Can Anyone Be An AUSSIE - A Critique Of Our Critics

The whole point of a homeland is that it belongs to us, and we belong to it, unconditionally.
The only reason anyone asks you to replace an exclusive form of national identity with an inclusive one is because he wants to replace you in your homeland.
Once you define yourself as replaceable, as being fungible like some paper currency, someone will try to replace you.

The West, including Canada and America, is not and never was intended to be, a place for "all races and nations".
To claim that it is, or was, is a direct attack on the identity, legitimacy, and existence of Western people.
Is it “intolerance” to say this, or is it intolerant NOT to, since THAT silence destroys the West?

Western Civilization isn’t a geographical location but ethnically unique peoples and thus any attack on our demography, our separate nations, and self determination is an attack on OUR Civilization.

Mirror: British Australian Community, March 28, 2024

Following the release of our video on Peter Drew’s ‘AUSSIE’ poster series, we received some negative comments from people who appear to have misunderstood the thrust of our arguments. We didn’t say, or imply that these people were bad people or necessarily of less value than other people. We didn’t deny their hard work or their contribution to Australian society. We just said that their ethnicities weren’t, in fact, identifiable as “Aussies”.The word “Aussie” as it is commonly understood, is a classification. Classifications are by definition, exclusive.

This video was proudly produced by the British Australian Community. If you appreciate our work, head to linktr.ee/britishaustraliancommunity for more information, or to become a part of our community.
-------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© )
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrig