Dive

While the causes of school shootings are complex and multifaceted, numerous studies have identified significant societal factors that play a role in these tragic events.

These factors often intersect, creating a toxic environment that can lead to violence.  

Poverty and Inequality

* Economic Disparity: Communities with high rates of poverty often have limited resources for schools, mental health services, and social programs. This can lead to increased stress, frustration, and a sense of hopelessness among students and their families.  
* Social Isolation: Poverty can isolate individuals, limiting their access to opportunities and social support networks. This isolation can contribute to feelings of loneliness, anger, and resentment.  

Lack of Support Systems

* Mental Health Resources: Inadequate access to mental health services can leave students struggling with untreated mental health conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and trauma. These conditions can increase the risk of violent behavior.  
* School Climate: A negative school climate, characterized by bullying, discrimination, and a lack of support, can contribute to feelings of alienation and despair among students.  
* Community Resources: Communities with limited resources may not have the necessary support systems, such as after-school programs, youth centers, and community outreach initiatives, to provide safe and positive spaces for young people.

Gun Control and Access

* Gun Availability: Easy access to firearms, particularly among individuals with mental health issues or a history of violence, can increase the risk of school shootings.  
* Gun Culture: A culture that glorifies violence and promotes gun ownership can contribute to a climate where violence is seen as a viable solution to problems.  

Media and Culture

* Violent Content: Exposure to excessive violence in media, such as movies, video games, and television, can desensitize individuals to violence and normalize it as a way to resolve conflicts.  
* Social Media: The prevalence of social media can amplify feelings of isolation, bullying, and harassment, contributing to a toxic online environment.  

Other Factors

* Bullying and Harassment: Experiencing bullying or harassment can lead to feelings of humiliation, anger, and a desire for revenge.  
* School Security Measures: While school security measures can be important, an overemphasis on security can create a climate of fear and mistrust, exacerbating existing problems.

These factors are often interconnected and can vary significantly from case to case. Understanding the complex interplay of these factors is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies. By addressing these underlying issues, we can work towards creating safer and more supportive communities for our young people.

So in conclusion, we can only guess what the cause of school shooting really is. We know the government wants power and will stop at nothing for control. We have evidence of them experimenting on us. That is a fact. But we have no evidence to support the claim they are actually involved in school shootings. They are, however, a suspect and in police work, you do not take them off the board until you can prove they are not a suspect anymore. Mental health too, is a suspect. Kids without guns but have access to dangerous books on how to build home explosives could go off the deep end. So guns are not a suspect. England outlawed knives and there are still knife killings there. Bullying, although not a suspect, is an accomplice. Societal lack of needs or a toxic envirnoment is too an accomplice but not a suspect. Just because a kid grows up poor doesn’t mean they want to mow down a school.

I believe after narrowing down the cause before the symptom I have given a proper case to put the government and mental health up on the board as our prime suspects. They have two accomplices that most likely is aiding the government which is bullying and societal lack. When the police investigate a murder, they look for motive. The government has plenty of motive to use their technology and mind control brainwash youth to carry out these abominations for power. And those with mental health have motive because they do not have the resources available to talk to them while they are still developing. The human brain doesn’t properly develop until the age of 27 and we outlawed federal instititions. Although the government and the mental health suspects could be unrelated, as one or two may happen regardless, both the government and mental health suspects get plenty of help from their accomplices which are the bullies and societal lack. Armed with this kind of information and research, any government institution could put together an easy program to get rid of their roadblocks to control. All it takes is motive to do it. If I were the goverment and I wanted to get rid of guns so I can jail more people for hate speech, I would build an army of profile bots on all social media accounts. I would programmatically infiltrate those in school that tested for accomplices that would enable the trigger. I would bully and harrass them with my fake accounts by using their own societal lack against them as an influence to push for my objective. The AI bots would have no trouble making the victim feel alone, depressed, angry, confused and all it would take would be a trigger remark for the event to take place. Children are deeply influenced by their peers and I would also have education teacher bots that would chime in reinforcing the trigger through subtle suggestion. In my previous work, I have proved the government has done horrific things to its own people and they have been sued and lost paying reparations. To me, it’s obvious who the suspect is the majoroty of the time. Worldwide, we are watching the new world order work harder for a one world government. You can’t havce that with the United States Consitution and school shootings are most likely one of hundreds of projects designed to get rid of freedom in America because it is the last country left that can defend itself.

sources

Gemini AI

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/10/president-and-first-lady-call-united-effort-address-bullying

https://www.socialsciencespace.com/2019/03/darpa-aims-to-score-social-and-behavioral-research/