In The Name Of Who ? King James Bible (KJV) New Testament Dramatized Audio

In The Name Of Who ? King James 1566-1625 The Black King Who Had The Bible Translated Into English. The King James Version (KJV) New Testament Dramatized Audio Is A Complete And Unabridged Audio 18 Hours 40 Mins. Recording Of The New Testament In The KJV Translation. The audio features a full cast of narrators, including both men and women, bringing the biblical stories to life with their natural and engaging performances. Listeners have praised the audio’s clarity, pace, and ability to make the Bible come alive with its dramatized presentation.

Show more

Why the King James Bible of 1611 Remains the Most Popular Translation in History. Not only was it the first 'people's Bible,' but its poetic cadences and vivid imagery have had an enduring influence on Western culture.

In 1604, England’s King James I authorized a new translation of the Bible aimed at settling some thorny religious differences in his kingdom—and solidifying his own power.

But in seeking to prove his own supremacy, King James ended up democratizing the Bible instead. Thanks to emerging printing technology, the new translation brought the Bible out of the church’s sole control and directly into the hands of more people than ever before, including the Protestant reformers who settled England’s North American colonies in the 17th century.

Emerging at a high point in the English Renaissance, the King James Bible held its own among some of the most celebrated literary works in the English language (think William Shakespeare). Its majestic cadences would inspire generations of artists, poets, musicians and political leaders, while many of its specific phrases worked their way into the fabric of the language itself.

Even now, more than four centuries after its publication, the King James Bible (a.k.a. the King James Version, or simply the Authorized Version) remains the most famous Bible translation in history—and one of the most printed books ever.

King James, was the 1st King of England born 1566-1625 and he was the first to rule Scotland and Northern Island at the same time. In 1603 he commissioned a scholars to have the bible translated into English and make it available to all English speaking people throughout the world. It’s a little known fact that he was a Black man who ruled these countries in Europe. During his time he was though to be one of if not the greatest leader of his time. King James, a Black Man.

King James I of England and VI of Scotland, 1619. James (1566-1625) acceded to the Scottish throne in 1567, and to the English throne in 1603 on the death of Elizabeth I. He was the son of Mary, Queen of Scots and Henry, Lord Darnley. James, an educated and able king, desired to bring peace to war-torn Europe. He is probably best remembered for commissioning an English translation of the bible, published in 1611, and still known as the King James Bible.
Historical Context Facts about the Slave Trade and Slavery. King James 1566-1625 So Black King Who Had The Bible Translated Into English also Signed The First Charter for the New World in 1619 Black Slave Trade and Slavery. (Yes a Black Man and King).

The Middle Passage was dangerous and horrific. The sexes were separated; men, women, and children were kept naked, packed close together; and the men were chained for long periods. About 12 percent of those who embarked did not survive the voyage.

Well over 90 percent of enslaved Africans were sent to the Caribbean and South America. Only about 6 percent of African captives were sent directly to British North America. Yet by 1825, the US population included about one-quarter of the people of African descent in the Western Hemisphere.

The 1619 Project (Slave Trade and Slavery. Black King James 1566-1625) is a long-form journalism endeavor developed by Nikole Hannah-Jones, writers from The New York Times, and The New York Times Magazine which "aims to reframe the country's history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans at the very center of the United States' national narrative.

How the King James Bible came to be ?. When King James VI of Scotland became King James I of England in 1603, he was well aware that he was entering a sticky situation.

For one thing, his immediate predecessor on the throne, Queen Elizabeth I, had ordered the execution of his mother, Mary, Queen of Scots, who had represented a Catholic threat to Elizabeth’s Protestant reign. And even though Elizabeth had established the supremacy of the Anglican Church (founded by her father, King Henry VIII), its bishops now had to contend with rebellious Protestant groups like the Puritans and Calvinists, who questioned their absolute power.

By the time James took the throne, many people in England at the time were hearing one version of the Bible when they went to church, but were reading from another when they were at home. While one version of Christianity’s holy texts—the so-called Bishops’ Bible—was read in churches, the most popular version among Protestant reformers in England at the time was the Geneva Bible, which had been created in that city by a group of Calvinist exiles during the bloody reign of Elizabeth’s half-sister, Mary I.

For the new king, the Geneva Bible posed a political problem, since it contained certain annotations questioning not only the bishop’s power but his own. So in 1604, when a Puritan scholar proposed the creation of a new translation of the Bible at a meeting at a religious conference at Hampton Court, James surprised him by agreeing.

Over the next seven years, 47 scholars and theologians worked to translate the different books of the Bible: the Old Testament from Hebrew, the New Testament from Greek and the Apocrypha from Greek and Latin. Much of the resulting translation drew on the work of the Protestant reformer William Tyndale, who had produced the first New Testament translation from Greek into English in 1525 but was executed for heresy less than a decade later.

Bringing the Bible directly to the people. Published in 1611, the King James Bible spread quickly throughout Europe. Because of the wealth of resources devoted to the project, it was the most faithful and scholarly translation to date—not to mention the most accessible.

“Printing had already been invented, and made copies relatively cheap compared to hand-done copies,” says Carol Meyers, a professor of religious studies at Duke University. “The translation into English, the language of the land, made it accessible to all those people who could read English, and who could afford a printed Bible.”

Whereas before, the Bible had been the sole property of the Church, now more and more people could read it themselves. Not only that, but the language they read in the King James Bible was English, unlike anything they had read before. With its poetic cadences and vivid imagery, the KJV sounded to many like the voice of God himself.

Why was the King James Bible so Important?
By giving more people direct access to the Bible, the King James Version also had a democratizing influence on Protestantism itself, especially in the English colonies being settled in the New World. The Puritans and other reformers “didn’t overtake the Anglican Church in England,” Meyers explains. “But in the colonies, the Anglicans no longer had supremacy, because the Puritans, Presbyterians, Methodists came,” all of whom made use of the King James Bible.

Meanwhile, back in England, the bitter religious disputes that had motivated the new Bible translation would spiral by the 1640s into the English Civil Wars, which ended in the capture and execution (by beheading) of King James’s son and successor, Charles I.

If James had hoped to quash any doubt of his (and his successors’) divine right to power, he clearly hadn’t succeeded. Meyers points out that the King James Bible gave people access to passages that were not ordinarily read in church—passages that limit the power of secular rulers like James. As an example, she cites Deuteronomy 17, which reads, “One from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee.” But it also suggests that the king should not acquire too many horses, wives or silver and gold for himself; and that he, like anyone else, should be subject to the laws of God.

“King James wanted to solidify his own reputation as a good king by commissioning the translation,” Meyers says. “Maybe he didn't know about those passages about the limits of the king's powers, or think making them available to all might threaten his divine right as king.”

The cultural legacy of the King James Bible.
From Handel’s Messiah to Coolio’s “Gangsta’s Paradise,” the King James Bible has inspired a wide swath of cultural expression across the English-speaking world over generations. Writers from Herman Melville to Ernest Hemingway to Alice Walker have drawn on its cadences and imagery for their work, while Martin Luther King Jr. quoted the King James Version of Isaiah (from memory) in his famous “I Have a Dream” speech.

Beyond the countless artists and leaders inspired by the King James Bible, its influence can be seen in many of the expressions English speakers use every day. Phrases like “my brother’s keeper,” “the kiss of death,” “the blind leading the blind,” “fall from grace,” “eye for an eye” and “a drop in the bucket”—to name only a few—all owe their existence, or at least their popularization in English, to the KJV.

From the early 20th century onward, mainstream Protestant denominations increasingly turned toward more modern Bible translations, which have been able to provide more accurate readings of the source texts, thanks to the use of more recently discovered ancient Semitic texts unavailable in 1611. Still, the King James Version remains extremely popular. As late as 2014, a major study on “The Bible in American Life” found that 55 percent of Bible readers said they reached most often for the King James Version, compared with only 19 percent who chose the New International Version, first published in 1978 and updated most recently in 2011. (The high percentage also likely included people who favor the New King James Version, an update of the classic English text published in the 1980s.)

It’s clear that after more than 400 years, the King James Bible has more than proven its staying power. “[For] reading in worship services, it's much more majestic than most of the modern translations,” says Meyers. “It’s had a very powerful influence on our language and our literature, to this very day.”

King James VI of Scotland became King James I of England is a black man ?

Historical Context: King James VI of Scotland and I of England was a European monarch, specifically a member of the House of Stuart. He was born on June 19, 1566, at Edinburgh Castle, Scotland, to Mary, Queen of Scots, and Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley.

Physical Appearance: There is no contemporary evidence or description of King James VI/I’s physical appearance that would suggest he was a black man. In fact, most historical accounts and portraits depict him as having a fair complexion, typical of the European nobility of his time.

Racial Classification: In the 16th and 17th centuries, the concept of race as we understand it today did not exist. The idea of racial categorization and the notion of “black” as a distinct racial group were not yet developed. It was not until the 18th century that the concept of race began to take shape, and even then, it was not universally accepted or defined.

Conclusion: Based on historical records and contemporary descriptions, King James VI of Scotland and I of England was not a black man. His physical appearance and ancestry are consistent with those of a European monarch of his time, and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise.

Moorish Kings of England: King James VI and I of Scotland and England 1566 – 1625 and his daughter. ames I (1566–1625) was the King of Great Britain from 1603 until his death in 1625. The first English ruler from the House of Stuart, he succeeded Queen Elizabeth I after her death, and was the first British monarch to rule both England and Scotland. In 1606, James authorized the Virginia Company of London to found the Jamestown colony. The English successfully settled in Virginia, planting the foundation of Great Britain’s American colonies and the future United States of America. This colonization enterprise was a moneymaking venture intended to boost the coffers of the Crown.

In The Name Of Jesus ? Who ? Out of all the gangsters, serial killers, mass murderers, incompetent & crooked politicians, spies, traitors, and ultra left-wing kooks in all of American history,” asked a conservative and have you ever wondered who the worst of the worst In The Name Of Jesus ? Who ?

Jesus,” which later employed the letter “J,” is a derivation It was not until 1630 that the differentiation became general in England.” Note in the original 1611 version of the King James Version of the Bible there was no “J” letter in this Bible for because it did not exist. James was spelled Iames. Jesus was spelled Iesous. The 80 books of the King James Version include 39 books of the Old Testament, 14 books of Apocrypha, and the 27 books of the New Testament.

The Letter “J” did not Exist - https://ia800703.us.archive.org/33/items/kjvkingjamesbibl1611lman/kjvkingjamesbibl1611lman.pdf - The Son of Elohim was not a White Guy with an English Name, speaking Greek

One of the most asked questions of the century. How can the Messiah’s Name be Jesus if the letter “J” did not exist 500 years ago?

The Messiah walked on earth about 2,000 years ago. If the letter and sound of “J” did not exist when the Messiah walked on this earth, what was His Name?

In the English Alphabet, the letter “J” was originally used for the letter “I”. The first to distinguish the difference between the letter “J” and the letter “I” was in Gian Giorgio’s 1524 “I” and “J” were originally the same letter but different shapes both equally the same letter.

According to the history of the English Alphabet, the official and original sound of the letter “J” was the sound of “Y” in “yet” or “yellow”.

The very first English-language book to make clear distinction between the sound of “I” and the sound of “J” was not written until 1634. It wasn’t until then, after the 1611 Bible was published, that the English language officially accepted the shape and sound of the letter “J” as “jay” and no longer the “yuh” “Y” sound.

Jehovah or Jesus are Man made Names, with Man Made Doctrines. Tricked, Bait & Switch. Now after Reading this Post, you are No Longer Tricked. From this Point on you’re making a Choice who to follow.

A Savior Created by the Church of Constantine the Great; “Let us then have nothing in common with the detestable Jewish crowd; for we have received from our Savior a different way.”

This is not the Savior Yahu’sha, this is a different one, that is followed a different way, his name is Jesus. The one we are warned would came in His name, the one told you would accept, while you reject the True Master. We were Warned and we Can see just how True it is.

King James 1566-1625 The Black King Who Had The Bible Translated Into English

https://rumble.com/v29ufns-king-james-1566-1625-the-black-king-who-had-the-bible-translated-into-engli.html

King James, was the 1st King of England born 1566-1625 and he was the first to rule Scotland and Northern Island at the same time. In 1603 he commissioned a scholars to have the bible translated into English and make it available to all English speaking people throughout the world. It’s a little known fact that he was a Black man who ruled these countries in Europe. During his time he was though to be one of if not the greatest leader of his time. King James, a Black Man.

King James I of England and VI of Scotland, 1619. James (1566-1625) acceded to the Scottish throne in 1567, and to the English throne in 1603 on the death of Elizabeth I. He was the son of Mary, Queen of Scots and Henry, Lord Darnley. James, an educated and able king, desired to bring peace to war-torn Europe. He is probably best remembered for commissioning an English translation of the bible, published in 1611, and still known as the King James Bible.

Historical Context Facts about the Slave Trade and Slavery. King James 1566-1625 So Black King Who Had The Bible Translated Into English also Signed The First Charter for the New World in 1619 Black Slave Trade and Slavery. (Yes a Black Man and King)

The Middle Passage was dangerous and horrific. The sexes were separated; men, women, and children were kept naked, packed close together; and the men were chained for long periods. About 12 percent of those who embarked did not survive the voyage.

Well over 90 percent of enslaved Africans were sent to the Caribbean and South America. Only about 6 percent of African captives were sent directly to British North America. Yet by 1825, the US population included about one-quarter of the people of African descent in the Western Hemisphere.

The 1619 Project (Slave Trade and Slavery. Black King James 1566-1625) is a long-form journalism endeavor developed by Nikole Hannah-Jones, writers from The New York Times, and The New York Times Magazine which "aims to reframe the country's history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans at the very center of the United States' national narrative.

Black Kings and Queens the Rulers of England From 1603/1901 Historians Never Talk?

https://rumble.com/v29twd2-black-kings-and-queens-the-rulers-of-england-from-16031901-historians-never.html

So Moorish and Black Kings and Queens the Rulers of England and Europe From 1603/1901 You may have heard of these England and European Emperors, Kings and Queens, but did you know that they were Black ? So England /American after 1776? So Slavery Trade began 400 years ago this month. Started by Black King James I and VI of Scotland 1603 -1625 signed into law by this king ? This is referred to as the country’s original sin, but it is more than that It is the country’s true origin. Ancient Europe is not what we've been taught. Many things have been whitewashed, especially its ancient History. Here are some facts that you probably didn't know. President Abraham Lincoln, the Melungeon or Tawny Moor was the President of the United States. As President, he has to balance the Moorish side and the European side.
Monarchs of England, Wales and Ireland

ELIZABETH I 1558-1603
The daughter of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn, Elizabeth was a remarkable woman, noted for her learning and wisdom. From first to last she was popular with the people and had a genius for the selection of capable advisors. Drake, Raleigh, Hawkins, the Cecils, Essex and many many more made England respected and feared. The Spanish Armada was decisively defeated in 1588 and Raleigh’s first Virginian colony was founded. The execution of Mary Queen of Scots marred what was a glorious time in English history. Shakespeare was also at the height of his popularity. Elizabeth never married.

British Monarchs
THE STUARTS
JAMES I and VI of Scotland 1603 -1625
James was the son of Mary Queen of Scots and Lord Darnley. He was the first king to rule over Scotland and England. James was more of a scholar than a man of action. In 1605 the Gunpowder Plot was hatched: Guy Fawkes and his Catholic friends tried to blow up the Houses of Parliament, but were captured before they could do so. James’s reign saw the publication of the Authorised Version of the Bible, though this caused problems with the Puritans and their attitude towards the established church. In 1620 the Pilgrim Fathers sailed for America in their ship The Mayflower.

When Was The Letter “J” Invented? (And Was It Before Jesus?) Some of you may be aware that the letter J is one of the more recent additions to our alphabet. But when was it invented? And what was language like before it came into existence?

When Was The Letter “J” Invented?
The Letter J was invented for the Italian language by a man called “Gian Giorgio Trissino” in the year 1524. It was used in Roman Numerals, but back then, it was an alternative way of writing I, not its own letter. Before the letter J, Jesus’ name was pronounced “Yeh-Soos”.

The History Of The Letter J
Let’s go over the history of the letter J and see how it went from being an alternative version of I to its own letter.

In the year 1524, Italian Gian Giorgio Trissino was the first to use J as a letter. The sound that this new letter would make has another common way of being written “dg“. Due to the influence that Latin and French had on Italian, the letter J was just another way of writing “dg”.

However, back then, the usage of J was far from common, even in Italy, and it wouldn’t be until much later that it would become as recognisable as it is today. It’s unlikely he would have lived long enough to see his new letter become popular.

Much later in the 16th century, a Frenchman called Pierre Ramous was the next person to separate I from J. Back then, words that today we would spell with a J would have been spelt with an I. But, this was only amongst a few French scholars.
It wasn’t until the 17th century that the letter J became common in English. If you read some of the older versions of the King James Bible, you will see the letter I where today’s version has the letter J.

What Was Jesus’ Name Before The Letter J?
Did you know that Jesus’ name wasn’t actually Jesus?

When he was alive, the letter J did not exist. And his name was “Yeshua”. This name is the same place that we get the name “Joshua” from.

The reason why modern English translations use Joshua and Jesus as two separate names is to separate the two to prevent people from getting them mixed up.
Before the Letter J was invented, to translate the Hebrew name “Yeshua” into English would have given you Yesus. This is what Jesus was known as for most of English history.
Most of the names we give people in the Bible are not their actual names.

Yahweh Vs Jehovah: What Is God’s Real Name?
If you read Christian literature, there will be two names that God tends to be given. One of them is Jehovah and the other is Yahweh. The reason why God seems to have two names is that his original Hebrew name has been translated differently.

In the Bible, his name is “הֹוָה‎ Yəhōwā,”. When spelt out phonetically, this name sounds like Yahweh.

However, if you were to take the letters of his original name, and turn them into Latin letters, his name is closer to Jehovah.

Because the Bible wasn’t written in English, it can be translated in multiple different ways.
The Letter J In Roman Numerals
Before J was a letter, it was an alternative way of writing I in Roman numerals. In Roman numerals, they would use letters like I, X, and V instead of numbers.

But sometimes, when there was no longer going to be any I’s, people would put a J at the end of the number instead of a final I. Therefore XIII and XIIJ were different ways of writing the number 13.

How to Pronounce Jesus, Jose, and Juan in Spanish I'll never forget it. One day after returning home from my Spanish class in high school, my mother was on the phone, talking to her colleague.

"Hey GEE-sus! Remember to fax me the accounting documents by tomorrow", I really need it.

Cringe. (Hint: It's not pronounced like that.)

I could almost hear the sigh on the other end of the phone. Here's a guide to pronouncing common Spanish first names, so that you'll never have another embarrassing introduction again.

1. How to Pronounce Jesus
Note: Jesús is spelled with an accent on the final 'u' because of Spanish accent rules. However, oftentimes in the United States the accent is ommitted. The omission does not change the pronounciation of the name.

Here in California, this is probably the most mispronounced hispanic name. Jesus accounts for 0.2% of male births in the United States according to the Social Security Administration. In fact, globally it is as popular as the female name Jessica.

In almost all situations, the Spanish name Jesus is pronounced "hay-SOOS". The J is pronounced just like an "H" sound in English. The Spanish 'u' vowel is similar to the pronounciation of the double O in the word "moon".

Searching for the name online results in videos where the name isn't pronounced until a few seconds in, so I'll save you the time. Here's a link to someone on YouTube saying the name accurately.

Jesus is a popular Latin American name owing to the popularity and widespread nature of Catholicism in Latin American countries. An entire 82.7% of Mexicans are Catholic; somewhere between 70-90% of Argentines are Catholic; around 73% of Spaniards are Catholic, and the list goes on across the Spanish-speaking world.

Compare this to the relative infrequency of Protestant names such as Matthew (Mateo) and Luke (Lucas) in Latin America compared to the United States and Europe.

2. How to Pronounce Jose
Note: In the same way as Jesús the final accent on the word José is frequently ommitted in everyday use in the United States. This omission does not change the pronunciation of the word.

First of all, the incorrect way to pronounce José is to say "Joe's", like the popular grocery store.

Instead, say "hoe-ZAY". A live demo can be found here.

José comes from Saint Joseph a prominent figure in Catholicism and the wife of Mary, the mother of Jesus.

3. How to Pronounce Juan
The picture above is Juan Rulfo, the author of Pedro Páramo, one of my favorite books of all time and a masterpiece of Latin American literature.

Juan, too, is a Catholic name, derived from the name "John", one of the Gospels in the Bible.

Juan is pronounced "WHOOAHN" in one syllable. For a recording of someone saying it, here you go.

Beyond Names
These three Latin American names are commonly mispronounced in Spanish, particularly for English speakers who try to pronounce things phonetically.

Spanish language pronunciation is a tricky thing to handle. Even though letters are pronounced the same way they are spelled, learning the pronunciation rules is often not enough to achieving fluency.

Fortunately, the pronunciation lessons do not end here.
All three names begin with a 'J', which should enforce the pronunciation rule to never pronounce the sound like the soft 'G' in Spanish. For more insights like this, Speech ling is a website that incorporates hundreds of sentences (along with names) with real vocal coaches that will correct your mistakes.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Books/1611-KJV-Original-Book-Names.php

To the most high and mightie Prince, James by the grace of God King of Great Britaine, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, &c. The translators of The Bible, wish Grace, Mercie, and Peace, through Jesus Christ our Lord.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611-Bible/1611-King-James-Bible-Introduction.php

Great and manifold were the blessings (most dread Soveraigne) which Almighty GOD, the Father of all Mercies, bestowed upon us the people of ENGLAND, when first he sent your Majesties Royall person to rule and raigne over us. For whereas it was the expectation of many, who wished not well unto our ZION, that upon the setting of that bright Occidentall Starre Queene ELIZABETH of most happy memory, some thicke and palpable cloudes of darkenesse would so have overshadowed this land, that men should have bene in doubt which way they were to walke, and that it should hardly be knowen, who was to direct the unsetled State: the appearance of your MAJESTIE, as of the Sunne in his strength, instantly dispelled those supposed and surmised mists, and gave unto all that were well affected, exceeding cause of comfort; especially when we beheld the government established in your HIGHNESSE, and your hopefull Seed, by an undoubted Title, and this also accompanied with Peace and tranquillitie, at home and abroad.

King James, was the 1st King of England and he was the first to rule Scotland and Northern Island at the same time. In 1603 he commissioned a scholars to have the bible translated into English and make it available to all English speaking people throughout the world. It’s a little known fact that he was a Black man who ruled these countries in Europe. During his time he was though to be one of if not the greatest leader of his time. King James, a Black Man.

James I, (born June 19, 1566, Edinburgh Castle, Edinburgh, Scotland—died March 27, 1625, Theobalds, Hertfordshire, England), king of Scotland (as James VI) from 1567 to 1625 and first Stuart king of England from 1603 to 1625, who styled himself “king of Great Britain.” James was a strong advocate of royal absolutism, and his conflicts with an increasingly self-assertive Parliament set the stage for the rebellion against his successor, Charles I.

James was the only son of Mary, Queen of Scots, and her second husband, Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley. Eight months after James’s birth his father died when his house was destroyed by an explosion. After her third marriage, to James Hepburn, 4th earl of Bothwell, Mary was defeated by rebel Scottish lords and abdicated the throne. James, one year old, became king of Scotland on July 24, 1567. Mary left the kingdom on May 16, 1568, and never saw her son again. During his minority James was surrounded by a small band of the great Scottish lords, from whom emerged the four successive regents, the earls of Moray, Lennox, Mar, and Morton. There did not exist in Scotland the great gulf between rulers and ruled that separated the Tudors and their subjects in England. For nine generations the Stuarts had in fact been merely the ruling family among many equals, and James all his life retained a feeling for those of the great Scottish lords who gained his confidence.

The King James Version (KJV), also the King James Bible (KJB) and the Authorized Version (AV), is an Early Modern English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England, which was commissioned in 1604 and published in 1611, by sponsorship of King James VI and I. The 80 books of the King James Version include 39 books of the Old Testament, 14 books of Apocrypha, and the 27 books of the New Testament. Noted for its "majesty of style", the King James Version has been described as one of the most important books in English culture and a driving force in the shaping of the English-speaking world.

The KJV was first printed by John Norton and Robert Barker, who both held the post of the King's Printer, and was the third translation into English language approved by the English Church authorities: The first had been the Great Bible, commissioned in the reign of King Henry VIII (1535), and the second had been the Bishops' Bible, commissioned in the reign of Queen Elizabeth I (1568). In Geneva, Switzerland, the first generation of Protestant Reformers had produced the Geneva Bible of 1560 from the original Hebrew and Greek scriptures, which was influential in the writing of the Authorized King James Version.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version

In January 1604, King James convened the Hampton Court Conference, where a new English version was conceived in response to the problems of the earlier translations perceived by the Puritans, a faction of the Church of England.

James gave the translators instructions intended to ensure that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology, and reflect the episcopal structure, of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained clergy. The translation was done by six panels of translators (47 men in all, most of whom were leading biblical scholars in England) who had the work divided up between them: the Old Testament was entrusted to three panels, the New Testament to two, and the Apocrypha to one. In common with most other translations of the period, the New Testament was translated from Greek, the Old Testament from Hebrew and Aramaic, and the Apocrypha from Greek and Latin. In the 1662 Book of Common Prayer, the text of the Authorized Version replaced the text of the Great Bible for Epistle and Gospel readings (but not for the Psalter, which substantially retained Coverdale's Great Bible version), and as such was authorized by Act of Parliament.

Daniel Wallace is a noted Greek scholar and professor of New Testament at Dallas Theological Seminary. In his paper entitled “Why So Many Versions?” Wallace makes the following statement -“...we must remember that the King James Bible of today is not the King James of 1611. It has undergone three revisions, incorporating more than 100,000 changes!”

This writer made a very interesting argument. He had details and, though I would say that the tone of his letter was certainly less than charitable, I thought that the content needed some investigation. To begin with, I did not personally count 100,000 changes between the 1611 KJV and the modern reprints. But I did take the word from some reputable scholars on that score. Second, this gentleman’s own statistics show that the count of 100,000 could not possibly be attributable to font changes alone: if so, then there should be nearly 791,328 changes (according to this gentleman’s word-count of the total words in the KJV [a number which, by the way, may include part of the Apocrypha1]). Third, since this gentleman has included rather minor changes (which I also assumed to be part of the 100,000 changes)—specifically, “printing errors, spelling standardization, and a few minor phrase changes” (though he considers these to be among the biggest of the 421 changes), we can proceed on his definition of an alteration. In particular, spelling standardization is the largest single group of changes made between 1611 and the modern era.

How can we proceed with this comparison? I have on the wall in my study two leaves from the 1611 edition—the first edition—of the King James Bible. The following text, 2 Samuel 12:20-31, is part of a leaf from the 1611 printing of the KJV. There are a total of 362 words in these verses. This ought to be a good test-case for whether there are 421 total changes or 100,000 changes to the KJV in its nearly 400-year history. Only 421 changes to the KJV equals an average of one change per 1880 words. Therefore, we should expect to find none in these twelve verses, statistically speaking (or, more precisely, about one-sixth of one change). If, on the other hand, there are 100,000 changes to the KJV, that averages out to one out of nearly eight words (1:7.91328 is the precise ratio), or 45.745 words.2 Thus, if my statistics are correct, we should expect to find one or more instances per verse, on average, and a grand total in the double digits. If Scott’s statistics are correct, to find more than one or two would be disturbing, and to find even a dozen or more would show that his data are fundamentally incorrect. To be sure, this is hardly a scientific sampling; but at the same time since the two statistical models are so widely divergent from one another, we might expect to see either pattern emerge.

Appendix
Three other points can be made here. First, Scott’s statistics are probably an amalgam of global changes and individual changes. That is, most of the 421 changes that he sees in the KJV are groups of changes. The change of ‘towards’ to ‘toward’ that occurs fourteen times is thus counted as one change. (In the five words he lists, the total number of changes comes out to 214 changes.) The problem with this is that we are led to believe that those 421 changes represent a specific percentage of the whole—or, in Scott’s words, “five one-hundredths of one percent.” That would only be true if there were 791,328 different words (as opposed to total words) in the KJV.

Second, when Scott details a handful of changes that are indeed trivial, he says, “Friends, this is the ENTIRE extent of the nature of the changes from the King James Bible of 1611 to the King James Bible of the present day.” As we mentioned above, that is not correct. Some of the changes in the KJV through the centuries have been fairly significant. The most famous blunder in the history of the King James Bible to come off the printing press was the 1631 edition. Robert Barker, the printer to the throne, inadvertently left out “not” in the seventh commandment! It was dubbed “the Wicked Bible” and Barker was fined 300 pounds for the error.4

Now, someone might object: “But that’s a printer’s error; that shouldn’t count.” There are two problems with this. First, errors creep into copies of a book, especially one that is nearly a million words long! Whether those errors crept into handwritten copies or printed copies, the principle is still the same. This, indeed, is one reason why the vast bulk of biblical scholars reject the KJV as the best translation available today and why they reject its underlying Greek text as being identical with the original: errors in the transmissional process have always taken place, and a great number of them are self-evident in the KJV tradition. Second, the problem is that the Bible that people have in their hands always have a small percentage of printing errors. Some of them are rather minor, some are major. But KJV-only advocates typically link inspiration to preservation to accessibility in such a way that logically makes printer’s errors a part of the package.

In The Name Of Jesus ? Who ? Most Evil Christians In World King James Bible 1611 - https://rumble.com/v32u9pw-in-the-name-of-jesus-who-most-evil-christians-in-world-king-james-bible-161.html

In The Name Of Jesus ? Who ? Out of all the gangsters, serial killers, mass murderers, incompetent & crooked politicians, spies, traitors, and ultra left-wing kooks in all of American history,” asked a conservative and have you ever wondered who the worst of the worst In The Name Of Jesus ? Who ? and I was shocked to hear about John MacArthur, Voddie Baucham, Joel Osteen, TD Jakes, Steven Furtick, Joyce Meyer, Kenneth Copeland, Oprah Winfrey, Mike Todd, Andy Stanley, Hillsong Music, Carl Lentz, Bethel Music, Bill Johnson, Benny Hinn, Creflo Dollar, Jesse Duplantis, Paula White, Justin Peters, Paul Washer, Todd White, Brandan Robertson, Kathryn Krick, Todd Bentley, Sid Roth, Kat Kerr, Rob Bell, David Oyedepo, Rodney Howard Browne, Chris Oyakhilome, Shepherd Bushiri, Heidi Baker, Che Ahn, Lou Engle, Oral Roberts, and John Hagee.

Thank you 🙏 lord God! Many blessings so many are about to take in the truth I pray bet we get access to the whole Bible. Thank you for sharing this means allot.

The Letter “J” did not Exist - https://ia800703.us.archive.org/33/items/kjvkingjamesbibl1611lman/kjvkingjamesbibl1611lman.pdf - The Son of Elohim was not a White Guy with an English Name, speaking Greek.

Did any of those churches open up as vaccination centers for the Mark of the Beast, the Time Release Death Injections (COVID Injections)? Because the church next door to me did that, they are killing off 98% of the town and they still think they have Jesus.....

Bingo... The great deception was told would come. Even the elite shall be deceived...

Right on. You understand, many don't....God Bless you.

I know one more thing... Love wins in the end. May God bless you and yours as well.

Or, you know, put the abridged KJV down and read the full, true Bible - like the Douay Rheims.

My bible gave Him one name and we are told to use it by Isaiah (pronounced Yah-sy-ah) And you shall call His name "Immanuel". Pronounced Yahmannuel. God said in Exodus, "My name (Yah) is with Him." So the name sure isn't Jesus. Side note about Isaiah, the Kolbrin Bible calls him Yosira.

this is dumb. and oprah winfrey is probably not a follower of Christ. but yeah, some christian "preachers" on tv are not your friend. find a home group or small church or friends who you can talk about the bible together. read the bible yourslef and ask folks to read it with you. it realy is that simple. but some folks would rather watch some shallow stuff... some of the folks in this list though do have some great insights into the word of God. even if they may not follow it themselves etc... but come on... Bill Johnson is awesome. and so is Heidi Baker!!!! but nothing on here about Andrew Womack.. He is legit as well and a blessing.

Andrew Wommack is the best source to learn about how wonderful God is. His understanding of the Bible is the only one that makes sense.

You can say that again! I always love his teaching/preaching. Reminds of how important it is to love God and be obedient. Were you born into a christian home?

All these sinning souls have sinned the worst sins of sins to use god as your own money maker ! These subhuman things will end up in the deepest pits of hell.

the comments show me there is much truth to this.

Yawn....these "christians" were following directions from j3w$ and the Talmud. Read the bible but you wont.

I'll read the Bible after satanic preachers hang next to human trafficers and genocide planners, and is fixed and includes the real teachings. We don't need churches or preachers standing between us and God. Give no money or thought to fake Christians. Give them a short rope drop now publically. That will wake some sheep the fuck up. TIA Lord Love ya.

Even the people calling out these FAKE CHRISTIANS are FAKE CHRISTIANS as well.

The proof of this can be learned by reading THE ANTI CHRIST by Dr. George W. Carey.

This is 100 year old material, but explains "WHAT" Jesus actually is, which is something

NONE of these FAKE CHRISTIANS are permitted to know or teach.

NONE of these FAKE Christians teach us how to LIGHT OUR HALO which is the "only" way we

can do GREATER WORKS THAN JESUS, as Jesus taught in John 14:12.

The Godless Zionists have "all" of these FAKE CHRISTIANS working for "them"!!!

John Hagee is as evil as they get. READ DR. GEORGE W. CAREY.

The tribe promotes these pseudo Christian frauds... true anti-Christs.

Jesus never said worship me.

Islam is the truth! Eisa (Jesus) is Muslim = prayed to one God.

Islam is a sham. Look at the roots of that false religion. Good luck with that though...

nope. Jesus aint muslim bro. and Mohammed is a false prophet and may be in hell as we speak. He denied Christ as the Messiah. even says in quran that jibreel took jesus body off cross and put another one there????? i mean the inconsistencies in quran are pretty evident. mohammed didnt even know really know the Levitical laws of moshei saying dont eat pig but rabbit and camel ok not to mention pagan junk... or that he said in quran that if he was false he would be poisoned and he was poisoned to death by widow of man he had killed.

You might be right about that. I have noticed that Christians tend to start worshiping Christ. Christ was sent by Our Eternal Father for rectification. Christ prayed to the Father as an example, yet people pray to Christ. It's quite confusing. Muslims worship the Father, and that sets right in my heart. God has sent prophets and angels yet none of them are to be worshiped, so why worship Christ? Many argue that it is because they are one. A married couple is considered as one, but the man is still and always the head. People have put the prophets before God in both religions and most fighting between men seems to be about that, more than anything. Yet both Muhammad and Jesus came to direct God's children back to God. It gets so confusing. Bless you my friend.

No worries my bro. When the statement “Jesus and the father are one” is promoted, it doesn’t mean Eisa (Jesus) May allah be pleased be with him is God. It is more of a metaphor highlighting how Jesus’s message is one with God’s message.

The Bible (Or better know as the Gospel) has been corrupted through centuries by different kings, rulers, monarchs and popes for their benefit.

You can even ask yourself why is there different Bibles? & On top of that since there’s different bibles through natural selection how do we determine which Bible is the most correct/accurate.

That’s why the Qur’an (Allahs speech) is the final testament, the final book and the final message.

nope. Jesus aint muslim bro. and Mohammed is a false prophet and may be in hell as we speak. He denied Christ as the Messiah. even says in quran that jibreel took jesus body off cross and put another one there????? i mean the inconsistencies in quran are pretty evident. mohammed didnt even know really know the Levitical laws of moshei saying dont eat pig but rabbit and camel ok not to mention pagan junk... or that he said in quran that if he was false he would be poisoned and he was poisoned to death by widow of man he had killed.

Black Kings and Queens the Rulers of England From 1603/1901 Historians Never Talk? - https://rumble.com/v29twd2-black-kings-and-queens-the-rulers-of-england-from-16031901-historians-never.html

So Moorish and Black Kings and Queens the Rulers of England and Europe From 1603/1901 You may have heard of these England and European Emperors, Kings and Queens, but did you know that they were Black ? So England /American after 1776? So Slavery Trade began 400 years ago this month. Started by Black King James I and VI of Scotland 1603 -1625 signed into law by this king ? This is referred to as the country’s original sin, but it is more than that It is the country’s true origin. Ancient Europe is not what we've been taught. Many things have been whitewashed, especially its ancient History. Here are some facts that you probably didn't know. President Abraham Lincoln, the Melungeon or Tawny Moor was the President of the United States. As President, he has to balance the Moorish side and the European side.

Black Monarchs of the British Isles, Pt.1 Until 1603 English and Scottish Crowns were Separate - https://rumble.com/v29uj48-black-monarchs-of-the-british-isles-pt.1-until-1603-english-and-scottish-cr.html

The purpose of this video is to expose the truth behind the appearances of the noble stocks of Britain and Scotland. As we do in every video, we will provide evidence based from texts, and use analysis based on visual aids and imagery.

Until 1603 the English and Scottish Crowns were separate, although links between the two were always close - members of the two Royal families intermarried on many occasions. Following the Accession of King James VI of Scotland as King James I of England to the English Throne, a single monarch reigned in the United Kingdom.

The last four hundred years have seen many changes in the nature of the Monarchy in the United Kingdom. From the end of the 17th century, monarchs lost executive power and they increasingly became subject to Parliament, resulting in today's constitutional Monarchy.

Royal titles are complicated because in some cases names of kingdoms are used that did not officially come into existence until later, or came into existence earlier without immediate adoption of the royal title.

In 1328, on the death of the French king, Charles IV, Edward III (nephew of Charles IV) claimed the French throne. English monarchs, and subsequently British monarchs, then styled themselves King of France or Queen of France until the Act of Union 1800, which led to the creation of the United Kingdom in 1801. By then France had been a republic for ten years. (See English claims to the French throne.)

Since 1559 English monarchs, and subsequently British monarchs, have also had the title Supreme Governor of the Church of England.
Note that the numbering of English monarchs starts afresh after 1066 (although this affects only the Edwards).
All Scottish monarchs held the title King of Scots or Queen of Scots, with the exception of the last three: Mary II, William III and Anne I used the style "of Scotland" rather than "of Scots".

In October 1604, one year after James VI of Scotland had become King of England, he decreed that the Royal Title would use the term Great Brittaine to refer to the "one Imperiall Crowne" made up of England and Scotland.

However using that title is problematic because the 'state' of Great Britain was not created until the Act of Union 1707. Nor was the united crown generally referred to as 'imperial'. To avoid confusion, historians in general thus refer to all monarchs up to 1707 as monarchs of England and Scotland. Thus James II of England was also James VII of Scotland; and William III of England was also William II of Scotland. Many English and British monarchs also claimed France as part of their official title, though this had no substance in reality. After the Union, the ordinal has been the English number (for "George", "Edward" and "Elizabeth") and, until recently, there was no formal rule (see List of regnal numerals of future British monarchs).

In different documents, the terms Kingdom of Great Britain and United Kingdom of Great Britain feature, even documents as official as the Act of Union 1707. Most historians presume the United was meant to be descriptive, indicating a union as a form of unity by marriage rather than coercion. For clarity and because the United is far more strongly associated with the later name United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland produced in the Act of Union 1800, the 1707 Kingdom is generally referred to as the Kingdom of Great Britain.

Black Monarchs of the British Isles, Pt.2 Until 1603 English and Scottish Crowns were Separate - https://rumble.com/v29un08-black-monarchs-of-the-british-isles-pt.2-until-1603-english-and-scottish-cr.html

The purpose of this video is to expose the truth behind the appearances of the noble stocks of Britain and Scotland. As we do in every video, we will provide evidence based from texts, and use analysis based on visual aids and imagery.

First Black/Moorish Presidential Candidate and Later Becoming President Abraham Lincoln - https://rumble.com/v29usdu-first-blackmoorish-presidential-candidate-and-later-becoming-president-abra.html

President Abraham Lincoln Has Done More For Melaninated People Than Any Civil Rights Leader Will Ever Do - First Black/Moorish President Is Abraham Lincoln Moorish definition, of or relating to the Moors, a Muslim people of NW Africa. Moor, in English usage, a Moroccan or, formerly, a member of the Muslim population of al-Andalus, now Spain and Portugal. Of mixed Arab, Spanish, and Amazigh (Berber) origins.

Abraham Lincoln made Thanksgiving an official holiday on October 3rd, 1863, so he is the greatest President of all time. (And he did some other stuff like outlawing slavery and presiding over the U.S. government through a civil war.) He was also our first Black/Moorish President.

President Abraham Lincoln, the Melungeon or Tawny Moor is a dark-skinned native of a non-European land was the President of the United States. As President, he has to balance the Moorish side and the European side. This is one government with two jurisdictions; which is hard for some people to see or understand, however the one dollar bill, known today as the One Dollar Federal Note shows this clearly on the back, however you will have to know symbolism, history and the founding of this one government with two jurisdiction to understand that. The Union is older than the “recent” United States Constitution.

However the recent United States Constitution is a continuation from the Union. Hence the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution stating “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union..”. This Union was made up of Moors and European sons through the Articles of Association in 1774. The Moors was the majority of that Union. Not only were Moors the majority of the Union, Moors were the ones who help to form the current United States Constitution and all the previous Constitutions.

So Moors are actually also founding fathers. “Those who made significant intellectual contributions to the Constitution are called the ‘Founding Fathers’ of our country” – The U.S. Constitution And Fascinating Facts About It by Terry L. Jordan. So this Union, who the Moors were the majority of was what President Abraham Lincoln wanted to save. Most so called pro black people or those who are emotionally attached to the words of “black”, “negro” or “white” think that it was about skin color only, but history, good research and understanding law shows that this is not the case. We can not use our modern brain or the 2018 mindset and try to fit it into the times of the Civil War or President Abraham Lincoln’s time. A slave was anyone who was dark, pale, mulatto or Native Indian that was held as a slave, was doing indentured servitude or was a prisoner of war. The same applies for the word Negro and Nigger. A Negro/Nigger was any pale, dark, mulatto or dark slave that had everything of their origin stripped from them.

This was known in President Abraham Lincoln’s time. All one has to do is type in “White Slavery” or “White Slaves” into Google, Google search or Youtube and information will easily pop up. “Term ‘Nigger’ Used to Describe White Man Who Favored the Union” – Nature Knows No Color Line by J.A. Rogers. So in the Americas when we hear about Negro/Nigger or Slave the first thing that pops into most people’s brain is an image of dark people only. That is because of ignorance.
When President Abraham Lincoln said that he wanted to save the Union and gave not one, but “three” scenarios about the Union and slaves, now understand what the Union really was and who the slaves really were when you deal with true history and understand the complete picture.

Many are confused or distracted based on certain events that happen during President Abraham Lincoln’s two terms, but they need to study law and what he did for those who were held as slaves. Many get distracted with his Union and slave comments, some get distracted by the event where the most mass hanging happen under his presidency forgetting that this was a war, and he was balancing the Moorish and European side of government. In a war there will be casualties. In the North you had pale, dark, mulatto and Native Indians on that side, and in the South you had pale, dark, mulatto and Native Indians on that side.

The Civil War was one of the bloodiest wars in the Americas. You had mulattoes killing mulattoes, pale people killing pale people, dark people killing dark people, Native Indians killing other Native Indians. So dont just signal out President Abraham Lincoln. Your ancestors was killing other ancestors based on what side of the war they were on. As for the mass hanging that took place during the Dakota War of 1862, look what President Abraham Lincoln had to deal with: “Henry Whipple, the Episcopal bishop of Minnesota and a reformer of U.S. policies toward Native Americans, first wrote an open letter and then went to Washington DC in the Fall of 1862 to urge Lincoln to proceed with leniency. On the other hand, General Pope and Minnesota Senator Morton S. Wilkinson told him that leniency would not be received well by the white population. Governor Ramsey warned Lincoln that, unless all 303 Sioux were executed, ‘Private revenge would on all this border take the place of official judgment on these Indians.’

In the end, Lincoln commuted the death sentences of 264 prisoners, but he allowed the execution of 39 men. This clemency resulted in protests from Minnesota, which persisted until the Secretary of the Interior offered white Minnesotans ‘reasonable compensation for the depredations committed.’ Republicans did not fare as well in Minnesota in the 1864 election as they had before. Ramsey (by then a senator) informed Lincoln that more hangings would have resulted in a larger electoral majority. The President reportedly replied, ‘I could not afford to hang men for votes.’
So would a savage man have a conscience? This was a time of war, a domestic war, these wars are bloody and tough decision have to be made.

The reason why President Abraham Lincoln has done more for melanated people than any civil rights leader will ever do is because everything that civil rights leaders are marching for, asking for, praying for or fighting for has already been taken care of. The problem is so called civil rights leaders do not know Constitutional law, civics or know what President Abraham Lincoln did for them. President Abraham Lincoln formed four Proclamations along with the 13th Amendment with “20 sections” (NOT to be confused with the 13th Amendment with 2 sections).

The Emancipation Proclamation freed the pale, dark, mulatto and Native Indian slaves in the south, the 13th Amendment with 20 sections freed the pale, dark, mulatto and Native Indian slaves nation wide. In those Proclamations, dealing with melanated people, in the Proclamations and 13th Amendment with 20 sections, it shows that we are to be forever free, to be naturalized to be true American Citizens, Compensated for being held as slaves, given land that totals to over 22 States; have health care, housing, clothing, free education, etc be provided for by the government, based on what happen to us.

President Abraham Lincoln gave congress a few years to get this done. He was assassinated in 1865, the 13th Amendment with 20 sections was switched with the one with 2 sections, parts of the 20 sections became the 14th and 15th Amendment and the Proclamations and 13th Amendment with 20 section was hidden. This conspiracy continues till this day. You can get the book The Great Conspiracy: Its Origin And History by John Alexander Logan for more clarity on the conspiracy.

President Abraham Lincoln also pushed the Freedman’s Bureau, which the official name was “The Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands”. If so called black people was all from Africa, how can there be abandon lands here? Again that takes knowing history. The Freedman’s Bureau is the reason why most of the Historical Black Colleges And Universities was constructed; except for three that was formed before 1865.

So ALL the people that already graduated or is currently in a Historical Black College or University have to thank President Abraham Lincoln for their schools. However the Freedman’S Bureau which was set up to fulfill parts of the Proclamations and 13th Amendment with 20 sections was shut down in 1871, officially 1872 by the military. So Naturalization, Compensation and Colonization of the over 22 States that Abraham Lincoln called Egypt Of the West was not fulfilled, and that contract still needs to be fulfilled. Which is another reason for the purpose of Prophet Noble Drew Ali coming in 1913.

To fulfill what congress and the government was not able to do and open up the door way lawfully and constitutionally for de-naturalized Moors or those who have been de-naturalized, labeled, classified, identified or “described” as Black, Negro, Colored, Ethiopian, West Indian, Native American, Native Indian, American Indian, Amerindian, Black Indian, Latino, Mexican, Afro American, African American, First People, First Nation, Original People, Asiatics, Aboriginal, Indigenous, Paleo, Pre-Adamite, Autochthon, etc. to get Naturalized, Colonized and Compensated. Proclaiming your nationality in constitutional law is known as naturalization. Working towards your actual freedom, or having a Bey/El with the hyphen or in law the annex/annexation (-) before it after your last name shows that you are working towards Colonization and Compensation. Many do not know what Prophet Noble Drew Ali movement is really about, especially the National side that is not being taught, neither do they know the signs he was demonstrating.

Many are missing the signs today. In the past few years there has been a few President Abraham Lincoln movies, President Barack Obama has used President Abraham Lincolns bible twice to take his oath, he is even gave the State Of The Union Speech on President Abraham Lincoln’s birthday on 2/12/13.

Many are just missing the signs. The sign is study what President Abraham Lincoln did, so there will be no reason to be talking about civil rights, which is unconstitutional as shown by previous court cases and work towards becoming true American Citizens, for us known as Moorish Americans and correcting your status, race, free national name, religion, birth certificate, etc. because Black, Afro? African American, West Indian, Latino, etc are nothing but modern slave labels. The process to correct this was made possible because of President Abraham Lincoln and the door way was opened up and secured by Prophet Noble Drew Ali and other Moorish masters that expanded the National side of the Moorish movement.

Show less