Distant Starlight Answers - Dr Jason Lisle

Dr. Jason Lisle joins Standing For Truth and Raw Matt to demonstrate why distant starlight is not a problem in a young universe. The full must-watch interview with Dr. Jason Lisle on Young Biblical Creation found here: https://youtu.be/nUjqTk8Ll6A #YoungEarth, #Creationist, #Evolutionfalsified, 👉Donate to the Show http://bit.ly/2GTZOhN 👉Support us on Patreon https://bit.ly/3fmqfwL 👉Subscribe on Facebook https://bit.ly/35PA6rZ 👉Our books https://bit.ly/36SbBK0 👉New Articles posts https://bit.ly/2UMSUSa 👉Our MERCHANDISE https://bit.ly/35Q39f2 a one-stop-shop for all Creationists! Shirts, hats, mugs, books, articles & more! Our goal is to one day do full time ministry. Your amazing generosity, support, and donations has made us closer than ever to this dream! God bless. Glad you found our channel! We believe that the Bible is true and can be put to the test for validity. We obviously know that the Bible has parables, allegories, poems, laws, short stories, genealogy, proverbs, sermons, prayers, prophecy, proverbial text, epistles, etc. But most importantly History. What we do is test the history with science and let the evidence show itself. We discovered that the evidence is in favor of Creation which just so happens to falsify evolution theory. This is why they know we are a threat and must remove Creation science from the education system at any cost. As Young Earth Creationists we believe God created only 2 human beings at creation. We also believe Genesis where it says God created all the animals in groups, and our definition of relation actually starts in genesis, that of “organisms that descend from the same ancestral gene pool.” The most popular definition today actually is in reference to the Biblical Flood of Noah’s definition, this is because of Frank Lewis Marsh who coined the term baramin who used the Noah's Ark definition to define a kind, in which he stated “that the ability to hybridize and create viable offspring was a sufficient condition for being members of the same baramin.” But this is After the flood, making sure that Noah brought species that could reproduce with one another, it's not the original definition which has thrown everyone off to this day. We believe as things speciate they lose allele variety and inherit more mutations. This shows us clear limitations with evolution, and shows that ancestrally that things were superior than today. Dollo's law of irreversibility also shows us that evolution cannot go in reverse, so when they lose this genetic information after speciation, they can never regain it. This is why all horses today are now homozygous and horses in the past were heterozygous. They cannot return to their once superior state allowing for more diversity. Evolution falsifies itself constantly but because they cannot allow the theory to die, they just rename and rehash it to the public as though everything is fine without anyone even noticing. A few examples; *Darwinian Gradualism becomes punctuated equilibrium when they need it too and Darwin's slow natural processes which do not make leaps, was found to make huge leaps and renamed Saltationism. (complete contradiction). *Ernst Mayr predicted that because evolution must be true, living organisms shouldn't share any genetic similarities because deep time would have separated them far too much. Then it was found they share many! So his predictions were removed and now it's used as one of the best pieces of evidence FOR evolution when it's actually a falsification of the theory. *Dead Worthless Junk DNA became non-coding regulatory DNA. A clever rhetorical strategy they often use: Call it evolutionary junk at first; Then when functions are found, call it the "motor of evolution." Notice their rescued device every time is that they just ASSERT or ASSUME co-option. * Functionless evolutionary leftover organs become functional organs deemed vestigial organs (lost primary function). A Singular Evolutionary tree became a 3 tier domain bush of life = Bacteria, Achaea, Eukarya. *Mitochondrial clocks (Observed fast rates from trio method) became the slow phylogenetic assumption method because the clocks were falsifying the deep time theory.